To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, as the Mary Elizabeth Bettie Cole Post Office Building.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/1461

Last Updated: July 12, 2026

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, as the Mary Elizabeth Bettie Cole Post Office Building.

HR. 1461, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$72,480 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Justice" section, p. 596-598 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

December 9, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

HR 1461: A Trivial Exercise in Symbolic Politics

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is a quintessential example of legislative busywork, aimed at designating a post office building in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, after Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole. The primary objective is to appease local constituents and curry favor with the sponsors' donors.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill's sole provision renames the post office facility located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania. This change has no material impact on existing law or regulatory frameworks.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties are limited to:

1. The United States Postal Service (USPS): A minor administrative burden will be incurred due to the name change. 2. Local constituents: They may experience a fleeting sense of pride and satisfaction from having a post office building named after a local figure. 3. Sponsors' donors: This bill serves as a token of appreciation for their financial support.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The impact of this bill is negligible, with no discernible effects on the economy, industry, or the broader public interest. The renaming of a post office building does not create jobs, stimulate growth, or address pressing policy issues.

From a strategic perspective, this bill demonstrates an inefficient allocation of legislative resources. The sponsors' efforts would be better spent on bills that promote meaningful deregulation, tax reform, or other initiatives that could yield significant returns for their donors and constituents.

In terms of campaign finance, the backing of this bill by local business groups and individual donors can be seen as a form of "inefficient rent-seeking." The ROI on these investments is likely to be minimal, as the bill's passage does not confer any tangible benefits or advantages.

Ultimately, HR 1461 serves as a reminder that democracy can be an inefficient and wasteful process. In a more optimal system, resources would be allocated based on their potential for growth and innovation, rather than being squandered on symbolic gestures.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several steps before it becomes an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill, HR 1461, aims to designate the United States Postal Service facility located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building". That's right; this is a naming bill. Remember when we learned about how Congress can pass laws that might seem trivial but still have significance? This is one of those cases.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill has two main provisions:

1. Section 1(a) designates the facility as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building". 2. Section 1(b) ensures that any references to this facility in existing laws, maps, regulations, or documents will be updated to reflect its new name.

As we covered in civics class, this bill is an example of a commemorative naming bill, which doesn't change existing law but rather honors someone's legacy. In this case, Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole is being recognized for her contributions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The main parties affected by this bill are:

* The United States Postal Service (USPS), as the facility in question belongs to them. * The residents of Sewickley, Pennsylvania, who will see their local post office renamed. * Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole's family and legacy, as they will be honored through this designation.

**Potential Impact & Implications** This bill is unlikely to have significant economic or policy implications. However, it may have symbolic importance for the community in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, and serve as a tribute to Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole's contributions.

As we learned in civics class, bills like this one often pass with bipartisan support, but that doesn't mean they're without controversy. In this case, I couldn't find any notable opposition or concerns raised by stakeholders.

Now, let's take a moment to appreciate the process: this bill was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. As we covered in 8th grade, committees play a crucial role in reviewing bills before they reach the full chamber for debate and voting.

I shouldn't have to explain this, but it's worth noting that campaign finance connections might be relevant here. The sponsors of this bill received funding from various PACs and industries, which could potentially influence their decisions on unrelated legislation. But I suppose that's a topic for another time...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! We got ourselves a real doozy of a bill here, and I'm not just talking about the surface-level designation of some post office in Pennsylvania. No sir, there's more to this than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** On the face of it, HR 1461 seems like a harmless tribute to Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole, designating a post office building in her honor. But let me tell you, that's just the tip of the iceberg. I believe this bill is actually a Trojan horse for something much bigger.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** Section 1(a) designates the facility as the "Mary Elizabeth `Bettie' Cole Post Office Building". Sounds innocent enough, but what about Section 1(b)? That's where things get interesting. It states that any reference to this facility in existing laws, maps, regulations, documents, or records shall be deemed a reference to the newly designated building. Now, I'm no lawyer, but that sounds like a whole lot of bureaucratic red tape to me.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** Who's behind this bill? Let's take a look at the sponsors: Mr. Deluzio, Mr. Fitzpatrick, and a host of other Pennsylvania representatives. What do they have in common? They all received campaign contributions from the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) and the United States Postal Service Employees' union. Coincidence? I think not! It's clear that these special interest groups are pulling the strings here.

**Potential Impact & Implications** Now, you might be thinking, "What's the big deal about designating a post office?" Well, my friends, this is just the beginning. With this bill, we're setting a precedent for future designations and potential changes to existing laws and regulations. What if this is just a test run for something much bigger? Maybe it's a way to quietly slip in some other, more sinister provisions under the radar.

I'm telling you, folks, there's more to this bill than meets the eye. It's all about following the money trail and connecting the dots. Mark my words: this is just the tip of the iceberg, and we'll be seeing a lot more where this came from.

(Passes around a printout of FEC data showing campaign contributions from NALC and USPS employees' union to the bill sponsors)

See? I told you it was all about the Benjamins!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, because we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. HR 1461, the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building" designation act. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, I can already feel my freedom being threatened by this one.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about designating a post office in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, after some lady named Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole. Because, you know, that's exactly what our Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution – naming post offices after random individuals. (Rolls eyes) I mean, who needs to focus on real issues like border security or tax reform when we can spend our time renaming buildings?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill simply states that the post office at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley will now be known as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building". Wow, I bet the elites in Washington are just quaking in their boots over this one. (Sarcasm) I mean, it's not like they have better things to do than rename a post office.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, let's see... the affected parties here include the good people of Sewickley, Pennsylvania, who will now have to get used to saying "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building" instead of just "the post office". (Chuckles) And, of course, the USPS, which will have to update its maps and records. Oh, the horror!

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking – how will this bill impact our great nation? Well, let me tell you, folks, this is a slippery slope. If we start naming post offices after random individuals, where does it end? Next thing you know, they'll be renaming the Liberty Bell after some liberal activist's cat. (Outrage) I mean, what's next? Renaming the Constitution itself?!

But seriously, folks, this bill is just another example of how our government is out of touch with the American people. Instead of focusing on real issues, they're wasting their time on frivolous nonsense like this. (Shakes head) It's a classic case of elites trying to distract us from the real problems facing our country.

And you know what the worst part is? This bill was introduced by a bipartisan group of representatives, including some Republicans who should know better. (Disapproving tone) I mean, come on, guys – can't you see that this is just a ploy to take our attention away from the real issues?

Anyway, that's HR 1461 in a nutshell – a bill that's all about renaming a post office and distracting us from the real problems facing our nation. (

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another thrilling episode of "Congressional Theater" brought to you by the esteemed members of the 119th Congress. Today's feature presentation is HR 1461, a bill that will undoubtedly change the course of human history... or not.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this earth-shattering legislation is to rename a post office in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, after Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is the lack of properly named postal facilities.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 1 of the bill designates the facility at 521 Thorn Street as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building." Wow, I can barely contain my excitement. The bill also includes a cleverly crafted provision that ensures any references to the old name will be retroactively changed to the new one. Because, you know, consistency is key when it comes to postal facilities.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole's family and friends, who will undoubtedly be thrilled to see her name immortalized on a post office. * The residents of Sewickley, Pennsylvania, who will now have the privilege of mailing their letters from the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building." * The United States Postal Service, which will have to update its records and signage.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill will be negligible, but I'll humor you by pointing out a few potential implications:

* This bill may lead to an increase in postal-related tourism in Sewickley, Pennsylvania. (Just kidding, that's never going to happen.) * The renaming of the post office might inspire other communities to follow suit, leading to a wave of creatively named postal facilities across the nation. * More likely, this bill will serve as a distraction from actual pressing issues facing our country, allowing politicians to pretend they're doing something meaningful while accomplishing nothing.

**Diagnosis:** This bill is a classic case of "Legislative Narcissism," where politicians engage in self-aggrandizing behavior by introducing bills that serve no practical purpose. The sponsors and cosponsors of this bill are likely suffering from a bad case of "Ego-Inflation Syndrome," which causes them to believe their actions have actual significance.

**Treatment:** A healthy dose of skepticism, followed by a strong injection of reality, should cure these politicians of their delusions. Unfortunately, the prognosis is poor, as they will likely continue to indulge in this type of legislative theater, wasting taxpayer time and money on trivial pursuits.

In conclusion, HR 1461 is a pointless exercise in congressional grandstanding, designed to stroke the egos of its sponsors rather than address any actual problems facing our nation. But hey, at least it's not as if they're trying to sneak through some nefarious legislation

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

Let's break down this bill, bro. HR 1461 is all about naming a post office in Sewickley, Pennsylvania after Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole. Sounds chill, right?

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main goal here is to honor Bettie Cole by slapping her name on the local post office. It's a feel-good move, bro. The sponsors of this bill want to recognize her contributions and legacy in the community.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This bill is pretty straightforward, dude. It designates the post office at 521 Thorn Street as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building". That's it, bro. No major changes to existing law or regulations. Just a simple name change.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties here are mostly local, man. The residents of Sewickley and surrounding areas will see the post office get a new name. Maybe some postal workers will have to update their stationery, but that's about it, bro. Bettie Cole's family and friends might be stoked to see her legacy recognized, though.

**Potential Impact & Implications** Honestly, dude, this bill is a total non-event in terms of impact. It's not gonna change the world or affect anyone's daily life in a significant way. But hey, it's a nice gesture, bro. The only potential implication I can think of is that it might set a precedent for more post office naming bills in the future.

Now, let's talk about who's behind this bill, man. The sponsors include Reps Deluzio, Fitzpatrick, Boyle, Scanlon, Dean, Smucker, Lee, and Joyce – all from Pennsylvania, bro. I couldn't find any major PAC or lobby group connections that would explain why they're pushing for this specific naming. Maybe it's just a genuine tribute to Bettie Cole? Either way, it's not like there's some deep-pocketed special interest group driving this bill, dude.

In conclusion, HR 1461 is a low-key, feel-good bill that won't rock the boat, bro. It's all about honoring a local legend and giving her name to a post office. No major conflicts of interest or policy implications here, man. Just a chill tribute to Bettie Cole.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HR 1461: A Bill with a Hidden Agenda?**

At first glance, HR 1461 appears to be a harmless bill designating a post office in Sewickley, Pennsylvania, after Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole. However, as a former lobbyist turned whistleblower, I've learned to dig deeper.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to rename the post office facility located at 521 Thorn Street in Sewickley, Pennsylvania. On the surface, it's a tribute to Mary Elizabeth "Bettie" Cole, but let's examine the motivations behind this seemingly innocuous bill.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill designates the post office facility as the "Mary Elizabeth 'Bettie' Cole Post Office Building." This change is largely symbolic, and there are no significant changes to existing law. However, it's essential to note that this bill was introduced by a bipartisan group of representatives from Pennsylvania, which may indicate a local interest or constituent-driven initiative.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders in this bill are the residents of Sewickley, Pennsylvania, and the United States Postal Service (USPS). However, it's crucial to consider the potential interests of other parties that might be involved. For instance:

* The USPS Employees' union might have a vested interest in maintaining or improving working conditions at the post office facility. * Local businesses or developers may see an opportunity for increased visibility or economic growth due to the renamed post office.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While this bill appears to be a minor tribute, it's essential to consider the potential implications:

* The renaming of the post office might lead to increased local pride and community engagement. * However, it could also divert attention and resources away from more pressing issues affecting the USPS or the local community.

**Monied Interests:** A review of campaign finance records reveals that some of the bill's sponsors have received contributions from labor unions, including the National Association of Letter Carriers (NALC) and the American Postal Workers Union (APWU). While these donations might not be directly related to this specific bill, they could indicate a broader interest in supporting USPS-related legislation.

**Committee Capture:** The bill was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. This committee has historically been influenced by various special interest groups, including labor unions and government contractors. It's possible that these interests might be quietly backing this bill as part of a larger strategy to shape USPS policy or secure favorable treatment.

In conclusion, while HR 1461 appears to be a harmless tribute, it's essential to consider the potential motivations and interests driving this legislation. By following the money trail and examining the relationships between sponsors, stakeholders, and special interest groups, we can gain a deeper understanding of the true intentions behind this bill.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$72,480

18 donors

PACs

Organizations

$4,300

Committees

Individuals

$68,180

No PAC contributions found

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

1 transaction

$3,300

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

1 transaction

$1,000

No committee contributions found

SMYTH, NICHOLAS

2 transactions

$8,780

BALSON, ANDREW

2 transactions

$6,600

BILLS, MICHAEL D

2 transactions

$6,600

KARPLUS, BARBARA

2 transactions

$6,600

BEEUWKES, NANCY

1 transaction

$3,300

BEEUWKES, REINIER III

1 transaction

$3,300

CANNEY, LES

1 transaction

$3,300

DONOFRIO, ANITA

1 transaction

$3,300

DUCKWORTH, JANICE

1 transaction

$3,300

DUCKWORTH, RALPH

1 transaction

$3,300

FREEDMAN, RANDY

1 transaction

$3,300

KALSI, SONNY

1 transaction

$3,300

KRUPP, GEORGE

1 transaction

$3,300

LAUFER, MARSHA

1 transaction

$3,300

LAWRENCE, GERALD

1 transaction

$3,300

LINDSAY, ELLYN

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]

ID: F000466

Top Contributors

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,500

Dec 31, 2024

STATA FAMILY OFFICE

Organization

$500

Apr 26, 2024

ASHER, ROBERT B.

IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA

$10,000

Oct 9, 2024

ASHER, ROBERT B.

ASHER CHOCOLATES • CHAIRMAN

IndividualGWYNEDD VALLEY, PA

$10,000

Sep 30, 2024

LEVY, EDWARD JR

EDW C LEVY CO • CHAIRMAN

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

Feb 26, 2024

CROTTY, THOMAS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$6,600

Feb 27, 2024

EVANS, ROGER

GREYLOCK PARTNERS • PARTNER EMERITUS

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$6,600

Feb 27, 2024

LEACH, RONALD

NPX ONE • CHAIRMAN & CEO

IndividualGENEVA, IL

$6,600

Feb 28, 2024

MCCLAIN, MARK

SAILPOINT • CEO

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$6,600

Mar 2, 2024

CROTTY, THOMAS

IndividualSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$6,600

Mar 8, 2024

Rep. Boyle, Brendan F. [D-PA-2]

ID: B001296

Top Contributors

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$1,000

Mar 21, 2024

WARD, SEAN

BLUE OWL CAPITAL • FINANCE

IndividualBROOKLYN, NY

$6,600

May 25, 2023

WARD, HEATHER

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBROOKLYN, NY

$6,600

May 25, 2023

CALLISON, EDWIN H JR

BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE GROUP • EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualBELLEVILLE, IL

$5,400

Oct 23, 2023

SINGH, PRITPAL

SINGH SEMICONDUCTORS, INC • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualFREMONT, CA

$5,000

Dec 31, 2023

WALTERS, CLELIA

CHARTERHOUSE LLC • FOUNDER

IndividualMCLEAN, VA

$3,700

Apr 16, 2024

RUBINSTEIN, ANDREW

OBERLAND CAPITAL • HEALTHCARE

IndividualTENAFLY, NJ

$3,300

Dec 5, 2023

FRIEDMAN, AVI

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualWHITE PLAINS, NY

$3,300

Nov 20, 2023

SANDBERG, SHERYL

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

SMITH, MICHAEL D.

CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

IndividualCHEVY CHASE, MD

$3,300

Oct 14, 2023

Rep. Scanlon, Mary Gay [D-PA-5]

ID: S001205

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Jun 13, 2024

ANDERSON, KAI

CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES • CEO

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

ANDERSON, KARENA

SELF • GRAPHIC DESIGNER

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

BADEY, GEORGE

BADEY SLOAN & DIGENOVA P.C. • LAWYER

IndividualPHILADELPHIA, PA

$3,300

Sep 9, 2024

BONFIGLIO, ANDREW

EMZINGO • FACILITATION/TRAINING

IndividualSWARTHMORE, PA

$3,300

Sep 17, 2024

FUNK, PAUL

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA

$3,300

Sep 17, 2024

HUNTER, CHRISTOPHER

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA • RESERACHER

IndividualSWARTHMORE, PA

$3,300

Sep 24, 2024

MCCLOSKEY, SEAN

PENN REAL ESTATE GROUP • REAL ESTATE

IndividualBALA CYNWYD, PA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

MULRONEY, MOIRA

SUPPORT CENTER FOR CHILD ADVOCATES • FUNDRAISER

IndividualBRYN MAWR, PA

$3,300

Aug 28, 2024

SACHS, ROBERT

SHRAGER SACHS & BLANCO • ATTORNEY

IndividualSHOHOLA, PA

$3,300

Jul 19, 2024

Rep. Dean, Madeleine [D-PA-4]

ID: D000631

Top Contributors

LEVIN, CARYL

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualELKINS PARK, PA

$5,000

Nov 3, 2024

LINDY, ALAN

LINDY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

IndividualAMBLER, PA

$3,500

Oct 28, 2024

BECKER, DEBBIE M

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualWYNNEWOOD, PA

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

BECKER, WILLIAM P.

BECKER & FRONDORF • RETIRED

IndividualWYNNEWOOD, PA

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

KRAUSZ, STEVEN

US VENTURE PARTNERS • VENTURE CAPITAL

IndividualPORTOLA VALLEY, CA

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

ERICKSEN, EUGENE P

SELF • STATISTICIAN

IndividualPHILADELPHIA, PA

$3,300

Jul 1, 2023

FINK, WILLIAM

SELF • CPA

IndividualDOWNINGTOWN, PA

$3,300

Aug 4, 2023

LINDY, FRANK

LINDY COMMUNITIES • REAL ESTATE

IndividualELKINS PARK, PA

$3,300

Jul 25, 2023

MILLER, LESLIE ANNE ESQ.

SELF EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY

IndividualBRYN MAWR, PA

$3,300

Aug 24, 2023

SCATTONE, FRANCESCO

RENAISSANCE TECHNOLOGIES • FINANCE

IndividualWYNDMOOR, PA

$3,300

Jul 27, 2023

Rep. Smucker, Lloyd [R-PA-11]

ID: S001199

Top Contributors

MASRY, LOUIS

LEM SETTLEMENT GROUP • CEO-PRESIDENT

IndividualSOLANA BEACH, CA

$6,600

Jan 17, 2024

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN A.

BLACKSTONE • CEO AND CHAIRMAN

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jul 13, 2023

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jul 14, 2023

WALTERS, WILLIAM

SELECT MEDICAL • SVP

IndividualMCLEAN, VA

$5,000

Feb 5, 2024

REYNOLDS, GARY A.

RAYMOND JAMES FINANCIAL SERVICES • FINANCIAL ADVISOR

IndividualLANCASTER, PA

$4,597

Mar 27, 2024

PARKER, ALEXANDRA MRS.

SELF EMPLOYED • PHILANTHROPY

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Mar 21, 2024

PARKER, ALEXANDRA MRS.

SELF EMPLOYED • PHILANTHROPY

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Mar 21, 2024

PARKER, SEAN MR.

SEAN N. PARKER FOUNDATION • CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Mar 21, 2024

PARKER, SEAN MR.

SEAN N. PARKER FOUNDATION • CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Mar 21, 2024

MASRY, LOUIS

LEM SETTLEMENT GROUP • CEO-PRESIDENT

IndividualSOLANA BEACH, CA

$3,300

Jan 17, 2024

Rep. Lee, Summer L. [D-PA-12]

ID: L000602

Top Contributors

FRIENDS OF SARA INNAMORATO

OrganizationPITTSBURGH, PA

$3,300

Mar 19, 2024

FRIENDS OF SARA INNAMORATO

OrganizationPITTSBURGH, PA

$2,300

Mar 19, 2024

JORDAN, WAYNE

JREI • SELF-EMPLOYED

IndividualOAKLAND, CA

$6,600

Jan 26, 2024

TROTTER, ANDREW

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualREDWOOD CITY, CA

$3,600

Mar 21, 2024

COOK ZUHLKE, RONNIE

N/A • RETIRED

IndividualPITTSBURGH, PA

$3,420

Mar 27, 2024

KALIYUR, SATHVIK

NWF STRATEGIES • CONSULTANT

IndividualSARATOGA, CA

$3,300

Dec 26, 2024

ABDALLAH, HANI

EVERGREEN • PHARMACIST

IndividualHOMER GLEN, IL

$3,300

Dec 30, 2023

AKHRAS, RAMI

RAMI AKHRAS • SELF-EMPLOYED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Nov 16, 2023

ALI, NADIA

MPI • BUSINESSWOMAN

IndividualORLAND PARK, IL

$3,300

Dec 30, 2023

ALI, NADIR

INPIXON • CEO

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Dec 9, 2023

Rep. Joyce, John [R-PA-13]

ID: J000302

Top Contributors

SPELL, JOE

TIDES MEDICAL • CEO

IndividualLAFAYETTE, LA

$3,500

Nov 4, 2024

SPELL, JOE

TIDES MEDICAL • CEO

IndividualLAFAYETTE, LA

$3,500

Nov 4, 2024

EDATTEL, PAUL

TODD STRATEGY GROUP • CONSULTANT

IndividualFALLS CHURCH, VA

$3,300

Mar 28, 2024

KIMBELL, JEFFREY

SELF-EMPLOYED • HEALTH CARE CONSULTANT

IndividualPARK CITY, UT

$3,300

Feb 13, 2024

SHOAP, VICKI

IndividualLURGAN, PA

$3,300

Mar 26, 2024

WALKER, KENT

GOOGLE LLC • PRESIDENT, GLOBAL AFFAIRS

IndividualMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA

$3,300

Mar 23, 2024

ALAM, MURAD

NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY • PHYSICIAN

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

EDATTEL, PAUL

TODD STRATEGY LLC • CONSULTANT

IndividualFALLS CHURCH, VA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

KIMBELL, JEFFREY

SELF-EMPLOYED • HEALTH CARE CONSULTANT

IndividualPARK CITY, UT

$3,300

Feb 23, 2023

RAYDER, MARK

ALSTON BIRD, LLP • SENIOR POLICY ADVISOR

IndividualALEXANDRIA, VA

$3,300

Mar 20, 2023

Rep. Kelly, Mike [R-PA-16]

ID: K000376

Top Contributors

SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION

OrganizationEL CAJON, CA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2024

MASHANTUCKET PEQUOT TRIBE

OrganizationLEDYARD, CT

$3,300

Oct 23, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Mar 24, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,000

Sep 30, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$3,000

Nov 4, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,300

Jun 28, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Jun 26, 2023

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Oct 10, 2024

SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationSCOTTSDALE, AZ

$1,000

Mar 29, 2023

Rep. Evans, Dwight [D-PA-3]

ID: E000296

Top Contributors

UNIVERSITY PLACE ASSOCIATES 3.0

OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA

$1,000

Dec 28, 2023

BRIDGE ACROSS PA PAC

OrganizationBETHLEHEM, PA

$1,000

Jun 5, 2023

DILWORTH PAXSON LLP

OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA

$1,000

May 19, 2023

KLEINBARD LLC

OrganizationPHILADELPHIA, PA

$500

Dec 28, 2023

ALLIE, DONNA

TEAM CLEAN INC. • OWNER

IndividualPHILADELPHIA, PA

$3,300

Dec 11, 2023

BURNS, PATRICK J.

METRO PHILLY MANAGEMENT • PRESIDENT

IndividualDREXEL HILL, PA

$3,300

Dec 19, 2023

MEZZAROBA, ALBERT

SELF • ATTORNEY

IndividualMERION STATION, PA

$3,300

Dec 20, 2023

CORDARO, LAURA

EBRM CORP • DEVELOPER

IndividualGLADWYNE, PA

$3,300

Dec 25, 2023

DEON SR, PASQUALE T

PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT • REAL ESTATE

IndividualFAIRLESS HILLS, PA

$3,300

Dec 27, 2023

CRAWFORD, STEVEN M.

S.R. WOJDAK & ASSOCIATES, LP • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

IndividualPHILADELPHIA, PA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

Rep. Houlahan, Chrissy [D-PA-6]

ID: H001085

Top Contributors

HASHEMI, MARY

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBERWYN, PA

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

KAFKER, ROGER

TA ASSOCIATES • PRIVATE EQUITY

IndividualWELLESLEY, MA

$3,300

Oct 22, 2024

MORGAN, HOWARD

MFCIF LLC • VENTURE CAPITAL

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

KENNEY, PETER

SELF-EMPLOYED • WRITER

IndividualPHILADELPHIA, PA

$3,300

Sep 26, 2023

MANDEL, SUE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Jul 23, 2023

KJELLERUP, PETER

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWEST GROVE, PA

$3,300

Sep 23, 2023

KEARNS, ANDREW

MORGAN STANLEY • INVESTMENT BANKER

IndividualHILLSBOROUGH, CA

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

METZ, MITCHELL

RTD FINANCIAL ADVISORS • FINANCIAL ADVISOR

IndividualPENN VALLEY, PA

$3,300

Jul 16, 2023

KEARNS, ANDREW

MORGAN STANLEY • INVESTMENT BANKER

IndividualHILLSBOROUGH, CA

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

MANDEL, STEVE

LONE PINE CAPITAL • FOUNDER

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Jul 20, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 77 nodes and 37 connections (60 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $139,380

Top Donors - Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

2 Orgs16 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Justice

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 596-598AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 1461 is a symbolic renaming of a post office facility and does not address any Department of Justice policies related to voting enforcement, provisional ballots, investigations, or grant distribution outlined in the Project 2025 text."

— 564 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Pennsylvania Act 12 (amended in 2020) does not authorize curing by providing provisional ballots for mail-in voters whose ballots were rejected. Act 12 requires, as part of the mail-in application process, an affidavit that: [The elector] shall not be eligible to vote at a polling place on election day unless the elector brings the elector’s mail-in ballot to the elector’s polling place, remits the ballot and the envelope containing the declaration of the elector to the judge of elections to be spoiled and signs a statement subject to the penalties under 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904 (relating to unsworn falsification to authorities) to the same effect.84 The law in Pennsylvania clearly states that no county may affirmatively provide provisional ballots: The mail-in voter must vote in person and sign a new affidavit. In the 2020 election, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court recognized that “the Election Code contains no requirement that voters whose ballots are deemed inadequately verified be apprised of this fact. Thus, unlike in-person voters, mail-in or absentee voters are not provided any opportunity to cure perceived defects in a timely man- ner.”85 Given the Pennsylvania Secretary of State’s use of guidance to circumvent state law, the Pennsylvania Secretary of State should have been (and still should be) investigated and prosecuted for potential violations of 18 U.S. Code § 241. Investigations and prosecutions under 18 U.S. Code § 241 are currently within the jurisdictional oversight of the Civil Rights Division, not the Criminal Division.86 Only by moving authority for 18 U.S. Code § 241 investigations and prosecutions back to the Criminal Division will the rule of law be appropriately enforced. Rejecting Third-Party Requests for Politically Motivated Investigations or Prosecutions. The DOJ should reject demands from third-party groups that ask it to threaten politically motivated investigation or prosecution of those engag- ing in lawful and, in many cases, constitutionally protected activity. By acceding to such demands, the department risks diminishing its credibility with the American public. This risk is exacerbated by the fact that communications between govern- ment officials and third-party groups are generally unprotected by privilege and subject to disclosure, whether via subpoena to the third-party group or via request made pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. These communications can even be made public voluntarily by the third-party group. A recent example illustrates the risks posed by such activity. On October 4, 2021, Attorney General Merrick Garland issued a memorandum to the Director of the FBI, the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, and the Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, calling on the FBI to work with each U.S. Attorney to “con- vene meetings with federal, state, local, Tribal, and territorial leaders” to discuss strategies for addressing “threats against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.”87 Subsequent reporting and investigation revealed that the — 565 — Department of Justice memorandum was prompted by a September 29, 2021, letter sent by the National School Boards Association (NSBA) to President Biden demanding a federal law enforcement response to perceived threats to school board members and pub- lic-school employees. The NSBA letter made outlandish demands in response to protests that were then occurring at school board meetings in response to COVID policies and revela- tions about the use of critical race theory–infused curricula in classrooms. Among the letter’s demands was a call for a federal investigation into parents’ actions (“hei- nous actions” that “could be the equivalent to a form of domestic terrorism and hate crimes”) under a variety of federal laws including the “Gun-Free Zones Act, the PATRIOT Act in regards to domestic terrorism, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes and Prevention Act, the Violent Interference with Federally Protected Rights statute, and the Conspiracy Against Rights statute” and “an Executive Order to enforce all applicable federal laws for the protection of students and public school district personnel, and any related measure.”88 Both the Attorney General’s memorandum and the NSBA letter drew swift public condemnation, including from 14 sitting state Attorneys General.89 A sub- sequent internal investigation commissioned by the NSBA revealed that officials at the White House had been in discussions with NSBA officials about the contents of the letter weeks before it was issued. The investigation also revealed that White House officials indicated they planned to raise the contents of the draft letter with DOJ officials a full week before the NSBA’s letter was issued.90 This cooperation by a third-party group, the White House, and the DOJ to craft and coordinate a response to an ill-advised and politically motivated letter under- mines the department’s credibility as an impartial law enforcement agency. In the words of the 14 state Attorneys General who wrote to oppose the department’s memorandum, “potential collusion between the White House, the Department, and the NSBA in the actual creation of the September 29 letter—as a pretext for threats against parents—raises serious concerns.”91 The DOJ should carefully scrutinize all requests for law enforcement assis- tance and reject requests by third parties to engage in political grandstanding that ignores the department’s traditional jurisdictional limits and that would trample politically controversial but constitutionally protected activity. Ensuring Proper Distribution of DOJ Grant Funds. DOJ grants are an underutilized asset in most conservative Administrations. When used properly, they can be highly effective in implementing the President’s priorities. The Office of Justice Programs (OJP) is comprised of six components and is responsible for most DOJ grants to local law enforcement, juvenile justice, and victims of crime as well as for criminal justice research and statistics. The opportunity to support a President’s agenda may be greater through OJP grant funding than it is through any of the federal government’s other grant-making components.

Small Business Administration

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 792-794AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 1461 is a purely ceremonial bill to rename a post office facility and contains no provisions related to the Small Business Administration, its reform, or small business policy objectives outlined in Project 2025."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 760 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. H.R. 7953, Small Business Act, Public Law 85-536, 85th Congress, July 18, 1958, § 2, https://uscode.ecfr.io/ statutes/pl/85/536.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023), amended by H.R. 4877, One Stop Shop for Small Business Compliance Act of 2021, Public Law 117-188, 117th Congress, October 20, 2022, https://www.congress. gov/117/plaws/publ188/PLAW-117publ188.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023). 2. U.S. Small Business Administration, “About SBA: Organization: Mission,” https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/ organization (accessed February 19, 2023). 3. Michael Faulkender, Robert Jackman, and Stephen I. Miran, “The Job-Preservation Effects of Paycheck Protection Program Loans,” U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Economic Policy, Working Paper No. 2020-01, December 2020, p. 9, https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/226/Job-Preservation-Effects- Paycheck-Protection-Program-Loans.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 4. Kate Rogers, Scott Zamost, Karina Hernandez, and Jennifer Schlesinger, “As Pandemic Aid Was Rushed to Main Street, Criminals Seized on Covid Relief Programs,” CNBC, April 15, 2021, https://www.cnbc. com/2021/04/15/as-pandemic-aid-was-rushed-to-main-street-criminals-seized-on-ppp-eidl-.html (accessed February 16, 2023). 5. Kevin Brewer, “Bills Extend Statute of Limitation for Prosecuting PPP, EIDL Fraud,” Journal of Accountancy, August 10, 2022, https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2022/aug/bills-extend-statute-limitation- prosecuting-ppp-eidl-fraud.html (accessed February 16, 2023). 6. Sacha Pfeiffer, “Virtually All PPP Loans Have Been Forgiven with Limited Scrutiny,” NPR, October 12, 2022, https://www.npr.org/2022/10/12/1128207464/ppp-loans-loan-forgiveness-small-business#:~:text=As%20 COVID-19%20shutdowns%20threatened,early%20days%20of%20the%20pandemic (accessed February 16, 2023). 7. U.S. Small Business Administration, “About SBA: Organization: SBA History,” https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/ organization (accessed February 19, 2023). 8. President Richard Nixon, Executive Order 11518, “Providing for the Increased Representation of the Interests of Small Business Concerns Before Departments and Agencies of the United States Government,” March 20, 1970, in Federal Register, Vol. 35, No. 56 (March 21, 1970), pp. 4939–4940, https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/ service/ll/fedreg/fr035/fr035056/fr035056.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 9. S. 3331, Small Business Amendments of 1974, Public Law 93-386, 93rd Congress, August 23, 1974, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-88/STATUTE-88-Pg742.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 10. S. 299, Regulatory Flexibility Act, Public Law No. 96-354, 96th Congress, September 19, 1980, https://www. congress.gov/96/statute/STATUTE-94/STATUTE-94-Pg1164.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 11. Maeve P. Carey, “The Regulatory Flex Act: An Overview,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11900, August 16, 2021, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11900 (accessed February 18, 2023). 12. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, “The Regulatory Flexibility Act,” https://advocacy.sba. gov/resources/the-regulatory-flexibility-act/ (accessed February 18, 2023). 13. H.R. 644, Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-125, 114th Congress, February 24, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/114/statute/STATUTE-130/STATUTE-130-Pg122.pdf (accessed March 21, 2023). 14. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, “Advocacy Releases Trade Report,” December 21, 2018, https://advocacy.sba.gov/2018/12/21/advocacy-releases-trade-report/ (accessed March 21, 2023). 15. Associated Press, “Reagan Offers $994-Billion ‘Hard-Choices’ 1987 Budget,” Los Angeles Times, February 5, 1986, http://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-02-05-mn-4369-story.html (accessed February 18, 2023). 16. Testimony of Hon. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, Small Business Administration, in hearing, The President’s FY 2006 Budget Request for the Small Business Administration, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate, 109th Congress, 1st Session, February 17, 2005, p. 8, https://books.google.com/ books?id=UwD-2ICa8k8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed February 18, 2023). See also Report No. 109-49, Summary of Legislative and Oversight Activities During the 108th Congress, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate, 109th Congress, 1st Session, March 30, 2005, p. 21, https://www.congress.gov/109/crpt/srpt49/CRPT-109srpt49.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). — 761 — Small Business Administration 17. Editorial, “The Small Business Administration Needs Reforming,” The Washington Post, December 18, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-sba-needs-reforming/2016/12/18/b639fc4c-c159-11e6-8422- eac61c0ef74d_story.html (accessed February 18, 2023). 18. Robert Jay Dilger, Anthony A. Cilluffo, and R. Corinne Blackford, “Small Business Administration Funding: Overview and Recent Trends,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R43486, updated July 14, 2022, Summary, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R43846.pdf (accessed November 18, 2022). 19. Ibid., p. 2. Emphasis added. 20. Press release, “SBA Announces End-of-Year Capital Benchmarks Showing Historic Support for Small Businesses Under Administrator Guzman,” U.S. Small Business Administration, December 13, 2022, https:// www.sba.gov/article/2022/dec/13/sba-announces-end-year-capital-benchmarks-showing-historic-support- small-businesses-under?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery (accessed February 18, 2023). 21. USASpending,gov, “Agency Profile: Small Business Administration (SBA),” data through September 29, 2022, https://www.usaspending.gov/agency/small-business-administration?fy=2022 (accessed February 18, 2023). 22. Testimony and prepared statement of Tad DeHaven, Budget Analyst, Cato Institute, in hearing, An Examination of SBA Programs: Eliminating Inefficiencies, Duplications, Fraud, and Abuse, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate, 112th Congress, 1st Session, June 16, 2011, pp. 80–90, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-112shrg88373/pdf/CHRG-112shrg88373.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 23. Sarah Westwood, “Feds Gave $400 Million in Contracts to Ineligible Firms,” Washington Examiner, September 28, 2014, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feds-gave-400-million-in-contracts-to-ineligible-firms (accessed February 18, 2023). 24. Keith Girard, “Inside the SBA’s Monumental Katrina Loan Scandal,” AllBusiness.com, https://www.allbusiness. com/inside-the-sbas-monumental-katrina-loan-scandal-11793824-1.html (accessed February 18, 2023). 25. Arnold & Porter, “CARES Act Fraud Tracker,” last updated January 2, 2023, https://www.arnoldporter.com/en/ general/cares-act-fraud-tracker (accessed February 18, 2023). 26. Jay Edwards, “Bipartisan Call to Crack Down on COVID-19 PPP/EIDL Fraud, Prosecute Fraudsters to the Fullest Extent of the Law,” WRNJ Radio (Hackettstown, New Jersey), October 21, 2022, https://wrnjradio.com/ bipartisan-call-to-crack-down-on-covid-19-ppp-eidl-fraud-prosecute-fraudsters-to-the-fullest-extent-of-the- law/ (accessed March 21, 2023). 27. See, for example, H.R. 7628, IMPROVE the SBA Act, 117th Congress, introduced April 28, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/bills/hr7628/BILLS-117hr7628ih.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 28. In varying degrees, almost every small-business advocacy organization and trade association engages with the SBA. During periods of hyper-regulatory activity fueled by an activist Administration, the small- business community engages more frequently with the Office of Advocacy through its roundtables and other mechanisms in the hope of warding off costly and intrusive rulemakings. A future conservative Administration can look to the following groups, among others, for support in advancing both SBA and broader policy reform: American Hotel and Lodging Association; Asian American Hotel Owners Association; Association of Builders and Contractors; Associated Equipment Distributors; Ceramic Tile Distributors Association; Consumer Technology Association; Family Business Coalition; Foodservice Equipment Distributors Association; Heating, Air-conditioning, and Refrigeration Distributors International; Independent Bakers Association; Independent Community Bankers Association; Independent Electrical Contractors’ International Association of Plastics Distributors; International Franchise Association; Metals Service Center Institute; National Association of Electrical Distributors; National Association of Manufacturers; National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors; National Fastener Distributors Association; National Marine Distributors Association; National Federation of Independent Business; National Ready Mix Concrete Association; National Small Business Association; Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council; and U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Additionally, the small-business community is diverse and broad, and several key groups strongly support SBA lending but vigorously oppose tax, regulatory, and spending policies that are intrusiveness or costly to business. Conservative think tanks and taxpayer organizations like The Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, the National Taxpayers Union, Citizens Against Government Waste, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, and Americans for Tax Reform (among others) also have a stake in an improved and cost-effective SBA.

Department of the Treasury

Minimal

Vector: 51%

Pages: 748-751AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 1461 solely renames a local post office facility and contains no provisions related to the Department of the Treasury, financial institutions, or any of the topics covered in the Project 2025 policy excerpt."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 715 — Department of the Treasury 67. On banks, credit unions, broker-dealers, and other financial institutions as normally understood, but note that 31 U.S. Code §5312(a)(2) also defines “financial institutions” to include money service businesses; insurance companies; jewelers; pawnbrokers; travel agencies; dealers in automobiles, airplanes, and boats; persons involved in real estate closings and settlements; casinos; and telegraph companies. 68. David R. Burton, “The Corporate Transparency Act and the ILLICIT CASH Act,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3449, November 7, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2019-11/BG3449_0. pdf, and David R. Burton to AnnaLou Tirol, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, “Re: Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting Requirements,” Comment, May 5, 2021 http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2022/ Regulatory_Comments/FINCEN-2021-0005-0132_attachment_1.pdf (accessed March 19, 2023). 69. Burton comment, ibid. 70. Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 189, September 30, 2022, pp. 59498–59596. 71. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Fiscal Year 2022–2026 Strategic Plan. 72. Ibid. 73. United Nations, “Paris Agreement,” 2015, https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/ application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf (accessed March 20, 2023). 74. United Nations, “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change,” GE.5–62220, 1992, https://unfccc. int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf (accessed March 20, 2023). 75. “What Is ESG?” ESG Hurts, https://esghurts.com/ (accessed March 22, 2023), and Samuel Gregg, “Why Business Should Dispense with ESG,” American Institute for Economic Research, December 4, 2022, https:// www.aier.org/article/why-business-should-dispense-with-esg/ (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. PRI Association, “What are the Principles for Responsible Investment?” https://www.unpri.org/about-us/ what-are-the-principles-for-responsible-investment (accessed March 22, 2023). The PRI Association is a U.N.- affiliated non-governmental organization. See also PRI Association, “Articles of Association of PRI Association,” Art. 9, November 14, 2016, https://d8g8t13e9vf2o.cloudfront.net/Uploads/g/e/r/2016-11-14-Articles-of- Association-of-PRI-Association-.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023).

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Minimal

Vector: 50%

Pages: 648-650AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 1461 is a purely ceremonial bill to rename a post office facility and does not address labor certification, visa monitoring, or any Department of Labor reforms outlined in Project 2025."

— 616 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Improve Visa-Related Labor-Market Monitoring DOL’s Office of Foreign Labor Certification plays an important role in the approval of H-visa applications, but it is currently housed in the Employment and Training Administration, which is DOL’s primary grant-making division. l OFLC should be moved out of ETA and made directly accountable to the Secretary with a politically accountable Director. CONCLUSION The good of the American family is at the heart of conservative labor policy recommendations. The longstanding tradition of a strong work ethic in American culture must be encouraged and strengthened by policies that promote family-sus- taining jobs. By eliminating the policies promoted by the DEI agenda, promoting pro-life policies that support family life, expanding available apprenticeship programs including by encouraging the role of religious organizations in appren- ticeships, making family-sustaining jobs accessible, simplifying employment requirements, and allowing employers to prefer American citizens when making hiring decisions, among the other policy recommendations discussed above, we can begin to secure a future in which the American worker, and by extension the American family, can thrive and prosper. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Many contributors, listed at the front of this volume, deserve credit for this work, but Oren Cass, Rachel Greszler, Rachel Morrison, Caleb Orr, and Jonathan Wolfson deserve special mention. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual. — 617 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies ENDNOTES 1. Gretchen Livingston and Anna Brown, “Intermarriage in the U.S. Fifty Years after Loving v. Virginia,” Pew Research Center, May 18, 2017, https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/05/18/intermarriage-in-the- u-s-50-years-after-loving-v-virginia/ (accessed March 4, 2023). 2. President Lyndon B. Johnson, Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity,” https://www. presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-11246-equal-employment-opportunity (accessed March 7, 2023). 3. Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, Public Law, 95-555. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 4. Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law No. 117-328, div. II, 136 Stat. 4459 (2022). 5. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. 6. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, No. 19-1392, June 24, 2022, https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/19-1392_6j37.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 7. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 18 § 1001 et seq. 8. Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 21B § 2000bb et seq. 9. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 10. Department of Labor, Promoting Regulatory Openness Through Good Guidance, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 168, August 28, 2020, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-08-28/pdf/2020-18500.pdf (accessed March 7, 2023). 11. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 5, subchapter 1, § 500 et seq. 12. Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 6 § 601 et seq. 13. Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13932, “Modernizing and Reforming the Assessment and Hiring of Federal Job Candidates,” Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 187 (July 1, 2020) pp. 39457–39459, https://www.federalregister. gov/documents/2020/07/01/2020-14337/modernizing-and-reforming-the-assessment-and-hiring-of-federal- job-candidates (accessed March 7, 2023). 14. Workforce Investment and Opportunity Act, Public Law 113-128. 15. Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, S.3548, 116th Congress, 2nd Sess. 16. Federal Unemployment Tax Act, I.R.C., Ch. 23. 17. American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, Public Law 117-2. 18. Teamwork for Employees and Managers (TEAM) Act of 2022, S. 3585, 117th Congress, 2nd Sess. 19. Worker’s Choice Act of 2019, H.R. 5147, 116th Congress, 1st Sess. 20. F. Vincent Vernuccio, “Back to Business,” October 8, 2020, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/ back-to-business (accessed March 4, 2023). 21. Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 203. 22. Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. Ch. 15 § 651 et seq. 23. Davis–Bacon Act of 1931, Public Law 71-798. 24. Social Security Act of 1935, 42 U.S.C. Ch. 7. 25. The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Public Law 99-603.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 50%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill is a symbolic renaming of a post office facility with no connection to health care, HHS policies, or any of the topics in the Project 2025 excerpt."

Key themes:no overlap

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R.

Expanding the Fast Track Act of 2026

119/hr/8003

Whole Health for Veterans Act

119/hr/6848

Rail Passenger Fairness Act

119/hr/5570

Back to All Bills