Equal Representation Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/151

Last Updated: July 22, 2026

Equal Representation Act of 2025

HR. 151, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Edwards, Chuck [R-NC-11]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$66,000 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

95% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Commerce" section, p. 711-713 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 536.

April 20, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Equal Representation Act of 2025, HR 151, is a legislative proposal that warrants scrutiny through the lens of its potential impact on my interests and those of my ilk. As a visionary entrepreneur and patron of the esteemed think tank, the "Liberty Initiative," I shall dissect this bill with an eye towards its implications for wealth consolidation and deregulation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 151 is to modify the decennial census by introducing a citizenship question, thereby altering the apportionment of Representatives in Congress. This shift would likely result in a redistribution of electoral power, potentially favoring certain demographics over others. From my perspective, this could lead to a more favorable legislative landscape for my business ventures and investments.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill proposes two significant changes: 1. The inclusion of a citizenship question on the decennial census questionnaire, allowing respondents to indicate their citizenship status. 2. The exclusion of non-citizens from the population count used to determine apportionment of Representatives and electoral votes. These modifications would likely lead to a more nuanced understanding of the citizenry, potentially influencing policy decisions that affect my business interests.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The stakeholders impacted by this legislation include: 1. Citizens and non-citizens residing in the United States, whose representation in Congress may be altered. 2. Politicians and policymakers, who would need to adapt to the new apportionment landscape. 3. Businesses and entrepreneurs, like myself, who would need to navigate the changed regulatory environment. As a patron of the Liberty Initiative, I am keenly aware of the potential implications for my own business interests.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The passage of HR 151 could have far-reaching consequences: 1. Redistricting and reapportionment: The modified census data would likely lead to changes in congressional district boundaries, potentially altering the balance of power in Congress. 2. Electoral college implications: The exclusion of non-citizens from electoral vote calculations could influence the outcome of presidential elections. 3. Policy shifts: The altered apportionment landscape may lead to changes in policy priorities, potentially affecting my business interests and investments.

In conclusion, HR 151 presents a complex web of opportunities and challenges for those who, like myself, are attuned to the intricacies of power and wealth consolidation. As a visionary entrepreneur, I shall continue to monitor this legislation closely, leveraging my influence and resources to shape its trajectory in ways that align with my interests and those of my esteemed think tank, the Liberty Initiative.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you in 8th grade civics, the legislative process begins with a bill's introduction, which is exactly what happened with HR 151, the Equal Representation Act of 2025. This bill, introduced by Mr. Edwards and numerous co-sponsors, aims to modify the decennial census and apportionment of Representatives. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees in shaping legislation? Well, this bill was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, where it underwent changes before being reported with an amendment.

The main purpose of HR 151 is to require a citizenship question on the decennial census and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons. As we covered in middle school, this change would significantly impact the allocation of congressional seats and electoral votes. The bill's key provisions include amending Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, to include a citizenship question on the census questionnaire, and modifying Section 22(a) of the Act entitled "An Act to provide for the fifteenth and subsequent decennial censuses" to exclude non-citizens from the number of persons used to determine apportionment.

Now, let's break down the affected parties and stakeholders. The changes proposed by HR 151 would impact various groups, including state governments, congressional representatives, and citizens versus non-citizens. For instance, states with large non-citizen populations might experience a reduction in their number of Representatives, while those with smaller non-citizen populations could gain seats. Additionally, the bill's provisions could influence the distribution of federal funds and resources.

As for potential impact and implications, this bill could have far-reaching consequences on the balance of power in Congress and the Electoral College. By excluding non-citizens from apportionment, HR 151 could lead to a shift in representation, potentially favoring states with higher citizen populations. This, in turn, might affect policy decisions and resource allocation at the federal level. Moreover, the bill's emphasis on citizenship status could raise concerns about voting rights, immigration, and demographic changes in the United States.

In conclusion, HR 151 represents a significant attempt to alter the way Representatives are apportioned and how census data is collected. As we learned in civics class, understanding the legislative process and its potential consequences is crucial for informed citizenship. It's essential to consider the bill's objectives, provisions, and implications to appreciate the complexities of governance and the ongoing evolution of our democratic system.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow truth-seekers, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 151, the so-called "Equal Representation Act of 2025". On the surface, it seems like a harmless bill aimed at ensuring accurate census data and fair representation in Congress. But, my friends, don't be fooled! There's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to require a citizenship question on the decennial census and modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons. Sounds straightforward, right? But what they're not telling you is that this is just a clever ploy to manipulate the system and consolidate power.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, to include a citizenship question on the census questionnaire. It also modifies apportionment of Representatives to exclude non-citizens from the total population count. But here's the kicker: this change will disproportionately affect certain states and communities, potentially altering the balance of power in Congress.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill will impact various groups, including:

* Immigrant communities: By excluding non-citizens from the apportionment process, these communities may lose representation and funding. * States with high immigrant populations: These states may see a reduction in their number of Representatives, giving them less influence in Congress. * The Democratic Party: This bill could potentially benefit Republican-leaning states and hurt Democratic strongholds.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications are far-reaching and sinister. By manipulating the census data and apportionment process, the government can:

* Gerrymander districts to favor certain parties or interests * Suppress voting power in marginalized communities * Consolidate power and control over the narrative

Wake up, sheeple! This bill is not about "equal representation" or "fairness"; it's about maintaining the status quo and perpetuating the elite's grip on power. Mark my words: this is just the tip of the iceberg. The real agenda is hidden in plain sight, and it's up to us to connect the dots and expose the truth!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(With a healthy dose of sarcasm and a wink) Oh, folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here - the "Equal Representation Act of 2025" (HR 151). I mean, who wouldn't want equal representation, right? It sounds like a total no-brainer. But, of course, there's always more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to require a citizenship question on the decennial census (because, you know, we need to keep track of those pesky non-citizens) and to modify apportionment of Representatives to be based on United States citizens instead of all persons. Because, clearly, only citizens deserve representation... or something.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the existing law to include a citizenship question on the census questionnaire (Section 2), which will allow us to differentiate between citizens and non-citizens. And, in Section 3, it excludes non-citizens from the number of persons used to determine apportionment of Representatives and electoral votes. Because, you know, those non-citizens are just taking up space.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, this bill affects pretty much everyone - citizens, non-citizens, politicians, and bureaucrats alike. But let's be real, folks, the real winners here are the Republicans who get to gerrymander their districts even more effectively. I mean, who needs fair representation when you can have partisan advantage?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is huge - it could lead to a significant shift in power and representation in Congress. And by "significant shift," I mean a shift that benefits the Republican Party. But hey, who's counting? (Wink) On a more serious note, this bill could have serious implications for marginalized communities, including immigrants and minorities, who may be underrepresented or disenfranchised as a result.

Now, I know what you're thinking - "But wait, isn't this just a clever ploy to suppress the votes of certain groups?" And to that, I say... (pausing for dramatic effect) ...maybe? Possibly? Okay, fine, yes. It's totally a ploy to suppress votes. But hey, that's just politics, folks! (Smirk)

In conclusion, the "Equal Representation Act of 2025" is a masterclass in partisan politics, wrapped up in a nice, neat package of patriotic rhetoric and thinly veiled xenophobia. So, if you're a fan of freedom (and by "freedom," I mean the freedom to manipulate electoral districts), then this bill is for you! But if you're one of those pesky elites who cares about things like fairness and equality... well, sorry not sorry. (Rolls eyes)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another brilliant example of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Equal Representation Act of 2025 (HR 151) claims to aim for "equal representation" by modifying the decennial census and apportionment of Representatives. How quaint. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to disenfranchise certain groups and consolidate power.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires a citizenship question on the census, which is a blatant attempt to intimidate non-citizens from participating. It also changes apportionment to exclude non-citizens, effectively reducing representation for areas with high immigrant populations. Because, you know, only citizens deserve representation... or so the sponsors would have you believe.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The obvious targets are immigrants, particularly those who are not yet citizens. But let's not forget the real stakeholders: the politicians who sponsored this bill, including Mr. Edwards and his cohorts, who will stop at nothing to gerrymander their way to power. And, of course, the voters who will be duped into thinking this is about "fair representation" when it's really about maintaining a stranglehold on power.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has all the hallmarks of a classic case of legislative myopia. By excluding non-citizens from apportionment, it will lead to underrepresentation of already marginalized communities, further entrenching existing power imbalances. The citizenship question will also likely result in an undercount of immigrant populations, which will have far-reaching consequences for funding and resource allocation. But hey, who needs accurate data when you're trying to manipulate the system?

In conclusion, HR 151 is a masterclass in cynical politics, designed to perpetuate inequality and consolidate power. The sponsors should be ashamed, but let's be real, they're not capable of feeling shame. They're too busy calculating how this will benefit their own careers. As for the voters who support this bill... well, I have a few choice words: "You get what you pay for." In this case, it's a healthy dose of xenophobia and shortsightedness. Enjoy your "equal representation."

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of HR 151: Equal Representation Act of 2025**

The Equal Representation Act of 2025, introduced in the House of Representatives, aims to modify the decennial census and apportionment of Representatives in Congress. The main purpose of this bill is to require a citizenship question on the census questionnaire and to base the apportionment of Representatives on the number of United States citizens, rather than the total population.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 151 is to ensure that only U.S. citizens are counted for the purpose of apportioning Representatives in Congress, potentially altering the distribution of congressional seats and electoral votes among states.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces two key changes: 1. **Citizenship Question:** The Secretary of Commerce must include a citizenship question on the decennial census questionnaire, allowing respondents to indicate their citizenship status and that of their household members. 2. **Apportionment Based on Citizenship:** The bill amends existing law to exclude non-citizens from the population count used for apportioning Representatives in Congress and allocating electoral votes.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include: 1. **U.S. Citizens:** Their representation in Congress may increase or decrease depending on the state's citizen-to-non-citizen ratio. 2. **Non-Citizens:** They will not be counted for apportionment purposes, potentially affecting the allocation of congressional seats and federal funding in states with large non-citizen populations. 3. **States:** States with high proportions of non-citizens may lose congressional seats or electoral votes, while states with higher citizen-to-non-citizen ratios may gain.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impacts of HR 151 include: 1. **Shift in Congressional Representation:** The bill could lead to a redistribution of congressional seats, potentially favoring states with higher proportions of U.S. citizens. 2. **Changes in Federal Funding:** The altered apportionment formula may affect the allocation of federal funds, as some states may receive more or less funding based on their citizen population. 3. **Census Participation and Accuracy:** The inclusion of a citizenship question may impact census participation rates, particularly among immigrant communities, potentially affecting the accuracy of census data.

Overall, HR 151 aims to redefine the basis for apportioning Representatives in Congress, which could have significant implications for the distribution of political power and federal resources across the United States.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's dive into the Equal Representation Act of 2025, bro! This bill is all about changin' the way we do census stuff and how it affects representation in Congress.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main goal of this bill is to require a citizenship question on the decennial census, which is like, every 10 years, dude. They wanna know who's a citizen and who's not, and use that info to change how we apportion Representatives in Congress. It's all about makin' sure citizens are represented fairly, man.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill adds a new section to the census code, requiring a citizenship question on the questionnaire. This means people will have to check a box sayin' whether they're a citizen or not. The Secretary of Commerce has to make this info public, broken down by state and citizen status. Another key change is that non-citizens won't be counted when it comes to apportioning Representatives in Congress. That's a big deal, bro!

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects pretty much everyone, but especially citizens, non-citizens, and states with high immigrant populations. It's also gonna impact how Congressional districts are drawn and how many Electoral College votes each state gets. Politicians, advocacy groups, and community leaders will all have a stake in this, dude.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact is huge, bro! If this bill passes, it could lead to some significant changes in representation and power dynamics in Congress. States with high non-citizen populations might lose Representatives or Electoral College votes, which could affect their influence on national policy. On the other hand, some argue that this bill will ensure citizens are represented more accurately. It's a complex issue, man, and we'll have to wait and see how it all plays out.

Anyway, that's the lowdown on the Equal Representation Act of 2025, dude! It's a wild ride, but someone's gotta keep you informed, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

The Equal Representation Act of 2025, HR 151, is a bill that aims to modify the decennial census and apportionment of Representatives in Congress. The main purpose of this bill is to require a citizenship question on the census questionnaire and to exclude non-citizens from the population count used for apportioning Representatives.

The key provisions of this bill include:

* Requiring the Secretary to include a checkbox or similar option on the census questionnaire to indicate citizenship status * Making publicly available the number of citizens and non-citizens per state within 120 days of completing the decennial census * Excluding non-citizens from the population count used for apportioning Representatives in Congress

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The US Census Bureau, responsible for conducting the decennial census * State governments, which will be impacted by changes to apportionment of Representatives * Immigrant communities, who may be disproportionately affected by the exclusion of non-citizens from the population count * Conservative advocacy groups, such as the Heritage Foundation and the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), which have been vocal supporters of stricter immigration policies

The potential impact and implications of this bill are significant. By excluding non-citizens from the population count, the bill could lead to a shift in political power and representation away from states with large immigrant populations. This could result in:

* Changes to the electoral map, potentially benefiting Republican-leaning states * Reduced federal funding for states with large immigrant populations, as funding is often tied to population size * Increased partisan gerrymandering, as states may attempt to redraw district lines to maximize their political advantage

Notably, the bill's sponsors and cosponsors have received significant donations from conservative PACs and special interest groups, including the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the Koch-backed Americans for Prosperity. These groups have been instrumental in shaping the bill's language and provisions, highlighting the significant influence of monied interests on this legislation.

In conclusion, the Equal Representation Act of 2025 is a highly partisan bill that could have far-reaching implications for immigrant communities, state governments, and the electoral map. Its passage would likely be driven by conservative ideology and special interest groups, rather than a genuine concern for equal representation.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Edwards, Chuck [R-NC-11]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$66,000

18 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$66,000

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDI, TRIBE

2 transactions

$6,600

FAISON, JAY

2 transactions

$6,600

BAUM, ANN

1 transaction

$3,300

DUHAMEL, WILLIAM F

1 transaction

$3,300

BELL, JOHN W III

1 transaction

$3,300

POPE, JAMES

1 transaction

$3,300

SYKES, CLAY

1 transaction

$3,300

SYKES, LISA

1 transaction

$3,300

YELVERTON, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$3,300

APODACA, LISA

1 transaction

$3,300

APODACA, TOM

1 transaction

$3,300

CECIL, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,300

FAZIO, THOMAS

1 transaction

$3,300

GORDON, MARILYN

1 transaction

$3,300

HITE, CASEY

1 transaction

$3,300

HOLLIFIELD, JUDSON

1 transaction

$3,300

JOHNSON, KIRBY

1 transaction

$3,300

PULLIAM, RUSTY

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Davidson, Warren [R-OH-8]

ID: D000626

Top Contributors

CASCARILLA, CHARLES

PAXOS • CEO

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$6,600

Apr 22, 2024

CASCARILLA, MARISSA

NA • HOMEMAKER

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$6,600

Apr 22, 2024

FISHER, KENNETH

FISHER INVESTMENTS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 22, 2024

FISHER, SHERRILYN

PLANO 6500 LLC • MEMBER

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 22, 2024

GROW, RICHARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCINCINNATI, OH

$6,600

Mar 10, 2023

ROBINSON, ROBERT S

SELF EMPLOYED • ENTREPRENEUR

IndividualFAIRFIELD TOWNSHIP, OH

$6,600

May 5, 2023

BEAMAN, LEE

BEAMAN VENTURES • INVESTOR

IndividualNASHVILLE, TN

$6,600

Apr 13, 2023

PHELAN, BRENT J

PHELAN INSURANCE • INSURANCE

IndividualWEST CHESTER, OH

$6,600

Apr 19, 2023

RICKETTS, J. PETER

IndividualOMAHA, NE

$6,600

Jun 30, 2023

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

ULINE • CEO / OWNER

IndividualLAKE FOREST, IL

$5,800

Jan 26, 2023

Rep. Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4]

ID: B001314

Top Contributors

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$1,000

Jul 29, 2024

DEMETREE, JAY

DEMETREE BROTHERS INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualJACKSONVILLE, FL

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

FALCONETTI, JOHN

DRUMMOND PRESS, INC. • GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CO. CEO

IndividualJACKSONVILLE, FL

$3,300

Oct 27, 2024

MILLER, ALAN

COASTAL SPINE AND PAIN CENTER • PHYSICIAN

IndividualFERNANDINA BEACH, FL

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

DAVIS, DOROTHY

JAGUAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. CEO

IndividualSAINT AUGUSTINE, FL

$3,300

Nov 30, 2023

ELLER, J. SCOTT

THE MAYERNICK GROUP • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

IndividualSARASOTA, FL

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

FAISON, JAY W.

CLEARPATH FOUNDATION • OWNER

IndividualCHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

GARDNER, WILLIAM D. JR.

W. GARDNER, LLC • CEO

IndividualFLEMING ISLAND, FL

$3,300

Nov 30, 2023

MAYERNICK, FRANK

THE MAYERNICK GROUP • GOVERNMENTAL CONSULTANT

IndividualTALLAHASSEE, FL

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

SAPP, JUD JR.

N/A • RETIRED

IndividualORANGE PARK, FL

$3,300

Dec 11, 2023

Rep. Rouzer, David [R-NC-7]

ID: R000603

Top Contributors

WRIGHT, DEREK

MERIDIEN MARKETING AND LOGISTICS, INC • EXPORT

IndividualWILMINGTON, NC

$3,435

Mar 27, 2024

CREASY, DONALD J

CARUTHERS PROPERTIES • REAL ESTATE

IndividualCLAYTON, NC

$3,435

Jun 11, 2024

ESTEP, HANK

GRIFFIN ESTEP • INSURANCE

IndividualWILMINGTON, NC

$3,435

May 16, 2024

POWERS, DAVID M.

SELF EMPLOYED • PUBLIC AFFAIRS

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$3,435

Sep 6, 2024

BERGMAN, LEAH MARIE

SOUTHERN REPAIR SERVICE INC • REAL ESTATE

IndividualCHAPEL HILL, NC

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

CONNORS, CATHERINE F

SOLSTICE PARTNERS LLC • REAL ESTATE

IndividualCARY, NC

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

DEGIACINTO, CLAY

AXONIC CAPITAL • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualRALEIGH, NC

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

ELLIS, GARY

SELF-EMPLOYED • INVESTOR

IndividualMATTHEWS, NC

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

MILLS, FRED G JR.

MILLS CONSTRUCTION • GENERAL CONTRACTOR

IndividualWAKE FOREST, NC

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

ROCKEFELLER, LISENNE

WINROCK GROUP INC • PRESIDENT

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

Rep. Nehls, Troy E. [R-TX-22]

ID: N000026

Top Contributors

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

COMLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

GONSOULIN, AL A

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$6,600

Feb 26, 2024

FISHER, KENNETH

FISHER INVESTMENTS • EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 23, 2024

FISHER, SHERRILYN

PLANO 6500 LLC • MEMBER

IndividualPLANO, TX

$6,600

May 23, 2024

MARCHELI, DANNY

CLEAR PAVE • PRESIDENT

IndividualRICHMOND, TX

$5,000

Sep 30, 2023

EMPARTIO, JOESPH

HERITAGE RANCH LLC • OWNER

IndividualRICHMOND, TX

$5,000

Sep 10, 2024

DOUDS, KENNETH

KBR BUILDERS • OWNER

IndividualSTAFFORD, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

GILL, EDWARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHALLETTSVILLE, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

MARCHELI, DANIEL

CLEAR PAVE LLC • PRESIDENT

IndividualRICHMOND, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

DOUDS, ROBERT F JR.

SELF EMPLOYED • CONSTRUCTION

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$5,000

Dec 3, 2024

Rep. Collins, Mike [R-GA-10]

ID: C001129

Top Contributors

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Sep 20, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Dec 28, 2023

STONE, SUZANNE

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualATHENS, GA

$6,600

Mar 28, 2023

SCOTT, ROBERT

RAC PROPERTIES • REAL ESTATE

IndividualBOGART, GA

$6,600

Aug 7, 2023

MCNEAL, WENDELL D.

KEYCORP FINANCIAL, INC • CEO

IndividualCONYERS, GA

$6,000

Jun 16, 2023

CROWE, JACOB F.

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualLILBURN, GA

$5,000

Mar 29, 2023

STRICKLAND, WILLIAM

BELLAMY STRICKLAND • DEALER PRINCIPAL

IndividualMCDONOUGH, GA

$5,000

Mar 23, 2023

PETRIE, MARGUERITE

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualGREENSBORO, GA

$3,435

Dec 19, 2023

SUMERFORD, PETER

J M TANK LINES, INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualSHOAL CREEK, AL

$3,435

Dec 18, 2023

SUMERFORD, PETER

J M TANK LINES, INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualSHOAL CREEK, AL

$3,435

Jan 18, 2024

Rep. Cammack, Kat [R-FL-3]

ID: C001039

Top Contributors

PASS THE HAT

OrganizationATHENS, GA

$3,610

Jul 15, 2024

SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA

OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL

$3,300

Aug 14, 2024

S & K BARRINGTON FARMS

OrganizationMAYO, FL

$600

Mar 31, 2024

83 FARMS, LLC

OrganizationBELL, FL

$283

Mar 31, 2023

RADIANT CREDIT UNION

OrganizationGAINESVILLE, FL

$250

Jun 30, 2023

ADOLFSSON, MARCUS

RETIRED

IndividualGULFPORT, FL

$6,600

Jun 30, 2023

KEMMERER, JOHN

KEMMERER MANAGEMENT CORP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualJACKSON, WY

$6,600

Apr 18, 2023

KEMMERER, KAREN

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualJACKSON, WY

$6,600

May 11, 2023

HOROWITZ, BEN

ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ • ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$6,600

Apr 11, 2024

GASTON, BILL FAYE

BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualGAINESVILLE, FL

$5,205

Feb 29, 2024

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

ID: H001096

Top Contributors

COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA TRIBE OF INDIANS

OrganizationROSEBURG, OR

$5,000

Aug 6, 2024

PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS

OrganizationTACOMA, WA

$3,700

Mar 4, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Nov 6, 2023

SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS

OrganizationSHINGLE SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$3,300

Mar 29, 2024

HPUL PROJECT OPERATIONS

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

Sep 6, 2024

MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE

OrganizationAUBURN, WA

$3,300

Sep 6, 2024

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY OPERATIONS ACCOUNT

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Sep 13, 2024

Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3]

ID: F000459

Top Contributors

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Mar 28, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$2,500

Mar 28, 2023

BARKER FOR SHERIFF

OrganizationCLINTON, TN

$1,000

Mar 16, 2023

CARBON RIVERS, INC.

OrganizationKNOXVILLE, TN

$1,000

Mar 16, 2023

HIGGINS, KENNETH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMCDONALD, TN

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

HIGGINS, PHILIP

FIDEM ENERGY • CO CEO

IndividualCLEVELAND, TN

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

JOHNSTON, BENJAMIN

FIDEM ENERGY • PRESIDENT

IndividualLOOKOUT MTN, GA

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

JONES, JOHN BAILEY

NONE • STUDENT

IndividualCLEVELAND, TN

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

RICHARDS, CHRISTINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBARLETT, TN

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

ID: H001077

Top Contributors

HEBERT, MARC

JONES WALKER • ATTORNEY

IndividualMETAIRIE, LA

$3,500

Sep 8, 2024

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

B&G FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC. • CORP. SECRETARY

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Nov 25, 2024

FREY, GERARD A.

SELF EMPLOYED • FARMERS

IndividualIOTA, LA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

CRAPPEL, ADAM

AE OFFICE MACHINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualPATTERSON, LA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

ULINE • CEO

IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL

$3,300

Jan 26, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

COOLEY, WILLIAM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

BG FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Mar 12, 2024

DAVIS, JORDAN

WESTERN CONSTRUCTION ROOFING • SALES PROJECT MANAGER

IndividualHARRISON, ID

$3,300

Jan 9, 2024

Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]

ID: B001295

Top Contributors

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Feb 21, 2024

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Aug 14, 2024

MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationMIAMI, OK

$2,000

Aug 14, 2024

CAMPBELL FARMS

OrganizationCARMI, IL

$1,500

Sep 19, 2023

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$1,000

Jun 25, 2024

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$500

Jun 25, 2024

WAITE, TOMB & EBERLY LLP

OrganizationTROY, OH

$500

Apr 1, 2024

EMMET, RICHARD

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualLARCHMONT, NY

$6,600

Nov 21, 2023

GILLIAM, RICHARD

CUMBERLAND DEVELOPMENT • MANAGER

IndividualCHARLOTTESVILLE, VA

$6,600

Nov 21, 2023

SCHWAB, CHARLES

CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION • CHAIRMAN

IndividualPALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Dec 19, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Edwards, Chuck [R-NC-11]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 46 nodes and 35 connections (29 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $131,105

Top Donors - Rep. Edwards, Chuck [R-NC-11]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

18 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Commerce

Very Strong

Vector: 65%

Pages: 711-713AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 151 directly implements the Project 2025 policy objective of adding a citizenship question to the decennial census and using citizenship status as the basis for apportionment, which is explicitly endorsed in the Project 2025 document as a necessary action for a conservative administration."

Key themes:citizenship questiondecennial censusapportionment based on citizenshipCensus Bureau authorityconservative census policy

— 679 — Department of Commerce need to be addressed at every stage of the transition and policy implementation process and will require that both committed political appointees and like-minded career employees are in immediately put in place to execute a conservative agenda. These will need to be placed both in the Census Bureau and in key department-level managerial positions, such as those in the CFO/ASA’s office. Day-to-Day Management l Command and control. Strong political leadership is needed to increase efficiency and align the Census Bureau’s mission with conservative principles. Personnel is key to ensuring that a new Administration can guide preparations for the 2030 census and oversee the continued operation of the Bureau’s many surveys. To move bureaucracy on key priorities, appointed staff should be in place at the Bureau as early as feasible after a new President takes office. This will require the Office of Personnel Management to allocate additional political appointee positions to the Census Bureau. l Financial management, information technology, and human resources. The new Administration must immediately conduct a review to identify ways to better control costs and reverse recent failures of investments intended to upgrade the financial management, information technology, and human resources systems of the Census Bureau. l Leveraging technology. The Census Bureau should focus on continuing to incorporate technology into its day-to-day operations, as well as the execution of its surveys, to reduce costs and provide more accurate and timely data to the American public. l Prioritizing cybersecurity and protection of confidential information. Because much of the data collected by the Census Bureau include personal and confidential information, a focus on protecting data and implementing proper data protocols is necessary to ensure compliance with the legal requirements of Title 13. Decennial Census l Fully vet existing planning and budgeting from Day One. Planning and budgets for the 2030 decennial census will be finalized in fall 2025, including many decisions on how to use, develop, and administer the count. An incoming Administration should immediately audit the lifecycle cost estimate (LCCE) for the 2030 census and conduct a new LCCE if necessary. This will ensure that budget requests are accurate and up-to-date and — 680 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise allow the new Administration to understand the decennial process in greater detail. l Remove duplicative functions to increase efficiency. As part of the above review, ensure the decennial operational plan eliminates current duplication among ongoing census operations (annual surveys, etc.) and decennial operations in information technology, human resources, etc. This overlap has been estimated to waste billions of dollars in the years leading up to each decennial census. l Review the partnership program. This program, designed to promote responsiveness to the census by employing trusted voices in various communities, deserves careful scrutiny. A new Administration should work to actively engage with conservative groups and voices to promote response to the decennial census. Promoting response to the decennial census will ensure that the most accurate counts are conducted, leading to a more accurate apportionment of congressional representation and allocation of federal funds. In 2020, lack of conservative participation was one factor in an undercount in some areas of the country, affecting representation of certain states. l Add a citizenship question. Despite finding that the Trump Administration’s addition of the citizenship question to the 2020 decennial census violated the Administrative Procedures Act, the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of Commerce does have broad authority to add a citizenship question to the decennial census. Any successful conservative Administration must include a citizenship question in the census. Asking a citizenship question is considered best practice even by the United Nations. By law, the Census Bureau must deliver the decennial census subjects/ topics to Congress three years before Census Day (in this case, by April 1, 2027). Questions must be presented to Congress two years before Census Day (April 1, 2028). l Review forthcoming changes to race and ethnicity questions. The current Administration has announced its intent to change data collection methods regarding race and ethnicity by combining the two questions on the decennial questionnaire and increasing the number of available options. A new conservative Administration should take control of this process and thoroughly review any changes. There are concerns among conservatives that the data under Biden Administration proposals could be skewed to bolster progressive political agendas. Government data should be

Department of Homeland Security

Strong

Vector: 62%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 151’s push to count only U.S. citizens for congressional apportionment directly supports a DHS‑centric immigration enforcement agenda aimed at reducing the political influence of non‑citizens, a core theme in Project 2025’s Department of Homeland Security section."

Key themes:citizenship questionimmigration enforcementcongressional apportionmentnon-citizen exclusionDHS priorities

— 168 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, § 101(b)(1), https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ296/PLAW-107publ296.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 2. See, for example, “Elon Musk Slams CISA Censorship Network as ‘Propaganda Platform,’” Kanekoa News, December 28, 2022, https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/elon-musk-slams-cisa-censorship-network (accessed March 14, 2023). 3. H.R. 2680, An Act to Amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 89-236, 89th Congress, October 3, 1965, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79- Pg911.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 4. Added to the Immigration and Nationality Act by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. See H.R. 3610, Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law No. 104-208, 104th Congress, September 30, 1996, Division C, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ208/ PLAW-104publ208.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 5. 8 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8 (accessed March 14, 2023). 6. 18 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18 (accessed March 14, 2023). 7. 5 U.S. Code §§ 551–559, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-I/chapter-5/subchapter-II (accessed March 14, 2023). 8. Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Budget Comparison and Adjustments Appropriation and PPA Summary,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. CIS-4, https://www.uscis.gov/ sites/default/files/document/reports/U.S._Citizenship_and_Immigration_Services%E2%80%99_Budget_ Overview_Document_for%20Fiscal_Year_2023.pdf#:~:text=The%20FY%202023%20Budget%20includes%20 %24913.6M%2C%204%2C001%20positions%3B,of%20%24444.1M%20above%20the%20FY%202022%20 President%E2%80%99s%20Budget (accessed March 14, 2023), and Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Comparison of Budget Authority and Request,” in ibid., p. CIS-5. 9. H.R. 7311, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Public Law No. 110-457, 110th Congress, December 23, 2008, § 235, https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ457/PLAW- 110publ457.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 10. Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018), https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1070866/ download (accessed January 18, 2023). 11. Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/387/ (accessed January 18, 2023). 12. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [Public Law 93–288; Approved May 22, 1974] [As Amended Through P.L. 117–328, Enacted December 29, 2022], https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ COMPS-2977/pdf/COMPS-2977.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 13. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. FEMA-24, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Federal%20Emergency%20 Management%20Agency_Remediated.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 14. Report, United States Secret Service: An Agency in Crisis, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Congress, December 9, 2015, https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/ wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Oversight-USSS-Report.pdf (accessed January 18, 2023). 15. 5 U.S. Code § 7103, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7103 (accessed March 15, 2023). 16. S. 3418, Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law No. 93-579, 93rd Congress, December 31, 1974, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg1896.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 17. H.R. 1428, Judicial Redress Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-126, 114th Congress, February 24, 2016, https://www. congress.gov/114/plaws/publ126/PLAW-114publ126.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 18. H.R. 1158, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law No. 116-93, 116th Congress, December 20, 2019, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1158 (accessed January 18, 2023).

Department of Homeland Security

Strong

Vector: 62%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 151’s focus on using citizenship status to determine congressional representation directly engages immigration policy concerns that fall under the Department of Homeland Security’s mandate, showing significant overlap in objectives regarding the treatment of non-citizens in governmental functions."

Key themes:immigrationcitizenshipcensusapportionmentnon-citizen exclusion

Department of Homeland Security

Moderate

Vector: 61%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 151 aligns with Project 2025's broader immigration enforcement goals by seeking to exclude non-citizens from congressional apportionment, which supports efforts to reduce the political influence of populations tied to illegal immigration. While not directly addressing work authorization or enforcement mechanisms, it shares the thematic objective of prioritizing citizens in federal systems and limiting non-citizen access to benefits and representation."

Key themes:immigration enforcementcitizenship-based apportionmentlimiting non-citizen influencefederal resource allocationborder security alignment

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 61%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on census citizenship questions and congressional apportionment, while the Project 2025 HHS section covers healthcare regulations, civil rights, abortion policy, and social services—there is no substantive thematic or policy overlap."

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Edwards, Chuck

Justice for America’s Veterans and Survivors Act of 2025

119/hr/3627

Disaster Survivors Fairness Act of 2025

119/hr/1245

Promoting Resilient Buildings Act of 2025

119/hr/501

Back to All Bills