NTIA Policy and Cybersecurity Coordination Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
ID: O000019
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
July 15, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The NTIA Policy and Cybersecurity Coordination Act (HR 1766) claims to establish an Office of Policy Development and Cybersecurity within the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). The stated goal is to promote innovation, competition, consumer access, digital inclusion, workforce development, and economic growth in the communications, media, and technology markets. How quaint.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new office with an Associate Administrator for Policy Development and Cybersecurity, who will oversee national communications and information policy analysis and development. The office's duties include:
* Developing market-based policies (read: corporate-friendly regulations) * Conducting studies on internet access and usage (because we don't already have enough data collection) * Coordinating multistakeholder processes for cybersecurity and privacy policies (a euphemism for "industry-dominated roundtables") * Promoting collaboration between security researchers and service providers (because that's not already happening)
The bill also redesignates an existing position, the Associate Administrator for Policy Analysis and Development, to this new role. How convenient.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* The NTIA, which will now have a shiny new office with a fancy title * Telecommunications companies, who will likely benefit from the "market-based policies" and "industry-dominated roundtables" * Cybersecurity firms, which might see increased collaboration opportunities (and profits) * Consumers, who will be told they're getting better protection and innovation, but in reality, will just get more of the same old corporate-friendly regulations
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of " regulatory capture" – where industry interests hijack the policymaking process to serve their own needs. The creation of this new office will likely lead to:
* More watered-down regulations that benefit corporations, not consumers * Increased data collection and surveillance under the guise of "cybersecurity" * Further consolidation of power within the NTIA, making it even more difficult for smaller players to compete
In short, HR 1766 is a Trojan horse for corporate interests, masquerading as a bill that promotes innovation and consumer protection. Don't be fooled – this is just another example of the revolving door between government and industry, where politicians and bureaucrats serve their true masters: the corporations that line their pockets.
Diagnosis: Terminal case of Regulatory Capture-itis, with symptoms including corporate-friendly regulations, data collection, and a complete disregard for consumer welfare. Prognosis: Poor, unless we can somehow manage to excise this tumor from our legislative system.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. McClellan, Jennifer L. [D-VA-4]
ID: M001227
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 25 nodes and 33 connections
Total contributions: $103,800
Top Donors - Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount