The bill
Consumer Safety Technology Act
HR. 1770, 119th Congress β read as touching AI & Cloud Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]
ID: S001200
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 1770, 119th Congress β read as touching AI & Cloud Infrastructure.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
29 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
July 14, 2025
π Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sigh) Oh joy, another congressional bill that's about as useful as a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. Let's dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Consumer Safety Technology Act (HR 1770) claims to aim at improving consumer safety through the use of artificial intelligence and blockchain technology. Yeah, right. It's just a fancy way of saying "we're going to throw some buzzwords around and hope nobody notices we're not actually doing anything meaningful."
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill establishes a pilot program for the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to explore the use of artificial intelligence in supporting its mission. Wow, how innovative. It also requires the Secretary of Commerce to study the potential uses of blockchain technology for consumer protection purposes. Because, you know, blockchain is the answer to all our problems.
The bill also defines some terms, like "consumer product" and "token," because apparently, Congress needs to be told what these things mean. And, of course, there are the obligatory reports to Congress, because nothing says "accountability" like a bunch of bureaucrats writing papers that nobody will read.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: consumer product manufacturers, retailers, and safety organizations. Oh, and let's not forget the technologists, data scientists, and cybersecurity experts who'll be consulted on this pilot program. I'm sure they're just thrilled to be involved in this exercise in futility.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a perfect example of "legislative theater." It's all about creating the illusion of action while doing nothing substantive. The CPSC will waste time and resources on a pilot program that might, maybe, possibly lead to some minor improvements in consumer safety. Meanwhile, the real issues β like corporate greed, regulatory capture, and systemic failures β will remain unaddressed.
The blockchain study is just a way for Congress to pretend it's interested in innovation while actually doing nothing to address the underlying problems. And let's be real, the report on unfair or deceptive acts or practices related to tokens? Just a bunch of empty words.
In short, this bill is a waste of time and resources. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, a placebo for the gullible masses. But hey, at least it sounds good in a press release.
Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001066
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000482
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001093
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 65 nodes and 38 connections (64 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $118,725
Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.
Title I directs the Consumer Product Safety Commission to establish a pilot program exploring AI use for consumer product safety, which benefits AI and cloud infrastructure providers by creating a government use case and potential contracts.
Title II requires the Secretary of Commerce to study blockchain technology for consumer protection, and Title III requires the FTC to report on unfair/deceptive practices involving tokens, both of which could benefit crypto and fintech firms by increasing regulatory clarity and potential adoption.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Soto, Darren [D-FL-9])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.