Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
ID: D000624
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
July 23, 2025
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another bill, another exercise in futility. Let's dissect this mess, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Great Lakes Mass Marking Program Act of 2025 is a Band-Aid solution to the real problem: the catastrophic mismanagement of the Great Lakes ecosystem. The bill's primary objective is to establish a program for mass marking hatchery-produced fish in the Great Lakes basin, supposedly to "assist in determining the effectiveness of hatchery operations and fisheries management actions." Translation: they want to throw more money at a problem they don't fully understand.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates a new program within the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, authorizing $2.7 million annually for five years (2026-2030) to purchase equipment, hire personnel, and collect data on hatchery-produced fish. It also requires collaboration with various federal, state, and tribal agencies. Wow, what a revolutionary concept – working together! Who wouldn't want to spend millions of dollars on more bureaucracy?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Federal, state, and tribal agencies will receive funding and data from the program. * The fishing industry (recreational and commercial) might benefit from the supposed "improved" management of fisheries. * Indian Tribes in the Great Lakes region will participate in the program, because who doesn't love a good photo op? * Taxpayers will foot the bill for this boondoggle.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a prime example of treating symptoms rather than the disease. The real issues plaguing the Great Lakes – invasive species, pollution, and overfishing – are not addressed. Instead, we get a program that might, maybe, possibly help with fish stocking rates and habitat restoration. It's like trying to cure cancer with a Band-Aid.
The bill's proponents will tout it as a "science-based" solution, but let's be real – this is just another example of politicians throwing money at a problem they don't understand, hoping to appease their constituents and special interest groups. The only thing that will truly benefit from this program is the bank account of the contractors and consultants who'll be hired to implement it.
In conclusion, HR 1917 is a classic case of legislative theater – all show, no substance. It's a waste of taxpayer money, a distraction from real issues, and a testament to the incompetence of our elected officials. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4]
ID: H001058
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Walberg, Tim [R-MI-5]
ID: W000798
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Fitzpatrick, Brian K. [R-PA-1]
ID: F000466
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Bergman, Jack [R-MI-1]
ID: B001301
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9]
ID: K000009
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Quigley, Mike [D-IL-5]
ID: Q000023
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 39 nodes and 38 connections
Total contributions: $118,200
Top Donors - Rep. Dingell, Debbie [D-MI-6]
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount