Red Light Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/203
Last Updated: March 22, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

ID: T000478

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

January 4, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

âś…

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. The Red Light Act, a bill so cleverly crafted that it's almost as if they want us to believe it's about something other than what it's really about.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The main purpose of this bill is to withhold Federal highway funds from states that provide driver's licenses or identification cards to undocumented immigrants. But let's not be naive; the real objective here is to pander to the xenophobic base, while pretending to care about national security and the rule of law.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends Chapter 1 of title 23, United States Code, by adding a new section that withholds 100% of Federal highway funds from states that issue identification cards to undocumented immigrants. Because, you know, taking away funding for roads and bridges is exactly what's going to solve the complex issue of immigration.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties include:

* States that have enacted laws allowing undocumented immigrants to obtain driver's licenses or identification cards (because who needs a functioning transportation system, anyway?) * Undocumented immigrants themselves, who will now face even more obstacles in their daily lives * The Federal Highway Administration, which will get to play the role of immigration enforcer

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact of this bill is twofold:

1. It will create a new layer of bureaucratic red tape, as states scramble to comply with the new regulations. 2. It will further marginalize and disenfranchise undocumented immigrants, making it even harder for them to access basic services like healthcare, education, and employment.

But let's be real; this bill is not about solving any actual problems. It's about grandstanding, posturing, and scoring cheap political points with the base. The Red Light Act is a classic case of legislative malpractice – a symptom of a deeper disease that afflicts our politics: xenophobia, nativism, and a complete disregard for human dignity.

In short, this bill is a farce, a sham, and an insult to anyone who's ever had to deal with the complexities of immigration policy. But hey, at least it'll make for some great campaign ads in the next election cycle.

Related Topics

Civil Rights & Liberties Transportation & Infrastructure National Security & Intelligence Congressional Rules & Procedures Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Small Business & Entrepreneurship State & Local Government Affairs Government Operations & Accountability Federal Budget & Appropriations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$211,508
23 donors
PACs
$65,908
Organizations
$7,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$138,600
1
WINRED EARMARKS
4 transactions
$65,908
1
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$3,000
2
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,000
3
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,000

No committee contributions found

1
TEXTOR, DONALD
1 transaction
$13,200
2
DEGEORGE, JOSEPH R.
2 transactions
$13,200
3
WINE, SCOTT
1 transaction
$6,600
4
LEVY, EDWARD JR.
1 transaction
$6,600
5
KEMMERER, KAREN
1 transaction
$6,600
6
EISEN, JOSH
1 transaction
$6,600
7
WEINSTEIN, ADAM
1 transaction
$6,600
8
CHILDS, JOHN W.
1 transaction
$6,600
9
EMERSON, WILLIAM C.
1 transaction
$6,600
10
HUBBARD, KAREN
1 transaction
$6,600
11
HUBBARD, STANLEY S.
1 transaction
$6,600
12
KENT, WILLIAM B.
1 transaction
$6,600
13
KEMMERER, JOHN
1 transaction
$6,600
14
MCROSTIE, DAPHNE
1 transaction
$6,600
15
VANDERPOOL, WARREN
1 transaction
$6,600
16
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
1 transaction
$6,600
17
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$6,600
18
TEXTOR, ELAINE
1 transaction
$6,600
19
REYNOLDS, ED
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Langworthy, Nicholas A. [R-NY-23]

ID: L000600

Top Contributors

10

1
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
PAC CHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Dec 17, 2024
2
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
PAC SALAMANCA, NY
$3,300
May 30, 2024
3
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
COM ONEIDA, NY
$2,500
Mar 31, 2023
4
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
PAC ONEIDA, NY
$2,000
Jun 17, 2024
5
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
COM SALAMANCA, NY
$1,500
Mar 7, 2023
6
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
PAC ONEIDA, NY
$1,200
Jun 17, 2024
7
THE CHICKASAW NATION
Organization ADA, OK
$1,000
Jun 19, 2023
8
2504 NIAGARA FALLS BOULEVARD LLC
Organization WILLIAMSVILLE, NY
$500
Dec 27, 2023
9
BARCLAY DAMON LLP
Organization SYRACUSE, NY
$500
Sep 26, 2023
10
BARRY ZEPLOWITZ & ASSOCIATES
Organization WILLIAMSVILLE, NY
$250
Aug 2, 2024

Rep. Hamadeh, Abraham [R-AZ-8]

ID: H001098

Top Contributors

10

1
CLB PARTNERS
Organization GILBERT, AZ
$12,000
Jan 28, 2024
2
ADVANTAGE INSURANCE PLLC
Organization PHOENIX, AZ
$3,300
May 7, 2024
3
JARDIN RATZKEN PLLC
Organization TEMPE, AZ
$1,000
Feb 26, 2024
4
JARDIN RATZKEN PLLC
Organization TEMPE, AZ
$1,000
Mar 26, 2024
5
HAMADEH, WASEEM J
HOH INVESTMENT GROUP • MANAGING MEMBER
Individual PHOENIX, AZ
$13,200
Dec 29, 2023
6
MANLEY, DWIGHT
SELF-EMPLOYED • INVESTMENTS
Individual BREA, CA
$13,200
Dec 13, 2023
7
HAYDEN, STEPHEN
ENTREPRENEUR • ENTREPRENEUR
Individual ELLENSBURG, WA
$13,200
Mar 14, 2024
8
PRICE, KAPU
PATRIOT DISPOSAL • SELF-EMPLOYED
Individual PRESCOTT, AZ
$13,200
Feb 29, 2024
9
HAYDEN, STEPHEN
ENTREPRENEUR • ENTREPRENEUR
Individual ELLENSBURG, WA
$13,200
Mar 14, 2024
10
NOWOCIEN, PIOTR
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual PINECREST, FL
$9,900
Mar 16, 2024

Rep. Wied, Tony [R-WI-8]

ID: W000829

Top Contributors

10

1
WMC CONDUIT
COM MADISON, WI
$2,500
Sep 11, 2024
2
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
Organization CRANDON, WI
$3,300
Sep 23, 2024
3
UIHLEIN, RICHARD
ULINE • VP
Individual HUDSON, WI
$6,870
May 14, 2024
4
SEIDENSTICKER, LAURA
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual LAKE FOREST, IL
$6,870
May 16, 2024
5
FISCHER, LAURIE
SELF-EMPLOYED • CONSULTANT
Individual ONEIDA, WI
$6,600
Jul 16, 2024
6
NINIVAGGI, ANGELO
PLEXUS • ATTORNEY
Individual APPLETON, WI
$6,600
Apr 8, 2024
7
NINIVAGGI, JENNIFER
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual APPLETON, WI
$6,600
Apr 9, 2024
8
CHARLES, DAVID R
CASH DEPOT • PRESIDENT
Individual NEW FRANKEN, WI
$6,600
May 16, 2024
9
GREENE, JAMES
WG&R FURNITURE CO • CHAIRMAN
Individual DE PERE, WI
$6,600
May 1, 2024
10
GREENE, MEGHAN
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
Individual DE PERE, WI
$6,600
May 1, 2024

Rep. Miller, Mary E. [R-IL-15]

ID: M001211

Top Contributors

10

1
WINRED PAC
PAC ARLINGTON, VA
$13,010
Mar 31, 2023
2
SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA
COM TAMA, IA
$1,000
Aug 11, 2023
3
RENEWABLE ENERGY, CITIZENS FOR
COM MADISON, WI
$500
Aug 20, 2024
4
POLITICAL COMMITTEE, NWF ACTION FUND
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Sep 18, 2024
5
ADAMS MEMORIALS
Organization CHARLESTON, IL
$1,000
Mar 23, 2023
6
VAHLING VINEYARDS
Organization STEWARDSON, IL
$500
Jan 11, 2024
7
THE CHICKASAW NATION
Organization ADA, OK
$1,000
Jun 20, 2023
8
US MARSHALS SERVICES
Organization NEW YORK, NY
$2,900
Apr 20, 2023
9
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
Organization RICHMOND, VA
$1,000
Mar 22, 2023
10
KASPAR, SCOTT
KASPAR LAW COMPANY • LAWYER
Individual ORLAND PARK, IL
$13,200
Mar 22, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 40 nodes and 40 connections

Total contributions: $264,088

Top Donors - Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC3 Orgs19 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. Higher similarity scores indicate stronger thematic connections.

Introduction

Low 47.0%
Pages: 174-176

— 141 — Department of Homeland Security enforcement. To return ICE to its primary mission, any new Administration that wishes to restore the rule of law to our immigration enforcement efforts should: l Order ICE to stop closing out pending immigration cases and apply the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as written by Congress.3 The Biden Administration closed out tens of thousands of immigration cases that had already been prepared and were slated for expedited removal processing or hearings before the U.S. Immigration Court. This misguided action constituted an egregious example of lawlessness that allowed thousands of illegal aliens and other immigration violators to go free in the United States. l Direct ICE to stop ignoring criminal aliens identified through the 287(g) program.4 Ultimately, Congress should prevent ICE from ignoring criminal aliens identified by local law enforcement agencies that are partners in the 287(g) program. However, before congressional action, ICE should be directed to take custody of all aliens with records for felonies, crimes of violence, DUIs, previous removals, and any other crime that is considered a national security or public safety threat as defined under current laws. l Eliminate T and U visas. Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit. If an alien who was a trafficking or crime victim is actively and significantly cooperating with law enforcement as a witness, the S visa is already available and should be used. Pending elimination of the T and U visas, the Secretary should significantly restrict eligibility for each visa to prevent fraud. l Issue clear guidance regarding detention and bond for aliens. Thousands of illegal aliens are allowed to bond out of immigration detention only to disappear into the interior of the United States where many commit crimes and many others disappear, never to be heard from again. This occurs primarily because of poorly worded bond regulations, contradictory bond policy memoranda, and poor practices for managing released aliens and the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) Program, which requires significant reform. l Prioritize national security in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). ICE should end its current cozy deference to educational institutions and remove security risks from the program. This requires working with the Department of State to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of visas issued to foreign students from enemy nations. — 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Introduction

Low 47.0%
Pages: 174-176

— 141 — Department of Homeland Security enforcement. To return ICE to its primary mission, any new Administration that wishes to restore the rule of law to our immigration enforcement efforts should: l Order ICE to stop closing out pending immigration cases and apply the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as written by Congress.3 The Biden Administration closed out tens of thousands of immigration cases that had already been prepared and were slated for expedited removal processing or hearings before the U.S. Immigration Court. This misguided action constituted an egregious example of lawlessness that allowed thousands of illegal aliens and other immigration violators to go free in the United States. l Direct ICE to stop ignoring criminal aliens identified through the 287(g) program.4 Ultimately, Congress should prevent ICE from ignoring criminal aliens identified by local law enforcement agencies that are partners in the 287(g) program. However, before congressional action, ICE should be directed to take custody of all aliens with records for felonies, crimes of violence, DUIs, previous removals, and any other crime that is considered a national security or public safety threat as defined under current laws. l Eliminate T and U visas. Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit. If an alien who was a trafficking or crime victim is actively and significantly cooperating with law enforcement as a witness, the S visa is already available and should be used. Pending elimination of the T and U visas, the Secretary should significantly restrict eligibility for each visa to prevent fraud. l Issue clear guidance regarding detention and bond for aliens. Thousands of illegal aliens are allowed to bond out of immigration detention only to disappear into the interior of the United States where many commit crimes and many others disappear, never to be heard from again. This occurs primarily because of poorly worded bond regulations, contradictory bond policy memoranda, and poor practices for managing released aliens and the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) Program, which requires significant reform. l Prioritize national security in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). ICE should end its current cozy deference to educational institutions and remove security risks from the program. This requires working with the Department of State to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of visas issued to foreign students from enemy nations.

Introduction

Low 46.6%
Pages: 30-32

— xxix — Contributors Marlo Lewis, Competitive Enterprise Institute Ben Lieberman, Competitive Enterprise Institute John Ligon Evelyn Lim, American Cornerstone Institute Mario Loyola, Competitive Enterprise Institute John G. Malcolm, The Heritage Foundation Joseph Masterman, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC Earl Matthews, The Vandenberg Coalition Dan Mauler, Heritage Action for America Drew McCall, American Cornerstone Institute Trent McCotter, Boyden Gray & Associates Micah Meadowcroft, The American Conservative Edwin Meese III, The Heritage Foundation Jessica Melugin, Competitive Enterprise Institute Frank Mermoud, Orpheus International Mark Miller, Office of Governor Kristi Noem Cleta Mitchell, Conservative Partnership Institute Kevin E. Moley Caitlin Moon, American Center for Law & Justice Clare Morell, Ethics and Public Policy Center Mark Morgan, The Heritage Foundation Hunter Morgen, American Cornerstone Institute Rachel Morrison, Ethics and Public Policy Center Jonathan Moy, The Heritage Foundation Iain Murray, Competitive Enterprise Institute Ryan Nabil, National Taxpayers Union Michael Nasi, Jackson Walker LLP Lucien Niemeyer, The Niemeyer Group, LLC Nazak Nikakhtar Milan “Mitch” Nikolich Matt O’Brien, Immigration Reform Law Institute Caleb Orr, Boyden Gray & Associates Michael Pack Leah Pedersen Michael Pillsbury, The Heritage Foundation Patrick Pizzella, Leadership Institute Robert Poole, Reason Foundation Christopher B. Porter Kevin Preskenis, Allymar Health Solutions Pam Pryor, National Committee for Religious Freedom Thomas Pyle, Institute for Energy Research John Ratcliffe, American Global Strategies

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.