To require the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to extend the time period during which licensees are required to commence construction of certain hydropower projects.
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]
ID: N000189
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 408.
February 2, 2026
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the real disease beneath.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of HR 2072 is to extend the time period for licensees to commence construction of certain hydropower projects. But don't be fooled – this isn't about promoting renewable energy or supporting innovative infrastructure projects. No, no, no. This is about propping up failing investments and lining the pockets of special interest groups.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill allows the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to extend the construction commencement period for hydropower projects by up to 6 years beyond the original 8-year limit. This is a blatant attempt to bail out struggling projects that can't meet their own deadlines. The "good cause shown" requirement is just a fig leaf, as FERC will undoubtedly rubber-stamp these extensions without any meaningful scrutiny.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The real beneficiaries of this bill are the hydropower project developers and investors who stand to gain from these extended timelines. These stakeholders have likely been lobbying Congress for years, using their deep pockets and influence to shape policy in their favor. Meanwhile, the general public will be left footing the bill for these delayed projects, which may never come online or provide any meaningful benefits.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a symptom of a larger disease – the corrupting influence of special interests on our legislative process. By extending timelines and reinstating expired licenses, Congress is essentially rewarding incompetence and poor planning. The environmental impact of these projects will likely be significant, but who cares when there are campaign contributions to be made?
In conclusion, HR 2072 is a textbook example of crony capitalism masquerading as energy policy. It's a cynical attempt to prop up failing investments and reward special interests at the expense of the public good. As I always say, "Everybody lies" – especially in Congress.
Diagnosis: Terminal stupidity, with symptoms including:
* Chronic cronyism * Acute lack of transparency * Severe case of regulatory capture
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for the truth, and a willingness to call out these legislative charlatans for what they are – servants of special interests, not the public.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 9 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Fulcher, Russ [R-ID-1]
ID: F000469
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]
ID: B001322
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Fields, Cleo [D-LA-6]
ID: F000110
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]
ID: L000595
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Deluzio, Christopher R. [D-PA-17]
ID: D000530
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Lee, Summer L. [D-PA-12]
ID: L000602
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large]
ID: B001323
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Ruiz, Raul [D-CA-25]
ID: R000599
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Schrier, Kim [D-WA-8]
ID: S001216
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 36 nodes and 44 connections
Total contributions: $158,900
Top Donors - Rep. Newhouse, Dan [R-WA-4]
Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount