Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/23

Last Updated: July 12, 2026

Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act

HR. 23, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$140,100 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Homeland Security" section, p. 174-176 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure not invoked in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 54 - 45. Record Vote Number: 22. (CR S410)

January 27, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act, HR 23, is a bill that seeks to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) for its efforts to investigate and prosecute individuals from the United States and its allies, particularly Israel. As a self-serving billionaire with interests in global markets and geopolitics, I'll analyze this bill through the lens of wealth and power implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 23 is to shield the United States, Israel, and their allies from ICC investigations and prosecutions. The bill aims to undermine the ICC's legitimacy and jurisdiction over non-state parties, effectively creating a double standard in international law.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** HR 23 introduces several key provisions:

1. Sanctions against foreign individuals and entities that aid or support ICC efforts to investigate or prosecute protected persons. 2. Property blocking and asset freezes for sanctioned individuals and entities. 3. Visa restrictions and revocation for aliens subject to sanctions.

These provisions build upon existing laws, such as the American Servicemembers' Protection Act (2002), which aimed to protect US military personnel from ICC prosecution.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders affected by HR 23 include:

1. The International Criminal Court and its officials. 2. Foreign individuals and entities that support or aid ICC efforts. 3. Protected persons, including US and Israeli officials, military personnel, and allies. 4. Global markets and investors, as sanctions and asset freezes may impact international trade and finance.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** HR 23 has significant implications for global governance, international law, and the balance of power:

1. **Undermining International Institutions:** By targeting the ICC, HR 23 erodes the legitimacy of international institutions and sets a precedent for other nations to disregard or undermine global governance frameworks. 2. **Escalating Global Tensions:** Sanctions and visa restrictions may exacerbate tensions between the United States, Israel, and their allies, on one hand, and countries that support the ICC's efforts, on the other. 3. **Consolidation of Power:** HR 23 reinforces the notion that powerful nations can disregard international law and institutions with impunity, further entrenching a system of might-makes-right geopolitics.

As a self-serving billionaire, I recognize that HR 23 presents opportunities for consolidation and deregulation in global markets. By undermining international institutions and promoting a Wild West approach to geopolitics, this bill may create new avenues for profit and influence. However, it also carries significant risks, including the potential for escalating global tensions and destabilizing international relations.

In conclusion, HR 23 is a calculated move by the United States to assert its dominance in global affairs, disregarding the principles of international law and institutions. As a billionaire with interests in global markets, I will closely monitor this bill's progress and adapt my strategies accordingly.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics, a bill is a proposed law that must go through various stages before becoming an actual law. This one, HR 23, is titled the "Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act."

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to impose sanctions on individuals and entities involved with the International Criminal Court (ICC) if they attempt to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute certain protected persons, including U.S. military personnel, officials, and allies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 2 outlines Congress's findings, which include the ICC's alleged illegitimacy and lack of jurisdiction over the United States and Israel. Section 3 introduces sanctions against foreign individuals who aid or support the ICC's efforts to investigate or prosecute protected persons. These sanctions include property blocking, visa revocation, and inadmissibility to the United States.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* The International Criminal Court (ICC) * Foreign individuals and entities involved with the ICC * Protected persons, including U.S. military personnel, officials, and allies * The President of the United States, who is authorized to impose sanctions

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, this bill could lead to increased tensions between the United States and the ICC, as well as other countries that support the court's jurisdiction. It may also create a precedent for the United States to unilaterally impose sanctions on international organizations and individuals who disagree with its policies.

As we covered in 8th grade civics, this bill would need to pass both the House of Representatives and the Senate before being signed into law by the President. However, given the current state of politics, it's anyone's guess how this will play out. *Sigh* It's a shame that some adults don't seem to remember the basics of how our legislative system works...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 23, and it's a doozy. This bill is like a puzzle piece in the grand scheme of global manipulation. Let me break it down for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act aims to counter the International Criminal Court's (ICC) efforts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute individuals from the United States and its allies, particularly Israel. The bill claims the ICC has no legitimacy or jurisdiction over these countries since they're not parties to the Rome Statute.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

This bill introduces new sanctions against foreign persons who aid the ICC in investigating or prosecuting protected individuals (i.e., US citizens and allies). These sanctions include:

1. Property blocking: Freezing assets of targeted individuals within the United States. 2. Visa restrictions: Denying visas, admission, or parole to affected aliens.

The bill also empowers the President to implement these measures using existing authorities under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill directly affects:

1. The International Criminal Court (ICC) 2. Foreign persons who aid the ICC in investigating or prosecuting protected individuals 3. Protected individuals, including US citizens and allies (notably Israel)

Indirectly affected parties include:

1. Human rights organizations and advocates pushing for accountability through international courts 2. Countries that are party to the Rome Statute and support the ICC's jurisdiction

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill has far-reaching implications:

1. **Escalating tensions**: By imposing sanctions, the US is essentially declaring war on the ICC, which could lead to a global backlash. 2. **Undermining international law**: The bill challenges the legitimacy of the ICC and undermines efforts to hold individuals accountable for war crimes and human rights abuses. 3. **Shielding allies from accountability**: By protecting Israeli officials from prosecution, the US is sending a message that its allies are above the law.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle, this bill seems reasonable; it's just defending our country and allies." Ah, my friends, don't be fooled! This is just another example of the government hiding its true agenda in plain sight. Think about it:

* Why is the US so adamant about shielding Israel from accountability? * What other interests are at play here? * How does this bill fit into the larger scheme of global politics and power struggles?

The truth, my friends, is that this bill is just a small part of a much larger game. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Folks, we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act, HR 23, is a masterclass in defending freedom and sovereignty against the elitist, globalist forces that seek to undermine our great nation.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about pushing back against the International Criminal Court's (ICC) overreach. The ICC thinks it can just waltz in here and start investigating our allies, like Israel? No way, José! This bill says, "Not on our watch." Its main objective is to impose sanctions on anyone who dares to aid the ICC in its illegitimate efforts.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the President to impose sanctions on foreign individuals and entities that assist the ICC in investigating or prosecuting protected persons (i.e., US citizens, officials, and allies). This includes blocking property transactions, revoking visas, and imposing penalties. It's a bold move, folks, and it sends a clear message: we won't let the ICC bully us around.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The ICC, of course, is the primary target here. But also affected are foreign individuals and entities that might be tempted to collaborate with the ICC. And let's not forget our allies, like Israel, who will benefit from this bill's protection. Oh, and the American people? We're the real winners here, folks. Our freedom and sovereignty are being defended against the forces of globalism.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a game-changer. It shows that we won't be pushed around by elitist international institutions. The ICC will think twice before messing with us or our allies again. And let's be real, folks, this is just the beginning. This bill sets a precedent for future pushback against globalist overreach.

(Smirk) Now, I know what you're thinking: "Isn't this just a bunch of saber-rattling?" Well, maybe it is. But hey, sometimes you gotta rattle those sabers to keep the elites in line. And trust me, folks, this bill will do just that.

(Outraged tone) So, let's get behind this bill and show the world what we're made of! We won't be intimidated by the ICC or any other globalist institution. It's time to stand up for freedom, sovereignty, and American exceptionalism!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the United States Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose its true nature.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (HR 23) is a thinly veiled attempt to shield American and Israeli officials from accountability for war crimes and human rights abuses. The bill's primary objective is to intimidate the International Criminal Court (ICC) into dropping its investigations and prosecutions of protected persons, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill imposes sanctions on any foreign person or entity that aids the ICC in investigating, arresting, detaining, or prosecuting American or Israeli officials. These sanctions include property blocking, visa revocation, and penalties for violating the act. The legislation also reaffirms the bipartisan American Servicemembers' Protection Act of 2002, which aimed to protect U.S. military personnel from international prosecution.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The ICC, its officials, and any foreign persons or entities that cooperate with the court are directly affected by this bill. Indirectly, the legislation impacts victims of war crimes and human rights abuses who seek justice through the ICC. American and Israeli officials, particularly those implicated in alleged war crimes, stand to benefit from this legislation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a blatant attempt to undermine international law and the rule of law. By threatening sanctions against anyone who cooperates with the ICC, the United States is effectively trying to strong-arm the court into dropping its investigations. This sets a dangerous precedent, as it allows powerful nations to dictate what constitutes "legitimate" justice.

In reality, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the corrupting influence of power and the willingness of politicians to sacrifice principles for short-term gains. The sponsors of this bill are either grossly ignorant of international law or deliberately trying to subvert it. Either way, their actions demonstrate a staggering lack of integrity.

In medical terms, this legislation is akin to a patient with a severe case of " politician-itis" – a condition characterized by an inflated sense of self-importance, a complete disregard for facts, and a willingness to sacrifice the well-being of others for personal gain. The treatment? A healthy dose of skepticism, a strong immune system (i.e., critical thinking), and a commitment to upholding the principles of justice and accountability.

In conclusion, HR 23 is a shameful example of legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to shield powerful individuals from accountability, dressed in the language of patriotism and national security. Don't be fooled – this bill is a poison pill that undermines the very fabric of international law and human rights.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Main Purpose and Objectives**

The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (HR 23) aims to counter the International Criminal Court's (ICC) efforts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute individuals from the United States and its allies, particularly Israel. The bill seeks to protect American servicemembers, officials, and those of allied countries from potential ICC prosecution.

**Key Provisions and Changes to Existing Law**

The bill imposes sanctions on foreign persons who:

1. Directly engage in or aid ICC efforts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute protected individuals. 2. Materially assist or provide support for such ICC efforts. 3. Are owned or controlled by, or act on behalf of, individuals engaging in such ICC efforts.

Sanctions include:

1. Property blocking: freezing assets and prohibiting transactions in the United States. 2. Visa restrictions: making aliens inadmissible to the United States, ineligible for visas, and revoking existing visas.

The bill also authorizes the President to implement these sanctions using authorities provided under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

**Affected Parties and Stakeholders**

1. The International Criminal Court (ICC) 2. Foreign persons who engage in or support ICC efforts against protected individuals 3. Protected individuals, including: * United States military personnel and officials * Officials and military personnel of allied countries that have not consented to ICC jurisdiction * Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant (specifically mentioned in the bill) 4. The United States government, particularly the President and relevant agencies

**Potential Impact and Implications**

1. Escalation of tensions between the United States and the ICC: The bill's sanctions may be seen as an attempt to undermine the ICC's authority and legitimacy. 2. Protection of American servicemembers and officials: The bill aims to safeguard individuals from potential ICC prosecution, which could have significant implications for U.S. foreign policy and national security. 3. Impact on international cooperation: The bill's provisions may affect cooperation between the United States and other countries that are parties to the Rome Statute or support the ICC's efforts. 4. Potential consequences for Israeli officials: The bill specifically condemns the ICC's actions against Netanyahu and Gallant, which could have implications for Israel's relations with the international community.

Overall, the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act reflects a strong stance by the U.S. Congress against the ICC's perceived overreach and aims to protect American interests and those of its allies.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

I'm gonna break down this gnarly bill for ya, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (HR 23) is all about pushin' back against the International Criminal Court (ICC). The main goal is to protect American and Israeli officials from gettin' investigated or prosecuted by the ICC. Congress thinks the ICC has no jurisdiction over the US or Israel, so they're tryin' to impose sanctions on anyone who helps the ICC go after these countries.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill's got some key provisions:

* Imposes sanctions on foreign individuals and entities that help the ICC investigate or prosecute American or Israeli officials. * Blocks property transactions and prohibits visas for those subject to sanctions. * Allows the President to use emergency economic powers to enforce these sanctions.

This bill changes existing law by addin' new sanctions and penalties for anyone who helps the ICC go after protected persons. It's also a big deal because it shows Congress is willing to take a hard stance against international courts they don't agree with.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The main parties affected are:

* American and Israeli officials, including military personnel and government leaders. * Foreign individuals and entities that help the ICC investigate or prosecute these officials. * The International Criminal Court itself, which could face sanctions and pressure from the US.

Other stakeholders include human rights groups, international organizations, and countries that support the ICC. They might see this bill as a threat to international justice and accountability.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The potential impact is huge, bro:

* This bill could escalate tensions between the US and the ICC, makin' it harder for the court to do its job. * It could also set a bad precedent for other countries to disregard international courts and laws. * On the flip side, some people might see this as a necessary move to protect American and Israeli interests.

But here's the thing, dude: this bill is all about politics and power. It's not just about protectin' officials; it's also about sendin' a message to the ICC and other international organizations. The implications are far-reaching, and we'll have to wait and see how it all plays out, man.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: HR 23 - Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act (HR 23) aims to counter the International Criminal Court's (ICC) efforts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute individuals from the United States and its allies, particularly Israel. The bill seeks to impose sanctions on foreign persons who aid or support the ICC in these endeavors.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill:

1. Finds that the ICC has no legitimacy or jurisdiction over the United States or Israel. 2. Condemns the ICC's actions against Israeli officials, including the issuance of arrest warrants. 3. Imposes sanctions on foreign persons who: * Directly engage in or aid the ICC's efforts to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute protected individuals. * Materially assist, sponsor, or provide financial support for such efforts. * Are owned or controlled by, or act on behalf of, individuals who engage in these activities. 4. Applies sanctions to immediate family members of sanctioned foreign persons.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

1. **International Criminal Court (ICC)**: The bill directly targets the ICC's actions and imposes sanctions on those who support its efforts against the United States and its allies. 2. **Israel**: As a key ally, Israel is explicitly mentioned in the bill, and the legislation aims to protect its officials from ICC prosecution. 3. **United States**: The bill seeks to shield U.S. military personnel, officials, and allies from ICC jurisdiction. 4. **Foreign persons and entities**: Those who aid or support the ICC's efforts against protected individuals will face sanctions.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

1. **Escalation of tensions with the ICC**: The bill may exacerbate existing tensions between the United States and the ICC, potentially leading to further diplomatic fallout. 2. **Protection of U.S. interests**: By imposing sanctions on those who support the ICC's efforts against protected individuals, the bill aims to safeguard U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. 3. **Impact on international cooperation**: The legislation may undermine international cooperation on human rights and accountability issues, as it seeks to shield certain individuals from prosecution.

**Monied Interest Analysis**

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has been a vocal supporter of this bill, reflecting the strong ties between the U.S. pro-Israel lobby and lawmakers who sponsored the legislation. Other organizations, such as the Republican Jewish Coalition, have also expressed support for the bill. The influence of these groups is evident in the bill's language and objectives, which prioritize protecting Israel from ICC prosecution.

**Committee Capture**

The House Foreign Affairs Committee, which has jurisdiction over this bill, has a history of being influenced by pro-Israel lobby groups. This may contribute to the committee's support for legislation that prioritizes Israeli interests over international cooperation on human rights issues.

In conclusion, HR

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$140,100

21 donors

PACs

Organizations

$1,000

Committees

Individuals

$139,100

No PAC contributions found

HOOVER SLOVACEK LLP

1 transaction

$1,000

No committee contributions found

DYER, DON

1 transaction

$13,300

COOPER, CHARLES

1 transaction

$7,000

HELD, DR. KRISTIN STORY

1 transaction

$6,600

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J. MS.

1 transaction

$6,600

COWDEN, DUKE

1 transaction

$6,600

MARSHALL, EVERETT PIERCE JR

1 transaction

$6,600

RATHBONE, MONROE JACK

1 transaction

$6,600

RATHBONE, RANDEE

1 transaction

$6,600

SPEAR, NANCY G.

1 transaction

$6,600

SPEAR, NELSON B.

1 transaction

$6,600

ANGELO, ERNEST JR

1 transaction

$6,600

HOLMES, MARY JANE

1 transaction

$6,600

HOLMES, WILLIAM L.

1 transaction

$6,600

PEROT, H ROSS JR.

1 transaction

$6,600

STALLINGS, JAMIE

1 transaction

$6,600

STALLINGS, KYLE L.

1 transaction

$6,600

ROSS, TARA

1 transaction

$6,600

COVINGTON, GARY N.

1 transaction

$6,600

DUKE, HEIDI

1 transaction

$6,600

HILL, HARLAN

1 transaction

$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Mast, Brian J. [R-FL-21]

ID: M001199

Top Contributors

AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$5,500

Dec 31, 2023

WINRED

PACARLINGTON, VA

$1,000

Aug 14, 2024

AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$350

Aug 7, 2024

HART, NANCY MRS.

NONE • HOMEMAKER

IndividualPALM BEACH GARDENS, FL

$6,600

Feb 16, 2024

LIPSCHULTZ, MARC MR.

BLUE OWL CAPITAL • INVESTMENTS

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Mar 14, 2024

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA MISS

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jun 12, 2023

LEVY, EDWARD JR.

EDW C LEVY CO • CHAIRMAN

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

May 1, 2024

LEVY, EDWARD JR.

EDW C LEVY CO • CHAIRMAN

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$6,600

Jul 25, 2024

PIKE, ROBERT

SELF EMPLOYED • TRANSPORTATION

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, AL

$6,534

Aug 2, 2023

BAKER, MAXINE

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualZANESVILLE, OH

$5,352

Jun 14, 2023

Rep. McCaul, Michael T. [R-TX-10]

ID: M001157

Top Contributors

SOUTH SPUR LP

OrganizationHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Jan 31, 2024

TRACEY FOX KING & WALTERS

OrganizationHOUSTON, TX

$1,000

Feb 17, 2023

CHILDS, JOHN W.

JW CHILDS ASSOCIATES • OWNER

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$50,000

Dec 12, 2023

LANIER, BECKY MRS.

LANIER LAW FIRM • ATTORNEY

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Mar 4, 2024

LANIER, MARK W.

LANIER LAW FIRM • ATTORNEY

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$50,000

Mar 4, 2024

CHILDS, JOHN W

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$38,400

Mar 15, 2024

CHILDS, JOHN W.

JW CHILDS ASSOCIATES • OWNER

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$38,400

May 7, 2024

CHILDS, JOHN W

IndividualVERO BEACH, FL

$33,400

Nov 14, 2024

CARLTON, C. CRAIG MR.

C.C. CARLTON INDUSTRIES • OWNER

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$25,000

Feb 13, 2024

LUROS, HILARY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSUGAR LAND, TX

$25,000

Feb 27, 2024

Rep. Crenshaw, Dan [R-TX-2]

ID: C001120

Top Contributors

CHEVRON

OrganizationSAN RAMON, CA

$5,000

Sep 4, 2024

COMPLETE EMERGENCY CARE HOLDING LLC

OrganizationSOUTHLAKE, TX

$3,500

Mar 11, 2024

SANDLIAN REALTY

OrganizationWICHITA, KS

$1,000

Feb 7, 2024

ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE

OrganizationLIVINGSTON, TX

$1,000

Sep 30, 2024

RUSSELL W H KRIDEL MD PA

OrganizationHOUSTON, TX

$250

Feb 28, 2023

JONES RANCH LLC

OrganizationCORPUS CHRISTI, TX

$250

Mar 13, 2024

MAFRIGE, DAVID

SELF • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 21, 2023

MAFRIGE, DAVID

SELF • COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 21, 2023

ODEN, KEITH

CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST • EXECUTIVE VICE CHAIRMAN

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 27, 2023

ODEN, KEITH

CAMDEN PROPERTY TRUST • EXECUTIVE VICE CHAIRMAN

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$9,900

Jun 27, 2023

Rep. Higgins, Clay [R-LA-3]

ID: H001077

Top Contributors

HEBERT, MARC

JONES WALKER • ATTORNEY

IndividualMETAIRIE, LA

$3,500

Sep 8, 2024

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

B&G FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC. • CORP. SECRETARY

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Nov 25, 2024

FREY, GERARD A.

SELF EMPLOYED • FARMERS

IndividualIOTA, LA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

CRAPPEL, ADAM

AE OFFICE MACHINES • PRESIDENT

IndividualPATTERSON, LA

$3,300

Mar 31, 2023

UIHLEIN, RICHARD

ULINE • CEO

IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL

$3,300

Jan 26, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

BOLLINGER, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW ORLEANS, LA

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

COOLEY, WILLIAM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

HAMER, GREGORY J MR. SR

BG FOOD ENTERPRISES LLC • EXECUTIVE

IndividualMORGAN CITY, LA

$3,300

Mar 12, 2024

DAVIS, JORDAN

WESTERN CONSTRUCTION ROOFING • SALES PROJECT MANAGER

IndividualHARRISON, ID

$3,300

Jan 9, 2024

Rep. Fleischmann, Charles J. "Chuck" [R-TN-3]

ID: F000459

Top Contributors

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Mar 28, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 30, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$2,500

Mar 28, 2023

BARKER FOR SHERIFF

OrganizationCLINTON, TN

$1,000

Mar 16, 2023

CARBON RIVERS, INC.

OrganizationKNOXVILLE, TN

$1,000

Mar 16, 2023

HIGGINS, KENNETH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualMCDONALD, TN

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

HIGGINS, PHILIP

FIDEM ENERGY • CO CEO

IndividualCLEVELAND, TN

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

JOHNSTON, BENJAMIN

FIDEM ENERGY • PRESIDENT

IndividualLOOKOUT MTN, GA

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

JONES, JOHN BAILEY

NONE • STUDENT

IndividualCLEVELAND, TN

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

RICHARDS, CHRISTINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBARLETT, TN

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

Rep. Finstad, Brad [R-MN-1]

ID: F000475

Top Contributors

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

COMPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

May 29, 2024

PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCIL

COMWELCH, MN

$2,500

Feb 15, 2023

REPUBLICAN MAINSTREET PARTNERSHIP PAC

PACWASHINGTON, DC

$1,000

Jul 28, 2023

WATONWAN COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY

COMSAINT JAMES, MN

$800

May 30, 2024

ANDERSON, ROLLIS H

ANDERSON TRUCKING SERVICE • CEO

IndividualSAINT CLOUD, MN

$13,200

Mar 20, 2024

KROLL, MARK W

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCRYSTAL BAY, MN

$13,200

Mar 31, 2023

SONNEK, KATHLEEN M

SELF • WRITER

IndividualLAKE CRYSTAL, MN

$10,000

Sep 21, 2023

HALKYARD, JONATHAN

MGM RESORTS • CFO

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$9,423

Mar 26, 2024

KING, RUSSELL S

KING CAPITAL LLC • CEO

IndividualMINNEAPOLIS, MN

$6,870

Dec 24, 2023

MILLER, HUGH L

RTP COMPANY • PRESIDENT

IndividualWINONA, MN

$6,600

Mar 28, 2024

Rep. Cline, Ben [R-VA-6]

ID: C001118

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

Oct 31, 2023

JOHNSON, CAMERON MR.

MAGIC CITY FORD • CAR DEALER

IndividualROANOKE, VA

$3,300

Nov 21, 2024

ROSENBERG, DIANE MS.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualROANOKE, VA

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

STOLTZFUS, MELISSA

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualBRIDGEWATER, VA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

STOLTZFUS, MICHAEL

DYNAMIC AVIATION • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualBRIDGEWATER, VA

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

STOLTZFUS, MICHAEL

DYNAMIC AVIATION • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualBRIDGEWATER, VA

$3,300

Nov 13, 2024

CLINE, JULIA S MRS.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLEXINGTON, VA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

CLINE, JULIA S MRS.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLEXINGTON, VA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

CARTLEDGE, GEORGE B MR. III

GRAND HOME FURNISHINGS • PRESIDENT

IndividualROANOKE, VA

$3,300

Mar 30, 2023

CARTLEDGE, GEORGE B MR. III

GRAND HOME FURNISHINGS • PRESIDENT

IndividualROANOKE, VA

$3,300

Mar 30, 2023

Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]

ID: B001302

Top Contributors

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 15, 2023

TAYLOR, MARGARETTA J

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Dec 15, 2023

MCCLEVE, LONNIE

SELF EMPLOYED • DEVELOPER

IndividualQUEEN CREEK, AZ

$3,300

Oct 16, 2023

BENSON, LEE

LEE BENSON • CEO

IndividualMESA, AZ

$3,300

Oct 18, 2023

FAUST, ANNE R

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEWTOWN SQUARE, PA

$3,300

Oct 6, 2023

BENSON, LEE

LEE BENSON • CEO

IndividualMESA, AZ

$3,300

Oct 18, 2023

BROPHY, DANIEL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualJACKSON, WY

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

LONDEN, PRISCILLA

LONDEN INSURANCE GROUP • EXECUTIVE

IndividualPHOENIX, AZ

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

ALLEN, GWYNDA S

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSUN LAKES, AZ

$3,300

Mar 22, 2023

COOLEY, WILLIAM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL

$3,300

Mar 7, 2023

Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]

ID: A000375

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 20, 2023

1349 FOOD & FIBER

OrganizationBEEVILLE, TX

$500

May 16, 2023

KIMBER, SHELDON

INTERSECT POWER • CEO

IndividualTRUCKEE, CA

$5,000

Sep 12, 2024

LEPRINO, TERRY

LEPRINO FOODS • BOARD DIRECTOR

IndividualDENVER, CO

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

ZAFFIRINI, CARLOS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$3,300

Dec 13, 2024

ZAFFIRINI, CARLOS

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$3,300

Dec 13, 2024

JOHNSON, CLAY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualAUSTIN, TX

$3,300

Dec 13, 2024

STENSON, ERIC

STENSON TAMADDON • CEO

IndividualPHOENIX, AZ

$3,300

Oct 27, 2023

MCCLELLAND, GAY L.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualOLNEY, TX

$3,300

Nov 3, 2023

MCCLELLAND, MARK

TOWER EXTRUSION, LLC • PRESIDENT

IndividualOLNEY, TX

$3,300

Nov 3, 2023

Rep. Houchin, Erin [R-IN-9]

ID: H001093

Top Contributors

HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA

OrganizationUPPER LAKE, CA

$3,300

Aug 3, 2023

OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationRED ROCK, OK

$3,300

Aug 3, 2023

TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA

OrganizationBELCOURT, ND

$3,300

Aug 3, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 19, 2023

BANKE, BARBARA

JACKSON FAMILY FOUNDATION • EXECUTIVE

IndividualGEYSERVILLE, CA

$6,600

Dec 7, 2023

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Mar 6, 2024

GRIFFIN, KENNETH

CITADEL LLC • FOUNDER CEO

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$6,600

Apr 10, 2023

ROWAN, CAROLYN

CAROLYN ROWAN COLLECTION LLC • EXECUTIVE

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Jun 28, 2023

ROWAN, MARC

APOLLO MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS • EXECUTIVE

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$6,600

Jun 28, 2023

KIESLER, DOUGLAS M MR.

KIESLER POLICE SUPPLY, INC. • CEO

IndividualGREENVILLE, IN

$6,600

Feb 22, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 56 nodes and 36 connections (41 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $229,950

Top Donors - Rep. Roy, Chip [R-TX-21]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

1 Org20 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 66%

Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 DHS section emphasize national security and protecting U.S. interests, but the bill focuses on sanctioning the ICC to shield U.S. and allied officials from international prosecution, whereas the Project 2025 policy concerns domestic immigration enforcement, ICE operations, and visa reforms, resulting only tangential overlap."

Key themes:national securityprotection of US officialssanctionssovereigntyexecutive authority

— 141 — Department of Homeland Security enforcement. To return ICE to its primary mission, any new Administration that wishes to restore the rule of law to our immigration enforcement efforts should: l Order ICE to stop closing out pending immigration cases and apply the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) as written by Congress.3 The Biden Administration closed out tens of thousands of immigration cases that had already been prepared and were slated for expedited removal processing or hearings before the U.S. Immigration Court. This misguided action constituted an egregious example of lawlessness that allowed thousands of illegal aliens and other immigration violators to go free in the United States. l Direct ICE to stop ignoring criminal aliens identified through the 287(g) program.4 Ultimately, Congress should prevent ICE from ignoring criminal aliens identified by local law enforcement agencies that are partners in the 287(g) program. However, before congressional action, ICE should be directed to take custody of all aliens with records for felonies, crimes of violence, DUIs, previous removals, and any other crime that is considered a national security or public safety threat as defined under current laws. l Eliminate T and U visas. Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit. If an alien who was a trafficking or crime victim is actively and significantly cooperating with law enforcement as a witness, the S visa is already available and should be used. Pending elimination of the T and U visas, the Secretary should significantly restrict eligibility for each visa to prevent fraud. l Issue clear guidance regarding detention and bond for aliens. Thousands of illegal aliens are allowed to bond out of immigration detention only to disappear into the interior of the United States where many commit crimes and many others disappear, never to be heard from again. This occurs primarily because of poorly worded bond regulations, contradictory bond policy memoranda, and poor practices for managing released aliens and the Alternatives to Detention (ATD) Program, which requires significant reform. l Prioritize national security in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP). ICE should end its current cozy deference to educational institutions and remove security risks from the program. This requires working with the Department of State to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of visas issued to foreign students from enemy nations. — 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 65%

Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on imposing sanctions, including visa restrictions, on foreign individuals supporting ICC investigations of U.S. and allied officials, while the Project 2025 DHS section concerns immigration enforcement reforms such as visa eligibility changes, detention policies, and prioritizing national security in visa programs. Both touch on visa policy and national security, but their primary objectives and mechanisms are unrelated."

Key themes:visa policynational securityimmigration enforcement

Department of Homeland Security

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 174-176AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 DHS section emphasize national security and protecting Americans from external threats, but the bill focuses on imposing sanctions against the ICC while the Project 2025 text centers on immigration enforcement, detention, and vetting reforms within DHS agencies."

Key themes:national securityprotecting US personsexecutive authorityvetting/screening

— 142 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Most of the foregoing can be accomplished rapidly and effectively through exec- utive action that is both lawful and appropriate. Additionally, ICE should clarify who is responsible for enforcing its criminal and civil authorities. It should also remove self-imposed limitations on its nationwide jurisdiction. l Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents in the 1811 series should enforce Title 8 and 18 crimes as the biggest part of their portfolio. Alien smuggling, trafficking, and cross-border crime as defined under Title 85 and Title 186 should be the focus of ICE operations. l The role of ICE Deportation Officers should be clarified. ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) should be identified as being primarily responsible for enforcing civil immigration regulations, including the civil arrest, detention, and removal of immigration violators anywhere in the United States, without warrant where appropriate, subject only to the civil warrant requirements of the INA where appropriate. l All ICE memoranda identifying “sensitive zones” where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating should be rescinded. Rely on the good judgment of officers in the field to avoid inappropriate situations. l To maximize the efficient use of its resources, ICE should make full use of existing Expedited Removal (ER) authorities. The agency has limited the use of ER to eligible aliens apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This is not a statutory requirement. New Policies U.S. national security and public safety interests would be well-served if ICE were to be combined with CBP and USCIS, as mentioned above. Additionally, ICE/ HSI, along with CBP, should be full participants in the Intelligence Community. The use of Blackies Warrants should be operationalized within ICE. These civil search warrants are commonly used for worksite enforcement when agents have probable cause that illegal aliens are employed at a business. This would stream- line investigations. Safeguarding Americans will require not just securing the border, but con- tinuous vetting and investigations of many aliens who exploited President Biden’s open border for potentially nefarious purposes, including some Afghan evacuees sent directly to the U.S. during America’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. — 143 — Department of Homeland Security Budget l Congress should mandate and fund additional bed space for alien detainees. ICE should be funded for a significant increase in detention space, raising the daily available number of beds to 100,000. l Congress should fund ICE for at least 20,000 ERO officers and 5,000 Office of the Principal Legal Advisor (OPLA) attorneys. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the agency tasked with administering the legal immigration and certain temporary visa programs. Needed Reforms Since January 2021, USCIS’s priorities have been misaligned, and this has trans- formed it into an open-borders agency, ignoring the critical role that it plays in national security, public safety, and safeguarding the integrity of our immigration system. USCIS should be returned to operating as a screening and vetting agency. Regulatory efforts have focused on easing asylum eligibility in a manner that is guaranteed to exacerbate asylum fraud as people surge at the border. Emphasis also has been placed on removing legal barriers to immigration, such as the use of public benefits. These actions violate statutes, erode congressional intent, and provide a significant magnet for continued illegal immigration. Additionally, USCIS resources have been misappropriated to focus more on creating and expanding large-scale parole and temporary status programs that violate the law and are otherwise contrary to congressional intent instead of focus- ing on a more secure and efficient process for those who are seeking benefits. The ever-increasing number of applications filed has made it difficult to vet applica- tions adequately for eligibility, fraud, and specific national security and public safety problems. The Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) is currently a small directorate with assigned officers reporting through the chain of command in the field, and this has led to stovepiping, lack of coordination in national policy, and inconsistencies throughout the agency. To prioritize vetting and fraud detection, FDNS should undergo a structural shift focused on direct reporting from the field to headquarters, reclassification of leadership, and FDNS directives taking prece- dence over those of other component entities. Correcting the current misalignment of agency priorities and resources should begin with this primary shift in focus to vetting and fraud detection. These actions would reform the agency, returning it to its screening and vetting mission in protecting the homeland. Other structural changes should include reimplementation of the USCIS denat- uralization unit—an effort to maintain integrity in the system by identifying and

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 63%

Pages: 177-179AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on imposing sanctions against the International Criminal Court to protect U.S. and allied officials from prosecution, while the Project 2025 policy excerpt concerns immigration enforcement, denaturalization, and restructuring USCIS within DHS. There is no substantive overlap in subject matter or objectives."

— 144 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise prosecuting criminal and civil denaturalization cases, in combination with the Department of Justice, for aliens who obtained citizenship through fraud or other illicit means. Additionally, USCIS should create a criminal enforcement compo- nent within the agency to investigate immigration benefits fraud under Title 8 (perhaps requiring additional legislative and regulatory authorities for the offi- cers themselves) and to prosecute cases through Special Assistant U.S. Attorneys (SAUSAs) with substantive knowledge in the field. Particular attention should be given to addressing increasing incidents of forced labor trafficking in temporary work visa programs. While the Biden regulatory agenda has focused on at least two major rules—the credible fear rule and the public charge rule—USCIS has utilized other policy and internal procedural mechanisms to extend employment authorization to large groups of people who are in the country without legal status. The agency has taken quiet steps to cut corners and lessen adjudicatory standards. During a tran- sition period, a complete audit of agency policies, memoranda, and management directives issued during the Biden Administration should be completed, and rescis- sion documents should be prepared for issuance within the first few days of the incoming Administration. Additionally, regulatory documents should be drafted to review or reverse all regulations promulgated during the Biden Administration. New Policies To advance the national interest, the three core immigration agencies—USCIS, ICE, and CBP—should remerge and have immigration elements outside of DHS (such as ORR of HHS) included. The fragmented immigration enforcement frame- work that developed in the wake of the Homeland Security Act has weakened each agency and should be remediated. Combining these critical agencies would strengthen their capabilities, ensure cooperation, and promote information-shar- ing. Agency responsibilities and the delineation of authorities, such as inconsistent use of deferred action and issuance of NTAs by each agency, have long been a point of contention that would be addressed much more easily if they were recombined into a single entity. Alternatively, new policies for USCIS as it currently exists should focus on mat- ters that can be addressed through administrative action. l The workforce should be realigned and, as necessary, retrained on base eligibility and fraud detection rather than speed in processing. l Training should be returned to Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC), which would underscore the enforcement role of USCIS as a vetting agency, and be rebranded accordingly. — 145 — Department of Homeland Security l Management Directives and policies should realign to ensure that the workforce, while adaptable and able to handle the bulk of the USCIS mission, is not allowed to be pulled off mission work to focus on unlawful programs (DACA, mass parole for Afghans, Ukrainians, Venezuelans, etc.), which divert resources away from nuclear family and employment programs. The regulatory agenda should include the immediate submission of notices of proposed rulemaking for the Trump Administration’s public charge rule (includ- ing aspects from its original notice of proposed rulemaking), temporary work visa reform, employment authorization reform rules, asylum bars rule, and a third-country transit rule. At a minimum, an enhanced regulatory agenda should include rules strengthening the integrity of the asylum system, parole reform, and U visa reform that prioritizes relief for victims of heinous crimes and ensures that we protect the truest and most deserving victims of crime. Not all policy changes require formal rulemaking, however, as internal guidance documents are generally exempt under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).7 In this subregulatory space, USCIS policy memos and operational guidance should reduce the validity of employment authorization documents and end the COVID flexibilities, including the reliance on biometrics reuse. USCIS should also enforce existing regulations by rejecting incomplete applications and petitions, ensuring both that they are completed before accepted for filing and that FDNS signs off on all approved applications and petitions before approval notices are sent to the alien or petitioner. Other efforts should be focused on adjudication standards returning to nearly 100 percent interview requirements for all appropriate cases. The incoming Administration should spearhead an immigration legislative agenda focused on creating a merit-based immigration system that rewards high- skilled aliens instead of the current system that favors extended family–based and luck-of-the-draw immigration. To that end, the diversity visa lottery should be repealed, chain migration should be ended while focusing on the nuclear family, and the existing employment visa program should be replaced with a system to award visas only to the “best and brightest.” Internal efforts to limit employment authorization should be matched by con- gressional action to narrow statutory eligibility to work in the United States and mitigate unfair employment competition for U.S. citizens. The oft-abused H-1B program should be transformed into an elite program through which employers are vying to bring in only the top foreign workers at the highest wages so as not to depress American opportunities. Additionally, Congress should: l Improve the integrity of the temporary work visa programs; l Repeal Temporary Protected Status (TPS) designations;

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 62%

Pages: 183-185AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on imposing sanctions against the International Criminal Court and foreign individuals supporting ICC investigations of U.S. and allied personnel, which is unrelated to the Department of Homeland Security immigration enforcement policies outlined in Project 2025, such as work authorization limits, asylum agreements, detention mandates, or parole restrictions."

— 151 — Department of Homeland Security l Employment authorization. Along with the legislative proposal, take regulatory action to limit the classes of aliens eligible for work authorization. Executive Orders l Pathways for border crossers 1. Direct the Department of State and the Department of Homeland Security to reinstate Asylum Cooperative Agreements with Northern Triangle Countries immediately. 2. Recommence negotiations with Mexico to fully implement the Remain in Mexico Protocols. 3. Reinstate, to the extent possible, expedited pathways with full credible fear/immigration court process (PACR and HARP). 4. Prohibit the use of Notices to Report, the use of any funds for travel into the interior of the United States, and government flights or transportation for aliens. 5. Mandate that ICE use all detention space in full compliance with Section 235 of the INA, issue weekly reports on detention capacity, and provide authority for low-level temporary capacity (for example, tents) once permanent space is full. 6. Eliminate the use of ATD for border crossers except in rare cases and only with the explicit authority of the Secretary. 7. Prohibit the use of parole except in matters that are certified by the Secretary of Homeland Security as requiring action for humanitarian or significant public benefit reasons, and prohibit the use of parole in any categorical circumstance. l Enforcement 1. Restrict prosecutorial discretion to eliminate it as a “catch-all” excuse for limiting immigration enforcement. 2. Mandate the use of E-Verify for anyone doing business with the government. — 152 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Designate USCIS as Intelligence Community–adjacent, ensuring that it has access to national security and law enforcement databases. 4. Rescind all memoranda limiting enforcement of immigration laws including those identifying sensitive zones. 5. End ICE’s widespread use of termination and administrative closure of cases in immigration court. l Averting or curtailing a mass migration event 1. Provide that whenever the Secretary of Homeland Security determines that an actual or anticipated mass migration of aliens en route to or arriving off the coast of the U.S. presents urgent circumstances requiring an immediate federal response, the Secretary may make, subject to the approval of the President, rules and regulations prohibiting in whole or in part the introduction of persons from such countries or places as he or she shall designate in order to avert or curtail such mass migration and for such period of time as is deemed necessary, including through the expulsion of such aliens. Such rule and regulation making shall not be subject to the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act. 2. Provide that notwithstanding any other provision of law, when the Secretary makes such a determination and then promulgates, subject to the approval of the President, such rules and regulations, the Secretary shall have the authority to waive all legal requirements of Title 8 that the Secretary, in his or her sole discretion, determines are necessary to avert or curtail the mass migration. Subregulatory Matters l USCIS priorities/structural changes 1. Ensure that focus is returned to vetting, base eligibility of applicants, and fraud detection. 2. Realign the Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate (FDNS) to ensure agencywide consistency on implementation of fraud detection and vetting policies. 3. Review and repeal any internal agency memo that is inconsistent with the priorities described in this chapter.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Roy, Chip

FACE Act Repeal Act of 2025

119/hr/589

Permanent Trump Secure Border Act

119/hr/9773

SAVE Act

119/hr/22

Back to All Bills