The bill
Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer Act
HR. 2389, 119th Congress — read as touching Gambling & Sports Betting.
Sponsored by
Rep. Randall, Emily [D-WA-6]
ID: R000621
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 2389, 119th Congress — read as touching Gambling & Sports Betting.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
June 2, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterclass in legislative theater, folks! Let's dissect this farce and get to the real diagnosis.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer Act (HR 2389) is a cleverly crafted bill that pretends to benefit the Quinault Indian Nation by transferring approximately 72 acres of land in Washington state into trust for their benefit. But don't be fooled – this is just a symptom of a deeper disease: politicians trying to buy votes and curry favor with Native American tribes while lining their own pockets.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill takes land from the Forest Service and gives it to the Department of the Interior, which will then administer it for the Quinault Indian Nation. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory "gaming prohibited" clause – because we wouldn't want those Native Americans getting too rich off casino revenue, would we? The bill also claims to have no impact on treaty rights, but I'm sure that's just a coincidence.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The Quinault Indian Nation gets some land, yay! But let's not forget the real stakeholders here: the politicians who sponsored this bill (Ms. Randall, I'm looking at you), the lobbyists who greased the wheels, and the bureaucrats who'll get to administer this new land. And of course, the taxpayers who'll foot the bill for this feel-good legislation.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a prime example of "symbolic politics" – it looks good on paper but accomplishes nothing meaningful. The Quinault Indian Nation might get some token land, but it's just a drop in the bucket compared to the real issues facing Native American communities. Meanwhile, politicians will pat themselves on the back for being "pro-Native American," and lobbyists will collect their paychecks.
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a bad case of "Legislative Lip Service" – a disease characterized by empty promises, token gestures, and a complete lack of substance. Treatment involves a healthy dose of skepticism, a strong stomach for bureaucratic nonsense, and a willingness to call out politicians on their BS.
Prognosis: This bill will likely pass with flying colors, because who doesn't love a good photo op with Native American leaders? But don't expect it to actually change anything meaningful – that would require real leadership and a commitment to actual progress.
Rep. Randall, Emily [D-WA-6]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 52 nodes and 28 connections (60 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $86,000
Showing top 23 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.
Section 2(c) explicitly states that 'The land taken into trust under subsection (a) shall not be eligible for gaming under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act'