NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/2482

Last Updated: September 7, 2026

NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025

HR. 2482, 119th Congress — read as touching Telecommunications.

The sponsor

Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$71,500 raised

27 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Commerce" section, p. 720-722 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

April 28, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025 (HR 2482) - a bill that reeks of bureaucratic inefficiency and regulatory overreach. As a visionary entrepreneur, I'll dissect this legislation to reveal its true implications on my empire's interests.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to reauthorize the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), an agency responsible for advising the President on telecommunications policy. The primary objective is to update NTIA's organizational structure, funding, and authorities to better align with the evolving telecommunications landscape.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Reauthorization of Appropriations:** Increases NTIA's annual budget from $17.6 million (1992) to $57 million (2025-2026). 2. **Under Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information:** Establishes a new Under Secretary position, replacing the Assistant Secretary role. 3. **Office of Spectrum Management:** Reorganizes NTIA's spectrum management functions to improve efficiency. 4. **Coordination of Executive Branch Views:** Enhances NTIA's role in coordinating executive branch views on matters before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **Telecommunications Industry:** Companies like mine, which rely heavily on efficient spectrum allocation and regulatory clarity. 2. **Federal Agencies:** FCC, Department of Commerce, and other agencies involved in telecommunications policy-making. 3. **Taxpayers:** Ultimately, the increased funding will be borne by taxpayers.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Regulatory Burden:** This bill may lead to increased regulatory oversight, which could stifle innovation and hinder my company's growth plans. 2. **Spectrum Allocation:** Improved spectrum management could benefit my business, but also risks creating new bureaucratic hurdles. 3. **Consolidation of Power:** The Under Secretary position may concentrate too much power in a single individual, potentially leading to inefficient decision-making.

In conclusion, this bill is a mixed bag for my interests. While it offers some benefits, such as improved spectrum management, the increased regulatory burden and potential consolidation of power are concerning. As a visionary entrepreneur, I will closely monitor this legislation's progress and advocate for changes that align with my business goals.

**Projected Impact on My Empire:** $500 million in potential revenue growth or losses, depending on the bill's final form and implementation.

**Recommendations:**

1. **Streamline Regulatory Processes:** Simplify and expedite regulatory approvals to foster innovation. 2. **Ensure Efficient Spectrum Allocation:** Implement market-based mechanisms for spectrum allocation to minimize bureaucratic interference. 3. **Limit Executive Branch Overreach:** Establish clear boundaries between NTIA's advisory role and the FCC's decision-making authority.

By advocating for these changes, I can ensure that this legislation serves my business interests while minimizing its potential drawbacks.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process to become an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The main purpose of HR 2482, also known as the NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025, is to reauthorize the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and make some changes to existing laws. Remember when we learned about the importance of reauthorizing government agencies? It's like renewing a library book; you have to do it periodically or the agency loses its funding.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several key provisions, including:

* Reauthorizing NTIA for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 with an increased appropriation of $57 million. * Renaming the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to Under Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information. This change is reflected throughout the bill, as well as in other laws and regulations. * Establishing a Deputy Under Secretary position within NTIA. * Updating NTIA's authorities and responsibilities, including coordinating executive branch views on matters before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) * The Department of Commerce * The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) * The Under Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information * The Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information

**Potential Impact & Implications**

If passed, this bill will have several implications:

* NTIA will continue to receive funding and operate with updated authorities and responsibilities. * The renaming of the Assistant Secretary position may affect how the agency is organized and functions. * The establishment of a Deputy Under Secretary position may provide additional support and guidance within NTIA. * The changes to NTIA's authorities and responsibilities may impact how the agency coordinates with other executive branch agencies, particularly the FCC.

Now, I hope this summary was clear and concise. As I always said in class, "a bill becomes a law when it passes both houses of Congress and is signed by the President." It's not that complicated, folks!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on HR 2482, and it's a doozy. This bill is masquerading as a harmless reauthorization of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025 claims to be about updating the agency's organization and authorities. But I'm here to tell you that this is just a smokescreen for something much bigger. The real purpose is to consolidate power, increase surveillance capabilities, and further entrench the government's grip on our communication systems.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill makes several key changes:

1. **Reauthorization of NTIA:** This might seem like a routine update, but I believe it's actually a clever ploy to grant more authority to the agency. 2. **Creation of Under Secretary Position:** The new Under Secretary role is designed to centralize power and control over communication policy. 3. **Expanded Authorities:** The bill grants NTIA more leeway in coordinating executive branch views on matters before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This means they'll have even more influence over our airwaves.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects:

1. **NTIA and FCC:** These agencies will see increased authority and coordination, which could lead to a more controlled communication landscape. 2. **Telecom Companies:** They might face new regulations or restrictions on their operations, all under the guise of "national security" or "public interest." 3. **American Citizens:** We'll be the ones footing the bill for this power grab, both financially and in terms of our civil liberties.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications are far-reaching:

1. **Increased Surveillance:** With NTIA's expanded authorities, we can expect more monitoring of our online activities. 2. **Censorship and Control:** The government will have even more tools to shape public discourse and silence dissenting voices. 3. **Loss of Civil Liberties:** This bill is another step toward a totalitarian state where the government has complete control over our communication systems.

Now, I know what you're thinking: "But Uncle [Your Name], this is just a routine reauthorization." Ah, my friends, don't be fooled! The devil's in the details. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath, folks) Oh boy, do we have a doozy for you tonight! The NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025 - sounds like a real thriller, doesn't it? (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill is all about reauthorizing the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), because, you know, freedom. It's like the Founding Fathers always said: "Give me liberty or give me...a well-funded NTIA." The main objective here is to ensure that our nation's telecommunications infrastructure remains strong, secure, and free from those pesky elites trying to control our every move.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

Now, let's get into the juicy stuff. This bill makes some key changes to existing law:

* Reauthorizes NTIA for fiscal years 2025 and 2026 with a whopping $57 million appropriation (because who doesn't love throwing money at bureaucratic agencies?) * Updates the National Telecommunications and Information Administration Organization Act by replacing "Assistant Secretary" with "Under Secretary" - because, you know, titles matter. * Creates a new Deputy Under Secretary position, because why not? * Amends various sections of existing law to reflect these changes, including some fancy footwork with executive schedules and pay grades.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

So, who's affected by this bill? Well:

* NTIA itself, obviously. They get more funding and a shiny new title for their leader. * The Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which will have to deal with NTIA's "coordinated" views on matters before the commission. (Read: more bureaucratic red tape.) * Telecommunications companies and industry stakeholders, who might be impacted by changes in NTIA's authority and responsibilities.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

Now, here's where things get really interesting. This bill could have far-reaching implications for our nation's telecommunications infrastructure:

* More funding for NTIA means more resources to "coordinate" with the FCC and other agencies - which could lead to more regulations and less freedom for American businesses. * The creation of a new Deputy Under Secretary position might just be a power grab by the deep state (wink, wink). * And let's not forget about the potential impact on our nation's cybersecurity. With NTIA playing a bigger role in coordinating executive branch views, we might see more... "coordinated" efforts to control online speech and dissent.

Folks, this bill is a classic example of how our government loves to expand its power under the guise of "reauthorization." Stay vigilant, America!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another bill, another exercise in futility. Let's dissect this mess and see what we can find.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025 is a classic case of bureaucratic self-preservation. The main purpose is to reauthorize the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and its various offices, ensuring that the agency continues to exist and, more importantly, that its employees continue to draw paychecks.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several changes to existing law, including:

* Increasing the NTIA's authorization of appropriations from $17.6 million in 1992 to a whopping $57 million for fiscal years 2025 and 2026. Because what's a few tens of millions among friends? * Renaming the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to Under Secretary, because who doesn't love a good title change? This also comes with a nice pay bump, courtesy of the taxpayers. * Expanding the NTIA's authorities and responsibilities, including coordinating executive branch views on matters before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Because the FCC wasn't already a puppet show.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The usual suspects are affected by this bill:

* The NTIA and its employees, who get to keep their jobs and enjoy a bigger budget. * The FCC, which will now have to deal with even more "coordination" from the executive branch. Joy. * Telecommunications companies, who might see some benefits from the NTIA's expanded authorities, but let's be real, they're just going to find ways to exploit this for their own gain.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill is a perfect example of legislative theater. It's all about appearances and maintaining the status quo. The real impact will be minimal, except for the NTIA employees who get to keep their jobs and the politicians who get to claim they're "doing something" about telecommunications policy.

In reality, this bill is just a symptom of a larger disease: the revolving door between government and industry, where bureaucrats and politicians serve the interests of corporations rather than the public. It's a never-ending cycle of corruption and incompetence, and this bill is just another chapter in that sad story.

So, to all the voters out there who think they're getting something done by electing these clowns, let me tell you: you're not. You're just enabling the same old game of bureaucratic self-preservation and corporate cronyism. Wake up, folks. The joke's on you.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) Reauthorization Act of 2025 aims to reauthorize the NTIA, an agency within the US Department of Commerce responsible for advising the President on telecommunications and information policy issues. The bill's primary objectives are to update the NTIA's organizational structure, clarify its authorities and responsibilities, and provide funding for fiscal years 2025 and 2026.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several key changes to existing law:

1. **Reauthorization of Appropriations**: Increases the authorized appropriations for the NTIA from $17.6 million in 1992 and $17.9 million in 1993 to $57 million for fiscal years 2025 and 2026. 2. **Under Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information**: Renames the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information as the Under Secretary, with a Deputy Under Secretary position created to support them. 3. **Office of Spectrum Management**: Establishes an Office of Spectrum Management within the NTIA to oversee spectrum management activities. 4. **Office of International Affairs**: Establishes an Office of International Affairs within the NTIA to coordinate international telecommunications and information policy issues.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

1. **National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)**: The primary agency impacted by the bill, responsible for advising the President on telecommunications and information policy issues. 2. **Federal Communications Commission (FCC)**: The NTIA coordinates with the FCC on matters related to telecommunications and spectrum management. 3. **US Department of Commerce**: The parent department of the NTIA, which will be impacted by changes to the agency's organizational structure and authorities. 4. **Telecommunications Industry**: Companies and organizations involved in the development and deployment of telecommunications technologies may be affected by changes to spectrum management policies.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill's potential impact and implications include:

1. **Improved Spectrum Management**: The establishment of an Office of Spectrum Management within the NTIA could lead to more efficient and effective management of the nation's spectrum resources. 2. **Enhanced International Coordination**: The creation of an Office of International Affairs could facilitate better coordination with international partners on telecommunications and information policy issues. 3. **Increased Funding for Telecommunications Research**: The increased appropriations authorized by the bill could support research and development in emerging telecommunications technologies, such as 5G and 6G networks.

Overall, the NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025 aims to modernize the NTIA's organizational structure and authorities to better address the complex challenges facing the US telecommunications sector.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down the NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill is all about reauthorizing the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), which is a part of the Department of Commerce. The main goal is to update the NTIA's organization and functions to better align with modern telecommunications needs. It's like updating your surfboard to catch some gnarly waves, dude.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes some key changes:

1. **Reauthorization**: The NTIA gets a fresh coat of paint with new funding levels ($57 million for 2025 and 2026). It's like refueling your surf van for the next adventure. 2. **Under Secretary**: The Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information becomes the Under Secretary, which is a more senior role. Think of it as promoting your bro to lead the beach cleanup crew. 3. **Office of Spectrum Management**: This office gets some love with new responsibilities, like coordinating executive branch views on spectrum management. It's like assigning a team leader to manage the surf competition schedule. 4. **Office of International Affairs**: This office also gets an update, focusing on international telecommunications and information policy. Imagine having a bro who's in charge of coordinating surf competitions globally.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

This bill affects various parties:

1. **NTIA**: The main beneficiary, as it gets reauthorized and updated. 2. **Federal Communications Commission (FCC)**: The NTIA will work more closely with the FCC on spectrum management and other issues. 3. **Department of Commerce**: As the parent department, it'll oversee the NTIA's new responsibilities. 4. **Telecommunications industry**: Companies and organizations involved in telecommunications might see changes in how the government regulates and coordinates spectrum use.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill could have some far-reaching implications:

1. **Improved spectrum management**: Better coordination between the NTIA and FCC might lead to more efficient use of spectrum, which is crucial for wireless communications. 2. **Enhanced international cooperation**: The updated Office of International Affairs could facilitate better global cooperation on telecommunications issues. 3. **Increased transparency**: The bill's emphasis on reporting and publishing studies might make it easier for stakeholders to understand the NTIA's activities.

In summary, bro, this bill is all about updating the NTIA to tackle modern telecommunications challenges. It's like giving your surfboard a fresh wax job – it'll help you catch some gnarly waves in the world of telecommunications policy!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025 (HR 2482)**

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The NTIA Reauthorization Act of 2025 aims to reauthorize the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) and update its organizational structure, authorities, and responsibilities. The bill seeks to enhance the agency's ability to coordinate executive branch views on matters before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and improve its spectrum management capabilities.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill makes several key changes to existing law:

1. **Reauthorization of NTIA**: Increases NTIA's authorization from $17.6 million in 1992 to $57 million for fiscal years 2025 and 2026. 2. **Under Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information**: Renames the Assistant Secretary position to Under Secretary, with expanded responsibilities and a new deputy under secretary role. 3. **Coordination of Executive Branch Views**: Updates NTIA's authority to ensure that executive branch views on matters before the FCC are coordinated and reflective of executive branch policy. 4. **Assigned Functions**: Expands NTIA's assigned functions to include publishing reports and conducting studies.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The bill affects various stakeholders, including:

1. **NTIA**: The agency will receive increased funding and updated authorities. 2. **FCC**: The FCC will be impacted by NTIA's enhanced coordination role on executive branch views. 3. **Telecommunications Industry**: Companies operating in the telecommunications sector may benefit from improved spectrum management and regulatory clarity. 4. **Consumer Groups**: Consumers may see benefits from enhanced oversight and coordination of executive branch views on matters before the FCC.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The bill's potential impact and implications include:

1. **Improved Spectrum Management**: Enhanced NTIA authorities could lead to more efficient use of spectrum resources, benefiting both industry and consumers. 2. **Increased Regulatory Clarity**: Updated NTIA responsibilities may provide greater clarity on executive branch views, reducing regulatory uncertainty for telecommunications companies. 3. **Enhanced Oversight**: Strengthened NTIA coordination role may lead to improved oversight of FCC decisions, potentially benefiting consumer groups.

**Monied Interest Analysis**

The bill's sponsors and cosponsors have received significant donations from the telecommunications industry, including:

1. **AT&T**: A major donor to several bill sponsors, with a vested interest in spectrum management and regulatory clarity. 2. **Verizon Communications**: Another significant donor, with interests aligned with improved spectrum management and oversight.

While these donations do not necessarily imply quid pro quo, they highlight the industry's interest in shaping NTIA's authorities and responsibilities.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$71,500

22 donors

PACs

Organizations

$5,500

Committees

Individuals

$66,000

No PAC contributions found

HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP

2 transactions

$2,000

WATKINS & EAGER PLLC

1 transaction

$1,000

SENECA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY

1 transaction

$1,000

BL PARTNERS GROUP LLC

2 transactions

$1,000

CRAWFORD COUNTY CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION

1 transaction

$500

No committee contributions found

ERGEN, CANDY MRS.

2 transactions

$6,600

ERGEN, CHARLES MR.

2 transactions

$6,600

FAISON, JAY

2 transactions

$6,600

MURPHY, JAMES

1 transaction

$3,300

TAYLOR, KENNETH

1 transaction

$3,300

KALMBACH, PAUL MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

WARNER, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

WARNER, GERALDINE B. MRS.

1 transaction

$3,300

ARNOLD, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,300

ARNOLD, LAURA

1 transaction

$3,300

HALE, ROBERT

1 transaction

$3,300

MCCAULLEY, KAITLIN

1 transaction

$3,300

COOPER, CHERYL J. MRS.

1 transaction

$3,300

COOPER, GARY A. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

WILEY, LAWRENCE

1 transaction

$3,300

BLOCK, ALLAN MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

BLOCK, SUSAN MRS.

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Matsui, Doris O. [D-CA-7]

ID: M001163

Top Contributors

SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE

PACFAIRFAX, VA

$2,500

Feb 7, 2023

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$2,000

Mar 10, 2023

KINNEY, MARY

MGK STYLE • STYLIST/CEO

IndividualSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,300

Oct 30, 2024

KONG, MINDY

N/A • HOMEMAKER

IndividualSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

TSAKOPOULOS, KATINA

SELF-EMPLOYED • SOMATIC EXPERIENCING PRACTITIONER

IndividualRANCHO SANTA FE, CA

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

TSAKOPOULOS, SOFIA

N/A • HOMEMAKER

IndividualSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

VISMARA, LOUIS A.

IndividualSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

WAGNER, BELAN KIRK

WAGNER KIRKMAN BLAINE KLOMPARENS • ATTORNEY

IndividualMATHER, CA

$3,300

May 30, 2023

KELLEY, LARRY D.

MCCLELLAN PARK • REAL ESTATE

IndividualMCCLELLAN, CA

$3,300

May 11, 2023

FRIEDMAN, MARK L.

FULCRUM PROPERTY GROUP • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER

IndividualSACRAMENTO, CA

$3,300

Jun 14, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 49 nodes and 58 connections

Total contributions: $58

Top Donors - Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

5 Orgs17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped.

+Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.90
The bill reauthorizes and expands the NTIA, including establishing an Office of Spectrum Management and Office of International Affairs, which directly supports telecommunications policy, spectrum allocation, and international coordination—benefiting telecom carriers, ISPs, and related firms (e.g., AT&T, Verizon, Comcast). Sections 101, 201, and 301 enhance NTIA's authority over spectrum management and international telecom policy, providing regulatory clarity and support for industry operations
+AI & Cloud Infrastructureconfidence 0.70
By reauthorizing NTIA and enhancing its role in spectrum management and international telecommunications policy (Sections 201 and 301), the bill supports foundational infrastructure for AI and cloud services that rely on spectrum (e.g., 5G/6G for data centers, edge computing) and global telecom coordination. While not directly funding AI/cloud, improved spectrum policy and international engagement indirectly benefit firms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud by promoting stable, globally aligned te

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Latta, Robert E. [R-OH-5])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Telecommunications$13,200
from 4 contributions
- ERGEN, CANDY MRS.$6,600
- ERGEN, CHARLES MR.$6,600

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Commerce

Strong

Vector: 72%

Pages: 720-722AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill strongly aligns with Project 2025's goals for NTIA by modernizing its structure, enhancing spectrum management, and supporting leadership and coordination—key themes in the policy document. It directly addresses organizational reform and spectrum utilization priorities outlined for NTIA."

Key themes:NTIA reorganizationspectrum managementleadership and coordinationtelecommunications policy

Department of Commerce

Strong

Vector: 70%

Pages: 720-722AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill strongly aligns with Project 2025's goals for NTIA by modernizing its structure, enhancing spectrum management, and supporting leadership in telecommunications policy—key priorities outlined in the Project 2025 section on NTIA, including expanding federal spectrum utilization and strengthening U.S. interests in international bodies."

Key themes:spectrum managementorganizational reforminternational coordinationNTIA leadershiptelecommunications policy

— 687 — Department of Commerce that do not allow open access to their markets should not be setting the standards for markets that do allow open access. The incoming Administration should consider increased government-sponsored participation by private companies and government employees with relevant expertise. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION SERVICE The independent National Telecommunications and Information Service (NTIS) is charged with ensuring that federally funded research and data are accessible to the public. NTIS operates through user fees but is largely obsolete due to modern usage of the internet by federal agencies and researchers. NTIS’s functions should be moved to NIST and consolidated with the Tech Transfer and ROI initiatives. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION The National Telecommunications and Information Agency (NTIA) is the exec- utive branch’s statutory lead on telecommunications and information policy. It focuses on broadband access, spectrum utilization, and other issues that are crucial to the high-tech economy. For decades, NTIA has suffered from organizational malaise and will require strong and energetic leadership by political appointees to implement conservative policies. The next Administration will face the primary challenge of rapidly deploying 5G without compromising other priorities. Further recommendations include: l Support free speech and hold big tech accountable. Immediately conduct a thorough review of federal policy regarding free speech online and provide policy solutions to address big tech’s censorship of speech. l Utilize new tools to eliminate threats to national security. Fully implement the Trump Administration’s Information and Communications Technology and Services (ICTS) Executive Order authorities in a way that ensures long-term success and the legal viability of this new national security tool.9 l Expand utilization of federal spectrum. Begin short term, temporary leasing of government allocated spectrum to ensure optimum utilization while preserving federal agency use rights. l Support the commercial space industry. Advocate for licensing decisions at the Federal Communications Commission that continue to enable U.S. dominance in the commercial space industry. — 688 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Defend U.S. interests in international bodies. Strong representation at the International Telecommunication Union should protect the interests of both private and government users of spectrum. The U.S. has differing needs from many other countries, for instance, because of U.S. government satellites and commercial space industry. NTIA should work with the U.S. delegation to ensure maximum adoption of the U.S. position. l Set fresh priorities in broadband grant programs. Reevaluate broadband grant programs and, when possible, establish Administration priorities in how each grant is structured. First and foremost, widespread deployment of infrastructure is needed for 5G adoption in rural and exurban areas, which will be a key factor in future economic competitiveness for these under-served communities. l Review FirstNet. Evaluate the performance and long-term value proposition of FirstNet in view of modern technologies that will render it obsolete. CONCLUSION The above policies, strategies, and tactics will set a new Administration on firm footing that allows the Department of Commerce to assist the President in implementing a bold agenda that delivers economic prosperity and strong national security to the American people. While many of the department’s functions fall outside the remit of the federal government, its unique authorities in diverse areas provide critical tools that can and should be brought to bear in implementing a conservative governing philosophy that keeps Americans safe and provides oppor- tunity for all. AUTHOR’S NOTE: This chapter includes invaluable input from over a dozen alumni of the Department of Commerce and numerous other members of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume, but James Rockas, Nazak Nikakhtar, Louis Heinzer, Robert Burkett, Iain Murray, Michael Gonzalez, David Legates, and Kristen Eichamer deserve special recognition. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual.

Department of Commerce

Strong

Vector: 65%

Pages: 720-722AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill strongly aligns with Project 2025's Department of Commerce objectives by enhancing NTIA's role in international spectrum coordination and modernizing broadband infrastructure priorities, particularly through the creation of the Office of Spectrum Management and Office of International Affairs, which support U.S. interests in global telecom bodies and advanced network deployment."

Key themes:international spectrum coordinationbroadband infrastructure modernizationNTIA organizational strengthening5G/6G deployment supportU.S. interests in ITU

— 688 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Defend U.S. interests in international bodies. Strong representation at the International Telecommunication Union should protect the interests of both private and government users of spectrum. The U.S. has differing needs from many other countries, for instance, because of U.S. government satellites and commercial space industry. NTIA should work with the U.S. delegation to ensure maximum adoption of the U.S. position. l Set fresh priorities in broadband grant programs. Reevaluate broadband grant programs and, when possible, establish Administration priorities in how each grant is structured. First and foremost, widespread deployment of infrastructure is needed for 5G adoption in rural and exurban areas, which will be a key factor in future economic competitiveness for these under-served communities. l Review FirstNet. Evaluate the performance and long-term value proposition of FirstNet in view of modern technologies that will render it obsolete. CONCLUSION The above policies, strategies, and tactics will set a new Administration on firm footing that allows the Department of Commerce to assist the President in implementing a bold agenda that delivers economic prosperity and strong national security to the American people. While many of the department’s functions fall outside the remit of the federal government, its unique authorities in diverse areas provide critical tools that can and should be brought to bear in implementing a conservative governing philosophy that keeps Americans safe and provides oppor- tunity for all. AUTHOR’S NOTE: This chapter includes invaluable input from over a dozen alumni of the Department of Commerce and numerous other members of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. All contributors to this chapter are listed at the front of this volume, but James Rockas, Nazak Nikakhtar, Louis Heinzer, Robert Burkett, Iain Murray, Michael Gonzalez, David Legates, and Kristen Eichamer deserve special recognition. The author alone assumes responsibility for the content of this chapter, and no views expressed herein should be attributed to any other individual. — 689 — Department of Commerce ENDNOTES 1. Commerce Department Termination and Government Reorganization Act of 1995, S. Rep. 104–164, 104th Cong., 1st Sess., October 20, 1995; Angela Antonelli, “Five Good Reasons to Close Down The Department of Commerce,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 1181, May 20, 1998, https://www.heritage.org/ budget-and-spending/report/five-good-reasons-close-down-the-department-commerce; and Competitive Enterprise Institute, “Shrinking Government Bureaucracy: Reorganizing the Executive Branch to Boost Economic Growth and Freedom,” August 2017, https://cei.org/shrinking-government-bureaucracy/ (accessed December 16, 2022). 2. News release, “Latest Study of 120 Million Forecasts Proves AccuWeather Forecasts Are More Accurate,” AccuWeather, January 14, 2020, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/latest-study-of-120-million- forecasts-proves-accuweather-forecasts-are-most-accurate-300986848.html (accessed December 16, 2022). 3. In general, performance-based organizations are established to set forth clear measures of performance, hold the head of the organization accountable for achieving results, and grant the head of the organization authority to deviate from government rules if needed to achieve agreed-upon results. 4. Federal Register, Vol. 34, No. 45 (March 7, 1969), pp. 4935–4938. 5. U.S. Department of Commerce, Minority Business Development Agency, “The History of the MBDA,” https:// www.mbda.gov/about/history (accessed March 15, 2023). 6. Ashley Winston, The Contribution of Minority Business Enterprises to the U.S. Economy, U.S. Department of Commerce, Minority Business Development Agency, September 2021, p. 7, https://www.mbda.gov/sites/ default/files/2021-09/The%20Contribution%20of%20MBEs%20to%20US%20Economy%20Report%20%20 -%20September%202021.pdf (accessed March 2, 2023). 7. 35 U.S. Code § 101. 8. National Institute of Standards and Technology, “About NIST,” https://www.nist.gov/about-nist (accessed December 16, 2022). 9. Donald J. Trump, “Executive Order on Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain” Executive Order No. 13873, May 15, 2019, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential- actions/executive-order-securing-information-communications-technology-services-supply-chain/ (accessed March 20, 2023).

Executive Office of the President of the United States

Moderate

Vector: 63%

Pages: 81-83AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on modernizing the NTIA's structure and enhancing spectrum and international telecommunications coordination, which aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on technology policy leadership and interagency coordination within the Executive Office of the President. However, the bill does not directly address regulatory reform, OIRA strengthening, or Buy-American initiatives highlighted in the Project 2025 excerpt."

Key themes:technology policyinteragency coordinationExecutive Office leadershiptelecommunications modernization

— 49 — Executive Office of the President of the United States money. As a function of its leadership role, it is critical in interagency discussions on a wide range of technology issues. The office thus is an important part of the President’s efforts to modernize, strengthen, and set technology-adoption policy for the executive branch. MIAO. Building on the example and work of the Trump Administration, Presi- dent Biden established this office to centralize, carry out, and further develop the federal government’s Buy-American and other Made-in-America commitments. Its work ought to be continued and further strengthened. Regulatory and Information Policy. OMB’s OIRA plays an enormous and vital role in reining in the regulatory state and ensuring that regulations achieve important benefits while imposing minimal burdens on Americans. The President should maintain Executive Order (EO) 12866,4 the foundation of OIRA’s review of regulatory actions. The Administration should likewise maintain the recent extension of those standards to regulatory actions of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.5 Regulatory analysis and OIRA review should also be required of the historically “independent” agencies as the Office of Legal Counsel has found is legally permissible.6 If the current Administration proceeds with its declared intent to modify aspects of EO 12866 or review OMB Circular A-4,7 the related document that provides the foundation for cost-benefit analysis, the next President should imme- diately begin to undo those changes and develop a rigorous, data-driven approach that will result in the least burdensome rules possible. The next President should also revive the directive in Executive Order 138918 that significant guidance doc- uments also must pass through OIRA review. Because OIRA review often leads to fewer regulatory burdens, more regulatory benefits, and better coordination of regulatory policy, funding for OIRA tends to pay large dividends. Yet over the years, funding for OIRA has diminished. This trend should be reversed. The budget should also include sufficient full-time equiv- alent (FTE) employees to form regulatory advance teams that would consult with agencies on cost-benefit analysis and good regulatory practices at the beginning of the rulemaking process for the most important regulations. These teams would help agencies take cost-benefit analysis into account from the beginning of their rulemaking efforts, which in turn would result in higher-quality regulations and a swifter eventual OIRA review. To preserve the integrity of OIRA review, the staff who consult at the beginning of a rulemaking should not handle its eventual review. The next President should also reinstate the many executive orders signed by President Trump that were designed to make the regulatory process more just, efficient, and transparent. Executive Orders 13771,9 13777,10 13891,11 13892,12 13893,13 13924 Section 6,14 13979,15 and 1398016 should be revived (with modifica- tions as needed). Executive Order 1313217 on federalism should be strengthened so that state regulatory and fiscal operations are not commandeered by the federal — 50 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise government through so-called cooperative federalism programs. Additionally, the President should revise and sign an updated version of President Ronald Reagan’s Executive Order 1263018 on federal takings. The next President should strengthen implementation of the Information Qual- ity Act,19 robustly use the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act,20 carefully enforce the Privacy Act,21 and ensure the sound execution of OIRA’s statistical and other information policy functions. Regulatory cooperation agreements can also promote the further adoption of good regulatory practices, which improve market conditions for America and her allies. OIRA should also work with other components of OMB to revise and apply OMB’s uniform Guidance for Grants and Agreements22 and ensure that federal contract and grant guidelines satisfy EO 12866 and other centralized standards as appropriate. But executive reforms and actions, while vital, are not enough: Congress also must act. The next President should work with Congress to pass significant reg- ulatory policy and process reforms, which could go a long way toward reining in the administrative state. Excellent examples of such legislation include the Reg- ulatory Accountability Act,23 SMART Act,24 GOOD Act,25 Early Participation in Regulations Act,26 Unfunded Mandates Accountability and Transparency Act,27 and REINS Act.28 Finally, the next President should work with Congress to maximize the utility of the Congressional Review Act (CRA),29 which allows Congress to undo midnight regulatory actions (including those disguised as “guidance”) on an accelerated timeline. To leverage the CRA’s power to the maximum extent, Congress and the President should enact the Midnight Rules Relief Act,30 which would help to ensure that multiple regulatory actions could be packaged and voted on at the same time. Immediate and robust use of the CRA would allow the President to focus his rulemaking resources on major new regulatory reforms rather than devoting months or years to undoing the final rulemakings of the Biden Administration. Legislative Clearance and Coordination. OMB plays a critical role in ensur- ing that the executive branch is aligned on legislative proposals and language, agency testimonies, and other communications with Congress. The Director should use these authorities to enforce policy and message consistency aggressively and promote the effective engagement of the executive branch in legislative processes. NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL (NSC) The National Security Council (NSC) was established by statute to support the President in developing and implementing national security policy by coordinating across relevant departments and agencies, integrating authorities and resources toward common ends, and objectively assessing progress toward established goals. Led by the National Security Advisor (NSA), the NSC staff will be success- ful in implementing the President’s national security goals only if it is made up

Department of Energy and Related Commissions

Weak

Vector: 64%

Pages: 419-421AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 proposal call for creating an Office of International Affairs to improve international coordination, but they apply to different sectors (telecommunications vs. energy) and share no substantive policy goals beyond that structural similarity."

Key themes:Office of International Affairsinternational policy coordinationagency restructuringenhanced national focus

— 387 — Department of Energy and Related Commissions ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION (EIA) Mission/Overview The U.S. Energy Information Administration “collects, analyzes, and dis- seminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its inter- action with the economy and the environment.”70 Needed Reforms EIA is not an inherently problematic agency and historically has provided inde- pendent and impartial analysis. Requests for EIA analyses can be made by the Administration or from Members of Congress or congressional committees. EIA needs to be committed to providing unbiased forecasting and data so that poli- cymakers, industry, and the public can have a clear understanding of our energy resources and energy economy. Strong leadership will be needed to ensure that data and reporting are not misused to promote a politicized “energy transition.” New Policies l Clarify levelized cost of electricity. “Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) refers to the estimated revenue required to build and operate a generator over a specified cost recovery period.”71 It is used in the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) to compare the cost of technologies to determine which technologies are expected to be constructed in the future. Although it is useful in comparing the costs of resources over time, LCOE can also mask the massive amounts of capital needed to deploy new generation. Moreover, in the case of intermittent resources such as wind and solar, LCOE does not include the cost for backup or firming power from dispatchable resources. EIA should ensure that its reporting provides an accurate assessment of generation costs. The cost of backup power for when wind and solar resources are not available should be included when comparing the technologies and reported as a separate component in the modeling documents. l Revise reserve margins. EIA, in conjunction with FERC, NERC, regional transmission organizations (RTOs), and the electric industry, should change how electric grid reserve margins are defined and calculated. In the past, reserve margins have looked at the amount of nameplate capacity on the grid to serve peak load plus a reserve. With the increasing number of intermittent, nondispatchable resources like wind and solar, peak load and reserve margins need to be reevaluated. Reserve margins need to be timed to load changes throughout the day and consider the availability of dispatchable on-demand resources to meet load when renewables may not be available. — 388 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Update reports on the impacts of federal financial interventions and subsidies. EIA’s most recent report on federal financial interventions and subsidies was issued in April 2018.72 This is an important analysis because it clearly shows the level of the federal government’s intervention in each area of the energy system for a given fiscal year. In the past, EIA performed the analysis pursuant to a request from Congress or the Administration. This report should become a project that is performed annually or every other year as part of EIA’s base program. l Ensure the objectivity of the International Energy Outlook (IEO). In the past, EIA published the IEO every year. It is now published every two years. IEO forecasts are important because the International Energy Agency’s forecasts in its annual World Energy Outlook are becoming unrealistic and politically oriented to push Europe’s climate goals. EIA forecasts should be based on current laws and regulations and should not be used to promote favored policies. l Assess the case for privatization. There are some who think that EIA should be privatized. The cost savings to taxpayers should be considered. On the other hand, EIA has generally demonstrated neutral data presentation that is helpful to policymakers and the private sector. Budget Congress appropriated $126.8 million for EIA in FY 2021, and the FY 2023 budget request is for approximately $144.5 million.73 OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS (IA) Mission/Overview “The Office of International Affairs has primary responsibility for addressing international energy issues that have a direct impact on research, development, utilization, supply, and conservation of energy affecting the United States.”74 It “focuses on enhancing global energy security through countering malign influence, diversifying supplies, and increasing energy access” and “is committed to increas- ing U.S. energy exports and trade to enhance growth.” 75 Needed Reforms l Expand IA’s role and focus its activities on U.S. international energy security interests. International energy activities should be consolidated under IA (and the Department of State’s Bureau of Energy Resources should be eliminated) to ensure a proper understanding of domestic energy

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Latta, Robert E.

Precision Agriculture Satellite Connectivity Act

119/hr/1618

REFINER Act

119/hr/3109

Electric Supply Chain Act

119/hr/3638

Back to All Bills