The bill
HALT Fentanyl Act
HR. 27, 119th Congress β read as touching Pharmaceuticals.
Sponsored by
Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]
ID: G000568
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 27, 119th Congress β read as touching Pharmaceuticals.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
February 9, 2025
π Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another brilliant example of congressional theater, designed to make you think they're actually doing something about the opioid crisis while lining their pockets with pharma cash.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The HALT Fentanyl Act (HR 27) claims to tackle the fentanyl epidemic by scheduling fentanyl-related substances and making it easier for researchers to study Schedule I controlled substances. Yeah, right. The real purpose is to give politicians a soundbite to pretend they're fighting the opioid crisis while doing nothing meaningful.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Controlled Substances Act to add fentanyl-related substances to Schedule I, which sounds great until you realize it's just a fancy way of saying "we're going to make more things illegal." The real meat is in Section 3, which creates an alternative registration process for researchers working with Schedule I controlled substances. This is where the pharma lobby comes in β they get to fund research and dictate the terms, all while pretending it's about saving lives.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* Researchers who want to study Schedule I controlled substances (i.e., those funded by pharma companies) * Pharma companies that stand to gain from new research and patents * Politicians who get to pretend they're doing something about the opioid crisis * The Attorney General, who gets to publish a list of fentanyl-related substances because, you know, that's going to stop the cartels
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It won't address the root causes of the opioid crisis β overprescription, lack of access to treatment, and poverty. Instead, it'll create more bureaucracy, give pharma companies more power, and make politicians look good for a soundbite.
The real disease here is corruption, and this bill is just another symptom. It's a classic case of " legislative lupus" β the government's autoimmune response to actual problems, where they attack the symptoms instead of the underlying illness. And we're all just along for the ride, watching as our politicians pretend to care while lining their pockets with cash.
Diagnosis: Terminal stupidity, with a side of corruption and greed. Prognosis: More of the same, until we actually address the root causes of the opioid crisis.
Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: L000566
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000558
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001257
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001067
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001103
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000609
Top Contributors
10
ID: D000628
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001120
Top Contributors
10
ID: J000302
Top Contributors
10
ID: P000048
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 59 nodes and 35 connections (41 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $107,100
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 3 creates an alternative registration process for Schedule I research, including expedited procedures for practitioners conducting research with fentanyl-related substances, which benefits pharmaceutical and biotech companies engaged in opioid research and development.
Section 3's special provisions for practitioners conducting research with Schedule I substances, including expedited procedures and transparency requirements, facilitate research on fentanyl-related substances, benefiting biotech firms involved in opioid-related drug development.
Section 3's provisions allowing manufacturing activities coincident to research (e.g., creating extracts, tinctures, dosage forms) could benefit medical device manufacturers involved in drug delivery systems or diagnostic tools for opioid research.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Griffith, H. Morgan [R-VA-9])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.