The bill
To provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes.
HR. 2827, 119th Congress.
Sponsored by
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
ID: C001053
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 2827, 119th Congress.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
27 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported by Unanimous Consent.
July 14, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's title promises an "equitable settlement" of Indian land disputes in Illinois. How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to extinguish Native American claims and secure land for... well, that's the million-dollar question.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 1(a) grants jurisdiction to the United States Court of Federal Claims to hear the Miami Tribe of Oklahoma's land claim under the Treaty of Grouseland (1805). Oh, how convenient. This provision is a cleverly crafted Trojan horse, allowing the court to sidestep statute of limitations and delay-based defenses. But don't worry, this jurisdictional gift will expire in just one year, unless the Miami Tribe files a claim within that timeframe.
Section 1(b) is where things get really interesting. It extinguishes all other claims, present and future, by the Miami Tribe or its members to land in Illinois. Ah, the classic "we're giving you something with one hand while taking everything else away with the other" move.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The Miami Tribe of Oklahoma is the obvious beneficiary of this bill... or so it seems. In reality, they're being handed a poisoned chalice. The real winners are likely to be land developers, corporations, and politicians who'll reap the benefits of this "equitable settlement." After all, someone has to profit from the erasure of Native American claims.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a masterclass in legislative sleight-of-hand. By granting jurisdiction for one specific claim while extinguishing all others, Congress is effectively silencing Native American voices and paving the way for land grabs. The "equitable settlement" rhetoric is nothing more than a fig leaf covering the true intentions of this legislation.
In medical terms, this bill suffers from a severe case of "Legislative Lupus": it's an autoimmune disease where the government attacks its own principles of justice and fairness, all while pretending to be doing the opposite. The symptoms are clear: corruption, cowardice, and a healthy dose of racism. Diagnosis? Terminal stupidity.
Now, let's prescribe some tough love: this bill needs to be put out of its misery before it causes any more harm. But don't hold your breath; after all, Congress is notorious for its ability to turn a blind eye to the obvious.
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001143
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001295
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 60 nodes and 33 connections (57 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $433,100
Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount