The bill
Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act
HR. 2985, 119th Congress β read as touching Cybersecurity.
Sponsored by
Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]
ID: M000194
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 2985, 119th Congress β read as touching Cybersecurity.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.
February 3, 2026
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterclass in legislative doublespeak, courtesy of the Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act (HR 2985). Let's dissect this mess, shall we?
**Diagnosis:** This bill is a classic case of "Techno-Cronyism," where politicians pretend to care about modernizing government tech while actually lining the pockets of their corporate donors.
**Symptoms:**
1. **Funding amounts and budget allocations:** The bill allocates $100 million for the Technology Modernization Fund (TMF), which is a paltry sum considering the vast technological needs of our bloated bureaucracy. 2. **Key programs and agencies receiving funds:** The TMF will be used to fund various IT projects across government agencies, with no clear prioritization or accountability measures in place. It's like throwing money at a problem without a plan. 3. **Notable increases or decreases from previous years:** Compared to the 2022 budget, this bill represents a modest increase of $20 million for TMF funding. Woohoo, progress! 4. **Riders and policy provisions attached to funding:** The real kicker is Section 2, which "realigns" the use of funds with the original congressional intent (read: allows more flexibility for bureaucratic shenanigans). This provision essentially gives agencies a blank check to spend TMF funds on whatever pet projects they fancy. 5. **Fiscal impact and deficit implications:** The bill's proponents claim it will improve government efficiency and reduce costs in the long run. Yeah, right. With no concrete metrics or oversight mechanisms in place, this is just another example of "throwing money at a problem" while ignoring the underlying issues.
**Treatment:**
To cure this case of Techno-Cronyism, we need to:
1. **Increase transparency and accountability:** Demand clear project priorities, regular progress reports, and strict oversight to prevent bureaucratic waste. 2. **Prioritize meaningful reforms:** Instead of throwing money at IT projects, focus on streamlining government operations, reducing redundancy, and implementing actual technological innovations. 3. **Eliminate riders and policy provisions that enable cronyism:** Remove Section 2's "flexibility" clause and ensure that TMF funds are allocated based on merit, not bureaucratic whims.
**Prognosis:**
Without significant reforms, this bill will only perpetuate the status quo of government inefficiency and waste. It's a Band-Aid solution for a bullet wound. Politicians will continue to tout their "commitment to modernizing government tech" while lining their pockets with campaign donations from corporate interests.
In conclusion, HR 2985 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's time to call out these politicians for what they are: enablers of bureaucratic waste and corruption.
Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: C001078
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001313
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 66 nodes and 34 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $120,050
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.
Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i)(II) states that funds may be used to 'enhance cybersecurity and privacy at the agency,' which benefits cybersecurity firms providing related services.
Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i) allows funds for 'acquisition, procurement, and operation of information technology' and 'development of information technology' to modernize legacy systems, which can include AI and cloud infrastructure services.
Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i) permits funding for IT modernization, which may involve procurement from large technology providers offering enterprise software, cloud, or IT services.
Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i) includes funding for IT acquisition and operation, which may encompass networking and broadband infrastructure provided by telecom firms.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.
CREATE AI Act of 2025
Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.