Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/2985
Last Updated: July 15, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

ID: M000194

Follow the money

The bill

Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act

HR. 2985, 119th Congress β€” read as touching Cybersecurity.

The sponsor

Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$97,100 raised

28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 42 - 0.

February 3, 2026

Introduced

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

πŸ›οΈ

Committee Review

πŸ—³οΈ

Floor Action

βœ…

Passed House

πŸ›οΈ

Senate Review

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterclass in legislative doublespeak, courtesy of the Modernizing Government Technology Reform Act (HR 2985). Let's dissect this mess, shall we?

**Diagnosis:** This bill is a classic case of "Techno-Cronyism," where politicians pretend to care about modernizing government tech while actually lining the pockets of their corporate donors.

**Symptoms:**

1. **Funding amounts and budget allocations:** The bill allocates $100 million for the Technology Modernization Fund (TMF), which is a paltry sum considering the vast technological needs of our bloated bureaucracy. 2. **Key programs and agencies receiving funds:** The TMF will be used to fund various IT projects across government agencies, with no clear prioritization or accountability measures in place. It's like throwing money at a problem without a plan. 3. **Notable increases or decreases from previous years:** Compared to the 2022 budget, this bill represents a modest increase of $20 million for TMF funding. Woohoo, progress! 4. **Riders and policy provisions attached to funding:** The real kicker is Section 2, which "realigns" the use of funds with the original congressional intent (read: allows more flexibility for bureaucratic shenanigans). This provision essentially gives agencies a blank check to spend TMF funds on whatever pet projects they fancy. 5. **Fiscal impact and deficit implications:** The bill's proponents claim it will improve government efficiency and reduce costs in the long run. Yeah, right. With no concrete metrics or oversight mechanisms in place, this is just another example of "throwing money at a problem" while ignoring the underlying issues.

**Treatment:**

To cure this case of Techno-Cronyism, we need to:

1. **Increase transparency and accountability:** Demand clear project priorities, regular progress reports, and strict oversight to prevent bureaucratic waste. 2. **Prioritize meaningful reforms:** Instead of throwing money at IT projects, focus on streamlining government operations, reducing redundancy, and implementing actual technological innovations. 3. **Eliminate riders and policy provisions that enable cronyism:** Remove Section 2's "flexibility" clause and ensure that TMF funds are allocated based on merit, not bureaucratic whims.

**Prognosis:**

Without significant reforms, this bill will only perpetuate the status quo of government inefficiency and waste. It's a Band-Aid solution for a bullet wound. Politicians will continue to tout their "commitment to modernizing government tech" while lining their pockets with campaign donations from corporate interests.

In conclusion, HR 2985 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's time to call out these politicians for what they are: enablers of bureaucratic waste and corruption.

Related Topics

Federal Budget & AppropriationsDefense Spending & ProcurementResearch & Innovation Policy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$97,100
27 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$12,800
Committees
$0
Individuals
$84,300

No PAC contributions found

1
REW INVESTMENTS LLC
2 transactions
$5,800
2
KING & SOCIETY, LLC
1 transaction
$2,000
3
BARBER BROTHERS, LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
4
COASTAL GREEN CBD LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
5
MALL DRIVE MANAGEMENT, LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
6
SEAGLASS PARTNERS, LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
7
TWIN RIVERS HOLDINGS LLC
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
GRIFFITH, JAMES
1 transaction
$6,600
2
RANNEY, TIM
1 transaction
$6,600
3
SINGER, PAUL
1 transaction
$6,600
4
GREENBLATT, SCOTT
1 transaction
$5,800
5
MOE, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$5,800
6
GLUECK, KENNETH
1 transaction
$5,000
7
HOME, CHARLOTTE
1 transaction
$5,000
8
DAVISON, KAY MS.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
HAAG, GORAN
1 transaction
$3,300
10
HAAG, ORPHA
1 transaction
$3,300
11
BUKOWSKY, BRANT
1 transaction
$3,300
12
BUKOWSKY, BROCK
1 transaction
$3,300
13
CATZ, SAFRA
1 transaction
$3,300
14
COOLEY, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
15
KELLOGG, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
16
TOPPER, LEWIS
1 transaction
$3,300
17
YODER, MAHLON
1 transaction
$3,300
18
CRUSEMANN, JEANNE
1 transaction
$3,300
19
EPSTEIN, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$3,300
20
GRENADER, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Connolly, Gerald E. [D-VA-11]

ID: C001078

Top Contributors

10

1
FOR SENATE, MARSDEN
MARSDEN FOR SENATE COMMITTEE β€’ SENATOR
COMBURKE, VA
$250
Mar 19, 2024
2
HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP
OrganizationRICHMOND, VA
$2,900
Jun 22, 2023
3
HERSHMAN, MICHAEL J.
THE FAIRFAX GROUP β€’ PRESIDENT
IndividualDELRAY BEACH, FL
$3,300
Dec 24, 2024
4
TRONE, DAVID
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES β€’ REPRESENTATIVE
IndividualPOTOMAC, MD
$3,300
Dec 9, 2024
5
MISENER, PAUL E
SELF-EMPLOYED β€’ LAWYER
IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA
$3,300
Sep 21, 2023
6
PUNARO, ARNOLD
PUNARO GROUP β€’ CONSULTANT
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
7
PUNARO, ARNOLD
PUNARO GROUP β€’ CONSULTANT
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
8
PUNARO, JULIA
RETIRED β€’ NONE
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
9
PUNARO, JULIA
RETIRED β€’ NONE
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$3,300
Jul 25, 2023
10
RABAUT, TOM W
NOT EMPLOYED β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA
$3,300
Sep 27, 2023

Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]

ID: B001313

Top Contributors

10

1
MORRIS-SINGER, ANDREW
SELF-EMPLOYED β€’ MANAGEMENT
IndividualPORTLAND, OR
$6,600
Jan 24, 2024
2
MORRIS-SINGER, COREY
SELF-EMPLOYED β€’ RESEARCH
IndividualPORTLAND, OR
$6,600
Jan 24, 2024
3
STEIN, KEVIN M
TRANSDIGM β€’ CEO
IndividualCHAGRIN FALLS, OH
$3,300
Feb 15, 2023
4
MOSS, KAREN
NICOLAS GUDBRANSON & COOPER β€’ ATTORNEY
IndividualCLEVELAND, OH
$3,300
Feb 24, 2023
5
SUMMERS, MICHAEL P.
NOT EMPLOYED β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualLAKEWOOD, OH
$3,300
Feb 28, 2023
6
JOHNSON, ALEX B
TRI-C β€’ COLLEGE PRESIDENT
IndividualBEACHWOOD, OH
$3,300
Mar 7, 2023
7
SINITO, FRANK T
MILLENIA HOUSING COMPANIES β€’ PRESIDENT
IndividualCLEVELAND, OH
$3,300
Mar 13, 2023
8
EMERSON, WILLIAM
ROCK HOLDINGS β€’ VICE CHAIRMAN
IndividualBLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI
$3,300
Apr 14, 2023
9
JURVETSON, KARLA
SELF β€’ PHYSICIAN
IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA
$3,300
May 11, 2023
10
RATNER, ALBERT B.
NOT EMPLOYED β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualLYNDHURST, OH
$3,300
Jun 13, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 66 nodes and 34 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $120,050

Top Donors - Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

7 Orgs20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

  • +Cybersecurityconfidence 0.90

    Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i)(II) states that funds may be used to 'enhance cybersecurity and privacy at the agency,' which benefits cybersecurity firms providing related services.

  • Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i) allows funds for 'acquisition, procurement, and operation of information technology' and 'development of information technology' to modernize legacy systems, which can include AI and cloud infrastructure services.

  • +Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.70

    Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i) permits funding for IT modernization, which may involve procurement from large technology providers offering enterprise software, cloud, or IT services.

  • +Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.60

    Section 2(b)(3)(A)(i) includes funding for IT acquisition and operation, which may encompass networking and broadband infrastructure provided by telecom firms.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Mace, Nancy [R-SC-1])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β€” they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Related Bills