Veterans Readiness and Employment Program Integrity Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/3579
Last Updated: July 12, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

ID: C001133

Follow the money

The bill

Veterans Readiness and Employment Program Integrity Act

HR. 3579, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Equity & Hedge Funds.

The sponsor

Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$152,234 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Veterans Affairs" section, p. 688-691 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

September 15, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

📍 Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. The Veterans Readiness and Employment Program Integrity Act (HR 3579) - a title that screams "we're doing something good for veterans, trust us."

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to make "certain improvements" to the Veterans Readiness and Employment program, because, you know, it wasn't working well enough already. The real purpose? To create a veneer of accountability while maintaining the status quo.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Application requirement**: The Secretary of Veterans Affairs can no longer provide an initial evaluation without receiving a complete application from the veteran, including work records and educational transcripts. Wow, what a revolutionary concept - actually requiring relevant information before providing services. 2. **Maximum duration of employment assistance**: Veterans are now limited to 365 days of assistance, with an option for an additional 180 days if they're "actively seeking employment." Because, clearly, the problem was that veterans were just too darn comfortable on the government's dime. 3. **Reporting and data collection requirements**: The Secretary must submit reports on veteran employment outcomes and wait times for vocational rehabilitation programs. Oh boy, I can already see the thrilling spreadsheets and PowerPoint presentations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* Veterans (supposedly) * Department of Veterans Affairs * Congressional committees (who get to pretend they're doing something useful)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a token effort to address the systemic issues plaguing veteran services, while actually accomplishing little. The changes are minor and won't significantly improve outcomes for veterans.

In reality, this bill serves as a distraction from the real problems:

* Inefficient bureaucracy * Lack of resources * Insufficient support for veterans

The politicians behind this bill are more concerned with appearing to care about veterans than actually doing something meaningful. It's a classic case of "legislative placebo" - making people feel like they're getting help while maintaining the status quo.

In conclusion, HR 3579 is a masterclass in legislative misdirection, designed to make politicians look good without actually solving anything. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to create another bill that's more about appearances than actual substance.

Related Topics

Military & Veterans Affairs
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$152,234
27 donors
PACs
$1,000
Organizations
$19,234
Committees
$0
Individuals
$132,000
1
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$1,000
1
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$5,134
2
CHEROKEE NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
3
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
4
THE CHICKASAW NATION
2 transactions
$3,000
5
DELTA AIRLINES
1 transaction
$2,500
6
MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
7
COLORADO RIVER INDIAN TRIBES
1 transaction
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
REIZOVIC, ROY
2 transactions
$13,200
2
EMMET, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
3
EVANS, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$6,600
4
KENDRICK, KEN
1 transaction
$6,600
5
KENDRICK, RANDY
1 transaction
$6,600
6
MCCALLISTER, ROSS
1 transaction
$6,600
7
SILVERMAN, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$6,600
8
STERN, ELIZABETH MAY
1 transaction
$6,600
9
WEEKLEY, RICHARD
1 transaction
$6,600
10
ASSENMACHER, ROBERT
1 transaction
$6,600
11
ASSENMACHER, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$6,600
12
BIDWILL, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$6,600
13
BRAVERMAN, VERONICA
1 transaction
$6,600
14
CHAMBERLAIN, JAIME
1 transaction
$6,600
15
CHAMBERLAIN, MARTHA
1 transaction
$6,600
16
CHAPMAN, TED
1 transaction
$6,600
17
CHRIST, HAROLD
1 transaction
$6,600
18
COONS, BETH
1 transaction
$6,600
19
COTTER, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Van Orden, Derrick [R-WI-3]

ID: V000135

Top Contributors

10

1
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Dec 9, 2024
2
HO CHUNK NATION
OrganizationBLACK RIVER FALLS, WI
$3,300
Nov 2, 2024
3
FOREST COUNTY POTAWATOMI COMMUNITY
OrganizationCRANDON, WI
$3,300
Sep 17, 2024
4
AIPAC PAC CONDUIT ACCOUNT
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Oct 23, 2024
5
ALLIANCE OF BANKERS FOR WISCONSIN
OrganizationMADISON, WI
$250
Apr 23, 2024
6
ANDERSON, JOHN R. MR.
ANDERSON ENTERPRISES LLC • OWNER
IndividualROCKFORD, IL
$10,000
Dec 19, 2023
7
BROIN, JEFF
POET LLC • CEO
IndividualSIOUX FALLS, SD
$6,600
Aug 24, 2023
8
UIHLEIN, RICHARD E. MR.
ULINE INC. • CEO
IndividualLAKE BLUFF, IL
$6,600
Feb 28, 2023
9
LEVY, EDWARD C.
EDW. C. LEVY CO. • CHAIRMAN
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$6,600
Mar 28, 2024
10
LEVY, EDWARD C.
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$6,600
May 6, 2024

Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila [D-FL-20]

ID: C001127

Top Contributors

10

1
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Nov 4, 2024
2
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Aug 20, 2024
3
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
OrganizationHOLLYWOOD, FL
$3,300
Sep 8, 2023
4
FIGGERS, FREDDIE
FIGGERS • INVENTOR
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Jun 8, 2023
5
FIGGERS, FREDDIE
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Sep 25, 2023
6
MOISE, RUDOLPH
IndividualDAVIE, FL
$3,300
Oct 7, 2024
7
GEORGE, DAVID J.
REFUEL DEPOT LLC • SALES
IndividualLEADWOOD, KS
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024
8
GOLDEN, SYLVIA
NONE • RETIRED
IndividualWEST PALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Aug 18, 2024
9
GORI, PHILIP
SELF • INVESTOR
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Sep 16, 2024
10
MUELLER, KYLE
ZUTEK • DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES
IndividualOLATHE, KS
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024

Rep. Murphy, Gregory F. [R-NC-3]

ID: M001210

Top Contributors

10

1
DOISE, DARYL
OCEANS HEALTHCARE • EXEC VP
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,700
Apr 1, 2024
2
DOISE, DARYL
IndividualDALLAS, TX
$6,700
Apr 10, 2024
3
KAPOOR, DEEPAK
SOLARIS HEALTH • PHYSICIAN EXECUTIVE
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Sep 23, 2024
4
KAPOOR, DEEPAK
IndividualFORT LAUDERDALE, FL
$6,600
Sep 30, 2024
5
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
BLACKSTONE • CEO AND CHAIRMAN
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 21, 2024
6
ARUMUGHAM, PRADEEP
ECU • DOCTOR
IndividualKINSTON, NC
$3,300
Dec 11, 2023
7
BOWEN, JOEY M
PRIVATEER TOBACCO CO. INC. • TOBACCONIST
IndividualGREENVILLE, NC
$3,300
Nov 15, 2023
8
BOWEN, JOEY M
PRIVATEER TOBACCO CO. INC. • TOBACCONIST
IndividualGREENVILLE, NC
$3,300
Nov 15, 2023
9
CLARK, MELISSA A
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualGREENVILLE, NC
$3,300
Oct 6, 2023
10
CLARK, MELISSA A
HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER
IndividualGREENVILLE, NC
$3,300
Oct 6, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 78 nodes and 39 connections (79 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $189,234

Top Donors - Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC7 Orgs19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped, 2 harmed.

  • Section 4(c)(1) requires the Secretary to seek a contract with a non-Department entity for an independent review of rehabilitation programs, potentially increasing costs for private equity and hedge funds involved in such contracts

  • Section 4(c)(2) implies increased scrutiny on vocational rehabilitation programs, which may negatively impact for-profit education providers participating in these programs

  • +Labor Unionsconfidence 0.60

    Section 3 implies support for veterans' employment assistance, potentially benefiting labor unions representing workers in industries that hire veterans

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Ciscomani, Juan [R-AZ-6])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Strong
Vector: 64%
Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 3579's emphasis on improving program integrity, imposing time limits on employment assistance, and enhancing data collection aligns closely with Project 2025's VA reform objectives of increasing accountability, efficiency, and outcome‑based management."

Key themes:program integrityemployment assistance limitsdata reportingaccountabilityveteran self‑sufficiency

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate
Vector: 65%
Pages: 682-684AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 VA policy seek to improve VA program effectiveness through greater accountability, transparency, and data-driven decision-making, but the bill targets the Veterans Readiness and Employment program while Project 2025 focuses on disability claims processing, technology adoption, and private-sector partnerships."

Key themes:program efficiencyaccountability and transparencydata collection and reportingveteran outcomesVA program integrity

— 649 — Department of Veterans Affairs approaches and technology tools that currently exist in the private sector could be employed to improve existing VBA activities. This problem is most pronounced in the disability claims process, which needs more and better management attention focused on streamlining the procedures involved in processing claims and administering benefits. The VA must improve timeliness of claim adjudication and benefits delivery: Veterans want the VBA to provide timely responses to requests for benefits support, render empathetic customer service and understandable explanations of those benefits, and deliver those benefits without frustrating delays (weeks, not months). l Identify performance targets for benefits, report publicly on actual performance each quarter, and use these metrics to drive consistent improvement. l Develop a new pilot “Express 30” commitment for a veteran’s first fully developed disability compensation claim and organize the VBA to complete the first claim in 30 days. l Hire more private companies to perform disability medical examinations. Delays in completing the examinations could be eliminated with more external capacity. l Increase automation. Hiring additional staff to process claims is costly, is inflexible, and has yielded mixed results. Attempting to change laws and regulations simply to adjudicate claims would be a herculean effort given their complexity. The best way to provide benefits faster and more accurately is by using technology to perform most of the work. Technology currently exists in the private sector, but the VBA lacks the expertise to use it. This would be more of an organizational challenge than a technology hurdle. l Reduce improper payment and fraud. About $500 million is improperly paid out each year. Better tools, training, and management could reduce this substantially, but rule changes at the departmental level would be needed. Budget The VA’s Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) has assigned disability ratings to a growing number of health conditions over time; some are tenuously related or wholly unrelated to military service. The further growth in presumptive service-connected medical conditions pursued by Congress and Veteran Service Organizations, begun with Agent Orange and most recently for Burn Pits/Airborne — 650 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Toxins, has led to historic increases in mandatory VBA spending in recent years. The VA has a time-phased plan to reassess the VASRD and its ratings for com- pensation, but this internal process can be slow and laborious, requires Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approvals, and can become politically charged both in Congress and with VSOs. l The next Administration should explore how VASRD reviews could be accelerated with clearance from OMB to target significant cost savings from revising disability rating awards for future claimants while preserving them fully or partially for existing claimants. l The VBA’s Information Technology top-line budget should be reexamined and reassessed in light of the need for expanded automation across the enterprise. l Traditionally, VHA captures the large majority of VA IT funding. The VBA needs to make the case for a larger IT budget with clear requirements to support that request. Personnel l Pursue reforms of the Human Capital Management process and operations within the VBA to build a more blended workforce with more contractors to process claims. This would free federal employees to perform other duties and be involved solely with the final decision to award benefits. l Improve the VBA acquisition workforce. The VBA needs more world-class contractor support. Currently, few of the top companies have contracts with the VBA, and the VBA needs to conduct more outreach to the private sector through senior leader engagement and industry conferences. l To identify more effective and efficient ways to complete claims, establish a knowledge exchange program with top-tier private-sector companies that do similar work. The VBA is fundamentally a financial services organization. A significant amount of its work has a private-sector analogue that could be leveraged to improve service to veterans. l For most of its existence, the VBA has been a risk-averse, insular, paper-based organization, implementing technology only over the past decade. This insularity has led to a predominantly “build it ourselves” approach, partly because VBA staff has limited experience or insight into current private- sector tools and methods and partly because the VBA struggles to compete

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate
Vector: 64%
Pages: 679-681AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 3579 aligns with Project 2025's emphasis on VA program accountability, transparency, and data-driven improvements, particularly through enhanced reporting and oversight of vocational rehabilitation services. While the bill focuses on VR&E program integrity and employment outcomes, it shares thematic goals with Project 2025's push for VA operational transparency and performance measurement, though it does not directly address the specific subsections cited (e.g., caregiver programs, innovation"

Key themes:program accountabilitydata transparencyveteran employment outcomesVA operational efficiencyperformance reporting

— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo,

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills