The bill
To amend the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands to make that Act applicable to hardrock minerals.
HR. 3872, 119th Congress — read as touching Coal Mining.
Sponsored by
Rep. Fallon, Pat [R-TX-4]
ID: F000246
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 3872, 119th Congress — read as touching Coal Mining.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
June 9, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The full House will vote on whether to pass the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who think a "MERICA Act" is a clever name. Let me put on my surgical gloves and dissect this monstrosity.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The MERICA Act's stated purpose is to amend the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands to include hardrock minerals. Wow, what a thrilling goal. I'm sure it has nothing to do with lining the pockets of mining corporations or enriching politicians who'll be receiving "donations" from said corporations.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill redefines terms like "acquired lands," "Secretary," and "mineral leasing laws." Oh, and it adds a new definition for "hardrock mineral," because apparently, that wasn't clear enough before. The changes are so earth-shattering that I'm surprised the authors didn't include a provision to rename the bill after themselves.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Mining corporations will be thrilled to know they can now lease hardrock minerals on acquired lands. Environmental groups might be less enthusiastic, but who cares about them? They're just tree-hugging hippies who don't understand the importance of "progress." Native American tribes, whose ancestral lands are often targeted for mining, will likely be ignored or placated with token gestures.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "regulatory capture," where industry lobbyists write legislation that benefits their clients at the expense of everyone else. Expect increased environmental degradation, displacement of indigenous communities, and a further concentration of wealth among mining corporations. But hey, who needs clean air and water when you can have more gold and copper?
Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Corporate-itis," a disease characterized by an excessive influence of special interests on legislation. Symptoms include a complete disregard for environmental and social consequences, as well as a blatant attempt to enrich the already wealthy.
Treatment: None needed. The patient (the MERICA Act) will likely be passed with minimal scrutiny, and its symptoms will only worsen over time. After all, who needs accountability when you have campaign contributions and lobbying dollars?
Rep. Fallon, Pat [R-TX-4]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: M001224
Top Contributors
10
ID: H001101
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 45 nodes and 28 connections (47 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $148,839
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 harmed.
Section 1(1)(G)(B)(i) excludes coal from the definition of 'hardrock mineral', meaning coal remains subject to separate leasing rules and does not benefit from the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands provisions now extended to hardrock minerals.
Section 1(1)(G)(B)(ii)-(iv) explicitly excludes oil, oil shale, and gas from the definition of 'hardrock mineral', so these fossil fuels are not brought under the Mineral Leasing Act for Acquired Lands, preserving their separate regulatory treatment.
Section 1(1)(G)(B)(v)-(vii) excludes sodium, potassium, and sulfur from 'hardrock mineral', which are key feedstocks for chemicals and plastics manufacturing; their exclusion means they remain outside the leasing framework now applied to hardrock minerals.
Section 1(1)(G)(B)(viii) excludes 'mineral materials subject to disposition under the Act of July 31, 1947, commonly known as the Materials Act of 1947', which includes sand, gravel, and stone used in construction; these materials are not covered by the new hardrock mineral leasing provisions.