Critical Mineral Dominance Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/4090
Last Updated: July 15, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

ID: S001212

Follow the money

The bill

Critical Mineral Dominance Act

HR. 4090, 119th Congress — read as touching Coal Mining.

The sponsor

Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$150,125 raised

26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

61% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 554-556 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.

July 14, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

(sigh) Oh joy, another bill that's going to "save America" by codifying some half-baked Executive Orders and pretending to address a real issue. Let me dissect this mess for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Critical Mineral Dominance Act (HR 4090) claims to establish the US as the leading producer of hardrock minerals, including rare earth minerals. The bill's sponsors think this will create jobs, strengthen supply chains, safeguard national security, and reduce the global influence of "malign and adversarial states." How quaint.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill codifies certain provisions from Executive Orders related to domestic mining and hardrock mineral resources. It requires the Secretary of the Interior to:

1. Analyze the economic impacts of net import reliance on minerals. 2. Identify priority mining projects on Federal land for expedited approval. 3. Report on barriers to byproduct production from mining projects on Federal land.

The bill also directs the Secretary to identify Federal land that may be leased for hardrock mineral exploration, development, or production.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Mining companies, the Department of the Interior, the US Geological Survey, and various Congressional committees will be affected. Oh, and let's not forget the "malign and adversarial states" that are supposedly going to be thwarted by this bill. (eyeroll)

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

* This bill is a classic case of "legislative theater." It pretends to address a real issue (mineral import reliance) but actually serves the interests of mining companies and their lobbyists. * The expedited approval process for priority mining projects will likely lead to environmental degradation and increased health risks for nearby communities. * The report on barriers to byproduct production is just a smokescreen to justify further deregulation and favoritism towards the mining industry. * The bill's focus on "malign and adversarial states" is a thinly veiled attempt to justify increased military spending and intervention in resource-rich countries.

In short, this bill is a disease masquerading as a cure. It's a symptom of a deeper illness: the corrupting influence of money and power in politics. The real diagnosis? A bad case of " politician-itis," characterized by an inability to think critically, a penchant for grandstanding, and a complete disregard for the well-being of ordinary citizens.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch politicians pretend to solve problems they don't understand.

Related Topics

Public Lands & Natural ResourcesEnergy Production & ConservationState & Local Government Affairs
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$150,125
24 donors
PACs
$500
Organizations
$10,925
Committees
$0
Individuals
$138,700
1
DEMOCRACY ENGINE INC
1 transaction
$500
1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUITY
2 transactions
$6,600
2
LEECH LAKE - PAC
1 transaction
$3,300
3
GOOGLE
1 transaction
$1,000
4
CHAIN BRIDGE BANK
1 transaction
$25

No committee contributions found

1
KING, RUSSELL
2 transactions
$13,200
2
ZOTTO, CARLA DEL
1 transaction
$10,000
3
ANDERSON, ROLLIS
1 transaction
$9,900
4
FAISON, JAY
1 transaction
$6,600
5
NYSTROM, BRIAN AND MARY ANN
1 transaction
$6,600
6
OSBORNE, DAVID
1 transaction
$6,600
7
HUBBARD, KAREN MRS.
1 transaction
$6,600
8
HUBBARD, STANLEY
1 transaction
$6,600
9
JOHNSON, TODD MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
10
MAKI, BRIAN MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
11
MURPHY, MARK B.
1 transaction
$6,600
12
ULRICH, ROBERT
1 transaction
$6,600
13
MCKINZIE, KAREN M.
1 transaction
$6,600
14
MCKINZIE, KEITH MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
15
OLSON, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$6,600
16
SPEVACEK, CHARLES MR.
1 transaction
$6,600
17
CERVENKA, DEBRA A
1 transaction
$6,600
18
KOCH, BARBARA
1 transaction
$6,600
19
GRUSS, MARK L.
1 transaction
$6,600

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Begich, Nicholas J. [R-AK-At Large]

ID: B001323

Top Contributors

10

1
LOKEN, TYLER
IndividualANCHORAGE, AK
$5,000
Oct 17, 2024
2
ODOM, WILLIAM L
ODOM CORPVICE CHAIRMAN
IndividualANCHORAGE, AK
$5,000
Oct 26, 2024
3
ODOM, WILLIAM L
IndividualANCHORAGE, AK
$5,000
Oct 26, 2024
4
FOX, RICHARD
GMS LLCMANAGER
IndividualANCHORAGE, AK
$3,435
Sep 4, 2024
5
GERONDALE, CHRISTOPHER
SELF
IndividualJUNEAU, AK
$3,300
Oct 16, 2023
6
GERONDALE, CHRISTOPHER
SELF
IndividualJUNEAU, AK
$3,300
Oct 16, 2023
7
MCNAMARA, MICHAEL
MICHAEL MCNAMARAPHYSICIAN
IndividualANCHORAGE, AK
$3,300
Oct 25, 2023
8
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 1, 2023
9
SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Nov 1, 2023
10
SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN
BLACKSTONE
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 30, 2023

Rep. Finstad, Brad [R-MN-1]

ID: F000475

Top Contributors

10

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
COMPRIOR LAKE, MN
$3,300
May 29, 2024
2
PRAIRIE ISLAND TRIBAL COUNCIL
COMWELCH, MN
$2,500
Feb 15, 2023
3
REPUBLICAN MAINSTREET PARTNERSHIP PAC
PACWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Jul 28, 2023
4
WATONWAN COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY
COMSAINT JAMES, MN
$800
May 30, 2024
5
ANDERSON, ROLLIS H
ANDERSON TRUCKING SERVICECEO
IndividualSAINT CLOUD, MN
$13,200
Mar 20, 2024
6
KROLL, MARK W
RETIREDRETIRED
IndividualCRYSTAL BAY, MN
$13,200
Mar 31, 2023
7
SONNEK, KATHLEEN M
SELFWRITER
IndividualLAKE CRYSTAL, MN
$10,000
Sep 21, 2023
8
HALKYARD, JONATHAN
MGM RESORTSCFO
IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV
$9,423
Mar 26, 2024
9
KING, RUSSELL S
KING CAPITAL LLCCEO
IndividualMINNEAPOLIS, MN
$6,870
Dec 24, 2023
10
MILLER, HUGH L
RTP COMPANYPRESIDENT
IndividualWINONA, MN
$6,600
Mar 28, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 48 nodes and 32 connections (43 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $171,925

Top Donors - Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC4 Orgs19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 helped, 2 harmed.

  • Coal Miningconfidence 0.90

    Section 8(2)(B)(i) explicitly excludes coal from the definition of 'hardrock mineral', indicating the bill does not support coal mining and may imply regulatory focus away from coal.

  • Oil & Gasconfidence 0.90

    Section 8(2)(B)(ii)-(iv) excludes oil, oil shale, and gas from the definition of 'hardrock mineral', indicating the bill does not support oil and gas extraction and focuses on other minerals.

  • Sections 4 and 5 involve identifying and expediting mining projects on Federal land, which would require construction and engineering services for mine development, infrastructure, and operations.

  • The bill's focus on domestic hardrock mineral production and supply chain robustness may increase demand for energy infrastructure (e.g., power for mining operations, transport of minerals), though not directly stated.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Industries this bill HARMS

  • from 1 contribution
    • JACKSON, RYAN$2,000
  • Oil & Gas$1,250
    from 2 contributions
    • FELLMAN, CRAIG$750
    • SWEENEY, TARA$500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate60.7%
Pages: 554-556

— 522 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise similar agency actions made in compliance with that order.18 Meanwhile, the new Administration must immediately reinstate the following Trump DOI sec- retarial orders: l SO 3348: Concerning the Federal Coal Moratorium;19 l SO 3349: American Energy Independence;20 l SO 3350: America-First Offshore Energy Strategy;21 l SO 3351: Strengthening the Department of the Interior’s Energy Portfolio;22 l SO 3352: National Petroleum Reserve—Alaska;23 l SO 3354: Supporting and Improving the Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Program and Federal Solid Mineral Leasing Program;24 l SO 3355: Streamlining National Environmental Policy Reviews and Implementation of Executive Order 13807, “Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure Projects”;25 l SO 3358: Executive Committee for Expedited Permitting;26 l SO 3360: Rescinding Authorities Inconsistent with Secretary’s Order 3349, “American Energy Independence;”27 l SO 3380: Public Notice of the Costs Associated with Developing Department of the Interior Publications and Similar Documents;28 l SO 3385: Enforcement Priorities;29 and l SO 3389: Coordinating and Clarifying National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 Reviews.30 Actions. At the same time, the new Administration must: l Reinstate quarterly onshore lease sales in all producing states according to the model of BLM’s IM 2018–034, with the slight adjustment of including expanded public notice and comment.31 The new Administration should work with Congress on legislation, such as the Lease Now Act32 and — 523 — Department of the Interior ONSHORE Act,33 to increase state participation and federal accountability for energy production on the federal estate. l Conduct offshore oil and natural gas lease sales to the maximum extent permitted under the 2023–2028 lease program,34 with the possibility to move forward under a previously studied but unselected plan alternative.35 l Develop immediately and finalize a new five-year plan, while working with Congress to reform the OCSLA by eliminating five-year plans in favor of rolling or quarterly lease sales. l Review all resource management plans finalized in the previous four years and, when necessary, select studied alternatives to restore the multi-use concept enshrined in FLPMA and to eliminate management decisions that advance the 30 by 30 agenda. l Set rents, royalty rates, and bonding requirements to no higher than what is required under the Inflation Reduction Act.36 l Comply with the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 to establish a competitive leasing and development program in the Coastal Plain, an area of Alaska that was set aside by Congress specifically for future oil and gas exploration and development. It is often referred to as the “Section 1002 Area” after the section of ANILCA that excludes the area from Arctic National Wildlife Refuge’s wilderness designation.37 l Conclude the programmatic review of the coal leasing program, and work with the congressional delegations and governors of Wyoming and Montana to restart the program immediately.38 l Abandon withdrawals of lands from leasing in the Thompson Divide of the White River National Forest, Colorado; the 10-mile buffer around Chaco Cultural Historic National Park in New Mexico (restoring the compromise forged in the Arizona Wilderness Act39); and the Boundary Waters area in northern Minnesota if those withdrawals have not been completed.40 Meanwhile, revisit associated leases and permits for energy and mineral production in these areas in consultation with state elected officials. l Require regional offices to complete right-of-way and drilling permits within the average time it takes states in the region to complete them.

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills