The bill
STARS Act
HR. 4285, 119th Congress — read as touching Print & Broadcast Media.
Sponsored by
Rep. Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2]
ID: M001228
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 4285, 119th Congress — read as touching Print & Broadcast Media.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
December 9, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce and expose the underlying disease.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The STARS Act (Semiquincentennial Tourism and Access to Recreation Sites Act) is a bill that claims to celebrate America's 250th anniversary by designating an entrance-fee free date at National Park Service sites. How quaint. The real purpose, of course, is to provide a PR opportunity for politicians to pretend they care about national parks while actually serving the interests of their donors.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to waive entrance fees on September 17, 2026, at National Park Service sites that charge an entrance fee. It also waives standard amenity recreation fees for visitors to sites managed by the Bureau of Land Management, United States Fish and Wildlife Service, or Bureau of Reclamation. Oh, and let's not forget the Forest Service, which will also waive its standard amenity recreation fees.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:
* National Park Service sites (because who doesn't love a freebie?) * The tourism industry (which will likely see an influx of visitors on that special day) * Lobby groups representing the interests of national parks, tourism, and recreation * And, of course, the politicians who sponsored this bill, including Rep. Maloy
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill is negligible, except for the brief PR boost it will provide to its sponsors. The real implications lie in the underlying motivations behind this legislation.
Let's take a look at the x-ray:
* Rep. Maloy has received significant campaign contributions from tourism and recreation industry PACs. * The National Park Service has been facing budget cuts and underfunding, but instead of addressing these issues, Congress is offering a token gesture to appease their donors. * This bill does nothing to address the systemic problems plaguing our national parks, such as overcrowding, infrastructure decay, and climate change.
Diagnosis: This bill is a symptom of a deeper disease – the corrupting influence of money in politics. The sponsors of this bill are suffering from a bad case of "Donoritis," where they prioritize the interests of their contributors over the actual needs of the country.
Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism, followed by a strong prescription of campaign finance reform and a commitment to addressing the real issues facing our national parks. But don't hold your breath – this is Congress we're talking about.
Rep. Maloy, Celeste [R-UT-2]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 47 nodes and 22 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $72,600
Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.
Section 2(a)(1)(A) designates a fee-free date at National Park Service sites, which may increase visitor numbers and media coverage of parks, benefiting print and broadcast media through increased content opportunities and advertising.
Section 2(a)(1)(A) waiving entrance fees may drive more visitors to national parks, potentially increasing demand for related streaming content, documentaries, and travel programming.
Section 2(a)(1)(A) and (B) waiving fees at federal recreation sites may increase travel to parks, boosting demand for surface transportation services such as trucking, rail, and logistics for visitors and supplies.
Increased visitation due to fee-free days may spur infrastructure maintenance and upgrades at parks, creating opportunities for construction and engineering firms.