Fix Our Forests Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/471
Last Updated: April 8, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4]

ID: W000821

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Subcommittee on Conservation, Forestry, Natural Resources, and Biotechnology. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 119-27.

March 6, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

âś…

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity and expose the real disease beneath.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Fix Our Forests Act (HR 471) claims to aim at "expediting" forest management activities on National Forest System lands, public lands under the Bureau of Land Management, and Tribal lands. The supposed goal is to return resilience to overgrown, fire-prone forested lands. How noble.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill is a laundry list of bureaucratic jargon, but I'll highlight a few "gems":

* Creates a Fireshed Center (Sec. 102) because, apparently, we need another layer of bureaucracy to manage forests. * Establishes a Fireshed Registry (Sec. 103), which will no doubt become a treasure trove of useless data and bureaucratic red tape. * Modifies the treatment of revenue and payments under good neighbor agreements (Sec. 111). Ah, yes, because nothing says "forest management" like tweaking accounting rules. * Introduces a new concept: "fireshed assessments" (Sec. 105), which will undoubtedly lead to more paperwork and less actual forest management.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* The Forest Service * Bureau of Land Management * Indian Tribes * Governors * Electric utility companies (because, of course, they need special treatment) * And, allegedly, the American people

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

This bill is a classic case of "legislative placebo effect." It creates the illusion of addressing forest management issues while actually doing nothing to address the root causes. The real impact will be:

* Increased bureaucracy and red tape * More opportunities for special interest groups to lobby and influence policy * A continued lack of meaningful action on actual forest management and wildfire prevention

In short, this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a prime example of Congress's inability to tackle real problems and instead opting for feel-good legislation that accomplishes nothing.

Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a severe case of "Legislative Myopia," where the symptoms are treated with more bureaucracy and special interest pandering, rather than addressing the underlying disease of ineffective forest management. Treatment: Apply a healthy dose of skepticism and scrutiny to this legislative abomination.

Related Topics

Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Transportation & Infrastructure State & Local Government Affairs National Security & Intelligence Congressional Rules & Procedures Government Operations & Accountability Federal Budget & Appropriations Small Business & Entrepreneurship Civil Rights & Liberties
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

đź’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$105,700
25 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$105,700
Committees
$0
Individuals
$0

No PAC contributions found

1
PUEBLO OF LAGUNA
1 transaction
$8,300
2
CHICKASAW NATION
2 transactions
$6,600
3
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
2 transactions
$6,600
4
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
5
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
6
SUQUAMISH INDIAN TRIBE
2 transactions
$6,600
7
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
1 transaction
$5,000
8
CHEROKEE NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
9
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF SILETZ INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
10
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
11
SNOQUALMIE TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
12
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION
1 transaction
$3,300
13
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
14
CATAWBA INDIAN NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
15
NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
16
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$3,300
17
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
18
ONEIDA NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
19
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
20
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
21
TULE RIVER TRIBAL COUNCIL
1 transaction
$3,300
22
MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
23
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
24
SANTA ROSA RANCHERIA
1 transaction
$3,300
25
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$3,300

No committee contributions found

No individual contributions found

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Peters, Scott H. [D-CA-50]

ID: P000608

Top Contributors

10

1
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
Organization SHELBYVILLE, MI
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
2
STRATEGIC LINK CONSULTING, LP
Organization KENNESAW, GA
$3,300
May 28, 2024
3
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
Organization AUBURN, WA
$3,300
Aug 11, 2023
4
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
Organization RED ROCK, OK
$2,900
May 29, 2024
5
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Organization UPPER LAKE, CA
$2,900
May 29, 2024
6
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA TRIBE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Organization BELCOURT, ND
$2,900
May 28, 2024
7
CHEROKEE NATION
Organization TAHLEQUAH, OK
$2,500
Jan 9, 2024
8
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Organization UPPER LAKE, CA
$2,500
Jun 30, 2024
9
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
Organization RED ROCK, OK
$2,500
Jun 30, 2024
10
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA TRIBE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Organization BELCOURT, ND
$2,500
Jun 30, 2024

Rep. Tiffany, Thomas P. [R-WI-7]

ID: T000165

Top Contributors

10

1
ISLAND CATTLE COMPANY
Organization LONG ISLAND, KS
$2,500
May 29, 2024
2
HANDEK CATTLE INC
Organization MUSHOTACH, KS
$300
May 7, 2024
3
SOLBERG, TRYGVE A
SELF • BUSINESS OWNER
Individual MINOCQUA, WI
$13,200
Sep 30, 2023
4
SHANNON, JEAN L
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual MILWAUKEE, WI
$13,200
Jul 27, 2023
5
NICKLAUS, GREG
INCREDIBLE BANK • VICE CHAIRMAN
Individual ARBOR VITAE, WI
$13,200
Mar 31, 2024
6
NICKLAUS, GREG
INCREDIBLE BANK • VICE CHAIRMAN
Individual ARBOR VITAE, WI
$13,200
Mar 31, 2024
7
BUHOLZER, RONALD
KLONDIKE CHEESE • PRESIDENT
Individual MONROE, WI
$13,200
Jun 30, 2024
8
MAYER, SCOTT A
QPS EMPLOYMENT GROUP • CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
Individual FRANKLIN, WI
$10,000
Feb 29, 2024
9
HILGEMANN, WILLIAM
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual STRATFORD, WI
$9,900
Jun 30, 2024
10
ZIETLOW, DONALD P
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual LA CROSSE, WI
$6,666
Jun 28, 2023

Rep. Panetta, Jimmy [D-CA-19]

ID: P000613

Top Contributors

10

1
ACROSS THE AISLE PAC
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Jan 12, 2023
2
ACROSS THE AISLE PAC
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Mar 23, 2023
3
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Apr 12, 2023
4
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Apr 12, 2023
5
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$3,300
Apr 12, 2023
6
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
Organization CHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Oct 16, 2024
7
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
Organization EL CAJON, CA
$2,500
Nov 9, 2023
8
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$1,700
Apr 12, 2023
9
CROWN, LESTER
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
Individual CHICAGO, IL
$6,600
Aug 9, 2024
10
KIM, SOON
Individual SANTA CRUZ, CA
$4,300
Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Stauber, Pete [R-MN-8]

ID: S001212

Top Contributors

10

1
DEMOCRACY ENGINE INC
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Jun 6, 2023
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUITY
Organization PRIOR LAKE, MN
$3,300
Jun 30, 2024
3
LEECH LAKE - PAC
Organization CASS LAKE, MN
$3,300
Dec 12, 2024
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUITY
Organization PRIOR LAKE, MN
$3,300
Nov 13, 2023
5
GOOGLE
Organization MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
$1,000
Feb 21, 2023
6
CHAIN BRIDGE BANK
Organization MCLEAN, VA
$25
Dec 6, 2023
7
ZOTTO, CARLA DEL
Individual GLADEWATER, TX
$10,000
Aug 27, 2024
8
ANDERSON, ROLLIS
ANDERSON TRUCKING SERVICE INC. • CEO
Individual SAINT CLOUD, MN
$9,900
Feb 8, 2024
9
FAISON, JAY
CLEARPATH • FOUNDER
Individual CHARLOTTE, NC
$6,600
Jun 30, 2024
10
NYSTROM, BRIAN AND MARY ANN
NYSTROM & ASSOCIATES • PRESIDENT & CEO
Individual ANDOVER, MN
$6,600
Sep 27, 2024

Rep. Whitesides, George [D-CA-27]

ID: W000830

Top Contributors

10

1
SWING LEFT
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$2,400
Nov 5, 2024
2
AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$500
Oct 17, 2024
3
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$1,000
Aug 8, 2024
4
HARRIS, WILLIAM
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
Individual LEXINGTON, MA
$5,000
Jan 25, 2024
5
HARRIS, WILLIAM
Individual LEXINGTON, MA
$5,000
Feb 7, 2024
6
BAILEY, DAVID
KPPB LLP • PATENT ATTORNEY
Individual LOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024
7
BIRMINGHAM, CYNTHIA
SELF EMPLOYED • ATTORNEY
Individual SAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
8
BROOKS, JAMES
GRACIE FILMS • WRITER/DIRECTOR/PRODUCER
Individual LOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Oct 17, 2024
9
CLUBOK, ANDY
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP • ATTORNEY
Individual WASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Oct 30, 2024
10
DELANEY, QUINN
NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED
Individual PIEDMONT, CA
$3,300
Nov 9, 2024

Rep. Collins, Mike [R-GA-10]

ID: C001129

Top Contributors

10

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
PAC PRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jun 28, 2023
2
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
Organization CHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Sep 20, 2024
3
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
Organization CHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Dec 28, 2023
4
SILBEY, ALEXANDER
ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC, • CONSULTANT
Individual WASHINGTON, DC
$6,600
Jul 23, 2024
5
ARNOLD, LAURA
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual HOUSTON, TX
$6,600
Aug 10, 2024
6
READ, KURT
RSF PARTNERS • PARTNER
Individual DALLAS, TX
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
7
COATES, CHRIS
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual IRVING, TX
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
8
READ, KURT
RSF PARTNERS • PARTNER
Individual DALLAS, TX
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
9
CROTTY, THOMAS
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual SCOTTSDALE, AZ
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023
10
COATES, CHRIS
RETIRED • RETIRED
Individual IRVING, TX
$3,300
Dec 29, 2023

Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2]

ID: V000136

Top Contributors

10

1
EVERY STATE BLUE
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$0
Nov 4, 2024
2
EVERY STATE BLUE
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
PAC WASHINGTON, DC
$0
Nov 4, 2024
3
MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE
Organization MESCALERO, NM
$3,300
Oct 29, 2024
4
SAN MIGUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization LOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
Jun 27, 2023
5
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Sep 27, 2023
6
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
Organization ROHNERT PARK, CA
$3,300
Sep 27, 2023
7
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
Organization TEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Dec 4, 2023
8
PUEBLO OF ISLETA
Organization ISLETA, NM
$3,300
Mar 8, 2024
9
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization SANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Sep 17, 2024
10
PUEBLO OF LAGUNA
Organization LAGUNA, NM
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024

Rep. Kim, Young [R-CA-40]

ID: K000397

Top Contributors

10

1
CHICKASAW NATION
PAC ADA, OK
$1,000
Sep 23, 2024
2
COSTCO
Organization SCOTTSDALE, AZ
$220
Aug 30, 2024
3
META
Organization MENLO PARK, CA
$1,200
Oct 30, 2024
4
MITCHELL PUBLISHING
Organization LOS ANGELES, CA
$689
Oct 30, 2024
5
GOOGLE
Organization MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
$500
Oct 30, 2024
6
PECHANGA BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS
Organization TEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
7
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
Organization UPPER LAKE, CA
$3,300
Jul 28, 2023
8
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
Organization RED ROCK, OK
$3,300
Jul 28, 2023
9
TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA OF NORTH DAKOTA
Organization BELCOURT, ND
$3,300
Jul 28, 2023
10
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
Organization PALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Costa, Jim [D-CA-21]

ID: C001059

Top Contributors

10

1
TABLE MOUNTAIN RANCHERIA
Organization FRIANT, CA
$3,300
Oct 30, 2023
2
EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS
Organization CHEROKEE, NC
$3,300
Sep 18, 2024
3
JJF SP TRUST
Organization SAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Sep 30, 2024
4
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RANCH
Organization FRESNO, CA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2023
5
SALT RIVER PIMA MARICOPA INDIAN COMMUNITY
Organization SCOTTSDALE, AZ
$1,000
Jul 31, 2023
6
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$1,000
Sep 8, 2023
7
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization SANTA YNEZ, CA
$1,000
May 19, 2023
8
CHAPPELL-MCLULLAR TRUST
Organization HONOLULU, HI
$500
Mar 2, 2024
9
ARK, MANDEEP
SELF EMPLOYED • INTERPRETER
Individual FRESNO, CA
$6,500
Aug 14, 2024
10
AFZAL, TEHMINA
SELF EMPLOYED • INTERPRETER
Individual CHINO HILLS, CA
$6,500
Aug 14, 2024

Rep. Zinke, Ryan K. [R-MT-1]

ID: Z000018

Top Contributors

10

1
PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE
Organization TUCSON, AZ
$3,300
Dec 31, 2023
2
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
Organization TEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Feb 5, 2024
3
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
Organization TEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Feb 5, 2024
4
THE TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON
Organization TULALIP, WA
$3,300
Jun 30, 2024
5
PALA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization PALA, CA
$2,500
Jun 6, 2023
6
CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES OF THE FLATHEAD NATION
Organization PABLO, MT
$2,350
Mar 20, 2023
7
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIAN TRIBE
Organization SANTA YNEZ, CA
$2,000
Oct 28, 2024
8
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS
Organization PLACERVILLE, CA
$2,000
Jan 16, 2024
9
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Organization BANNING, CA
$2,000
Mar 5, 2024
10
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
Organization MARICOPA, AZ
$2,000
Sep 30, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 43 nodes and 45 connections

Total contributions: $147,400

Top Donors - Rep. Westerman, Bruce [R-AR-4]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

25 Orgs

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Introduction

Strong
Vector: 70%
Pages: 341-343 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Fix Our Forests Act aligns strongly with the Project 2025 policy objective of reforming forest service wildfire management by promoting proactive and active management of forests, reducing regulatory obstacles to fuel reduction, and increasing timber sales. The bill's focus on landscape-scale restoration, hazardous fuels management, and collaborative decision-making also supports the policy's goals."

Key themes: forest management wildfire risk reduction proactive vegetation management regulatory reform

— 308 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Reform Forest Service Wildfire Management. The United States Forest Service is one of four federal government land management agencies that admin- ister 606 million acres, or 95 percent of the 640 million acres of surface land area managed by the federal government.115 Located within the USDA, the Forest Service manages the National Forest System, which is comprised of 193 million acres.116 As explained by the USDA, “The USDA Forest Service’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations.”117 The Forest Service should focus on proactive management of the forests and grasslands that does not depend heavily on burning. There should be resilient forests and grasslands in the wake of management actions. Wildfires have become a primary vegetation management regime for national forests and grasslands.118 Recognizing the need for vegetation management, the Forest Service has adopted “pyro-silviculture” using “unplanned” fire,119 such as unplanned human-caused fires, to otherwise accomplish vegetation management.120 The Forest Service should instead be focusing on addressing the precipitous annual amassing of biomass in the national forests that drive the behavior of wildfires. By thinning trees, removing live fuels and deadwood, and taking other preventive steps, the Forest Service can help to minimize the consequences of wildfires. Increasing timber sales could also play an important role in the effort to change the behavior of wildfire because there would be less biomass. Timber sales and timber harvested in public forests dropped precipitously in the early 1990s and still remain very low. For example, in 1988, the volume of timber sold and harvested by volume was about 11 billion and 12.6 billion board feet (BBF), respectively.121 In 2021, timber sold was 2.8 BBF and timber harvested was 2.4 BBF. In 2018, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13855 to, among other things, promote active management of forests and reduce wildfire risks.122 The executive order stated, “Active management of vegetation is needed to treat these dangerous conditions on Federal lands but is often delayed due to challenges associated with regulatory analysis and current consultation requirements.”123 It further explained the need to reduce regulatory obstacles to fuel reduction in forests created by the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act.124 The next Administration should: l Champion executive action, consistent with law, and proactive legislation to reduce wildfires. This would involve embracing Executive Order 13855, building upon it, and working with lawmakers to promote active management of vegetation, reduce regulatory obstacles to reducing fuel buildup, and increase timber sales. — 309 — Department of Agriculture Eliminate or Reform the Dietary Guidelines. The USDA, in collaboration with HHS, publishes the Dietary Guidelines every five years.125 For more than 40 years, the federal government has been releasing Dietary Guidelines,126 and during this time, there has been constant controversy due to questionable recommenda- tions and claims regarding the politicization of the process. In the 2015 Dietary Guidelines process, the influential Dietary Guidelines Advi- sory Committee veered off mission and attempted to persuade the USDA and HHS to adopt nutritional advice that focused not just on human health, but the health of the planet.127 Issues such as climate change and sustainability infiltrated the process. Fortunately, the 2020 process did not get diverted in this manner. How- ever, the Dietary Guidelines remain a potential tool to influence dietary choices to achieve objectives unrelated to the nutritional and dietary well-being of Americans. There is no shortage of private sector dietary advice for the public, and nutrition and dietary choices are best left to individuals to address their personal needs. This includes working with their own health professionals. As it is, there is constantly changing advice provided by the government, with insufficient qualifications on the advice, oversimplification to the point of miscommunicating important points, questionable use of science, and potential political influence. The Dietary Guidelines have a major impact because they not only can influence how private health providers offer nutritional advice, but they also inform federal programs. School meals are required to be consistent with the guidelines.128 The next Administration should: l Work with lawmakers to repeal the Dietary Guidelines. The USDA should help lead an effort to repeal the Dietary Guidelines. l Minimally, the next Administration should reform the Dietary Guidelines. The USDA, with HHS, should develop a more transparent process that properly considers the underlying science and does not overstate its findings. It should also ensure that the Dietary Guidelines focus on nutritional issues and do not veer off-mission by focusing on unrelated issues, such as the environment, that have nothing to do with nutritional advice. In fact, if environmental concerns supersede or water down recommendations for human nutritional advice, the public would be receiving misleading health information. The USDA, working with lawmakers, should codify these reforms into law. ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES Based on the recommended reforms identified as ideal solutions, the USDA would look different in many respects. One of the biggest changes would be a USDA that is not focused on welfare, given that means-tested welfare programs would

Introduction

Strong
Vector: 70%
Pages: 341-343 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Fix Our Forests Act strongly aligns with the Project 2025 policy objective of reforming Forest Service wildfire management by promoting proactive and active management of forests, reducing regulatory obstacles to fuel reduction, and increasing collaboration among stakeholders. The bill's focus on landscape-scale restoration, hazardous fuels management, and timber sales also resonates with the policy's emphasis on addressing biomass accumulation and minimizing wildfire consequences."

Key themes: forest management wildfire risk reduction proactive vegetation management regulatory reform

— 308 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Reform Forest Service Wildfire Management. The United States Forest Service is one of four federal government land management agencies that admin- ister 606 million acres, or 95 percent of the 640 million acres of surface land area managed by the federal government.115 Located within the USDA, the Forest Service manages the National Forest System, which is comprised of 193 million acres.116 As explained by the USDA, “The USDA Forest Service’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the nation’s forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present and future generations.”117 The Forest Service should focus on proactive management of the forests and grasslands that does not depend heavily on burning. There should be resilient forests and grasslands in the wake of management actions. Wildfires have become a primary vegetation management regime for national forests and grasslands.118 Recognizing the need for vegetation management, the Forest Service has adopted “pyro-silviculture” using “unplanned” fire,119 such as unplanned human-caused fires, to otherwise accomplish vegetation management.120 The Forest Service should instead be focusing on addressing the precipitous annual amassing of biomass in the national forests that drive the behavior of wildfires. By thinning trees, removing live fuels and deadwood, and taking other preventive steps, the Forest Service can help to minimize the consequences of wildfires. Increasing timber sales could also play an important role in the effort to change the behavior of wildfire because there would be less biomass. Timber sales and timber harvested in public forests dropped precipitously in the early 1990s and still remain very low. For example, in 1988, the volume of timber sold and harvested by volume was about 11 billion and 12.6 billion board feet (BBF), respectively.121 In 2021, timber sold was 2.8 BBF and timber harvested was 2.4 BBF. In 2018, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13855 to, among other things, promote active management of forests and reduce wildfire risks.122 The executive order stated, “Active management of vegetation is needed to treat these dangerous conditions on Federal lands but is often delayed due to challenges associated with regulatory analysis and current consultation requirements.”123 It further explained the need to reduce regulatory obstacles to fuel reduction in forests created by the National Environmental Policy Act and the Endangered Species Act.124 The next Administration should: l Champion executive action, consistent with law, and proactive legislation to reduce wildfires. This would involve embracing Executive Order 13855, building upon it, and working with lawmakers to promote active management of vegetation, reduce regulatory obstacles to reducing fuel buildup, and increase timber sales.

Introduction

Weak
Vector: 65%
Pages: 350-352 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Fix Our Forests Act and the Project 2025 policy have weak alignment, as they address different topics (forest management vs. education policy), but share a tangential connection through their emphasis on decentralization and empowering local decision-making."

Key themes: decentralization local control empowering communities

— 318 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 121. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, “FY 1905–2021 National Summary Cut and Sold Data Graphs,” https://www.fs.usda.gov/forestmanagement/documents/sold-harvest/documents/1905-2021_Natl_ Summary_Graph_wHarvestAcres.pdf (accessed December 16, 2022), and U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, “Forest Products Cut and Sold from the National Forests and Grasslands,” https://www.fs.usda. gov/forestmanagement/products/cut-sold/index.shtml (accessed December 16, 2022). 122. Donald J. Trump, “Promoting Active Management of America’s Forests, Rangelands, and Other Federal Lands to Improve Conditions and Reduce Wildfire Risk,” Executive Order 13855, December 21, 2018, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-201800866/pdf/DCPD-201800866.pdf (accessed December 16, 2022). 123. Ibid. 124. Ibid. 125. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/ (accessed December 16, 2022). 126. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, “History of the Dietary Guidelines,” https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/ about-dietary-guidelines/history-dietary-guidelines (accessed December 16, 2022). 127. Daren Bakst, “Extreme Environmental Agenda Hijacks Dietary Guidelines: Comment to the Advisory Committee,” The Daily Signal, July 17, 2014, https://www.dailysignal.com/2014/07/17/extreme-environmental- agenda-hijacks-dietary-guidelines-comment-advisory-committee/ (accessed December 16, 2022). 128. Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, S. 3307, 111th Cong., 2nd Sess., https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th- congress/senate-bill/3307/text (accessed December 16, 2022), and Dietary Guidelines for Americans, “Current Dietary Guidelines,” https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/usda-hhs-development-dietary-guidelines (accessed December 16, 2022). — 319 — 11 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Lindsey M. Burke MISSION Federal education policy should be limited and, ultimately, the federal Depart- ment of Education should be eliminated. When power is exercised, it should empower students and families, not government. In our pluralistic society, fami- lies and students should be free to choose from a diverse set of school options and learning environments that best fit their needs. Our postsecondary institutions should also reflect such diversity, with room for not only “traditional” liberal arts colleges and research universities but also faith-based institutions, career schools, military academies, and lifelong learning programs. Elementary and secondary education policy should follow the path outlined by Milton Friedman in 1955, wherein education is publicly funded but education decisions are made by families. Ultimately, every parent should have the option to direct his or her child’s share of education funding through an education sav- ings account (ESA), funded overwhelmingly by state and local taxpayers, which would empower parents to choose a set of education options that meet their child's unique needs. States are eager to lead in K–12 education. For decades, they have acted inde- pendently of the federal government to pioneer a variety of constructive reforms and school choice programs. For example, in 2011, Arizona first piloted ESAs, which provide families roughly 90 percent of what the state would have spent on that child in public school to be used instead on education options such as private school tuition, online courses, and tutoring. In 2022, Arizona expanded the program to be available to all families.

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text