The bill
PIPES Act of 2025
HR. 5301, 119th Congress β read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6]
ID: G000546
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 5301, 119th Congress β read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
28 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
September 16, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The PIPES Act of 2025 is a 32-section behemoth that promises to "provide enhanced safety in pipeline transportation." How quaint.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to create the illusion of pipeline safety while actually serving as a vehicle for pork-barrel spending, regulatory capture, and industry-friendly giveaways. The sponsors, Mr. Graves et al., are either naive or complicit in this charade.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**
* Authorization of appropriations: A whopping $181.4 million for fiscal year 2026, increasing annually to $206.6 million by 2029. Because throwing money at a problem always solves it. * Regulatory updates: The bill incorporates various industry-friendly changes, such as allowing for the use of "composite materials" in pipelines (read: cheaper, less safe alternatives). * Workforce development: A token provision aimed at creating jobs and training programs, likely to benefit connected contractors rather than actual workers. * Sense of Congress on PHMSA engagement prior to rulemaking activities: A laughable attempt to feign transparency and accountability.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**
* Pipeline operators: The real beneficiaries of this bill, as they'll enjoy relaxed regulations and increased funding for their pet projects. * Industry lobbyists: The invisible hands guiding the sponsors' pens, ensuring that their clients' interests are well-represented. * Taxpayers: Footing the bill for this exercise in regulatory capture and pork-barrel spending. * Environmental groups: Tokenistically mentioned, but ultimately ignored, as the bill prioritizes industry interests over actual safety and environmental concerns.
**Potential Impact & Implications:**
* Increased risk of pipeline accidents and environmental disasters due to relaxed regulations and cost-cutting measures. * Further entrenchment of regulatory capture, as industry interests continue to dictate policy. * A modest increase in jobs and training programs, mostly benefiting connected contractors rather than actual workers. * A hefty price tag for taxpayers, with little tangible benefit to show for it.
In conclusion, the PIPES Act of 2025 is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. Behind the faΓ§ade of pipeline safety lies a complex web of industry-friendly giveaways, regulatory capture, and pork-barrel spending. It's a testament to the boundless creativity of lawmakers in crafting legislation that serves everyone except the public interest. Bravo, Congress!
Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 37 nodes and 28 connections (43 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $215,569
Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 8 helped.
The bill enhances pipeline safety regulations, provides grants for natural gas distribution system upgrades (Sec. 2(i)), and authorizes appropriations for pipeline safety programs, directly benefiting midstream operators and pipeline companies involved in oil, gas, and hazardous liquid transport.
Sec. 25 amends definitions and requirements for carbon dioxide pipelines, which are used in oil and gas operations for enhanced oil recovery and carbon capture, providing regulatory clarity and potential market expansion for CO2 transport infrastructure.
Sec. 13 (Rights-of-way management) includes provisions for alternative methods of maintaining rights-of-way, such as integrated vegetation management, habitat development, and maintenance strategies, which would benefit construction and engineering firms involved in pipeline right-of-way work.
Sec. 2(i) provides grants for publicly owned natural gas distribution pipeline systems, which are often operated by or affiliated with electric utilities that also distribute gas, reducing their monetary losses and improving system reliability.
Sec. 4 (Workforce development) authorizes additional FTE positions and recruitment/retention incentives for PHMSA, which could increase demand for skilled labor and potentially benefit labor unions representing technical and inspection workers.
Sec. 14 studies composite materials for pipelines transporting hydrogen and hydrogen-blended natural gas, supporting future renewable hydrogen infrastructure and potentially benefiting renewable energy producers seeking to use existing pipeline networks for green hydrogen transport.
+ 2 more industries not shown.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Graves, Sam [R-MO-6])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.