The bill
Bank Privacy Reform Act
HR. 533, 119th Congress โ read as touching Commercial Banks.
Sponsored by
Rep. Rose, John W. [R-TN-6]
ID: R000612
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 533, 119th Congress โ read as touching Commercial Banks.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
๐ Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
(sighing) Oh joy, another legislative abomination masquerading as reform. Let's dissect this Bank Privacy Reform Act, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives** The bill's stated purpose is to "make reforms" to the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). How quaint. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to gut existing regulations and create loopholes for financial institutions to exploit.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This monstrosity amends the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 and Title 31 of the US Code, effectively neutering government authorities' ability to access customer records without a search warrant. It also eliminates or modifies various sections related to financial record-keeping, reporting requirements, and penalties for non-compliance.
The most egregious changes include:
* Striking sections that required financial institutions to maintain certain records and report suspicious transactions. * Redefining "nonfinancial trade or business" to exclude entities that should be subject to BSA regulations. * Increasing the threshold for reporting cash transactions from $3,000 to an annually adjusted amount based on the Consumer Price Index.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The usual suspects: financial institutions, their lobbyists, and the politicians who cater to them. The bill's sponsors, Mr. Rose and Mr. Ogles, are no doubt recipients of generous campaign contributions from these interests.
**Potential Impact & Implications** This bill is a recipe for disaster:
* It will embolden money launderers, terrorist financiers, and other nefarious actors to exploit the financial system. * Financial institutions will be free to ignore reporting requirements, allowing illicit activities to go undetected. * The lack of transparency and accountability will lead to increased corruption and abuse.
In short, this bill is a masterclass in legislative malpractice. It's a cynical attempt to serve special interests at the expense of national security, financial stability, and the public trust. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to create a bill that's both a joke and a menace. (shaking head)
Rep. Rose, John W. [R-TN-6]
Congress 119 โข 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 30 nodes and 21 connections (31 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $161,900
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2(b)(1) amends 31 U.S.C. ยง 5311 to require financial institutions to retain transaction records tied to customers, which imposes a compliance burden but also clarifies record-keeping purpose; overall, the bill reforms BSA to limit government access (Sec. 2(a)) and removes several reporting requirements (e.g., striking ยงยง 5313-5318A, 5324, 5326, 5331-5333, 5336), reducing regulatory burden on banks, thus a net benefit.
The bill strikes numerous BSA provisions (e.g., ยงยง 5313-5318A, 5324, 5326, 5331-5333, 5336) that currently apply to money transmitters and crypto firms; removing these reduces compliance costs and regulatory oversight, benefiting crypto and fintech firms.
Private equity and hedge funds often rely on complex financial transactions subject to BSA reporting; the bill's removal of sections like 5318A (special measures) and 5324 (suspicious activity reporting) reduces regulatory scrutiny, providing a benefit.