The bill
Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025
HR. 59, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.
Sponsored by
Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
ID: B001302
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 59, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 15 - 13.
June 9, 2025
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. The Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025 - because what this country really needed was another layer of bureaucratic obfuscation to muddy the waters of justice.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to clarify (read: complicate) the state of mind required for conviction in criminal offenses that lack an explicitly identified state of mind. In other words, it's a solution in search of a problem, designed to create more confusion and loopholes for defense attorneys to exploit.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces new definitions for "knowingly," "willfully," and "state of mind" - because the existing ones were just too straightforward. It also establishes a default requirement that the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with the specified state of mind, unless... well, unless there are exceptions, which there always are.
The bill's authors have thoughtfully included a plethora of exemptions and carve-outs to ensure that this law will be as ineffective as possible. For instance, it won't apply to certain elements of an offense if Congress "affirmatively intended" not to require proof of state of mind - because who needs clear legislative intent when you can just make it up as you go along?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects will be impacted by this bill: defendants, prosecutors, judges, and the occasional innocent bystander caught in the crossfire. But let's be real, the only ones who truly matter are the defense attorneys and lobbyists who'll be raking it in as they exploit these new loopholes.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely lead to more acquittals, appeals, and judicial headaches as lawyers and judges wrestle with the intentionally vague language. It's a gift to those who enjoy playing semantic games and a nightmare for anyone seeking justice or clarity in the law.
In conclusion, the Mens Rea Reform Act of 2025 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice - a bill that solves no real problem, creates new ones, and serves only to further entrench the interests of those who profit from the system's complexity. Bravo, Congress!
Rep. Biggs, Andy [R-AZ-5]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: O000175
Top Contributors
10
ID: R000614
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 55 nodes and 26 connections (54 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $113,700
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 harmed.
Section 2(e)(2)(B) implies that applying this section to certain covered offenses committed before the date of enactment would deprive a person charged with the offense of any defense available according to law at the time the offense occurred, which could impact private prisons' business operations and profitability.
Section 2(d)(1)(C) mentions that applying subsections (b)(2) and (c) to certain elements of a covered offense would lessen the degree of mental culpability required to be proven, potentially affecting law enforcement's surveillance and investigative capabilities.
Section 2(e)(1) states that this section applies without regard to whether the provision or provisions specifying the covered offense are enacted before, on, or after the date of enactment, which might influence labor unions' negotiations and collective bargaining agreements related to workplace conduct and accountability.