To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office".

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/6006

Last Updated: August 3, 2026

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office".

HR. 6006, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Rep. Figures, Shomari [D-AL-2]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$76,300 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Veterans Affairs" section, p. 688-691 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

July 21, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The HR 6006 bill, a quintessential example of bureaucratic busywork. Let's dissect this inconsequential legislation and assess its implications for the truly important stakeholders – namely, myself and my fellow visionaries.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to rename a United States Postal Service facility in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." A feel-good gesture, no doubt, but one that serves no discernible purpose other than to placate local interests and waste congressional resources.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill designates a single postal facility with a new name, which will have zero impact on the Postal Service's operations or efficiency. It's a symbolic gesture, devoid of any meaningful policy changes. The "References" section (b) is particularly amusing, as it attempts to retroactively update all existing records to reflect the new name – a Sisyphean task that will only serve to further bog down an already inefficient bureaucracy.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders here are the local community and the Postal Service itself. However, I fail to see how this renaming will have any tangible benefits for either party. The real stakeholders – those with significant economic interests at play – remain unaffected by this legislation. My own business ventures, which rely on efficient logistics and streamlined regulations, will not be impacted in the slightest.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a perfect example of how democracy's inefficiencies can lead to wasted resources and pointless grandstanding. The opportunity cost of devoting congressional time to such trivial matters is staggering. Imagine if this energy were channeled into meaningful deregulation or tax reform – now that would be a game-changer for the economy.

In conclusion, HR 6006 is a non-event, a legislative sideshow that will have zero impact on my business interests or the broader economic landscape. I'll continue to focus on shaping policy that truly matters – the kind that unlocks innovation, reduces regulatory burdens, and increases my bottom line.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through a series of steps before it becomes an actual law. This one, HR 6006, is a relatively simple example.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to designate a specific post office in Tuskegee, Alabama as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office". Remember when we learned about how Congress can pass laws to honor individuals or groups? This is an example of that. The objective is to recognize the contributions and legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill has two main provisions:

* Section 1(a) designates the post office at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office". * Section 1(b) states that any references to this facility in existing laws, maps, or documents will be updated to reflect its new name.

This bill doesn't change any existing law; it simply adds a new designation. We covered how bills can amend existing laws or create new ones in class... I'm sure you all remember that.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties are:

* The United States Postal Service (USPS), which will have to update its records and signage for the post office. * The residents of Tuskegee, Alabama, who may take pride in having a post office named after the Tuskegee Airmen. * Historians and enthusiasts interested in preserving the legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The impact of this bill is largely symbolic. It's a way for Congress to honor the Tuskegee Airmen and their contributions to American history. There are no significant economic or policy implications. However, it may have some minor administrative effects on the USPS.

As I'm sure you recall from our lessons on checks and balances, this bill will need to pass both the House of Representatives and the Senate before being signed into law by the President. It's currently been referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in the House. We'll see if it makes its way through the legislative process...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got my eyes on HR 6006, and let me tell you, this bill is more than just a simple name change for a post office in Tuskegee, Alabama. On the surface, it's about designating the facility at 401 North Elm Street as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." But, my friends, that's just the tip of the iceberg.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The official story is that this bill aims to honor the Tuskegee Airmen, a group of African American pilots who served in World War II. Sounds noble, right? But what if I told you that this is actually a clever ruse to distract us from the real agenda?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Section 1(a) designates the post office as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." Section 1(b) ensures that any references to the facility in existing laws, maps, or documents will be updated to reflect the new name. Sounds innocuous? Think again! This is a classic case of "legislative sleight-of-hand." By making this change, they're creating a precedent for future name changes and rebranding efforts.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** On the surface, it's just the good people of Tuskegee, Alabama, who'll be affected by this name change. But what about the larger implications? What about the USPS itself? Are we seeing a subtle attempt to rebrand our national postal service as a tool for social engineering and historical revisionism?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Here's where things get interesting. By honoring the Tuskegee Airmen in this way, are we inadvertently perpetuating a narrative that reinforces the government's control over our collective memory? Think about it: by designating a post office as a memorial, they're creating a physical monument to their version of history. What other historical events or figures will be subject to similar "honoring" in the future?

Now, I know what you're thinking: "Uncle, this is just a harmless bill." But let me tell you, my friends, nothing is as it seems. This bill is just one piece of a larger puzzle, and once we start connecting the dots, we'll see that there's more to this story than meets the eye.

So, the next time you mail a letter from Tuskegee, Alabama, remember: you're not just sending a piece of correspondence – you're participating in a subtle experiment in social control. Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round, I've got a real doozy for you tonight. We're talking about HR 6006, the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office" bill. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, this one's a real game-changer. I mean, who doesn't love renaming a post office? It's not like we have more pressing issues to tackle in this great nation of ours.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of this bill is to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office". (Air quotes) "Honoring" the Tuskegee Airmen, a group of brave African American pilots who served during World War II. (Smirk) Because what's more patriotic than renaming a post office?

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill simply designates the post office with a new name and updates any references in existing laws, maps, regulations, documents, papers, or records of the United States to reflect this change. Wow, I can barely contain my excitement.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** Well, let's see... The affected parties include:

* The residents of Tuskegee, Alabama (who will now have a post office with a fancy new name) * The United States Postal Service (which will have to update its signage and stationery) * And, of course, the "elites" in Washington D.C. who get to pat themselves on the back for "honoring" American heroes

**Potential Impact & Implications** (Sarcastic tone) Oh, this bill is going to change everything! I mean, just think about it: a renamed post office will surely boost the local economy, create jobs, and make America great again. (Eye roll) And let's not forget the "deep state" implications – clearly, this is part of a larger conspiracy to distract us from the real issues facing our nation.

In all seriousness, folks, this bill is a classic example of Congress doing what it does best: renaming buildings and wasting taxpayer dollars on symbolic gestures. But hey, at least we can all agree that the Tuskegee Airmen were true American heroes, right? (Wink) Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go prepare for my next segment, where I'll be outraged about something else entirely.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** Ah, yes, the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office" bill. Because what America really needs is another post office with a fancy name. The main purpose of this bill is to stroke the egos of its sponsors and provide a feel-good moment for the constituents back home. It's a classic case of "Look, we're doing something!" while actually accomplishing nothing.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** Oh boy, this one's a doozy. The bill designates a single post office in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." Wow, I bet that took hours of intense deliberation and debate. The only change to existing law is that any reference to this post office will now include its new, fancy name. Because, clearly, this is a pressing issue that required immediate attention.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Let's see... the affected parties include:

* The sponsors of the bill, who get to pat themselves on the back for "honoring" the Tuskegee Airmen. * The constituents in Alabama, who will no doubt be thrilled to have a post office with a new name (yawn). * The United States Postal Service, which will now have to update its records and signage. Oh, the humanity! * And, of course, the Tuskegee Airmen themselves, whose legacy is being used as a prop for this legislative farce.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Ah, the impact of this bill? Well, let me put on my thinking cap... (tapping sound) Hmm... I've got it! The potential impact of this bill is that people might feel slightly warmer and fuzzier about their government. For a whole 30 seconds. Until they realize that nothing actually changed.

In conclusion, HR 6006 is a perfect example of legislative malpractice. It's a pointless exercise in self-aggrandizement, designed to distract from the real issues facing this country. But hey, at least it's not as bad as some of the other bills floating around Congress. That's like saying a patient with terminal cancer has a slightly better prognosis than one with Ebola. Congratulations, America! You've got a new post office name to brag about. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have real problems to solve – like diagnosing the underlying disease that is our legislative system.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: HR 6006 - Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 6006 is to designate the United States Postal Service facility located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." This bill aims to honor the legacy and contributions of the Tuskegee Airmen, a group of African American pilots and support personnel who served with distinction during World War II.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill consists of two main provisions:

1. Section 1(a) designates the specified postal facility as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." 2. Section 1(b) ensures that any references to the facility in existing laws, maps, regulations, documents, and records will be updated to reflect its new name.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* The United States Postal Service (USPS) * The community of Tuskegee, Alabama * The families and descendants of the Tuskegee Airmen * Historians and researchers interested in preserving the legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The passage of HR 6006 will have several positive impacts:

1. **Honoring a significant historical group:** By designating the post office as a memorial to the Tuskegee Airmen, Congress acknowledges their remarkable achievements and contributions to American history. 2. **Community recognition:** The designation will serve as a source of pride for the community of Tuskegee, Alabama, and reinforce its connection to this important chapter in American history. 3. **Educational opportunities:** The memorial post office may become a focal point for educational initiatives and events, promoting awareness about the Tuskegee Airmen's experiences and achievements.

Overall, HR 6006 is a symbolic gesture that recognizes the significance of the Tuskegee Airmen's legacy and provides an opportunity to educate future generations about their remarkable story.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

**HR 6006: A Bill with a Noble Face, but Follow the Money**

At first glance, HR 6006 appears to be a harmless bill aimed at honoring the Tuskegee Airmen by designating a post office in their name. However, as a seasoned lobbyist turned whistleblower, I've learned to look beyond the surface level and follow the money trail.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 6006 is to rename the United States Postal Service facility located at 401 North Elm Street in Tuskegee, Alabama, as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." This bill is a classic example of a "feel-good" piece of legislation, designed to garner bipartisan support and appease local constituents.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill's key provision is straightforward: it designates the specified post office as the "Tuskegee Airmen Memorial Post Office." There are no significant changes to existing law or regulations. However, this bill may set a precedent for future naming rights and commemorative designations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders in this bill are:

1. The United States Postal Service (USPS): As the facility's owner, USPS will be responsible for implementing the name change. 2. Local constituents: Residents of Tuskegee, Alabama, may take pride in having a post office named after the legendary Tuskegee Airmen. 3. Special interest groups: Organizations focused on preserving African American history and promoting diversity may support this bill.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** While HR 6006 appears to be a benign bill, it's essential to consider the potential implications:

1. **Naming rights:** This bill could set a precedent for future naming rights and commemorative designations, potentially leading to a surge in similar bills. 2. **Local economic impact:** The renamed post office may attract tourism and boost local economic activity, although this is speculative at best. 3. **PAC influence:** Although not directly relevant to this bill, it's worth noting that the USPS has been a target of lobbying efforts by various special interest groups, including those representing postal workers and mailers.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** A review of campaign finance records reveals that some of the bill's sponsors have received donations from organizations with interests in postal reform or labor unions. For example:

* Rep. Terri Sewell (D-AL) has received contributions from the National Association of Letter Carriers and the American Postal Workers Union. * Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) has received donations from the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association.

While these connections are not directly relevant to HR 6006, they highlight the complex web of interests surrounding postal reform and labor issues.

In conclusion, HR 6006 is a bill with a noble face, but it's essential to consider the potential implications and follow the money trail.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Figures, Shomari [D-AL-2]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$76,300

24 donors

PACs

Organizations

$16,800

Committees

Individuals

$59,500

No PAC contributions found

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

4 transactions

$9,900

MALDI MA

1 transaction

$2,000

HILLWOOD LIQUORS LLC

1 transaction

$1,000

SIP & SMOKE LLC

1 transaction

$1,000

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

1 transaction

$1,000

MOWA BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

2 transactions

$650

MAA PETROLEUM LLC

1 transaction

$500

STEWART HOWARD PC

1 transaction

$500

YAK THE KATHMANDU KITCHEN

1 transaction

$250

No committee contributions found

DESSOURCES, KALISHA

3 transactions

$9,900

JARRETT, ANGELA

1 transaction

$5,000

LANDEGGER, GEORGE

1 transaction

$5,000

JACOBS, IRWIN

1 transaction

$3,300

M TUCKSON, MARGIE

1 transaction

$3,300

MCCARTY III, E L

1 transaction

$3,300

ROMEIN, STEVE

1 transaction

$3,300

BONNER, WILLIAM E

1 transaction

$3,300

BOWERS, SHALOMYAH

1 transaction

$3,300

BROWN, TOBY D

1 transaction

$3,300

BURDEN, ANTHONY

1 transaction

$3,300

BURRILL, STEPHANIE

1 transaction

$3,300

CAIN, DAVID S

1 transaction

$3,300

CARTWRIGHT, STEVEN

1 transaction

$3,300

DESSOURCES, JEAN L

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Sewell, Terri A. [D-AL-7]

ID: S001185

Top Contributors

BUFFALO ROCK COMPANY

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$5,000

Oct 15, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Mar 26, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Sep 21, 2023

BUFFALO ROCK COMPANY

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$2,500

Sep 10, 2024

BUFFALO ROCK COMPANY

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$2,500

Sep 30, 2024

LAW OFFICES OF FREDERICK GRAEFE LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Sep 30, 2023

CHIROPRACTIC CARE INC.

OrganizationGULF SHORES, AL

$250

Feb 26, 2024

BROWN, CANDACE P.

NONE • RETIRED

IndividualFLORENCE, SC

$4,500

Sep 6, 2024

BROWN, JAMES A.

SMS COMPANY • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualFLORENCE, SC

$4,500

Sep 6, 2024

LEHMAN, WILLIAM

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualAVENTURA, FL

$3,300

Dec 9, 2024

Rep. Palmer, Gary J. [R-AL-6]

ID: P000609

Top Contributors

NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY ASSOC PC

OrganizationVESTAVIA HILLS, AL

$3,000

Mar 4, 2024

RMS LLC

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$1,000

Jun 5, 2024

JDM PUBLIC STRATEGIES LLC

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Jun 15, 2023

HEART OF DIXIE OBLIGATION PAC

OrganizationGADSDEN, AL

$10

Mar 4, 2024

ARD, GARRY

ARD CONTRACTING • PRESIDENT

IndividualMOUNTAIN BRK, AL

$13,200

Jun 28, 2023

BROOKS, RICHARD A.

EXPRESS OIL CHANGE LLC • CEO

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, AL

$13,200

Jun 6, 2023

ELCAN, DANIEL G. MR.

ELCAN AND ASSOCIATES INC. • REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER

IndividualMOBILE, AL

$13,200

Apr 11, 2023

SIDDLE, GLENN C.

NEWCASTLE CONSTRUCTION • CEO

IndividualINDIAN SPRINGS, AL

$13,200

May 23, 2023

WHITE-SPUNNER, JOHN

WHITE-SPUNNER CONSTRUCTION • EXECUTIVE

IndividualDAPHNE, AL

$13,200

Apr 11, 2023

ARD, GARRY

ARD CONTRACTING • PRESIDENT

IndividualMOUNTAIN BRK, AL

$13,200

Jun 28, 2023

Rep. Moore, Barry [R-AL-1]

ID: M001212

Top Contributors

WINRED TECHNICAL SERVICES

OrganizationARLINGTON, VA

$3,300

Sep 30, 2023

ENTERPRISE TARPAULIN PRODUCTS, INC.

OrganizationENTERPRISE, AL

$3,300

Aug 9, 2023

WINRED TECHNICAL SERVICES

OrganizationARLINGTON, VA

$3,300

Jul 16, 2023

WINRED TECHNICAL SERVICES

OrganizationARLINGTON, VA

$3,300

Jul 16, 2023

NORTH MONTGOMERY MATERIALS LLC

OrganizationMILLBROOK, AL

$3,300

Sep 11, 2023

PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C.

OrganizationENTERPRISE, AL

$3,300

Aug 21, 2023

SOUTHLAND STRUCTURAL LLC

OrganizationFLORALA, AL

$3,300

Aug 22, 2023

WATSON GLASS

OrganizationENTERPRISE, AL

$3,300

Sep 13, 2023

WATSON GLASS

OrganizationENTERPRISE, AL

$3,300

Sep 13, 2023

ARGUTA RESOURCES, LLC

OrganizationEUFAULA, AL

$2,500

Aug 2, 2023

Rep. Rogers, Mike D. [R-AL-3]

ID: R000575

Top Contributors

CHICKASAW NATION

PACADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 20, 2023

CHICKASAW NATION

PACADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 17, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Apr 16, 2024

COOPER CONSTRUCTION CO.

OrganizationBIRMINGHAM, AL

$500

Mar 16, 2023

BLUE, NEAL

GENERAL ATOMICS • CEO AND CHAIRMAN

IndividualLA JOLLA, CA

$150,000

Apr 1, 2024

BLUE, NEAL

GENERAL ATOMICS • CEO AND CHAIRMAN

IndividualLA JOLLA, CA

$125,000

Mar 22, 2023

RANE, JIMMY

YELLAWOOD • PRESIDENT

IndividualABBEVILLE, AL

$52,900

Aug 3, 2023

ARONOV, JAKE

ARONOV REALTY • PRESIDENT

IndividualMONTGOMERY, AL

$50,000

Sep 22, 2023

COLLAZO, FRANCISCO

COLSA CORP. • FOUNDER / CHAIRMAN

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$50,000

Feb 9, 2023

Rep. Strong, Dale W. [R-AL-5]

ID: S001220

Top Contributors

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Aug 2, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

Jun 15, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Aug 2, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,000

Jun 30, 2023

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$1,000

Sep 29, 2023

JOHN PLUNK ATTORNEY PC

OrganizationATHENS, AL

$1,000

Nov 18, 2024

LEE, ARNOLD

SESI • EXECUTIVE

IndividualSANTA ROSA BEACH, FL

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

HINCHMAN, ROBERT

IGNITE • CEO

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$6,600

Feb 23, 2023

LIPTON, LEE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLAKE WORTH, FL

$5,000

Apr 19, 2023

BENTLEY, PHILIP W. III

BENTLEY BUICK GMC CADILLAC • PRESIDENT

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$5,000

Sep 7, 2023

Rep. Aderholt, Robert B. [R-AL-4]

ID: A000055

Top Contributors

CHALMERS, ADAMS, BACKER & KAUFMAN LLC

OrganizationJOHNS CREEK, GA

$2,900

Mar 7, 2023

IMPACT JOURNALS

OrganizationORCHARD PARK, NY

$1,200

Jun 4, 2023

SUIT, LLC

OrganizationATTALLA, AL

$500

Jun 10, 2023

ROBIN, CRAIG A.

EO SOLUTIONS • CEO

IndividualALBUQUERQUE, NM

$6,600

Nov 13, 2023

HOKR, BRETT H.

EO SOLUTIONS • CTO

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$6,600

Nov 13, 2023

LESSMANN, KURT M.

TRIDEUM • CTO

IndividualMADISON, AL

$6,600

Oct 2, 2023

KHALILI, KAVEH

EO SOLUTIONS • COO

IndividualBOULDER CITY, NV

$6,600

Nov 13, 2023

BUFFALOE, STEPHANIE

HOME INSTEAD TUSCALOOSA • OWNER

IndividualTUSCALOOSA, AL

$6,600

Nov 15, 2023

COLLAZO, FRANCISCO JOSE

COLSA CORP • PRESIDENT/CEO

IndividualHUNTSVILLE, AL

$6,600

Oct 2, 2023

HUNT, RAY L.

HUNT CONSOLIDATED INC. • PRESIDENT

IndividualDALLAS, TX

$6,600

Feb 21, 2024

Rep. McDonald Rivet, Kristen [D-MI-8]

ID: M001237

Top Contributors

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS

OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI

$3,300

Oct 30, 2024

MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS

OrganizationSHELBYVILLE, MI

$2,500

Oct 25, 2024

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,000

Oct 29, 2024

FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA

OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA

$1,000

Aug 5, 2024

SAULT STE. MARIE TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS

OrganizationSAULT SAINTE MARIE, MI

$500

Aug 6, 2024

TAYLOR, DONZEL

IndividualSAGINAW, MI

$4,105

Sep 22, 2024

GANDHI, MILAN

SEFL EMPLOYED • ADMINISTRATOR

IndividualSOUTHFIELD, MI

$3,550

Mar 28, 2024

WILCOX, ALLISON

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIDLAND, MI

$3,350

Jun 14, 2024

ALTMAN, LYNDA CARTER

POTOMAC PRODUCTIONS • ACTRESS

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Nov 1, 2024

Rep. Bishop, Sanford D. [D-GA-2]

ID: B000490

Top Contributors

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA

OrganizationMANSURA, LA

$3,300

Dec 30, 2023

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LOUISIANA

OrganizationMANSURA, LA

$2,500

Oct 30, 2024

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

OrganizationOKMULGEE, OK

$1,000

Oct 28, 2024

DAVIS, HENRY BART III

SELF-EMPLOYED • FARMER

IndividualDOERUN, GA

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

DAVIS, HENRY BART JR

SELF-EMPLOYED • FARMER

IndividualDOERUN, GA

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

DAVIS, JEDD ADAM

SELF-EMPLOYED • FARMER

IndividualDOERUN, GA

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

DAVIS, PAULA

SELF EMPLOYED • FARMER

IndividualDOERUN, GA

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

REDDING, ROBERT L. JR

THE REDDING FIRM • PRESIDENT

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

VECCHIARELLI, DANIEL A

LEPRINO FOODS • VICE CHAIRMAN

IndividualDENVER, CO

$3,300

Oct 28, 2024

BARNES, ROY E.

THE BARNES LAW GROUP LLC • ATTORNEY

IndividualMARIETTA, GA

$3,300

Oct 25, 2024

Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7]

ID: C001072

Top Contributors

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

May 22, 2023

INDIANA IMPORT LLC

OrganizationFISHERS, IN

$1,000

Nov 11, 2023

MNAYMEH, HALA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCORAL GABLES, FL

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

DE LA CRUZ, FABIO

WESTON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • PARTNER

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

KHAN, AZHER M

CALDERON TEXTILES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCARMEL, IN

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

HOGAN, ALAN P.

THE HOGAN GROUP, INC. • CONSULTANT

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Feb 22, 2023

JOHNSON, LACY M.

ICE MILLER • ATTORNEY

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Mar 16, 2023

STACK, ANN M.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Feb 22, 2023

ABDALLA, MIKE A.

MAGNA PROPERTIES • PRESIDENT

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Mar 11, 2024

MAMOUN, IHSAN

SDI RADIOLOGY • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSEFFNER, FL

$3,300

Jan 23, 2024

Rep. Wilson, Frederica S. [D-FL-24]

ID: W000808

Top Contributors

MAGELLAN HOUSING

OrganizationSUGAR LAND, TX

$1,500

Mar 27, 2024

LEHMAN, WILLIAM JR.

LEHMAN DEALERSHIP ENTERPRISES • PRESIDENT

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$5,000

Jul 18, 2024

LEHMAN, WILLIAM JR.

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,400

Aug 2, 2024

SANDBERG, SHERYL

NOT EMPLOYED • PHILANTHROPIST

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Dec 21, 2023

ARISON, MADELEINE

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL

$3,300

Mar 6, 2023

ARISON, MICKY

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualBAL HARBOUR, FL

$3,300

Mar 6, 2023

LEHMAN, WILLIAM JR.

LEHMAN DEALERSHIP ENTERPRISES • PRESIDENT

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Jun 28, 2023

MOISE, RUDOLPH

SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualDAVIE, FL

$3,300

Jul 18, 2024

STIEFEL, BARBARA

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualCORAL GABLES, FL

$3,300

Jul 18, 2024

ACCIME, HERICKSON

KEMET GROUP • ENGINEER

IndividualMIAMI, FL

$3,300

Jul 14, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Figures, Shomari [D-AL-2]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 45 nodes and 64 connections

Total contributions: $64

Top Donors - Rep. Figures, Shomari [D-AL-2]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

9 Orgs15 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate

Vector: 53%

Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill honors the Tuskegee Airmen, a distinguished group of African American veterans, which aligns with the Department of Veterans Affairs' broader mission to recognize and support veterans, though it does not directly affect VA programs or services."

Key themes:veteran recognitionhistorical preservationhonoring servicecommunity engagementeducation

Department of Defense

Weak

Vector: 55%

Pages: 134-136AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on honoring the Tuskegee Airmen through a postal facility designation, which is a symbolic tribute to military service. Project 2025's DOD section centers on defense exportability, FMS process reform, and recruiting/retention policies, sharing only a broad theme of recognizing military contributions without substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:military service recognitionhistorical legacyveterans

— 101 — Department of Defense 1. Ensure that senior U.S. military leadership emphasizes exportability in the initial development of defense systems that are both available and interoperable with our partners and allies. 2. Create a funding mechanism to incentivize exportability in initial planning, which can be recouped after future FMS transactions. l End informal congressional notification. Informal congressional notification or “tiered review” is a hinderance to ensuring timely sales to our global partners. The tiered review process is not codified in law; it is merely a practice by which the Department of State provides a preview of prospective arms transfers before Congress is formally notified.9 1. End the tiered review process to eliminate at least 20 days from the FMS process. 2. Use the tiered review process only when unanimous congressional support is guaranteed in order to eliminate the “weaponization” by select Members of Congress that has prevented billions of dollars of arms sales from moving into formal congressional notification. l Minimize barriers to collaboration. The high cost of developing advanced defense platforms requires the United States to collaborate with key allies to minimize waste, complement strengths, and supplement our defense industrial base to create a system that is greater than that of the United States alone. 1. Enhance defense industrial base planning with partners to allow them to focus on niche areas where there are cost advantages for the United States. 2. Decrease International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to facilitate trade with such allies as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. 3. Create opportunities to improve the health of the defense supply chain with added opportunities for partners and allies to contribute. l Reform the FMS contracting process. The contracting timeline for the FMS process is shockingly slow. On average, the DOD contracting timeline takes approximately 18 months because of slow bureaucratic processes and chronic understaffing.10 — 102 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Immediately fund more contracting capacity in all services to decrease the contracting timeline and improve the delivery of defense articles to our global partners. 2. Rationalize and speed arms sales decision-making to preclude our enemies from exploiting bureaucratic slothfulness and allow us to manage the development of indigenous defense industrial bases. DOD PERSONNEL The men and women of America’s armed forces are the most critical component of our national defense strategy, but in recent years, they have been overextended, undervalued, and insufficiently resourced. Their families help them to carry the burden of service, but the assistance they receive is disproportionately less than the sacrifices they make. Young civilians who would thrive in a military environ- ment are disenfranchised when educators and influencers discourage them from learning about military service and preparing for the honor of wearing Ameri- ca’s uniform. The United States military is an extraordinary institution, staffed by exceptional people who have defended our nation and changed the course of history, but the Biden Administration, through word and deed, has treated the armed forces as just another place to work. We must restore our military to a place of honor and respect and recruit and retain the individuals who will meet the rigorous standards of excellence that are required for membership in the world’s greatest fighting force. Needed Reforms l Rescue recruiting and retention. Recruiting was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations and is expected to be even worse in 2023. Some of the problems are self-inflicted and ongoing. The recruiting problem is not service-specific: It affects the entire Joint Force. 1. Appoint a Special Assistant to the President who will maintain liaison with Congress, DOD, and all other interested parties on the issue of recruiting and retention. 2. Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system that uses private medical records of potential recruits at Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS), creating unnecessary delays and unwarranted rejections.11 3. Improve military recruiters’ access to secondary schools and require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery

Department of Veterans Affairs

Weak

Vector: 53%

Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HR 6006 honors the Tuskegee Airmen, a group of African American military veterans, which tangentially relates to veterans' recognition—a theme within the Department of Veterans Affairs section of Project 2025. However, the bill is purely symbolic (naming a post office) and does not address VA policy, healthcare, benefits, or systemic reforms outlined in the Project 2025 VA section."

Key themes:veterans recognitionhistorical commemorationAfrican American veterans

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra. — 657 — Section Four THE ECONOMY The next Administration must prioritize the economic prosperity of ordi- nary Americans. For several decades, establishment “elites” have failed the citizenry by refusing to secure the border, outsourcing manufacturing to China and elsewhere, spending recklessly, regulating constantly, and generally controlling the country from the top down rather than letting it flourish from the bottom up. The proper role of government, as was articulated nearly 250 years ago, is to secure our God-given, unalienable rights in order that we might enjoy the pursuit of happiness, the benefits of free enterprise, and the blessings of liberty. Finding the right approach to trade policy is key to the fortunes of everyday Americans. In Chapter 26, president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute Kent Lassman and former White House director of trade and manufacturing policy Peter Navarro debate what an effective conservative trade policy would look like. Lass- man argues that the best trade policy is a humble, limited-government approach that would encourage free trade with all nations. He maintains that aggressive trade policies involve an increased government role that future leftist Administra- tions will utilize to push “climate change” and “equity”-based activism. Focusing more on gross domestic product (GDP) growth than on median income, he writes that “people mistakenly believe that U.S. manufacturing and the U.S. economy are in decline” when in truth “American manufacturing output is currently at an all-time high.” Meanwhile, we continue to experience “record-setting real GDP” despite our “long-run decline in manufacturing employment.” Lassman does not think that an aggressive U.S. trade policy would lead to more manufacturing jobs. Rather, he writes, “Federal Reserve research shows” that the

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 54%

Pages: 515-517AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill HR 6006 focuses on honoring the Tuskegee Airmen by naming a post office after them, which is a symbolic and historical recognition effort. The Project 2025 policy excerpt pertains to healthcare policy reforms under HHS and HRSA, including caregiver strategy, telehealth licensure, contraceptive mandates, and preventive services—none of which relate to postal facility naming or historical memorials."

— 483 — Department of Health and Human Services l Readdress the National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers. While in theory the strategy aims to support family members with duties to care for older family members, the plan is overly focused on racial and “LGBTQ+ equity.” The strategy should be examined to establish an efficient plan to support caregivers and their families. There should also be a review of its COVID-19 policies. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (HRSA) l Congress should allow CMS to use the 340B data that HRSA collects rather than having CMS conduct its own survey, especially in view of the U.S. Supreme Court’s American Hospital Association v. Becerra decision.69 The legislation should also create penalties for those who do not respond to HRSA’s data collection. l Legally define the locus of service as where the provider is located during the telehealth visit rather than where the patient is. With such a definition, states could continue to reserve their powers to establish the standards for licensure and scope of practice. The providers could ensure continuity and consistency of care no matter where their patients might move while maintaining the licenses that make the most sense for them. Americans are far more mobile and technologically advanced today than they were when most health care laws were written. Telehealth has become increasingly important, particularly during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also has great potential in rural and other areas where there are shortages of health care providers. HRSA’s Office for the Advancement of Telehealth includes a program known as the Licensure Portability Grant Program, which bolsters state efforts to reform licensing laws to maximize telehealth flexibility. HRSA does not have the authority through this office to dictate licensure laws; that power has typically been reserved to the states. However, telehealth across state lines, when permitted, is interstate commerce, which can be regulated by the federal government according to the Constitution. l Restore Trump religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate (also a CMS rule). HHS should rescind, if finalized, the regulation titled “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” proposed jointly by HHS, Treasury, and Labor.70 This rule proposes to amend Trump-era final rules regarding religious and moral exemptions and accommodations for coverage of certain preventive services under the ACA. Preventive services include contraception, and — 484 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise it appears the proposed rule would change the existing regulations for religious and moral exemptions to the ACA’s contraception mandate. There is no need for further rulemaking that curtails existing exemptions and accommodations. l Require HRSA to use rulemaking to update the women’s preventive services mandate. The contraceptive mandate issued under Obamacare has been the source of years of egregious attacks on many Americans’ religious and moral beliefs. The mandate was issued as part of the women’s preventive services guidelines, which were issued without any rulemaking that involved public notice and an opportunity to comment. Instead, HRSA issued and changed the mandate by simply posting changes to its website. HRSA also started off not requiring coverage of fertility awareness–based methods of family planning, then requiring them, and then removing the requirement without notifying the public. A federal judge recently ruled that this failure to undergo notice and comment in issuing the mandate is unlawful. HRSA should be required to repromulgate any women’s preventive services mandates through the notice and comment process that is compliant with the Administrative Procedures Act. Moreover, since the Obama Administration HRSA entered into long- term contracts with the pro-abortion American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and related entities to serve as an exclusive adviser with respect to the content of this mandate, HRSA has used this arrangement to ignore comments that members of the public were sometimes able to submit in the process, and ACOG has abused its position to attack HHS’s allowance of religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate. HHS should rescind these contracts and establish an advisory committee that is compliant with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and has members that are committed to women’s preventive services and are not pro-abortion ideologues. l Expand inclusion of fertility awareness–based methods and supplies to family planning in the women’s preventive services mandate. The ACA requires coverage of and prevents insurance plans from imposing any cost-sharing requirements on women who obtain preventive care and screenings as defined by HRSA. In 2016, HHS included “instruction in fertility awareness-based methods” as part of this requirement. However, in December 2021, HHS removed that language from its list without using the notice-and-comment process or giving any rationale, both of which are mandated by the Administrative Procedures Act. In August

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 53%

Pages: 189-191AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill HR 6006 is a symbolic measure to honor the Tuskegee Airmen by naming a post office after them, which has no substantive connection to the Project 2025 policy objectives for the U.S. Secret Service, such as reforming its dual mission, transferring investigative functions, or focusing on immigration-related financial crimes."

— 157 — Department of Homeland Security to such returnees. These two steps could be foundational for any improvements in the recruiting process. U.S. SECRET SERVICE (USSS) Needed Reforms The U.S. Secret Service must be the world’s best protective agency. Currently, the agency is distracted by its dual mission of protection and financial investigations. The result has been a long series of high-profile embarrassments and security fail- ures, perhaps most notably its allowing of then-Vice President-elect Kamala Harris to be inside the Democratic National Committee office on January 6, 2021, while a pipe bomb was outside. Despite the great size and scope of the January 6 inves- tigation, this high-profile incident of danger to a protectee remains unresolved. The failures of the USSS protective mission are too numerous to list here. A December 2015 bipartisan report from the House Oversight Committee listed dozens of such incidents as well as needed recommendations for reform.14 This chapter adopts those findings and recommendations in whole, especially the finding that USSS’s dual-mission structure detracts from the agency’s protective capabilities. At the time of that report, USSS agents spent only one-third of their work hours on protection-related activities as opposed to investigative activities. USSS was established initially to investigate counterfeit currency, but its mission has evolved over the decades to prioritize electronic financial crimes. For example, as this chap- ter was being written, all 15 of the USSS’s most wanted individuals were wanted for financial crimes, many of them international in nature. Notably, the last head of the agency left not for a protection-related job, but to be the Chief Security Officer of social media company SnapChat. This is a pattern that has developed over the years, with agents seeking to burnish their online financial crimes credentials to secure corporate security jobs. Coupled with some of the lowest morale in the federal government, the agency has completely lost sight of the primacy of its protective mission. New Policies USSS should transfer to the Department of Justice and Department of the Treasury all investigations that are not related to its protective function. It should begin the logistical operation of closing all field offices throughout the country and internationally to the extent they are not taken over by Treasury or Justice. USSS agents stationed outside of Washington, D.C., should be transferred to work in Immigration and Customs Enforcement field offices where they would continue to be the “boots on the ground” to follow up on threat reports throughout the country and liaise with local law enforcement for visits by protectees. — 158 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise The only investigations not related to USSS’s protective function that agents should pursue would be directed by HSI and relate to tracking the financial crimes associated with illegal immigration. This should include tracing remittances, any funds that are used to pay coyotes or the cartels, and payments by businesses to illegal aliens and all other crimes associated with illegal immigration. USSS should keep visitor logs for all facilities where the President works or resides. The Biden Administration has evaded such transparency with President Biden spending a historic amount of time for a President at his Delaware residence. This has left the American people in the dark as to who is influencing the highest levels of their own government. Budget The suggested reforms would result in a significant USSS budget reduction, primarily because the agency would relinquish dozens of physical offices through- out the U.S. and internationally. Some amount of savings should be used to fix the personnel problems and for recruitment initiatives aimed at individuals who are inclined to join a protection-focused agency. Personnel As documented extensively in the above-referenced 2015 bipartisan congressio- nal report, low morale and high turnover are key drivers of USSS problems. With their mission focused on protection, agents would no longer spend the bulk of their time developing unrelated skillsets. Instead, USSS agents could hone their protection skills and pursue a protection career path in the agency rather than quickly leaving USSS for high-paying corporate security jobs. The Uniform Division (UD) of USSS requires a significant staffing increase. As documented in the bipartisan report, understaffing results in unpredictable and long hours, which in turn result in high turnover, which only compounds the problem. Another key issue is that UD officers lack the ability to enforce criminal laws outside the immediate vicinity of the White House. As the District of Columbia is a federal jurisdiction and currently is beholden to the trend of progressive pro- crime policies, UD officers should enforce all applicable laws. The result would be to allow UD officers to gain more law enforcement experience—an attractive credential that would improve morale. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (TSA) The TSA model is costly and unwisely makes TSA both the regulator and the regulated organization responsible for screening operations. As part of an effort to shrink federal bureaucracies and bring private-sector know-how to govern- ment programs, TSA is ripe for reform. The U.S. should look to the Canadian and

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Figures, Shomari

ESTUARIES Act

119/hr/3962

Back to All Bills