BARN Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/6122
Last Updated: November 19, 2025

Sponsored by

Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12]

ID: A000372

Follow the money

The bill

BARN Act

HR. 6122, 119th Congress — read as touching Agribusiness.

The sponsor

Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$66,500 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Labor and Related Agencies" section, p. 645-647 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another brilliant piece of legislative theater, courtesy of our esteemed Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity and see what kind of disease it's trying to treat.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The BARN Act (because who doesn't love a good acronym?) claims to reform the H-2A program for nonimmigrant agricultural workers. In reality, its primary purpose is to massage the egos of farm lobby groups and their congressional lapdogs while pretending to address labor shortages.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes several changes to the existing law, including:

* Transferring authority from the Secretary of Labor to the Secretary of Agriculture (because who needs expertise in labor issues when you can have someone with a green thumb?) * Redefining "agricultural labor" to include more activities (read: expanding the pool of cheap labor) * Introducing a deemed approval process for applications (i.e., if the Secretary doesn't respond within 15 days, it's automatically approved – because who needs oversight?) * Eliminating the 50-Percent Rule (which required employers to demonstrate that at least half of their workforce was comprised of U.S. workers) * Capping wage rates at 115% of the federal minimum wage (because who needs a living wage when you can have cheap labor?)

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:

* Farm lobby groups, who will get to exploit more cheap labor * Agricultural employers, who will benefit from reduced labor costs and increased flexibility * Nonimmigrant agricultural workers, who will be treated like disposable cogs in the machine * Taxpayers, who will foot the bill for this charade

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of " lipstick on a pig." It pretends to address labor shortages while actually perpetuating the exploitation of nonimmigrant workers. The real impact will be:

* Increased profits for agricultural employers at the expense of worker welfare * Further erosion of labor standards and protections * A continued reliance on cheap, exploitable labor rather than investing in automation or domestic workforce development

In short, this bill is a cynical attempt to placate farm lobby groups while maintaining the status quo of exploitation. It's a disease masquerading as a cure – and we're all just pawns in their game of legislative theater.

Related Topics

Labor & Employment Policy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$66,500
18 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$500
Committees
$0
Individuals
$66,000

No PAC contributions found

1
CHEVY CHASE ENERGY LLC
1 transaction
$500

No committee contributions found

1
MASSEY, JON G.
2 transactions
$6,600
2
STEPHENSON, DONNA Y. MR.
2 transactions
$6,600
3
STEPHENSON, JAMES E. MR.
2 transactions
$6,600
4
RHODES, JIMMY MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
5
RHODES, KERRY MRS.
1 transaction
$3,300
6
DORE, WILLIAM J. SR.
1 transaction
$3,300
7
BAKER, ROBERT D
1 transaction
$3,300
8
HATCHER, MARILEE MRS.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
WINCHESTER, GAYLE MRS.
1 transaction
$3,300
10
HERBERT, MARK B.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
TARBUTTON, BEN III
1 transaction
$3,300
12
DREW, JAMES H. MR. III
1 transaction
$3,300
13
SNELLING, III, GEORGE N.
1 transaction
$3,300
14
BOARDMAN, BRAYE MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
15
GLEASON, RYAN
1 transaction
$3,300
16
IBSEN, MICHAEL MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
17
RAEDER, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$3,300

Donor Network - Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 24 nodes and 21 connections (29 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $66,500

Top Donors - Rep. Allen, Rick W. [R-GA-12]

Showing top 18 donors by contribution amount

1 Org17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped, 1 harmed.

  • +Agribusinessconfidence 0.90

    Section 2(a) expands the definition of agricultural labor to include handling, planting, drying, packing, packaging, processing, freezing, grading, storing, or delivering agricultural commodities, which benefits agribusinesses involved in these activities.

  • +Crop Producersconfidence 0.90

    Section 2(a) expands the definition of agricultural labor to include handling, planting, drying, packing, packaging, processing, freezing, grading, storing, or delivering agricultural commodities, which benefits crop producers who rely on H-2A workers for these tasks.

  • Section 2(a) expands the definition of agricultural labor to include processing of agricultural commodities, which could benefit meat and dairy processors that employ H-2A workers in processing activities.

  • −Labor Unionsconfidence 0.70

    Section 2(f) limits wage rates to no more than 115% of the greatest of federal and state minimum wages, which could reduce labor costs for employers but may be opposed by labor unions seeking higher wages for workers.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Moderate
Vector: 72%
Pages: 645-647AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The BARN Act aligns moderately with Project 2025's discussion of the H-2A program by seeking to reform it to improve efficiency and access to foreign labor, which reflects the alternative view in Project 2025 that values the program for sustaining agriculture and controlling food costs. However, the bill does not advocate for phasing out H-2A, nor does it emphasize hiring American workers or enforcing visa fraud protections as primary goals, limiting stronger alignment."

Key themes:H-2A visa programagricultural labortemporary worker programsemployer access to foreign labor

— 612 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Alternative View. Some conservatives believe that temporary worker programs help to fill jobs that Americans will not fill, prevent illegal immigration by giving farmers and others who hire low-skilled labor access to workers, and keep down the prices of food and other products and services produced by the temporary workers. Some credibly argue that, absent the H-2A program, many farmers would have to drastically increase wages, raising the price of food for all Americans, and that even such wage increases may not be sufficient to attract enough temporary American workers to complete the necessary farm tasks to get food products to market since those jobs are, by their nature, seasonal. Those who share this view argue that any plan to phase out the program should weigh the program’s current costs (relatively low) and the program’s current benefits (makes American farming more profitable and sustainable while keeping down food costs). l Phase out the H-2B visa program. The H-2B visa, for nonagricultural seasonal workers, suffers from many of the same harms and abuses as H-2A, albeit of lesser scope because of its cap and distribution across many sectors. Congress should immediately cap this program at its current levels and establish a schedule for its gradual and predictable phasedown over no more than 10 years. Alternative View. As with the H-2A program, some conservatives see the H-2B program as a valuable program that provides low-cost temporary workers in jobs that American companies, by and large, cannot find enough American workers to fill (e.g., tourist season childcare providers at ski resorts, swimming instructors at summer camps, housekeepers and groundskeepers at amusement parks, and extra summer cooks at restaurants that serve national park patrons).These seasonal jobs are less desirable to Americans who predominantly prefer year-round work. Labor shortages after the pandemic support this belief. Absent the H-2B program, many of these seasonal businesses would be forced to cut their hours or even close altogether. Any plan to phase out the program should weigh the program's current costs (relatively low) and the program’s current benefits (makes seasonal business more feasible). Hire American Requirements. When government purchases goods or ser- vices, if at all possible, not only should the company be an American company and the products be manufactured in America, but the companies should also be encouraged to hire American workers. Likewise, private employers should be free to prefer our own countrymen. l Congress should mandate that all new federal contracts require at least 70 percent of the contractor’s employees to be U.S. citizens, with the percentage increasing to at least 95 percent over a 10-year period. — 613 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l Congress must amend the law so that employers can again have the freedom to make hiring Americans a priority. Despite the significant advantages that preferring citizens over (work-authorized) aliens in hiring would provide to American workers, businesses, and the country at large, such a practice has been illegal since 1986.25 This makes no sense. Alternative View Some conservatives believe that the government has a duty to limit its spending in order to limit how much it takes from American families. This means that when the government spends money, it must find the most econom- ical and effective way to do so. Excessive government spending will be borne by American workers and families through reduced incomes and purchasing power. There may be good reasons to require a certain percentage of American workers on federal contracts, but those decisions should be based on economy and efficiency as opposed to arbitrary quotas. Visa Fraud. American businesses that commit visa fraud and hire illegal immi- grants should not be the beneficiaries of federal spending. But a 2020 report by the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) examined the depart- ment’s process for excluding employers who commit visa fraud and abuse from federal contracts and found much to be desired. l To protect the American workforce from unscrupulous immigration lawyers, employers, and labor brokers, the department must follow the recommendations of the OIG and institute more robust investigations for suspected visa fraud and speedier debarments for those found guilty. INTERNATIONAL LABOR POLICY Leveling the International Playing Field for Workers. As recent decades of intense import competition and offshoring have made clear, American workers suffer when the U.S. opens its markets to foreign nations’ minimal labor standards and exploitative conditions. While federal law already prohibits the importation of goods produced with forced labor, the prohibitions are toothless without effective means of enforcement and cover only the most basic of workers’ rights. The Trump Administration and its United States Trade Representative (USTR) took unprece- dented steps to redress the issue for workers. The U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) contained the strongest and most far-reaching labor provisions of any free trade agreement (FTA), with protections and commitments to reduce labor abuses and raise wages. It also established new modes of enforcement. For future FTAs, the USTR should replicate the labor provisions of USMCA, especially the provisions to:

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Moderate
Vector: 68%
Pages: 645-647AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The BARN Act reforms the H-2A program to streamline employer access to foreign agricultural labor while maintaining some worker protections, which aligns with Project 2025's recognition of the program's economic benefits in sustaining agriculture and controlling food costs. However, the bill does not advocate for phasing down the program as Project 2025 suggests for H-2B, nor does it implement 'Hire American' hiring mandates for federal contractors, resulting in only moderate thematic overlap."

Key themes:H-2A program reformagricultural labor accessemployer streamliningtemporary worker programseconomic sustainability of farming

— 612 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Alternative View. Some conservatives believe that temporary worker programs help to fill jobs that Americans will not fill, prevent illegal immigration by giving farmers and others who hire low-skilled labor access to workers, and keep down the prices of food and other products and services produced by the temporary workers. Some credibly argue that, absent the H-2A program, many farmers would have to drastically increase wages, raising the price of food for all Americans, and that even such wage increases may not be sufficient to attract enough temporary American workers to complete the necessary farm tasks to get food products to market since those jobs are, by their nature, seasonal. Those who share this view argue that any plan to phase out the program should weigh the program’s current costs (relatively low) and the program’s current benefits (makes American farming more profitable and sustainable while keeping down food costs). l Phase out the H-2B visa program. The H-2B visa, for nonagricultural seasonal workers, suffers from many of the same harms and abuses as H-2A, albeit of lesser scope because of its cap and distribution across many sectors. Congress should immediately cap this program at its current levels and establish a schedule for its gradual and predictable phasedown over no more than 10 years. Alternative View. As with the H-2A program, some conservatives see the H-2B program as a valuable program that provides low-cost temporary workers in jobs that American companies, by and large, cannot find enough American workers to fill (e.g., tourist season childcare providers at ski resorts, swimming instructors at summer camps, housekeepers and groundskeepers at amusement parks, and extra summer cooks at restaurants that serve national park patrons).These seasonal jobs are less desirable to Americans who predominantly prefer year-round work. Labor shortages after the pandemic support this belief. Absent the H-2B program, many of these seasonal businesses would be forced to cut their hours or even close altogether. Any plan to phase out the program should weigh the program's current costs (relatively low) and the program’s current benefits (makes seasonal business more feasible). Hire American Requirements. When government purchases goods or ser- vices, if at all possible, not only should the company be an American company and the products be manufactured in America, but the companies should also be encouraged to hire American workers. Likewise, private employers should be free to prefer our own countrymen. l Congress should mandate that all new federal contracts require at least 70 percent of the contractor’s employees to be U.S. citizens, with the percentage increasing to at least 95 percent over a 10-year period.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Moderate
Vector: 67%
Pages: 645-647AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The BARN Act aligns moderately with Project 2025's goal of prioritizing American workers in hiring by aiming to protect domestic workers through good-faith hiring efforts, though it simultaneously expands employer flexibility in the H-2A program, which conflicts with the policy's preference for limiting foreign labor. Both share concerns about visa fraud and protecting American workers from unfair labor competition."

Key themes:protecting American workersvisa fraud preventionH-2A program reformlabor market priorities

— 613 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l Congress must amend the law so that employers can again have the freedom to make hiring Americans a priority. Despite the significant advantages that preferring citizens over (work-authorized) aliens in hiring would provide to American workers, businesses, and the country at large, such a practice has been illegal since 1986.25 This makes no sense. Alternative View Some conservatives believe that the government has a duty to limit its spending in order to limit how much it takes from American families. This means that when the government spends money, it must find the most econom- ical and effective way to do so. Excessive government spending will be borne by American workers and families through reduced incomes and purchasing power. There may be good reasons to require a certain percentage of American workers on federal contracts, but those decisions should be based on economy and efficiency as opposed to arbitrary quotas. Visa Fraud. American businesses that commit visa fraud and hire illegal immi- grants should not be the beneficiaries of federal spending. But a 2020 report by the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) examined the depart- ment’s process for excluding employers who commit visa fraud and abuse from federal contracts and found much to be desired. l To protect the American workforce from unscrupulous immigration lawyers, employers, and labor brokers, the department must follow the recommendations of the OIG and institute more robust investigations for suspected visa fraud and speedier debarments for those found guilty. INTERNATIONAL LABOR POLICY Leveling the International Playing Field for Workers. As recent decades of intense import competition and offshoring have made clear, American workers suffer when the U.S. opens its markets to foreign nations’ minimal labor standards and exploitative conditions. While federal law already prohibits the importation of goods produced with forced labor, the prohibitions are toothless without effective means of enforcement and cover only the most basic of workers’ rights. The Trump Administration and its United States Trade Representative (USTR) took unprece- dented steps to redress the issue for workers. The U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) contained the strongest and most far-reaching labor provisions of any free trade agreement (FTA), with protections and commitments to reduce labor abuses and raise wages. It also established new modes of enforcement. For future FTAs, the USTR should replicate the labor provisions of USMCA, especially the provisions to: — 614 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Eliminate all forms of forced or compulsory labor. l Protect workers’ rights to organize and participate voluntarily in a union without employer interference or discrimination. l Create a rapid-response mechanism to provide for an independent panel investigation of denial of labor rights at covered facilities. l Shift the burden of proof by presuming that an alleged violation affects trade and investment, unless otherwise demonstrated. For future authorizations of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), the President should urge Congress to: l Create mechanisms for supply-chain transparency. l Institute a general prohibition on forced labor conditions. Investigate Foreign Labor Violations That Undermine American Work- ers. The United States’ embrace of globalization has exposed American workers to unfair competition from nations with cheap, abundant, and often exploited labor. American workers have, as a consequence, seen their earning power erode. While negotiating stronger trade agreements with robust labor provisions should be the primary tool with which to regulate international labor competition, the federal government can also take steps to identify the worst labor abuses and rule breakers. DOL’s Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) plays a critical role in monitor- ing and enforcing the labor provisions of U.S. trade agreements and trade preference programs as well as investigating child labor and human trafficking violations. l The next Administration should focus ILAB investigations on foreign labor violations that do the most to damage American workers’ earning power, specifically regimes that engage in child and forced labor, fail to protect workers’ organizing rights, and permit hazardous or otherwise exploitative working conditions. Alternative/Additional View. Conservatives share a belief in protecting and pro- moting American workers and their families and orienting international policies with Americans’ interests first. Some conservatives believe that the best way to put Amer- ica first is by making America more attractive. In addition to restrictions imposed on other countries, removing existing barriers to American manufacturing, employ- ment, and commerce can help American workers, entrepreneurs, and families.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills