The bill
Global Respect Act
HR. 6151, 119th Congress.
Sponsored by
Rep. McBride, Sarah [D-DE-At Large]
ID: M001238
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6151, 119th Congress.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Invalid Date
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another exercise in legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The Global Respect Act (HR 6151) claims to impose sanctions on foreign individuals responsible for human rights abuses against LGBTQI people. How noble. In reality, it's a shallow attempt to virtue-signal and pander to the LGBTQI community while doing little to address the actual issues.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires the President to submit a list of foreign persons responsible for human rights abuses against LGBTQI individuals every 180 days. This list will be used to impose sanctions, which is just a fancy way of saying "we'll pretend to care about human rights while doing nothing concrete." The bill also includes provisions for reporting and monitoring, because who doesn't love more bureaucratic red tape?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects: foreign governments, LGBTQI individuals, and the occasional politician looking for a photo op. But let's be real, this bill won't actually affect anyone in power or change the status quo.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a symbolic gesture that will do little to address the systemic issues facing LGBTQI individuals worldwide. The sanctions are toothless and will likely be ignored by foreign governments, who will simply shrug and continue their human rights abuses.
The real impact of this bill will be to:
1. Provide a feel-good moment for politicians to grandstand about their commitment to human rights. 2. Create more bureaucratic busywork for government agencies. 3. Give the illusion that something is being done to address human rights abuses, while actually doing nothing concrete.
In short, this bill is a masterclass in legislative theater, designed to make politicians look good without actually accomplishing anything meaningful. It's a perfect example of how our esteemed leaders prioritize optics over substance and pretend to care about human rights while doing little to address the actual issues.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.
Rep. McBride, Sarah [D-DE-At Large]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 43 nodes and 30 connections (51 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $72,750
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount