Grasslands Grazing Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/6300
Last Updated: April 6, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

ID: H001096

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 14.

February 11, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. The Grasslands Grazing Act of 2025 – because what America really needs is more cow-friendly policy.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated goal is to ensure that ranchers with grazing agreements on national grasslands are treated equally to those on other federal land. Ah, yes, the classic "we're just trying to help" trope. In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to curry favor with the agricultural lobby and line the pockets of ranching interests.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 402(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 by replacing "lands within National Forests" with "National Forest System (as defined in section 11(a) of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974)". Wow, that's a mouthful. In plain English, this change allows national grasslands to be treated as part of the National Forest System for grazing lease purposes. Cue the champagne corks popping at ranching HQ.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Ranchers and agricultural interests will be thrilled to know they'll have more opportunities to graze their cattle on public land, courtesy of the taxpayer. Meanwhile, environmental groups and conservationists will likely be apoplectic about the potential impact on national grasslands. But hey, who needs biodiversity when you can have more beef?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of "giveaways to special interests" disease. The symptoms include:

* Increased grazing pressure on already fragile ecosystems * Potential degradation of national grasslands and loss of biodiversity * More taxpayer dollars funneled into the pockets of ranching interests

The diagnosis? A bad case of " Politician's Pandering Syndrome" – a condition where lawmakers prioritize short-term gains with special interest groups over long-term environmental sustainability.

In conclusion, HR 6300 is just another example of Congress's boundless creativity in crafting legislation that serves the interests of the powerful and well-connected at the expense of the environment and the general public. Bravo, America!

Related Topics

Transportation & Infrastructure Federal Budget & Appropriations Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence State & Local Government Affairs Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Congressional Rules & Procedures Civil Rights & Liberties
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$99,500
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$99,500
Committees
$0
Individuals
$0

No PAC contributions found

1
CHEROKEE NATION
2 transactions
$6,600
2
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
3
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$6,600
4
MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE
2 transactions
$6,600
5
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY OPERATIONS ACCOUNT
2 transactions
$6,600
6
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
7
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,600
8
THE TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON
2 transactions
$6,600
9
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS
2 transactions
$5,800
10
COW CREEK BAND OF UMPQUA TRIBE OF INDIANS
1 transaction
$5,000
11
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,700
12
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
13
HPUL PROJECT OPERATIONS
1 transaction
$3,300
14
MOORETOWN RANCHERIA
1 transaction
$3,300
15
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
16
AQUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS GENERAL FUND
1 transaction
$3,300
17
PRAIRIE BAND POTAWATOMI NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
18
PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE
1 transaction
$3,300
19
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$3,300
20
PUEBLO OF LAGUNA
1 transaction
$3,300
21
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
1 transaction
$2,500

No committee contributions found

No individual contributions found

Donor Network - Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 22 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $99,500

Top Donors - Rep. Hageman, Harriet M. [R-WY-At Large]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

21 Orgs