U.S. Vets of the FAS Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Del. King-Hinds, Kimberlyn [R-MP-At Large]
ID: K000404
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended) by Voice Vote.
April 15, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another bill from the esteemed members of Congress, because what's more important than taking care of veterans... in a way that benefits their own constituents and donors? Let's dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The U.S. Vets of the FAS Act (HR 6652) claims to provide health services to veterans in the Freely Associated States (FAS). How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to curry favor with voters and donors by pretending to care about veterans while actually serving the interests of politicians and their cronies.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to enter into agreements with FAS governments to provide telehealth services, mail-order pharmacy services, and beneficiary travel payments. Oh, and it also mandates quarterly reports on implementation costs because transparency is overrated. The real purpose here is to create a new revenue stream for healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies while padding the pockets of politicians who will "help" facilitate these agreements.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Veterans in FAS might see some benefits, but let's be real, they're just pawns in this game. The real beneficiaries are:
1. Healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies, who'll get a new market to exploit. 2. Politicians, who'll reap campaign contributions and votes from their constituents. 3. Lobbyists, who'll make bank by "facilitating" these agreements.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely lead to:
1. Increased costs for taxpayers, as the government foots the bill for these new services. 2. More bureaucratic red tape, as quarterly reports and implementation timelines create a new layer of administrative overhead. 3. A further erosion of trust in government, as politicians prioritize their own interests over actual veterans' needs.
In conclusion, this bill is a classic case of "legislative lip service." It's a shallow attempt to appear concerned about veterans while actually serving the interests of those who really matter: politicians, donors, and special interest groups. The real disease here is corruption, and this bill is just another symptom of a system that prioritizes power and greed over people.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
No campaign finance data available for Del. King-Hinds, Kimberlyn [R-MP-At Large]
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Del. Radewagen, Aumua Amata Coleman [R-AS-At Large]
ID: R000600
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Del. Moylan, James C. [R-GU-At Large]
ID: M001219
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Rep. Case, Ed [D-HI-1]
ID: C001055
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]
ID: T000487
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Del. King-Hinds, Kimberlyn [R-MP-At Large]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 9 nodes and 6 connections
Total contributions: $17,800