The bill
U.S. Vets of the FAS Act
HR. 6652, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.
Sponsored by
Del. King-Hinds, Kimberlyn [R-MP-At Large]
ID: K000404
Follow the money
The bill
HR. 6652, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 679-681 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.
May 13, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another bill from the esteemed members of Congress, because what's more important than taking care of veterans... in a way that benefits their own constituents and donors? Let's dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The U.S. Vets of the FAS Act (HR 6652) claims to provide health services to veterans in the Freely Associated States (FAS). How noble. In reality, it's a thinly veiled attempt to curry favor with voters and donors by pretending to care about veterans while actually serving the interests of politicians and their cronies.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to enter into agreements with FAS governments to provide telehealth services, mail-order pharmacy services, and beneficiary travel payments. Oh, and it also mandates quarterly reports on implementation costs because transparency is overrated. The real purpose here is to create a new revenue stream for healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies while padding the pockets of politicians who will "help" facilitate these agreements.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Veterans in FAS might see some benefits, but let's be real, they're just pawns in this game. The real beneficiaries are:
1. Healthcare providers and pharmaceutical companies, who'll get a new market to exploit. 2. Politicians, who'll reap campaign contributions and votes from their constituents. 3. Lobbyists, who'll make bank by "facilitating" these agreements.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will likely lead to:
1. Increased costs for taxpayers, as the government foots the bill for these new services. 2. More bureaucratic red tape, as quarterly reports and implementation timelines create a new layer of administrative overhead. 3. A further erosion of trust in government, as politicians prioritize their own interests over actual veterans' needs.
In conclusion, this bill is a classic case of "legislative lip service." It's a shallow attempt to appear concerned about veterans while actually serving the interests of those who really matter: politicians, donors, and special interest groups. The real disease here is corruption, and this bill is just another symptom of a system that prioritizes power and greed over people.
Del. King-Hinds, Kimberlyn [R-MP-At Large]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: R000600
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
ID: M001219
Top Contributors
10
ID: C001055
Top Contributors
10
ID: T000487
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 30 nodes and 29 connections (21 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $65,788
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
Section 2(b) requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish health services via telehealth and mail-order pharmacy to veterans in the Freely Associated States, which will increase demand for health services provided by hospitals and health systems.
Section 2(b)(2) requires the Secretary to furnish pharmaceutical products delivered by mail to veterans in the Freely Associated States, increasing demand for pharmaceutical products.
Section 2(b)(1) requires furnishing health services provided by telehealth, which will increase demand for telecommunications infrastructure and services to support telehealth.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo,
— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo, — 647 — Department of Veterans Affairs reimagine the health care footprint in some locales, and spur a realignment of capacity through budgetary allocations. Specifically: 1. Embrace the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) as an avenue to maintain a VA footprint in challenging medical markets without investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses. 2. Explore the potential to pilot facility-sharing partnerships between the VA and strained local health care systems to reduce costs by leveraging limited talent and resources. Personnel l Extend the term of the Under Secretary for Health (USH) to five years. Additionally, authority should be given to reappoint this individual for a second five-year term both to allow for continuity and to protect the USH from political transition. l Establish a Senior Executive Service (SES) position of VHA Care System Chief Information Officer (CIO), selected by and reporting to the chief of the VHA Care System with a dotted line to the VA CIO. l Identify a workflow process to bring wait times in compliance with VA MISSION Act–required time frames wherever possible. 1. Assess the daily clinical appointment load for physicians and clinical staff in medical facilities where wait times for care are well outside of the time frames required by the VA MISSION Act. 2. Require VHA facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day. 3. Consider a pilot program to extend weekday appointment hours and offer Saturday appointment options to veterans if a facility continues to demonstrate that it has excess capacity and is experiencing delays in the delivery of care for veterans. 4. Identify clinical services that are consistently in high demand but require cost-prohibitive compensation to recruit and retain talent, and examine exceptions for higher competitive pay.
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.