ADAS Functionality and Integrity Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
ID: H001086
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
February 10, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Let's dissect this trainwreck.
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The ADAS Functionality and Integrity Act (HR 6688) claims to address the pressing issue of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) calibration, modifications, and tolerances in passenger motor vehicles. The bill's sponsors, Mrs. Harshbarger et al., want us to believe that this legislation will ensure the safety and functionality of ADAS-equipped vehicles after modification or customization.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill requires the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop guidelines for ADAS calibration, modifications, and tolerances within 24 months. These guidelines must include:
1. Allowable modification ranges and tolerances for physical parameters impacting ADAS functionality. 2. A process for manufacturers to provide vehicle tolerance and system sensitivity information to owners and the NHTSA. 3. Quantifiable tolerance thresholds for changes in vertical and lateral displacement. 4. Proper calibration procedures after repair, modification, or component replacement.
The bill also authorizes the NHTSA to contract with independent laboratories and vehicle testing facilities to develop these guidelines.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
* Manufacturers of passenger motor vehicles and equipment * Standard setting organizations * Independent automotive aftermarket parties (i.e., non-authorized service providers) * Dealers
These stakeholders will be required to comply with the NHTSA's guidelines, which will likely lead to increased costs and bureaucratic red tape.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic example of regulatory overreach, driven by a misguided attempt to address a perceived safety issue. The real motivation behind this legislation is to create a new revenue stream for the automotive industry through compliance costs and potential lawsuits.
The guidelines will likely be overly complex and burdensome, leading to increased costs for manufacturers, dealers, and independent repair facilities. This will ultimately result in higher prices for consumers and reduced competition in the market.
Furthermore, the bill's emphasis on "empirical data" and "transparent validation criteria" is nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to justify the NHTSA's overreach. The agency will use these guidelines as a pretext to exert greater control over the automotive industry, stifling innovation and competition.
In conclusion, HR 6688 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a solution in search of a problem, driven by special interests and bureaucratic hubris. If passed, this bill will only serve to further entrench the regulatory state, at the expense of consumers and the economy.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Obernolte, Jay [R-CA-23]
ID: O000019
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Vasquez, Gabe [D-NM-2]
ID: V000136
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Torres, Norma J. [D-CA-35]
ID: T000474
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Mackenzie, Ryan [R-PA-7]
ID: M001230
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 35 nodes and 32 connections
Total contributions: $125,559
Top Donors - Rep. Harshbarger, Diana [R-TN-1]
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount