The bill
VISN Reform Act of 2025
HR. 6733, 119th Congress — read as touching Hospitals & Health Systems.
VISN Reform Act of 2025
Download PDFBill ID: 119/hr/6733
Last Updated: May 20, 2026
Sponsored by
Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]
ID: B001295
Follow the money
The sponsor
Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
$104,500 raised
27 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
63% match to Project 2025
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 679-681 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee Hearings Held
May 19, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
🗳️
Floor Action
✅
Passed House
🏛️
Senate Review
🎉
Passed Congress
🖊️
Presidential Action
⚖️
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The VISN Reform Act of 2025 is a perfect example of how politicians can take a simple idea – improving veterans' healthcare – and turn it into a bloated, bureaucratic monstrosity.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to "make certain improvements" to the administration of Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs) under the Department of Veterans Affairs. In reality, this is just a euphemism for "reorganizing the deck chairs on the Titanic." The actual objective is to create more bureaucratic layers, justify additional funding, and provide a veneer of accountability.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill creates new sections in Title 38 of the United States Code, which will inevitably lead to more confusion and red tape. It establishes eight geographically defined VISNs, each with its own headquarters office, because what every bureaucracy needs is more middle management. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs is tasked with ensuring that these VISNs are "aligned" with the department's mission, a vague requirement that will be interpreted in whatever way suits the bureaucrats.
The bill also mandates collaboration and cooperation between various offices and entities, because nothing says "efficiency" like adding more stakeholders to the mix. And, of course, there's the obligatory report-generating provision, which will provide ample opportunities for politicians to grandstand about their commitment to veterans' healthcare.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main beneficiaries of this bill are the bureaucrats and administrators who will staff these new VISNs. Veterans themselves might see some marginal improvements in care, but only if they're lucky enough to navigate the labyrinthine system created by this legislation. The real stakeholders, however, are the politicians who sponsored this bill, as it provides them with a convenient talking point for their next election campaign.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The VISN Reform Act of 2025 will likely lead to increased bureaucracy, more waste, and further entrenchment of the status quo. It's a classic case of "rearranging the furniture" rather than addressing the underlying problems plaguing veterans' healthcare. The added layers of management and reporting requirements will only serve to slow down decision-making and increase costs.
In short, this bill is a perfect example of how politicians can take a simple problem and turn it into a complex, bureaucratic nightmare. It's a testament to their boundless creativity in finding new ways to waste taxpayer dollars and perpetuate the status quo. Bravo, Congress!
Related Topics
Military & Veterans Affairs
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
Total Contributions
$104,500
19 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$12,100
Committees
$0
Individuals
$92,400
No PAC contributions found
1
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
$6,600
2
MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
$2,000
3
CAMPBELL FARMS
$1,500
4
MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION
$1,500
5
WAITE, TOMB & EBERLY LLP
$500
No committee contributions found
1
EMMET, RICHARD
$23,100
2
GILLIAM, RICHARD
$9,900
3
SCHWAB, CHARLES
$6,600
4
STERN, ELIZABETH MAY
$6,600
5
WEEKLEY, RICHARD
$6,600
6
BRADLEY, JACQUELINE
$6,600
7
BUKOWSKY, BRANT N. MR.
$6,600
8
BUKOWSKY, BROCK R. MR.
$6,600
9
BUKOWSKY, JENNIFER
$3,300
10
DONOHO, KIMBERLY K. MRS.
$3,300
11
FLINT, ETHAN
$3,300
12
GREENBLATT, SCOTT
$3,300
13
HOPKINS, JUSTIN MR.
$3,300
14
MCINERNEY, THOMAS E.
$3,300
Donor Network - Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]
PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Loading...
Showing 48 nodes and 27 connections (65 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $104,500
Top Donors - Rep. Bost, Mike [R-IL-12]
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount
5 Orgs14 Individuals
Industry Impact
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 helped.
- +Hospitals & Health Systemsconfidence 0.90
Section 2(a) reorganizes Veterans Health Administration into VISNs, requiring agreements with governmental, public, and private health care organizations (including hospitals) to meet veterans' needs, which expands opportunities for hospitals and health systems to partner with VA.
- +Long-Term Care & Nursing Homesconfidence 0.85
Section 2(a)(e)(1) includes 'nursing home care' in the mission of VISNs, requiring collaboration to provide such care, which benefits long-term care providers through potential contracts and referrals.
- +Biotech & Researchconfidence 0.80
Section 2(a)(e)(1) includes 'research' in the mission of VISNs, requiring collaboration with medical schools and affiliates, which could increase funding and opportunities for biotech research firms engaged in VA-related research.
Project 2025 Policy Matches
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
Introduction
Moderate63.2%
Pages: 679-681
— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo, — 647 — Department of Veterans Affairs reimagine the health care footprint in some locales, and spur a realignment of capacity through budgetary allocations. Specifically: 1. Embrace the expansion of Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) as an avenue to maintain a VA footprint in challenging medical markets without investing further in obsolete and unaffordable VA health care campuses. 2. Explore the potential to pilot facility-sharing partnerships between the VA and strained local health care systems to reduce costs by leveraging limited talent and resources. Personnel l Extend the term of the Under Secretary for Health (USH) to five years. Additionally, authority should be given to reappoint this individual for a second five-year term both to allow for continuity and to protect the USH from political transition. l Establish a Senior Executive Service (SES) position of VHA Care System Chief Information Officer (CIO), selected by and reporting to the chief of the VHA Care System with a dotted line to the VA CIO. l Identify a workflow process to bring wait times in compliance with VA MISSION Act–required time frames wherever possible. 1. Assess the daily clinical appointment load for physicians and clinical staff in medical facilities where wait times for care are well outside of the time frames required by the VA MISSION Act. 2. Require VHA facilities to increase the number of patients seen each day to equal the number seen by DOD medical facilities: approximately 19 patients per provider per day. Currently, VA facilities may be seeing as few as six patients per provider per day. 3. Consider a pilot program to extend weekday appointment hours and offer Saturday appointment options to veterans if a facility continues to demonstrate that it has excess capacity and is experiencing delays in the delivery of care for veterans. 4. Identify clinical services that are consistently in high demand but require cost-prohibitive compensation to recruit and retain talent, and examine exceptions for higher competitive pay.
Introduction
Moderate63.2%
Pages: 679-681
— 646 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 3. Section 121 (developing and administering an education program that teaches veterans about their health care options available from the Department of Veterans Affairs). 4. Section 152 (returning the Office for Innovation of Care and Payment to the Office of Enterprise Integration with a joint governance process set up with the VHA). 5. Section 161 (overhauling Family Caregiver Program expansion, which has gone poorly, so that it focuses on consistency of eligibility and awareness that the most severely wounded or injured may require the program indefinitely). l Require the VHA to report publicly on all aspects of its operation, including quality, safety, patient experience, timeliness, and cost-effectiveness, using standards similar to those in the Medicare Accountable Care Organization program so that the government may monitor and achieve continuous improvement in the VA system more effectively. l Encourage VA Medical Centers to seek out relevant academic and private- sector input in their communities to improve the overall patient experience. Budget l Conduct an independent audit of the VA similar to the 2018 Department of Defense (DOD) audit to identify IT, management, financial, contracting, and other deficiencies. l Assess the misalignment of VHA facilities and rising infrastructure costs. The VHA operates 172 inpatient medical facilities nationally that are an average of 60 years old. Some of these facilities are underutilized and inadequately staffed. Facilities in certain urban and rural areas are seeing significant declines in the veteran population and strong competition for fresh medical staff. In 2018, Congress authorized an Asset Infrastructure Review (AIR) of national VHA medical markets to provide insight into where the VA health care budget should be responsibly allocated to serve veterans most effectively. However, the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee lacked the political will to act on the White House’s nominations of commission members, and this ultimately led to termination of the AIR process. The next Administration should seek out agile, creative, and politically acceptable operational solutions to this aging infrastructure status quo,
Introduction
Moderate60.4%
Pages: 676-678
— 644 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise In sum, the VA for the foreseeable future will experience significant fiscal, human capital, and infrastructure crosswinds and risks. Budgets are at historic highs, and with a workforce now above 400,000, the VA is contending with a lack of new veteran enrollees to offset the declining population of older veterans. Recruitment of medical and benefits personnel has become more challenging. Veterans are migrating from the northern states to the southern and western states for retirement and employment. Meanwhile, VA information technol- ogy (IT) is struggling to keep pace with the evolution of patient care and record keeping. Consequently, VA leaders in the next Administration must be wise and courageous political strategists, experienced managers to run day-to-day oper- ations more effectively, innovators to address the changing veteran landscape, and agile “fixers” to mitigate and repair systemic problems created or ignored by the present leadership team. VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (VHA) Needed Reforms l Rescind all departmental clinical policy directives that are contrary to principles of conservative governance starting with abortion services and gender reassignment surgery. Neither aligns with service-connected conditions that would warrant VA’s providing this type of clinical care, and both follow the Left’s pernicious trend of abusing the role of government to further its own agenda. l Focus on the effects of shifting veteran demographics. At least during the next decade, the VA will experience a significant generational shift in its overall patient population. Of the approximately 18 million veterans alive today, roughly 9.1 million are enrolled for VA health care, and 6.4 million of these enrollees use VA health care consistently. These 6.4 million veterans are split almost evenly between those who are over age 65 and those who are under age 65, but the share of VA’s health care dollars is spent predominantly in the over-65 cohort. That share increases significantly as veterans live longer and use the VHA system at a higher rate. VHA enrollments of new users are increasingly at risk of being exceeded by the deaths of current enrollees, primarily because significant numbers of the Vietnam generation are reaching their life expectancy. The generational transition from Vietnam-era veterans to post-9/11 veterans will take several years to complete. The ongoing demographic transition is a catalyst for needed assessments of how the VA can improve the delivery of care to a numerically declining and differently dispersed national population — 645 — Department of Veterans Affairs of veterans—a population that is more active, reaching middle age or retirement age, and migrating for lifestyle and career reasons. At the center of the VHA’s evolution during this generational transition is an ongoing tension, some of it politically contrived, between Direct Care for Veterans provided from inside the VHA system and Community Care for Veterans who are referred to private providers participating in the VHA’s two Community Care Networks (CCNs). In recent years, the budget for Community Care has grown as demand from veterans has risen sharply, sometimes outpacing the budgets for Community Care at individual VAMCs. The Trump Administration made Community Care part of its “Veteran- centric” approach to ensure that veterans would be able to participate more fully in their health care decisions and have options if or when the VHA was unable to meet their needs. The Biden Administration has watered down that effort, has sought various procedural ways to slow the rate of referrals to private doctors, and at some facilities is reportedly manipulating the Community Care access standards required by the VA MISSION Act of 2018. If the makeup of Congress is favorable in 2025, the next Administration should rapidly and explicitly codify VA MISSION Act access standards in legislation to prevent the VA from avoiding or watering down the requirements in the future. First and foremost, a veterans bill of rights is needed so that veterans and VA staff know exactly what benefits veterans are entitled to receive, with a clear process for the adjudication of disputes, and so that staff ensure that all veterans are informed of their eligibility for Community Care. Currently, veterans are not routinely and consistently told that they are eligible for Community Care unless they request information or are given a referral. l To strengthen Community Care, the next Administration should create new Secretarial directives to implement the VA MISSION Act properly. Sections for consideration and areas for reform include the following: 1. Sections 101 and 103 (Community Care eligibility for access standards and the best medical interest of the veteran). 2. Section 104 (Community Care access standards and standards for quality of care).
About These Correlations
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.
Related Bills
Other Bills by Rep. Bost, Mike
Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act
119/hr/1041
Veterans Appeals Efficiency Act of 2025
119/hr/3835
To amend title 36, United States Code, to move the place of incorporation and domicile of the National Woman’s Relief Corps to Illinois, to move the principal office of such Corps to Murphysboro, Illinois, and for other purposes.
119/hr/988