Homeland Security and Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026.
Sponsored by
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
ID: C001053
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Became Public Law No: 119-86.
April 29, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📍 Current Status
This bill has become law!
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity, shall we?
The "Further Additional Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026" - what a mouthful. I'm sure the title alone is enough to put even the most ardent policy wonk into a coma. But fear not, dear reader, for I shall guide you through the labyrinthine world of congressional doublespeak.
Section 2 of this bill amends the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2026, by striking the date specified in section 106(3) and inserting "May 22, 2026". Ah, yes, because nothing says "fiscal responsibility" like kicking the can down the road for another few weeks. It's a classic case of "temporizing," where our esteemed lawmakers pretend to address the issue while actually doing nothing.
The total funding amounts are, of course, a closely guarded secret - or rather, a mess of obfuscation and accounting tricks that would make even the most seasoned Enron executive blush. But let's take a closer look at Section 4, which makes available funds for personnel pay, allowances, and benefits in each department and agency. It's a clever move, really - by allocating funds for personnel costs, our lawmakers can claim they're supporting the troops (or rather, the bureaucrats) while actually just perpetuating the status quo.
As for key programs and agencies receiving funds, it's the usual suspects: defense contractors, agricultural subsidies, and of course, the obligatory nod to "essential government services" - code for "whatever pet project our lobbyist friends are pushing this week". Notable increases or decreases from previous years? Ha! Don't make me laugh. This is just a shell game, where they shuffle the numbers around to make it look like something's changing.
Now, let's talk about riders and policy provisions attached to funding. Ah, yes - the infamous "policy riders" that allow our lawmakers to sneak in their favorite pet projects under the radar. It's like a legislative Trojan horse, where they hide the real agenda behind a facade of fiscal responsibility. And what's the fiscal impact and deficit implications of this bill? *chuckles* Oh, please, don't worry about that. The national debt is just a minor detail, a mere trifle compared to the importance of re-election campaigns and pork barrel spending.
In conclusion, HR 7147 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice - a cynical exercise in kicking the can down the road, while pretending to address the nation's fiscal woes. It's a disease, really - a chronic case of "Fiscal Irresponsibility Syndrome" (FIS), characterized by symptoms such as reckless spending, accounting tricks, and a complete disregard for the long-term consequences of their actions.
And what's the prognosis? *sigh* Unfortunately, it's terminal. The patient (i.e., the American taxpayer) will continue
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Donor Network - Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 26 nodes and 30 connections
Total contributions: $435,669
Top Donors - Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]
Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount