Veteran DATA Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/7280
Last Updated: July 16, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

ID: B001315

Follow the money

The bill

Veteran DATA Act

HR. 7280, 119th Congress β€” read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.

The sponsor

Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$71,300 raised

26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

April 14, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

πŸ—³οΈ

Floor Action

βœ…

Passed House

πŸ›οΈ

Senate Review

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Veteran DATA Act, a bill so cleverly crafted to make you believe that our esteemed representatives actually care about veterans' privacy. How quaint.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to pretend to protect veterans' sensitive personal information from being sold or misused by contractors. Because, you know, the VA's track record on data security is impeccable (insert sarcasm here). The objectives are twofold: (1) to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from entering into contracts that allow contractors to sell or disclose sensitive personal information, and (2) to ensure that contractors don't monetize, sell, or misuse covered information.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends title 38 of the United States Code by adding a new subsection that prohibits the Secretary from entering into contracts that permit the sale of sensitive personal information. It also requires the Secretary to include clauses in contracts that prohibit contractors from monetizing or misusing covered information. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory report to Congress, because what's a bill without some pointless bureaucratic busywork?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include veterans (whose data is supposedly being protected), contractors (who will have to pretend to care about data security), and the VA (which will have to go through the motions of implementing these new provisions). Stakeholders include the usual suspects: lobbyists for defense contractors, veterans' organizations, and anyone else who can spin this bill as a victory for their particular interest group.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is negligible, as this bill is largely symbolic. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, designed to make politicians look good without actually addressing the underlying issues. The implications are clear: more bureaucratic red tape, more opportunities for contractors to find loopholes, and more empty promises to veterans that their data will be protected.

In conclusion, the Veteran DATA Act is a perfect example of legislative placebo effect – it's designed to make you feel better without actually doing anything meaningful. It's a symptom of a deeper disease: the chronic inability of our government to effectively address real problems, instead opting for shallow, PR-friendly solutions that benefit no one except the politicians and special interest groups who crafted them. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.

Related Topics

Military & Veterans AffairsCybersecurity & Data Privacy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$71,300
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$5,300
Committees
$0
Individuals
$66,000

No PAC contributions found

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$3,300
2
LABORERS LOCAL 397 PAC
2 transactions
$1,000
3
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 553
2 transactions
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
MCNALLY, R. STEPHEN
2 transactions
$6,600
2
MORINO, MARIO M.
2 transactions
$6,600
3
FISHER, CYNTHIA
1 transaction
$3,300
4
MURPHY, JAMES
1 transaction
$3,300
5
NELSON, REED C.
1 transaction
$3,300
6
NI, PIN
1 transaction
$3,300
7
PRICE, RICHARD
1 transaction
$3,300
8
GOTTLIEB, HOWARD L.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
STEYER, TOM
1 transaction
$3,300
10
TRONE, DAVID J.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
WALTON, JAMES
1 transaction
$3,300
12
BEIDLER, PRUDENCE
1 transaction
$3,300
13
BENNETT, RAYMOND
1 transaction
$3,300
14
CHAVKIN, ARNIE
1 transaction
$3,300
15
CLIFFORD, ROBERT A.
1 transaction
$3,300
16
CONWAY, KEVIN
1 transaction
$3,300
17
COONEY, ROBERT
1 transaction
$3,300
18
DUNN, PAUL
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Barrett, Tom [R-MI-7]

ID: B001321

Top Contributors

10

1
MICHIGAN AGGREGATES ASSOCIATION PAC
OrganizationOKEMOS, MI
$300
Feb 27, 2024
2
DEMKOWICZ, BRIAN MR.
HURON CAPITAL β€’ INVESTOR
IndividualGROSSE POINTE, MI
$13,200
Jan 8, 2024
3
STADLER, BRIAN
WOLGAST CORPORATION β€’ MANAGER
IndividualSAGINAW, MI
$6,870
Sep 28, 2023
4
UIHLEIN, RICHARD
ULINE β€’ CHAIRMAN
IndividualLAKE FOREST, IL
$6,870
Sep 26, 2023
5
COURTNEY, JOHN
RETIRED β€’ RETIRED
IndividualOKEMOS, MI
$6,870
Dec 8, 2023
6
BAKER, JEFFREY
MUSKEGON CAR CREDIT β€’ EXECUTIVE
IndividualGRAND RAPIDS, MI
$6,600
Jul 25, 2023
7
BANCROFT, NICHOLAS
AGROLIQUID β€’ CEO
IndividualSAINT JOHNS, MI
$6,600
Sep 19, 2023
8
HAWORTH, MATTHEW
HAWORTH, INC. β€’ CHAIRMAN
IndividualHOLLAND, MI
$6,600
Sep 18, 2023
9
HAWORTH, RICHARD
HAWORTH, INC. β€’ CHAIRMAN EMERITUS
IndividualSAUGATUCK, MI
$6,600
Sep 18, 2023
10
O'NEIL, WILLIAM
W J O'NEIL COMPANY β€’ EXECUTIVE
IndividualCOMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI
$6,600
Sep 11, 2023

Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]

ID: V000138

Top Contributors

10

1
LUX FOR VIRGINIA
OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA
$500
Mar 29, 2024
2
LUX FOR VIRGINIA
OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA
$500
Mar 31, 2024
3
FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE
NOT EMPLOYED β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT
$4,000
Apr 20, 2024
4
FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE
IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT
$4,000
May 5, 2024
5
VON STEIN, THOMSON
IndividualROCKVILLE, MD
$3,500
Aug 7, 2024
6
HULL, MEGAN
SELF β€’ ACTIVIST
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Nov 2, 2024
7
KAISER, GEORGE
GBK CORPORATION β€’ EXECUTIVE
IndividualTULSA, OK
$3,300
Oct 25, 2024
8
PARSONS, KATHLEEN
NOT EMPLOYED β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualPOTOMAC, MD
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
9
STAPLE, HARISE
SELF β€’ MD
IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
10
HOLMES, LAURA
SELF β€’ REAL ESTATE INVESTOR
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 54 nodes and 32 connections (61 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $96,670

Top Donors - Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 7 harmed.

  • Section 2 prohibits VA from entering contracts that allow contractors to sell sensitive personal information; private prison contractors often handle VA health data and could be barred from such contracts, imposing a cost.

  • Section 2's ban on selling sensitive personal information affects contractors like surveillance tech firms (e.g., Palantir, Clearview AI) that may seek VA data for policing or immigration enforcement, imposing a regulatory cost.

  • Section 2 prohibits VA contractors from selling sensitive personal information; large tech firms (e.g., Google, Amazon) that contract with VA for cloud or data services would be barred from monetizing such data, imposing a cost.

  • Section 2's prohibition on selling sensitive personal information applies to VA contractors; telecom firms (e.g., AT&T, Verizon) providing services to VA could be restricted from monetizing VA-held data, imposing a cost.

  • βˆ’Health Insuranceconfidence 0.70

    Section 2 bars VA contractors from selling sensitive personal information; health insurers (e.g., UnitedHealth, CVS Health) that contract with VA for claims processing or data analytics would be prohibited from monetizing such data, imposing a cost.

  • βˆ’Medical Devicesconfidence 0.65

    Section 2's ban on selling sensitive personal information affects VA contractors; medical device firms (e.g., Medtronic, Abbott) that handle VA patient data for device monitoring or trials would be barred from monetizing that data, imposing a cost.

+ 1 more industry not shown.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β€” they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Related Bills