Veteran DATA Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/7280
Last Updated: August 17, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

ID: B001315

Follow the money

The bill

Veteran DATA Act

HR. 7280, 119th Congress — read as touching Private Prisons & Immigration Detention.

The sponsor

Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$71,300 raised

26 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Veterans Affairs" section, p. 688-691 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.

April 14, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. The Veteran DATA Act, a bill so cleverly crafted to make you believe that our esteemed representatives actually care about veterans' privacy. How quaint.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to pretend to protect veterans' sensitive personal information from being sold or misused by contractors. Because, you know, the VA's track record on data security is impeccable (insert sarcasm here). The objectives are twofold: (1) to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from entering into contracts that allow contractors to sell or disclose sensitive personal information, and (2) to ensure that contractors don't monetize, sell, or misuse covered information.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends title 38 of the United States Code by adding a new subsection that prohibits the Secretary from entering into contracts that permit the sale of sensitive personal information. It also requires the Secretary to include clauses in contracts that prohibit contractors from monetizing or misusing covered information. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory report to Congress, because what's a bill without some pointless bureaucratic busywork?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include veterans (whose data is supposedly being protected), contractors (who will have to pretend to care about data security), and the VA (which will have to go through the motions of implementing these new provisions). Stakeholders include the usual suspects: lobbyists for defense contractors, veterans' organizations, and anyone else who can spin this bill as a victory for their particular interest group.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact is negligible, as this bill is largely symbolic. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, designed to make politicians look good without actually addressing the underlying issues. The implications are clear: more bureaucratic red tape, more opportunities for contractors to find loopholes, and more empty promises to veterans that their data will be protected.

In conclusion, the Veteran DATA Act is a perfect example of legislative placebo effect – it's designed to make you feel better without actually doing anything meaningful. It's a symptom of a deeper disease: the chronic inability of our government to effectively address real problems, instead opting for shallow, PR-friendly solutions that benefit no one except the politicians and special interest groups who crafted them. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.

Related Topics

Military & Veterans AffairsCybersecurity & Data Privacy
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$71,300
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$5,300
Committees
$0
Individuals
$66,000

No PAC contributions found

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$3,300
2
LABORERS LOCAL 397 PAC
2 transactions
$1,000
3
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 553
2 transactions
$1,000

No committee contributions found

1
MCNALLY, R. STEPHEN
2 transactions
$6,600
2
MORINO, MARIO M.
2 transactions
$6,600
3
FISHER, CYNTHIA
1 transaction
$3,300
4
MURPHY, JAMES
1 transaction
$3,300
5
NELSON, REED C.
1 transaction
$3,300
6
NI, PIN
1 transaction
$3,300
7
PRICE, RICHARD
1 transaction
$3,300
8
GOTTLIEB, HOWARD L.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
STEYER, TOM
1 transaction
$3,300
10
TRONE, DAVID J.
1 transaction
$3,300
11
WALTON, JAMES
1 transaction
$3,300
12
BEIDLER, PRUDENCE
1 transaction
$3,300
13
BENNETT, RAYMOND
1 transaction
$3,300
14
CHAVKIN, ARNIE
1 transaction
$3,300
15
CLIFFORD, ROBERT A.
1 transaction
$3,300
16
CONWAY, KEVIN
1 transaction
$3,300
17
COONEY, ROBERT
1 transaction
$3,300
18
DUNN, PAUL
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Barrett, Tom [R-MI-7]

ID: B001321

Top Contributors

21

1
MICHIGAN AGGREGATES ASSOCIATION PAC
OrganizationOKEMOS, MI
$300
Feb 27, 2024
2
DEMKOWICZ, BRIAN MR.
HURON CAPITAL • INVESTOR
IndividualGROSSE POINTE, MI
$13,200
Jan 8, 2024
3
STADLER, BRIAN
WOLGAST CORPORATION • MANAGER
IndividualSAGINAW, MI
$6,870
Sep 28, 2023
4
UIHLEIN, RICHARD
ULINE • CHAIRMAN
IndividualLAKE FOREST, IL
$6,870
Sep 26, 2023
5
COURTNEY, JOHN
RETIRED • RETIRED
IndividualOKEMOS, MI
$6,870
Dec 8, 2023
6
BAKER, JEFFREY
MUSKEGON CAR CREDIT • EXECUTIVE
IndividualGRAND RAPIDS, MI
$6,600
Jul 25, 2023
7
BANCROFT, NICHOLAS
AGROLIQUID • CEO
IndividualSAINT JOHNS, MI
$6,600
Sep 19, 2023
8
HAWORTH, MATTHEW
HAWORTH, INC. • CHAIRMAN
IndividualHOLLAND, MI
$6,600
Sep 18, 2023
9
HAWORTH, RICHARD
HAWORTH, INC. • CHAIRMAN EMERITUS
IndividualSAUGATUCK, MI
$6,600
Sep 18, 2023
10
O'NEIL, WILLIAM
W J O'NEIL COMPANY • EXECUTIVE
IndividualCOMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI
$6,600
Sep 11, 2023

Rep. Vindman, Eugene Simon [D-VA-7]

ID: V000138

Top Contributors

22

1
LUX FOR VIRGINIA
OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA
$500
Mar 29, 2024
2
LUX FOR VIRGINIA
OrganizationLADYSMITH, VA
$500
Mar 31, 2024
3
FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT
$4,000
Apr 20, 2024
4
FORSTER-BURKE, DIANE
IndividualCOTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT
$4,000
May 5, 2024
5
VON STEIN, THOMSON
IndividualROCKVILLE, MD
$3,500
Aug 7, 2024
6
HULL, MEGAN
SELF • ACTIVIST
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$3,300
Nov 2, 2024
7
KAISER, GEORGE
GBK CORPORATION • EXECUTIVE
IndividualTULSA, OK
$3,300
Oct 25, 2024
8
PARSONS, KATHLEEN
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualPOTOMAC, MD
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
9
STAPLE, HARISE
SELF • MD
IndividualLOS ALTOS, CA
$3,300
Oct 18, 2024
10
HOLMES, LAURA
SELF • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR
IndividualBOCA RATON, FL
$3,300
Oct 22, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 46 nodes and 61 connections

Total contributions: $61

Top Donors - Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 7 harmed.

  • Section 2 prohibits VA from entering contracts that allow contractors to sell sensitive personal information; private prison contractors often handle VA health data and could be barred from such contracts, imposing a cost.

  • Section 2's ban on selling sensitive personal information affects contractors like surveillance tech firms (e.g., Palantir, Clearview AI) that may seek VA data for policing or immigration enforcement, imposing a regulatory cost.

  • −Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.80

    Section 2 prohibits VA contractors from selling sensitive personal information; large tech firms (e.g., Google, Amazon) that contract with VA for cloud or data services would be barred from monetizing such data, imposing a cost.

  • −Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.75

    Section 2's prohibition on selling sensitive personal information applies to VA contractors; telecom firms (e.g., AT&T, Verizon) providing services to VA could be restricted from monetizing VA-held data, imposing a cost.

  • −Health Insuranceconfidence 0.70

    Section 2 bars VA contractors from selling sensitive personal information; health insurers (e.g., UnitedHealth, CVS Health) that contract with VA for claims processing or data analytics would be prohibited from monetizing such data, imposing a cost.

  • −Medical Devicesconfidence 0.65

    Section 2's ban on selling sensitive personal information affects VA contractors; medical device firms (e.g., Medtronic, Abbott) that handle VA patient data for device monitoring or trials would be barred from monetizing that data, imposing a cost.

+ 1 more industry not shown.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Budzinski, Nikki [D-IL-13])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Strong
Vector: 59%
Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Veteran DATA Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's focus on the Department of Veterans Affairs by enhancing data privacy and security for veterans, which supports the broader goal of improving VA operations and accountability. Both emphasize protecting veteran information and ensuring responsible handling by contractors and the VA."

Key themes:veteran data protectionVA accountabilitycontractor oversightpersonal information security

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra. — 657 — Section Four THE ECONOMY The next Administration must prioritize the economic prosperity of ordi- nary Americans. For several decades, establishment “elites” have failed the citizenry by refusing to secure the border, outsourcing manufacturing to China and elsewhere, spending recklessly, regulating constantly, and generally controlling the country from the top down rather than letting it flourish from the bottom up. The proper role of government, as was articulated nearly 250 years ago, is to secure our God-given, unalienable rights in order that we might enjoy the pursuit of happiness, the benefits of free enterprise, and the blessings of liberty. Finding the right approach to trade policy is key to the fortunes of everyday Americans. In Chapter 26, president of the Competitive Enterprise Institute Kent Lassman and former White House director of trade and manufacturing policy Peter Navarro debate what an effective conservative trade policy would look like. Lass- man argues that the best trade policy is a humble, limited-government approach that would encourage free trade with all nations. He maintains that aggressive trade policies involve an increased government role that future leftist Administra- tions will utilize to push “climate change” and “equity”-based activism. Focusing more on gross domestic product (GDP) growth than on median income, he writes that “people mistakenly believe that U.S. manufacturing and the U.S. economy are in decline” when in truth “American manufacturing output is currently at an all-time high.” Meanwhile, we continue to experience “record-setting real GDP” despite our “long-run decline in manufacturing employment.” Lassman does not think that an aggressive U.S. trade policy would lead to more manufacturing jobs. Rather, he writes, “Federal Reserve research shows” that the

Department of Veterans Affairs

Moderate
Vector: 61%
Pages: 688-691AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Veteran DATA Act's focus on safeguarding veterans' personal information aligns with the Project 2025 VA objective of enhancing veteran trust and experience through responsible data handling, though the specific Project 2025 policy details are not fully disclosed."

Key themes:veteran data privacyVA contract oversightpersonal information protectionveteran trust

— 655 — Department of Veterans Affairs ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Division, VHA Directive 1003, “VHA Veteran Patient Experience,” April 14, 2020, pp. 1 and B-1. 2. S. 2372, VA Mission Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress. gov/115/plaws/publ182/PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VA History Office, “VA History,” last updated May 27, 2021, https://www. va.gov/HISTORY/VA_History/Overview.asp (accessed January 28, 2023). 4. 38 U.S. Code § 1116, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/38/1116 (accessed January 28, 2023). 5. S. 3373, Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act of 2022 (Honoring Our PACT Act of 2022), Public Law No. 117-168, 117th Congress, August 10, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ168/PLAW-117publ168.pdf (accessed January 28, 2023). 6. H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division S, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). Known variously as the Department of Veterans Affairs Nurse and Physician Assistant Retention and Income Security Enhancement Act and the VA Nurse and Physician Assistant RAISE Act. 7. See note 5, supra.

Department of Veterans Affairs

Weak
Vector: 58%
Pages: 676-678AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Veteran DATA Act focuses on protecting veterans' personal information from sale or disclosure, whereas the Project 2025 VA section addresses health care delivery, disability benefits, demographic shifts, and conservative governance reforms; there is no direct overlap in objectives, only a shared concern for veterans within the VA context."

Key themes:Veterans Affairsveteran data protectionVA operations

— 643 — Department of Veterans Affairs with a growth in same-day surgical procedures and outpatient care, so has the VA, and in 2018 Congress added access to private-sector urgent care outlets as one of the VA’s health care benefits. Today, the VA operates 172 inpatient VA Medical Centers (VAMCs), which are an average of 60 years old, and 1,113 Community Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs), which are newer facilities designed to meet the needs of veterans closer to home. The VA also manages a Community Care Network (CCN) through contracts with Optum and TriWest, third-party health care administrators responsible for build- ing and maintaining a robust population of community providers to meet the needs of veterans referred for care outside of the VA system. Currently, approximately 6.4 million veterans out of 18 million nationally (and out of the 9.1 million who are enrolled) use the VA for health care; the remainder use employer-sponsored plans, Tricare, Medicare, and Medicaid. The disability benefits system evolved significantly in the years between the Cold War era and the global war on terrorism, a period when the VA enrolled large numbers of veterans from World War II, Korea, and Vietnam who were seeking disability benefits and health care. Disability compensation is the largest VA benefit, but there also are dozens of others, the next largest of which are the GI Bill and the Home Loan Guaranty. These benefits are administered through 56 Regional Benefits Offices (RBOs) and hundreds of satellite sites around the country. The Agent Orange Act of 19914 significantly expanded the scope of disability ben- efits for those who had deployed to Vietnam, and the cost of those benefits began to increase dramatically as the Vietnam generation of veterans aged and began to expe- rience adverse health conditions, some of which were presumed to have been caused by defoliant chemicals used in Southeast Asia. In 2016 and 2017, a burdensome backlog of appeals of denied disability claims from multiple wartime generations—a backlog numbering in the hundreds of thousands—led to a joint effort by the VA, Vet- eran Service Organizations (VSOs), and Congress to pass legislation that streamlined appeal processes. Implemented in 2017, this historic “good governance” success has helped the VA to reduce the number of these appeals dramatically. The Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring Our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act of 20225 addressed adverse health outcomes presumed to be the result of veterans’ exposure to airborne toxins during the global war on terrorism and further expanded disability benefits to the most recent gen- eration of veterans. These ambitious authorities, like the 1991 authorities, have the potential to overwhelm the VA’s ability to process new disability claims and adjudicate appeals. Currently, the VA is seeking to hire large numbers of personnel to process these claims while exploring the use of an automated process to accel- erate claims reviews and decisions. The ever-present lag in the hiring and training of new employees could result in major problems with the timely adjudication of benefits well into the next Administration in 2025. — 644 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise In sum, the VA for the foreseeable future will experience significant fiscal, human capital, and infrastructure crosswinds and risks. Budgets are at historic highs, and with a workforce now above 400,000, the VA is contending with a lack of new veteran enrollees to offset the declining population of older veterans. Recruitment of medical and benefits personnel has become more challenging. Veterans are migrating from the northern states to the southern and western states for retirement and employment. Meanwhile, VA information technol- ogy (IT) is struggling to keep pace with the evolution of patient care and record keeping. Consequently, VA leaders in the next Administration must be wise and courageous political strategists, experienced managers to run day-to-day oper- ations more effectively, innovators to address the changing veteran landscape, and agile “fixers” to mitigate and repair systemic problems created or ignored by the present leadership team. VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (VHA) Needed Reforms l Rescind all departmental clinical policy directives that are contrary to principles of conservative governance starting with abortion services and gender reassignment surgery. Neither aligns with service-connected conditions that would warrant VA’s providing this type of clinical care, and both follow the Left’s pernicious trend of abusing the role of government to further its own agenda. l Focus on the effects of shifting veteran demographics. At least during the next decade, the VA will experience a significant generational shift in its overall patient population. Of the approximately 18 million veterans alive today, roughly 9.1 million are enrolled for VA health care, and 6.4 million of these enrollees use VA health care consistently. These 6.4 million veterans are split almost evenly between those who are over age 65 and those who are under age 65, but the share of VA’s health care dollars is spent predominantly in the over-65 cohort. That share increases significantly as veterans live longer and use the VHA system at a higher rate. VHA enrollments of new users are increasingly at risk of being exceeded by the deaths of current enrollees, primarily because significant numbers of the Vietnam generation are reaching their life expectancy. The generational transition from Vietnam-era veterans to post-9/11 veterans will take several years to complete. The ongoing demographic transition is a catalyst for needed assessments of how the VA can improve the delivery of care to a numerically declining and differently dispersed national population

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills