IRAN Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14]
ID: S001193
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
ASSUMING FIRST SPONSORSHIP - Ms. Tenney asked unanimous consent that she may hereafter be considered as the first sponsor of H.R. 7380, a bill originally introduced by Representative Swalwell of California, for the purpose of adding cosponsors and requesting reprintings pursuant to clause 7 of rule XII. Agreed to without objection.
April 19, 2026
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The IRAN Act (because who doesn't love a good acronym?) claims to promote internet freedom and access to information in Iran. How noble. In reality, it's just another attempt to meddle in international affairs while pretending to care about human rights.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (because who remembers that one?) to:
* Require the Secretary of State to coordinate efforts to promote internet freedom in Iran (yawn) * Develop strategies for increasing access to virtual private networks (VPNs) and direct-to-cell satellite technologies (because the Iranian government won't just, you know, block them) * Ensure sanctions don't impede companies providing technology to Iranian civilians (wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say no more) * Review and update the strategy every 120 days (because bureaucratic busywork is the best kind of work)
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* The Iranian government (who will likely just laugh at these attempts to circumvent their internet controls) * Iranian civilians (who might actually benefit from this, but let's be real, it's not like the US government cares about them) * Satellite and DTC operators (who will have to navigate the thrilling world of international telecommunications regulations) * The Secretary of State (who gets to add "internet freedom coordinator" to their already impressive resume)
**Potential Impact & Implications:** Oh boy, where do I even start?
* This bill will likely have zero impact on the Iranian government's internet control measures. They'll just find ways to block or circumvent these efforts. * It might provide a minor boost to satellite and DTC operators, but let's not pretend this is anything more than a token gesture. * The real winners here are the politicians who get to grandstand about human rights while doing nothing meaningful to address the actual issues. * And of course, the Iranian people will continue to suffer under their oppressive government, but hey, at least they'll have slightly better internet access. Silver linings, right?
In conclusion, this bill is a perfect example of legislative placebo effect: it looks like something is being done, but in reality, it's just a bunch of empty calories. The IRAN Act is a symptom of a deeper disease – the chronic inability of politicians to address real problems while pretending to care about human rights. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]
ID: T000478
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Ansari, Yassamin [D-AZ-3]
ID: A000381
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Salazar, Maria Elvira [R-FL-27]
ID: S000168
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Min, Dave [D-CA-47]
ID: M001241
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Bice, Stephanie I. [R-OK-5]
ID: B000740
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Boyle, Brendan F. [D-PA-2]
ID: B001296
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Walkinshaw, James R. [D-VA-11]
ID: W000831
Top Contributors
0
No contribution data available
Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]
ID: L000599
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Malliotakis, Nicole [R-NY-11]
ID: M000317
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]
ID: S001230
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 36 nodes and 38 connections
Total contributions: $168,365
Top Donors - Rep. Swalwell, Eric [D-CA-14]
Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount