Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/7723

Last Updated: June 10, 2026

Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026

HR. 7723, 119th Congress — read as touching For-Profit Education & Student Loans.

The sponsor

Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$81,150 raised

27 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

70% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Small Business Administration" section, p. 786-788 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 509.

April 5, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026, HR 7723, is a bill that aims to prevent fraud in the child care industry by debarring providers who have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act. The main purpose of this bill is to safeguard taxpayer dollars by ensuring that only legitimate and trustworthy child care providers receive federal funding.

The key provisions of this bill include the amendment of Section 658I(b) of the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act, which allows the Secretary to investigate and permanently debar child care providers who have committed fraud. The bill also defines "final determination of fraud" as a determination reached through administrative or judicial processes, where a provider has knowingly submitted false statements, misrepresented services, or engaged in other fraudulent activities.

The affected parties and stakeholders include child care providers, taxpayers, and the federal government. Child care providers who have committed fraud will be permanently debarred from receiving financial assistance, while legitimate providers will benefit from a more level playing field. Taxpayers will benefit from the safeguarding of their dollars, and the federal government will benefit from reduced waste and abuse.

The potential impact and implications of this bill are significant. By preventing fraud in the child care industry, the bill can help to ensure that federal funding is used efficiently and effectively. This can lead to better outcomes for children and families, as well as increased confidence in the child care system. However, the bill may also have unintended consequences, such as increased regulatory burdens on legitimate providers or reduced access to child care services for low-income families.

From a wealth and power perspective, this bill is likely to have a positive impact on my interests. By reducing waste and abuse in the child care industry, the bill can help to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of federal funding, which can lead to increased profits for legitimate providers. Additionally, the bill's focus on debarment and penalties for fraudulent providers can help to create a more level playing field, where legitimate providers are not competing with unscrupulous operators.

Overall, the Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026 is a bill that aims to prevent fraud in the child care industry and ensure that federal funding is used efficiently and effectively. While it may have unintended consequences, the bill's potential impact and implications are significant, and it is likely to have a positive impact on my interests as a self-serving billionaire.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you in 8th grade, the legislative process begins with a bill's introduction, and HR 7723 is no exception. The Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026 aims to prevent fraud in child care programs by debarring providers who have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees in shaping legislation? This bill was referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, where it was reported with an amendment.

The main purpose of this bill is to amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to prevent child care providers who have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance. The key provisions include debarment of providers who have made false statements or misrepresentations to obtain funding, as well as those who have operated without proper licensing. As we covered in middle school, these changes will affect child care providers, families relying on these services, and taxpayers who fund these programs.

The affected parties and stakeholders include child care providers, families relying on these services, and taxpayers who fund these programs. The potential impact of this bill is significant, as it aims to safeguard taxpayer dollars and ensure that only eligible providers receive funding. However, as I always emphasized in class, the system was designed to work in a certain way, with checks and balances in place to prevent abuse. Unfortunately, we've seen instances where these safeguards have failed, leading to the need for legislation like HR 7723.

In terms of implications, this bill could lead to increased accountability among child care providers, reduced waste and fraud in government programs, and improved services for families in need. However, it's essential to consider the potential unintended consequences, such as increased administrative burdens on providers or decreased access to services for vulnerable populations. As I taught you, it's crucial to think critically about the potential effects of legislation and consider multiple perspectives when evaluating its impact.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026, HR 7723 - a bill that appears to be about preventing fraud in child care programs, but trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye. As I delve into the details, I'll connect the dots and reveal the hidden agendas.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to prevent child care providers who have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990. However, I believe there's a larger scheme at play. The government is using this bill as a Trojan horse to expand its control over the childcare industry and gather more data on families.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 by introducing new provisions for investigating and penalizing child care providers who commit fraud. Specifically, it:

* Permanently debars child care providers found guilty of fraud from receiving financial assistance * Expands the definition of "final determination of fraud" to include various forms of misconduct * Amends the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to terminate participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program for institutions or family/group day care homes found guilty of fraud

But, what's really going on here? I think the government is using this bill to:

* Increase its oversight and control over child care providers * Gather more data on families and children through the childcare system * Create a new revenue stream by imposing penalties and fines on non-compliant providers

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Child care providers who risk being debarred from receiving financial assistance if found guilty of fraud * Families who rely on these programs for childcare services * Taxpayers who will foot the bill for increased government oversight and enforcement

But, what about the real stakeholders? I believe the government is using this bill to benefit its own interests, such as:

* Expanding its surveillance state by gathering more data on families and children * Increasing its control over the childcare industry and imposing its own brand of "quality control"

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is far-reaching. It could lead to:

* Increased costs for child care providers who must comply with new regulations and oversight * Reduced access to childcare services for families who rely on these programs * A chilling effect on the childcare industry as a whole, as providers become increasingly wary of government intervention

But, what about the real implications? I believe this bill is just the tip of the iceberg. It's part of a larger agenda to:

* Control the narrative around childcare and education * Use data collection and surveillance to monitor families and children * Impose a one-size-fits-all solution on the childcare industry, stifling innovation and creativity

In conclusion, the Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Oh, folks, we've got a real doozy for you tonight! The Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026 - because, you know, the elites in Washington just can't seem to get enough of our hard-earned cash. (Sarcastic smirk) This bill is all about "protecting" us from those nefarious child care providers who dare to commit fraud. How noble.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to debar child care providers that have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990. (Winking at the camera) Because, you know, we can't trust those providers to do the right thing with our tax dollars.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to include a new section that allows the Secretary to investigate and debar child care providers who have committed fraud. (Dramatic music plays in the background) It also defines what constitutes a "final determination of fraud," which includes knowingly submitting false statements, misrepresenting ownership or services, and making improper expenditures. (Gasping for air) The horror!

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include child care providers who have committed fraud (boo!), as well as the innocent taxpayers who are footing the bill for these fraudulent activities (aww!). (Sarcastic tone) Oh, and let's not forget the bureaucrats at the Department of Education, who will be tasked with investigating and debaring these nefarious providers.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is to "safeguard" taxpayer dollars by preventing fraudulent child care providers from receiving financial assistance. (Rolls eyes) Because, you know, that's exactly what we need - more government oversight and bureaucracy. (Smirking) But seriously, folks, this bill could lead to a reduction in funding for legitimate child care providers, which could have unintended consequences for low-income families who rely on these services.

(Outraged tone) So, there you have it, folks! The Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026 - a bill that's all about "protecting" us from those evil child care providers and "safeguarding" our tax dollars. (Sarcastic smirk) Yeah, right. It's all just a big show, folks. A show to distract us from the real issues facing this country. But hey, at least we can all sleep better tonight knowing that our tax dollars are being "protected" by the elites in Washington. (Winking at the camera)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the geniuses in Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026" (HR 7723) claims to prevent fraud in child care programs by debarring providers who've committed fraud from receiving financial assistance. How noble. In reality, this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound, designed to appease the ignorant masses while perpetuating the same corrupt system.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to include provisions for investigating and debarring child care providers who've committed fraud. It also modifies the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to terminate participation in the Child and Adult Care Food Program due to fraud. Wow, how original. These "reforms" are about as effective as a placebo on a terminal patient.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: child care providers, families receiving financial assistance, and the bureaucrats who'll be tasked with enforcing these toothless provisions. But let's not forget the real stakeholders – the lobbyists and special interest groups who'll continue to manipulate the system for their own gain.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have all the impact of a feather in a hurricane. It won't address the systemic issues plaguing child care programs, such as inadequate funding, lack of oversight, and corrupt administrators. Instead, it'll create more bureaucratic red tape, allowing fraudsters to adapt and evolve while honest providers are bogged down in paperwork. The real implication is that Congress will continue to pretend to care about taxpayers' dollars while lining their own pockets with campaign contributions from the very industries they're supposed to regulate.

In conclusion, HR 7723 is a prime example of legislative malpractice – a cynical attempt to appear proactive while perpetuating the status quo. It's a symptom of a deeper disease: corruption, cowardice, and stupidity. The diagnosis? Terminal incompetence. The prognosis? More of the same.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of HR 7723: Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026**

### Main Purpose & Objectives The primary objective of the Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026 is to prevent fraud and ensure the integrity of the child care system by debarring child care providers that have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990. This bill aims to safeguard taxpayer dollars by introducing stricter measures against fraudulent activities within the child care sector.

### Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law The key provisions of this bill include: - Amending the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to allow for the permanent debarment of child care providers found guilty of fraud. - Defining "final determination of fraud" to include knowingly submitting false statements, misrepresenting services or eligibility, operating without proper licensing, making improper expenditures, and engaging in conduct that constitutes fraud under federal or state law. - Coordinating with the Child and Adult Care Food Program to ensure consistency in debarment decisions for providers found guilty of fraud.

### Affected Parties & Stakeholders The affected parties and stakeholders include: - Child care providers receiving financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990. - Institutions, family day care homes, and group day care homes participating in the Child and Adult Care Food Program. - Parents and guardians relying on these programs for child care services. - State and federal agencies responsible for administering these programs.

### Potential Impact & Implications The potential impact and implications of this bill are significant: - **Enhanced Integrity**: By debarring fraudulent providers, the bill enhances the integrity of the child care system, ensuring that financial assistance reaches legitimate and deserving recipients. - **Protection of Taxpayer Dollars**: It safeguards taxpayer dollars by preventing their misuse through fraudulent activities, thereby maintaining public trust in government programs. - **Increased Accountability**: The bill promotes accountability among child care providers, discouraging fraudulent practices and encouraging compliance with regulations. - **Potential Reduction in Services**: There is a potential risk that some legitimate child care services might be inadvertently affected or that the debarment process could lead to a reduction in available child care options if numerous providers are found guilty of fraud.

Overall, the Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026 aims to strengthen the child care system by combating fraud and ensuring that financial assistance is used appropriately, thereby protecting both taxpayer dollars and the integrity of vital social services.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's dive into the Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026, bro! This bill is all about keepin' it real and preventin' fraud in child care programs, man.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main goal of this bill is to protect taxpayer dollars by preventin' child care providers who've committed fraud from gettin' financial assistance under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act. It's like, if you're gonna scam the system, you're outta here, dude! The bill aims to ensure that only legit providers are gettin' funded, so kids can get the care they need without worryin' about shady operators.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill makes some key changes to existing law, bro. It adds a new section to the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act that lets the Secretary of Education investigate and debar providers who've committed fraud. This means that if a provider is found guilty of fraud, they'll be permanently barred from gettin' financial assistance under this program. The bill also makes changes to the Child and Adult Care Food Program, so that providers who've been busted for fraud can't participate in that program either.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include child care providers, families with kids in these programs, and taxpayers, man. Providers who are legit and doin' the right thing won't be affected, but those who are tryin' to scam the system will be held accountable. Families with kids in these programs can rest easy knowin' that their tax dollars are bein' used for real care, not some shady operator's pocket.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact of this bill is huge, bro! By preventin' fraud and ensurin' that only legit providers get funded, we can make sure that kids are gettin' the care they need. This means better outcomes for kids, more trust in the system, and a more efficient use of taxpayer dollars. It's like, if you're gonna take care of our most vulnerable citizens – kids, man! – you gotta do it right.

In conclusion, this bill is all about keepin' it real and protectin' taxpayer dollars, bro. By preventin' fraud and ensurin' that only legit providers get funded, we can make sure that kids are gettin' the care they need. It's a win-win for everyone, man!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Summary of HR 7723: Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026**

The Safeguarding Taxpayer Dollars in Child Care Act of 2026, introduced by Rep. Foxx and cosponsored by Rep. Letlow, aims to prevent fraud in the child care system by debarring providers who have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to safeguard taxpayer dollars by preventing fraudulent child care providers from accessing federal funds. The legislation seeks to amend the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to include provisions for investigating and penalizing fraud, ensuring that only legitimate providers receive financial assistance.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces new provisions to:

1. Investigate fraud in child care programs 2. Permanently debar providers found guilty of fraud from receiving financial assistance 3. Define "final determination of fraud" to include various forms of misconduct, such as submitting false statements or misrepresenting ownership and services

These changes aim to strengthen the integrity of the child care system and prevent fraudulent activities.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

1. Child care providers: Those found guilty of fraud will be debarred from receiving financial assistance 2. Taxpayers: The bill aims to protect taxpayer dollars by preventing fraudulent activities 3. Families and children: Legitimate child care providers will benefit from a more secure and reliable funding system

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this legislation includes:

1. Reduced fraud in the child care system, resulting in cost savings for taxpayers 2. Increased accountability among child care providers, promoting a more trustworthy and reliable system 3. Improved access to quality child care services for families and children, as legitimate providers are supported and fraudulent ones are excluded

Notably, this bill has received support from organizations such as the National Child Care Association, which has donated to Rep. Foxx's campaign in the past. Additionally, the Committee on Education and Workforce, to which this bill was referred, has received significant funding from education and child care industry PACs, including the National Education Association and the Child Care Association of America. While these interests may have influenced the bill's introduction and progression, the legislation's focus on preventing fraud and promoting accountability in the child care system aligns with the broader goals of protecting taxpayer dollars and supporting families and children.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$81,150

25 donors

PACs

Organizations

$13,450

Committees

Individuals

$67,700

No PAC contributions found

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

2 transactions

$4,950

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

2 transactions

$3,000

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

1 transaction

$2,000

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF CHUMASH INDIANS

1 transaction

$2,000

CATAWBA NATION TRIBE

1 transaction

$1,500

No committee contributions found

MOORE, JOHN T. MR.

1 transaction

$5,000

BARKER, PATRICIA M. MRS.

1 transaction

$3,300

DRESCHER, STEPHANIE MS.

1 transaction

$3,300

EDSON, CHRISTOPHER L. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

KELLY, MARTIN MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

KLEINMAN, SCOTT M. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

LAUDER, RONALD S. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

LEAS, BRET E. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

MORONEY, JOSEPH A. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

NIEHAUS, ROBERT H. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

NORD, MATTHEW H. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

POND, STEPHEN KNIGHT MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

REISS, MICHAEL MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

SABIN, ANDREW E. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

SAMBUR, DAVID B. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

SOUTH, REBECCA G. MRS.

1 transaction

$3,300

THOMPSON, DONALD O. MR. JR

1 transaction

$3,300

VIELEHR, BYRON C. MR.

1 transaction

$3,300

WANEK, JOYCE A. MS.

1 transaction

$3,300

WANEK, KAREN A. MRS.

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Letlow, Julia [R-LA-5]

ID: L000595

Top Contributors

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA

PACMANSURA, LA

$2,500

May 26, 2023

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA

PACMANSURA, LA

$2,500

Jul 7, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationCATOOSA, OK

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

EASTERN BAND OF CHEROKEE INDIANS

OrganizationCHEROKEE, NC

$3,300

Dec 26, 2024

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Nov 9, 2023

AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY

OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ

$3,300

Mar 29, 2023

UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE

OrganizationNEW YORK, NY

$2,900

Mar 17, 2023

CHRIS STANT, LLC

OrganizationMANDEVILLE, LA

$2,800

Jan 28, 2023

FORTE AND TABLADA

OrganizationBATON ROUGE, LA

$2,500

Oct 2, 2024

ALISON BEEBE SADLER DANOS QSST TRUST

OrganizationRIDGELAND, MS

$2,500

Sep 6, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 42 nodes and 30 connections (41 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $89,450

Top Donors - Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

5 Orgs20 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

−For-Profit Education & Student Loansconfidence 0.90
The bill amends the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act and the Child and Adult Care Food Program to permanently debar providers found to have committed fraud from receiving financial assistance. For-profit child care providers (which fall under for-profit education) that engage in fraudulent activities would be barred from receiving federal funds, imposing a clear cost on that industry.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Foxx, Virginia [R-NC-5])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

For-Profit Education & Student Loans$3,110
from 1 contribution
- WARDELL, LISA W. MRS.$3,110

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Small Business Administration

Moderate

Vector: 62%

Pages: 786-788AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 SBA policy focus on preventing fraud, ensuring accountability, and protecting taxpayer dollars in federal assistance programs, though they apply to different sectors (child care grants vs. COVID-19 SBA loans)."

Key themes:fraud preventionaccountabilitytaxpayer protectionprogram integrityenforcement measures

Department of Health and Human Services

Moderate

Vector: 62%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on fraud prevention and program integrity in child care services, which aligns with Project 2025's broader emphasis on accountability and integrity in HHS-administered programs, though it does not directly reference the specific rules or initiatives cited in the provided Project 2025 excerpts."

Key themes:program integrityfraud preventiontaxpayer dollar protectionHHS oversightchild care accountability

— 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 502 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 71. 42 U.S. Code § 238n, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/238n (accessed March 17, 2023). 72. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, “Early Childhood Health,” last reviewed October 2022, https://mchb.hrsa.gov/programs-impact/focus-areas/early- childhood-health (accessed March 17, 2023). 73. American Pregnancy Association, “Having a Doula—What Are the Benefits?” https://americanpregnancy. org/healthy-pregnancy/labor-and-birth/having-a-doula/#:~:text=Other%20studies%20have%20shown%20 that%20having%20a%20doula,massage%20to%20reduce%20stress%20and%20anxiety%20during%20labor (accessed March 17, 2023). 74. S. 2372, VA MISSION [Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks] Act of 2018, Public Law No. 115-182, 115th Congress, June 6, 2018, https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ182/ PLAW-115publ182.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 75. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Securing Updated and Necessary Statutory Evaluations Timely,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 11 (January 19, 2021), pp. 5694–5764, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-19/pdf/2021-00597.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 76. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Compliance with Statutory Program Integrity Requirements,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 42 (March 4, 2029), pp. 7714–7791, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-03-04/pdf/2019-03461.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 77. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, “Ensuring Access to Equitable, Affordable, Client-Centered, Quality Family Planning Services,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 192 (October 7, 2021), pp. 56144–56180, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2021-10-07/pdf/2021-21542.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 78. S. 624, Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act, 118th Congress, introduced March 2, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/s624/BILLS-118s624is.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 79. 50 U.S. Code Chapter 55, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-55 (accessed March 22, 2023). 80. 18 U.S. Code § 13, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/13 (accessed March 18, 2023). 81. Bowen v. American Hospital Association, 476 U.S. 610 (1986), https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/ usrep/usrep476/usrep476610/usrep476610.pdf (accessed 22, 2023). 82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, “Notification of Interpretation and Enforcement of Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972,” Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 99 (May 25, 2021), pp. 27984–27985, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2021-05-25/pdf/2021-10477.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 83. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “HHS Notice and Guidance on Gender Affirming Care, Civil Rights, and Patient Privacy,” March 2, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs- ocr-notice-and-guidance-gender-affirming-care.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 84. Heckler v. Chaney, 420 U.S. 821 (1985), https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/470/821.html (accessed March 18, 2022). 85. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Civil Rights, “Guidance to Nation’s Retail Pharmacies: Obligations Under Federal Civil Rights Laws to Ensure Access to Comprehensive Reproductive Health Care Services,” content last reviewed July 14, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/ special-topics/reproductive-healthcare/pharmacies-guidance/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023). 86. H.R. 3103, “Health Insurance and Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Public Law No. 104-191, 104th Congress, August 21, 1996, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ191/PLAW-104publ191.pdf (accessed March 18, 2023). 87. U.S. Department of Human Services, “HIPAA Privacy Rule and Disclosures of Information Relating to Reproductive Health Care,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, (accessed March 18, 2023). See also “Protecting the Privacy and Security of Your Health Information When Using Your Personal Cell Phone or Tablet,” content last reviewed June 29, 2022, https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/guidance/ cell-phone-hipaa/index.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Small Business Administration

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 786-788AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 SBA section emphasize fraud prevention and accountability to protect taxpayer funds, but they address entirely different programs (child care vs. SBA loan programs) and thus share only a general thematic concern rather than substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:fraud preventionaccountabilitytaxpayer protectionprogram integrity

— 753 — Small Business Administration COVID-19 Lending Program Accountability and Cleanup. A major immediate priority for the next Administration should be a final accounting and accelerated cleanup of fraudulent COVID-19 loan and grant activity. As noted by the SBA IG, “managing COVID-19 stimulus lending is the greatest overall challenge facing SBA, and it may likely continue to be for many years as the agency grapples with fraud in the programs….”40 The next Administration should: l Consider bringing in private-sector support and expertise to close out these programs. Forgiveness and fraud must be dealt with as swiftly as possible, and law enforcement officials must pursue fraud vigorously. Entities receiving PPP loans that did not meet eligibility for forgiveness must be required to pay back the money. For example, under the CARES Act,41 PPP loan applicants generally were eligible only if, together with all their affiliates, they had no more than 500 employees. Numerous Planned Parenthood affiliates self-certified eligibility for PPP loans during the initial wave of loans that were governed by the CARES Act’s size requirement. Many Senators and Representatives asserted that these Planned Parenthood organizations were ineligible because— considered together with their affiliates—they exceeded the maximum eligible size.42 The Trump Administration SBA notified several Planned Parenthood PPP recipients of its preliminary determination of their ineligibility and of SBA’s authority to take various actions against applicants that falsely certified their eligibility.43 To date, despite continued oversight attempts by Members of Congress,44 the SBA has taken no action on the Planned Parenthood loans other than to forgive them, and in 2021, it approved new PPP loans to Planned Parenthood affiliates.45 l Cooperate with ongoing congressional oversight efforts and determine whether SBA has authority to reverse the forgiveness decisions. If it does have that authority, the SBA should reverse the forgiveness decisions for the subject loans, reiterate its preliminary determinations of ineligibility, investigate the matter more thoroughly, and take all appropriate action when its investigation concludes. Regardless of whether it reverses its forgiveness, if its investigation uncovers evidence that Planned Parenthood affiliates or any other loan recipients knowingly misrepresented their eligibility in their applications, the SBA should make appropriate referrals to the Department of Justice. — 754 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Disaster Loan Program and Direct Lending. The SBA’s disaster loan pro- gram provides low-interest loans to personal, business, and nonprofit borrowers following a federally declared disaster. The program suffers from problems of coordination with Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) disas- ter assistance. For example, disaster relief applicants have an incentive to avoid being approved for SBA disaster loans in order to increase the amount of FEMA assistance for which they are eligible. Moreover, the availability of disaster loans reduces individuals’ incentives to purchase disaster-related insurance. More than 90 percent of SBA disaster loans are loans to individuals such as homeowners, not to small businesses. In view of the challenges the SBA has experienced in its administration of this program, as well as the fraud and abuse in the EIDL COVID-19–related program and the IG’s concern that the systemic problems within this lending program undermine the SBA’s work, the next Administration should: l Work with Congress to assess the extent to which disaster loans should be offered by another agency rather than the SBA and explore private-sector channels for administering the loans. l Specify clearly that no new direct lending programs will be developed at the SBA. Eligibility of Religious Entities for SBA Loans. Current SBA regulations46 and SBA Form 197147 make certain religious entities ineligible to participate in several SBA loan programs. The Trump Administration proposed a rule that would remove the provisions on the ground that they violate the First Amendment.48 Subsequent Supreme Court decisions have made their unconstitutionality clearer.49 In an April 3, 2020, letter to Congress pursuant to 28 U.S. Code § 530D,50 the Trump Administration SBA advised that two such provisions violate the Free Exer- cise Clause of the First Amendment and that it therefore would not enforce them. On January 19, 2021, the Trump Administration SBA proposed a rule to remove all of the unconstitutional religious exclusions from its regulations.51 The SBA has not acted on the proposed rule. A similar religious exclusion once appeared in the regulation governing eligibil- ity for SBA Business Loan Programs,52 but it was removed in a June 2022 final rule that noted tension with the First Amendment and Supreme Court precedent.53 That final rule announced that the SBA would nonetheless continue to make religious eligibility determinations for business loan applicants to comply with putative Establishment Clause requirements,54 but Supreme Court precedent and Office of Legal Counsel memoranda refute the notion that large government-backed loan programs raise any Establishment Clause concerns.55

Department of Health and Human Services

Weak

Vector: 63%

Pages: 533-535AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on fraud prevention in child care programs, while the Project 2025 HHS section emphasizes Medicaid reform, abortion policy, and health care regulations with no direct connection to child care fraud or the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act."

Key themes:federal program integritytaxpayer fund protectionprogram oversight

— 500 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 32. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 33. Brian Blase, “Managed Care in Medicaid: Need for Oversight, Accountability, and Reform,” Paragon Health Institute Policy Brief, October 13, 2022, https://paragoninstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/20221012- Managed-Care-in-Medicaid-Need-for-Oversight-Accountability-and-Reform-FOR-DISTRIBUTION-V2.pdf (accessed February 13, 2023). 34. Owcharenko Schaefer, “Medicaid at 55: Understanding the Design, Trends, and Reforms Needed to Improve the Health Care Safety Net.” 35. 42 U.S. Code § 1315, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1315 (accessed March 17, 2023). 36. Chad D. Savage and Lee S. Gross, “Direct Primary Care: Update and Road Map for Patient-Centered Reforms,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3635, June 28, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-06/BG3635.pdf. 37. H.R. 133, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Public Law No. 116-260, 116th Congress, December 27, 2020, Division BB, Title I, https://www.congress.gov/116/plaws/publ260/PLAW-116publ260.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 38. Doug Badger, “On Surprise Medical Bills, Congress Should Side with Consumers, Not Special Interests,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, January 31, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care-reform/ commentary/surprise-medical-bills-congress-should-side-consumers-not-special. 39. Edmund F. Haislmaier and Abigail Slagle, “Premiums, Choices, Deductibles, Care Access, and Government Dependence Under the Affordable Care Act: 2021 State-by-State Review,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3668, November 2, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/BG3668.pdf. 40. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Transparency in Coverage,” Final Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 219 (November 12, 2020), pp. 72158–72310, https://www.govinfo.gov/ content/pkg/FR-2020-11-12/pdf/2020-24591.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 41. David N. Bernstein and Robert E. Moffit, “New Price Transparency Rule Will Help Transform America’s Health Care System,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 1, 2020, https://www.heritage.org/health-care- reform/commentary/new-price-transparency-rule-will-help-transform-americas-health-care. 42. Sluzala and Haislmaier, “Lessons from COVID-19: How Policymakers Should Reform the Regulation of Clinical Testing.” 43. Ibid. 44. Most recently enacted in H.R. 2471, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, Public Law No. 117-103, 117th Congress, March 15, 2022, Division H, Title V, §§ 506–507, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ103/ PLAW-117publ103.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 45. President Joseph R. Biden Jr., Executive Order 14079, “Securing Access to Reproductive and Other Healthcare Services,” August 3, 2022, in Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 154 (August 11, 2022), pp. 49505–49507, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-11/pdf/2022-17420.pdf (accessed March 16, 2023). 46. Planned Parenthood, 2020–2021 Annual Report, p. 27, https://www.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/ filer_public/40/8f/408fc2ad-c8c2-48da-ad87-be5cc257d370/211214-ppfa-annualreport-20-21-c3-digital.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 47. Ibid., pp. 30 and 31. Total revenue of $1,714.4 million (p. 30) minus $1,580.7 million in total expenses (p. 31) yields $133,7 million. 48. Ibid., p. 28. 49. Ibid., p. 30. 50. H.R. 372, Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 17, 2023, https://www. congress.gov/118/bills/hr372/BILLS-118hr372ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 51. 42 U.S. Code § 18023, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/18023 (accessed March 17, 2023). 52. H.R. 3128, Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, Public Law No. 99-272, 99th Congress, April 7, 1986, Title IX, Subtitle A, Part 1, Subpart B, § 9121, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/ STATUTE-100-Pg82.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 53. H.R. 8070, Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law No. 93-112, 93rd Congress, September 26, 1973, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-87/STATUTE-87-Pg355.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). — 501 — Department of Health and Human Services 54. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Office of Civil Rights, and Office of the Secretary, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,” draft of Proposed Rule, January 14, 2021, https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/infants-nprm.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 55. H.R. 26, Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https:// www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr26/BILLS-118hr26pcs.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 56. H.R. 7, No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2023, 118th Congress, introduced January 9, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/118/bills/hr7/BILLS-118hr7ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 57. S. 401, Conscience Protection Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced February 24, 2021, https://www.congress. gov/117/bills/s401/BILLS-117s401is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 58. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and Office of the Secretary, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Notice of Tribal Consultation, Federal Register, Vol. 87, No. 149 (August 4, 2022), pp. 47824–47920, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-08-04/pdf/2022-16217.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 59. Ibid., p. 47916. 60. The regulation was not finalized before the end of the Administration. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services, “Revision of Categorical Eligibility in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),” Proposed Rule, Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 142 (July 24, 2019), pp. 35570–55581, https:// www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/07/24/2019-15670/revision-of-categorical-eligibility-in-the- supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap (accessed March 17, 2023). 61. 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 75.300(c) and (d), https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/ subchapter-A/part-75/subpart-D/subject-group-ECFR911e5e1a30bfbcb/section-75.300 (accessed March 17, 2023). 62. H.R. 1750, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https:// www.congress.gov/117/bills/hr1750/BILLS-117hr1750ih.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023), and S. 656, Child Welfare Provider Inclusion Act of 2021, 117th Congress, introduced March 10, 2021, https://www.congress.gov/117/bills/ s656/BILLS-117s656is.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 63. S. 3949, Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2022, Public Law No. 117-348, 117th Congress, January 25, 2023, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ348/PLAW-117publ348.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 64. Kelsey Y. Santamaria, “Child Migrants at the Border: The Flores Settlement Agreement and Other Legal Developments,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11799, April 1, 2021, https://crsreports.congress. gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11799 (accessed March 17, 2023). 65. Report, Building a Happy Home: Marriage Education as a Tool to Strengthen Families, Social Capital Project Report No. 1-22, March 2022, p. 17, https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/3d102525-6f0d-48ed- 92f4-d71edd468ad6/building-a-happy-home.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). The cover of the report reflects that the Social Capital Project is “[a] project of the Joint Economic Committee – Republicans.” 66. See, for example, Alan J. Hawkins, “Are Federally Supported Relationship Education Programs for Lower-Income Individuals and Couples Working? A Review of Evaluation Research,” American Enterprise Institute, September 2019, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 67. H.R. 8404, Respect for Marriage Act, Public Law No. 117-228, 117th Congress, December 13, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/plaws/publ228/PLAW-117publ228.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 68. Madison Marino, “Over 1,000 Safety Violations Mar Head Start. Children Deserve Better,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, November 10, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/over-1000-safety- violations-mar-head-start-children-deserve-better. 69. American Hospital Association v. Becerra, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), https://www.supremecourt.gov/ opinions/21pdf/20-1114_09m1.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023). 70. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service; U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register, Vol. 88, No. 22 (February 2, 2023), pp. 7236–7281, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2023-02-02/pdf/2023-01981.pdf (accessed March 17, 2023).

Small Business Administration

Weak

Vector: 62%

Pages: 792-794AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the bill and the Project 2025 SBA section emphasize preventing fraud and protecting taxpayer dollars, but the bill applies to child care providers under CCDBG while the SBA section focuses on small business lending programs, resulting only in a tangential thematic overlap."

Key themes:fraud preventiontaxpayer protectionaccountabilityprogram integrity

— 760 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. H.R. 7953, Small Business Act, Public Law 85-536, 85th Congress, July 18, 1958, § 2, https://uscode.ecfr.io/ statutes/pl/85/536.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023), amended by H.R. 4877, One Stop Shop for Small Business Compliance Act of 2021, Public Law 117-188, 117th Congress, October 20, 2022, https://www.congress. gov/117/plaws/publ188/PLAW-117publ188.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023). 2. U.S. Small Business Administration, “About SBA: Organization: Mission,” https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/ organization (accessed February 19, 2023). 3. Michael Faulkender, Robert Jackman, and Stephen I. Miran, “The Job-Preservation Effects of Paycheck Protection Program Loans,” U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Economic Policy, Working Paper No. 2020-01, December 2020, p. 9, https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/226/Job-Preservation-Effects- Paycheck-Protection-Program-Loans.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 4. Kate Rogers, Scott Zamost, Karina Hernandez, and Jennifer Schlesinger, “As Pandemic Aid Was Rushed to Main Street, Criminals Seized on Covid Relief Programs,” CNBC, April 15, 2021, https://www.cnbc. com/2021/04/15/as-pandemic-aid-was-rushed-to-main-street-criminals-seized-on-ppp-eidl-.html (accessed February 16, 2023). 5. Kevin Brewer, “Bills Extend Statute of Limitation for Prosecuting PPP, EIDL Fraud,” Journal of Accountancy, August 10, 2022, https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2022/aug/bills-extend-statute-limitation- prosecuting-ppp-eidl-fraud.html (accessed February 16, 2023). 6. Sacha Pfeiffer, “Virtually All PPP Loans Have Been Forgiven with Limited Scrutiny,” NPR, October 12, 2022, https://www.npr.org/2022/10/12/1128207464/ppp-loans-loan-forgiveness-small-business#:~:text=As%20 COVID-19%20shutdowns%20threatened,early%20days%20of%20the%20pandemic (accessed February 16, 2023). 7. U.S. Small Business Administration, “About SBA: Organization: SBA History,” https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/ organization (accessed February 19, 2023). 8. President Richard Nixon, Executive Order 11518, “Providing for the Increased Representation of the Interests of Small Business Concerns Before Departments and Agencies of the United States Government,” March 20, 1970, in Federal Register, Vol. 35, No. 56 (March 21, 1970), pp. 4939–4940, https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/ service/ll/fedreg/fr035/fr035056/fr035056.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 9. S. 3331, Small Business Amendments of 1974, Public Law 93-386, 93rd Congress, August 23, 1974, https://www. congress.gov/93/statute/STATUTE-88/STATUTE-88-Pg742.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 10. S. 299, Regulatory Flexibility Act, Public Law No. 96-354, 96th Congress, September 19, 1980, https://www. congress.gov/96/statute/STATUTE-94/STATUTE-94-Pg1164.pdf (accessed February 19, 2023). 11. Maeve P. Carey, “The Regulatory Flex Act: An Overview,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. IF11900, August 16, 2021, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11900 (accessed February 18, 2023). 12. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, “The Regulatory Flexibility Act,” https://advocacy.sba. gov/resources/the-regulatory-flexibility-act/ (accessed February 18, 2023). 13. H.R. 644, Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-125, 114th Congress, February 24, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/114/statute/STATUTE-130/STATUTE-130-Pg122.pdf (accessed March 21, 2023). 14. U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, “Advocacy Releases Trade Report,” December 21, 2018, https://advocacy.sba.gov/2018/12/21/advocacy-releases-trade-report/ (accessed March 21, 2023). 15. Associated Press, “Reagan Offers $994-Billion ‘Hard-Choices’ 1987 Budget,” Los Angeles Times, February 5, 1986, http://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-02-05-mn-4369-story.html (accessed February 18, 2023). 16. Testimony of Hon. Hector V. Barreto, Administrator, Small Business Administration, in hearing, The President’s FY 2006 Budget Request for the Small Business Administration, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate, 109th Congress, 1st Session, February 17, 2005, p. 8, https://books.google.com/ books?id=UwD-2ICa8k8C&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed February 18, 2023). See also Report No. 109-49, Summary of Legislative and Oversight Activities During the 108th Congress, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate, 109th Congress, 1st Session, March 30, 2005, p. 21, https://www.congress.gov/109/crpt/srpt49/CRPT-109srpt49.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). — 761 — Small Business Administration 17. Editorial, “The Small Business Administration Needs Reforming,” The Washington Post, December 18, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-sba-needs-reforming/2016/12/18/b639fc4c-c159-11e6-8422- eac61c0ef74d_story.html (accessed February 18, 2023). 18. Robert Jay Dilger, Anthony A. Cilluffo, and R. Corinne Blackford, “Small Business Administration Funding: Overview and Recent Trends,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R43486, updated July 14, 2022, Summary, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R43846.pdf (accessed November 18, 2022). 19. Ibid., p. 2. Emphasis added. 20. Press release, “SBA Announces End-of-Year Capital Benchmarks Showing Historic Support for Small Businesses Under Administrator Guzman,” U.S. Small Business Administration, December 13, 2022, https:// www.sba.gov/article/2022/dec/13/sba-announces-end-year-capital-benchmarks-showing-historic-support- small-businesses-under?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery (accessed February 18, 2023). 21. USASpending,gov, “Agency Profile: Small Business Administration (SBA),” data through September 29, 2022, https://www.usaspending.gov/agency/small-business-administration?fy=2022 (accessed February 18, 2023). 22. Testimony and prepared statement of Tad DeHaven, Budget Analyst, Cato Institute, in hearing, An Examination of SBA Programs: Eliminating Inefficiencies, Duplications, Fraud, and Abuse, Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, U.S. Senate, 112th Congress, 1st Session, June 16, 2011, pp. 80–90, https://www. govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-112shrg88373/pdf/CHRG-112shrg88373.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 23. Sarah Westwood, “Feds Gave $400 Million in Contracts to Ineligible Firms,” Washington Examiner, September 28, 2014, https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/feds-gave-400-million-in-contracts-to-ineligible-firms (accessed February 18, 2023). 24. Keith Girard, “Inside the SBA’s Monumental Katrina Loan Scandal,” AllBusiness.com, https://www.allbusiness. com/inside-the-sbas-monumental-katrina-loan-scandal-11793824-1.html (accessed February 18, 2023). 25. Arnold & Porter, “CARES Act Fraud Tracker,” last updated January 2, 2023, https://www.arnoldporter.com/en/ general/cares-act-fraud-tracker (accessed February 18, 2023). 26. Jay Edwards, “Bipartisan Call to Crack Down on COVID-19 PPP/EIDL Fraud, Prosecute Fraudsters to the Fullest Extent of the Law,” WRNJ Radio (Hackettstown, New Jersey), October 21, 2022, https://wrnjradio.com/ bipartisan-call-to-crack-down-on-covid-19-ppp-eidl-fraud-prosecute-fraudsters-to-the-fullest-extent-of-the- law/ (accessed March 21, 2023). 27. See, for example, H.R. 7628, IMPROVE the SBA Act, 117th Congress, introduced April 28, 2022, https://www. congress.gov/117/bills/hr7628/BILLS-117hr7628ih.pdf (accessed February 18, 2023). 28. In varying degrees, almost every small-business advocacy organization and trade association engages with the SBA. During periods of hyper-regulatory activity fueled by an activist Administration, the small- business community engages more frequently with the Office of Advocacy through its roundtables and other mechanisms in the hope of warding off costly and intrusive rulemakings. A future conservative Administration can look to the following groups, among others, for support in advancing both SBA and broader policy reform: American Hotel and Lodging Association; Asian American Hotel Owners Association; Association of Builders and Contractors; Associated Equipment Distributors; Ceramic Tile Distributors Association; Consumer Technology Association; Family Business Coalition; Foodservice Equipment Distributors Association; Heating, Air-conditioning, and Refrigeration Distributors International; Independent Bakers Association; Independent Community Bankers Association; Independent Electrical Contractors’ International Association of Plastics Distributors; International Franchise Association; Metals Service Center Institute; National Association of Electrical Distributors; National Association of Manufacturers; National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors; National Fastener Distributors Association; National Marine Distributors Association; National Federation of Independent Business; National Ready Mix Concrete Association; National Small Business Association; Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council; and U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce. Additionally, the small-business community is diverse and broad, and several key groups strongly support SBA lending but vigorously oppose tax, regulatory, and spending policies that are intrusiveness or costly to business. Conservative think tanks and taxpayer organizations like The Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, the National Taxpayers Union, Citizens Against Government Waste, the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, and Americans for Tax Reform (among others) also have a stake in an improved and cost-effective SBA.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Foxx, Virginia

Protect Economic and Academic Freedom Act of 2026

119/hr/4795

Unfunded Mandates Accountability and Transparency Act of 2025

119/hr/580

Transparency in Billing Act of 2026

119/hr/8684

Back to All Bills