Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/7744
Last Updated: March 26, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]

ID: C001053

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

March 9, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

๐Ÿ“ Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

๐ŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

๐Ÿ–Š๏ธ

Presidential Action

โš–๏ธ

Became Law

๐Ÿ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another exercise in futility, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this bloated appropriations bill for the Department of Homeland Security.

**Total Funding Amounts and Budget Allocations**

The grand total? A whopping $316,295,000 for the Office of the Secretary and Executive Management. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is ensuring that DHS bureaucrats have sufficient funds to attend conferences and buy new office furniture. The Management Directorate gets a cool $1,690,380,000, because who doesn't love a good vehicle fleet modernization? Meanwhile, the Office of Intelligence and Analysis receives a paltry $340,819,000, which will undoubtedly be squandered on "operations and support" โ€“ code for bureaucratic busywork.

**Key Programs and Agencies Receiving Funds**

The usual suspects: Federal Protective Service ($58,106,000), Office of Inspector General ($257,599,000), and the obligatory "Intelligence, Analysis, and Situational Awareness" programs. Because nothing says "national security" like throwing money at vague concepts.

**Notable Increases or Decreases from Previous Years**

I'll spare you the tedious details, but rest assured that this bill is a masterclass in incremental budgeting โ€“ i.e., giving everyone a little something to keep them quiet. The only notable decrease is in the Office of Strategy, Policy, and Plans, which loses $8 million. Perhaps they finally realized that strategy and policy are overrated.

**Riders or Policy Provisions Attached to Funding**

The piรจce de rรฉsistance: Section 101 requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a report on grants and contracts awarded without full and open competition. Because, clearly, the most pressing issue facing our nation is ensuring that DHS bureaucrats follow proper procurement procedures. And who needs actual oversight when you can just require reports?

**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications**

Don't worry about it; this bill will only add to the national debt. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) will undoubtedly score this bill as " deficit-neutral," because magic happens when you assume that future Congresses will somehow, miraculously, reduce spending.

In conclusion, this appropriations bill is a textbook example of legislative malpractice โ€“ a Frankenstein's monster cobbled together from pork-barrel projects, bureaucratic busywork, and vague promises of national security. The only thing more astonishing than the sheer waste of taxpayer dollars is the brazen incompetence of our elected officials.

Diagnosis: Terminal stupidity, with symptoms including fiscal irresponsibility, bureaucratic bloat, and a complete disregard for the well-being of American taxpayers. Prognosis: Poor. Treatment: None available; the patient is beyond salvation.

Related Topics

National Security & Intelligence Congressional Rules & Procedures Government Operations & Accountability Transportation & Infrastructure State & Local Government Affairs Civil Rights & Liberties Small Business & Entrepreneurship Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Federal Budget & Appropriations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

๐Ÿ’ฐ Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]

Congress 119 โ€ข 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$435,669
25 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$395,269
Committees
$0
Individuals
$40,400

No PAC contributions found

1
EDGEWORTH PROTECTIVE SERVICES
1 transaction
$245,533
2
CHEROKEE NATION
3 transactions
$124,200
3
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
2 transactions
$8,300
4
SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE
1 transaction
$5,000
5
ROSEWOOD SAND HILL
1 transaction
$2,560
6
ISBELL FARMS
1 transaction
$1,500
7
BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,500
8
THE CITIZEN HOTEL
1 transaction
$1,454
9
CAMBRIA HOTEL
1 transaction
$1,260
10
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
11
JETBLUE AIRWAYS
1 transaction
$789
12
HYATT CENTRIC
1 transaction
$758
13
EMBASSY SUITES
1 transaction
$646
14
OEK NJ LLC
1 transaction
$500
15
M&T BANK
2 transactions
$219
16
COMMON SENSE PAC
1 transaction
$50

No committee contributions found

1
BANKE, BARBARA R. MS.
2 transactions
$6,600
2
SIDIROPOULOS, JIM MR.
1 transaction
$5,600
3
BERGER, RICHARD MR.
1 transaction
$5,000
4
LOEB, JOHN L. MR. JR
1 transaction
$5,000
5
BAUMRIND, MARTIN M. MR.
1 transaction
$5,000
6
DUIT, JAMES A
1 transaction
$3,300
7
DUIT, PAMELA A
1 transaction
$3,300
8
LAUDER, RONALD S.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
BERMAN, MYRON
1 transaction
$3,300

Donor Network - Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 26 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $435,669

Top Donors - Rep. Cole, Tom [R-OK-4]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

16 Orgs9 Individuals