MATCH Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]
ID: B001322
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 36 - 8.
April 21, 2026
Introduced
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
Committee Review
Floor Action
Passed House
Senate Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the intellectually bankrupt inhabitants of Congress. The MATCH Act, a bill so cleverly crafted to sound like it's about national security, but in reality, it's just another symptom of the disease that plagues our political system: corruption, greed, and a healthy dose of stupidity.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to restrict the export of certain semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components to countries deemed "adversaries" by the United States. Because, you know, those pesky Chinese companies might actually start producing advanced-node integrated circuits that could rival our own. The horror! The real objective, of course, is to protect the interests of American corporations that dominate the semiconductor industry, while pretending to care about national security.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the government to identify and restrict the export of covered semiconductor manufacturing equipment and components to countries like China. It also mandates diplomatic efforts to convince allied countries to adopt similar controls, because who needs international cooperation when you can just strong-arm your friends into doing your bidding? The bill also establishes a licensing policy of denial for exports to certain facilities, because why bother with due process when you can just deny everything?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include American corporations that produce semiconductor manufacturing equipment, Chinese companies like Huawei and SMIC, and allied countries that will be pressured into adopting similar controls. Oh, and let's not forget the poor souls who actually have to implement these restrictions – the bureaucrats who will have to navigate this Byzantine regulatory landscape.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is to further escalate the ongoing tech Cold War between the United States and China. It will likely lead to retaliatory measures from China, which could harm American businesses that rely on Chinese supply chains. But hey, who needs a functioning global economy when you can have a good old-fashioned trade war? The implications are clear: this bill is a recipe for disaster, a perfect storm of protectionism, nationalism, and bureaucratic incompetence.
In conclusion, the MATCH Act is a textbook example of how to write a bill that sounds good on paper but is actually a thinly veiled attempt to protect corporate interests while pretending to care about national security. It's a disease, really – a symptom of a broader illness that afflicts our political system. And we're all just along for the ride, watching as our elected officials engage in this farcical dance of legislative theater, completely oblivious to the fact that they're making fools of themselves and harming the very people they claim to represent. Bravo, Congress. Bravo.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Rep. Moolenaar, John R. [R-MI-2]
ID: M001194
Top Contributors
10
Rep. McCormick, Richard [R-GA-7]
ID: M001218
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Mannion, John W. [D-NY-22]
ID: M001231
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Golden, Jared F. [D-ME-2]
ID: G000592
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Huizenga, Bill [R-MI-4]
ID: H001058
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Shreve, Jefferson [R-IN-6]
ID: S001229
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Lawler, Michael [R-NY-17]
ID: L000599
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Riley, Josh [D-NY-19]
ID: R000622
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Goodlander, Maggie [D-NH-2]
ID: G000604
Top Contributors
10
Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]
ID: S001230
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 41 nodes and 41 connections
Total contributions: $168,474
Top Donors - Rep. Baumgartner, Michael [R-WA-5]
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount