Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hr/8712

Last Updated: July 16, 2026

Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act

HR. 8712, 119th Congress — read as touching Big Tech Platforms.

The sponsor

Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$71,550 raised

23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Labor and Related Agencies" section, p. 645-647 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H3461)

May 13, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act (HR 8712) is a bill that, if passed, would require issuers to disclose certain activities related to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). The main purpose of this bill is to prevent companies from profiting from forced labor in the XUAR.

The key provisions of this bill include requiring issuers to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) containing documentation about their supply chains, including information on goods sourced from or produced in the XUAR. The SEC would also be required to issue rules for independent verification of this documentation by third-party auditors.

The affected parties and stakeholders include publicly traded companies, particularly those with supply chains linked to the XUAR, as well as investors and consumers who may be impacted by the disclosures.

From a wealth and power perspective, this bill poses a significant threat to my interests. The added compliance costs and potential reputational risks could negatively impact my portfolio, which includes investments in companies with supply chains linked to the XUAR. I estimate that the implementation of this bill could result in losses ranging from $500 million to $1 billion for my holdings alone.

Furthermore, this bill is a prime example of how inefficient democracy can be. The government's attempt to regulate and dictate how businesses operate will only lead to more bureaucracy and red tape, stifling innovation and growth. My think tank, the "Liberty and Prosperity Institute," has consistently argued that such regulations are counterproductive and that the free market should be allowed to self-regulate.

In conclusion, the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act is a misguided attempt at social engineering that will ultimately harm the very people it claims to help. As a rational and forward-thinking individual, I will continue to advocate for deregulation and the privatization of government services, allowing the free market to flourish unencumbered by unnecessary regulations.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you in 8th grade civics, the process of how a bill becomes a law is quite straightforward - or at least, it's supposed to be. Remember when we learned about the importance of committees and checks and balances? Well, let's take a look at HR 8712, the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act.

The main purpose of this bill is to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requiring issuers to disclose certain activities related to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. As we covered in middle school, the legislative process involves introducing a bill, referring it to a committee, and then marking it up before it's voted on. In this case, HR 8712 was introduced in the House of Representatives and referred to the Committee on Financial Services.

The key provisions of this bill include requiring issuers to report on their supply chains and disclose any connections to forced labor in the Xinjiang region. This is a significant change to existing law, as it adds new requirements for companies to be transparent about their sourcing practices. As I'm sure you recall from our discussions on the importance of transparency in government, this is a crucial step towards holding companies accountable for their actions.

The affected parties and stakeholders include issuers, national securities exchanges, and third-party auditors. Issuers will need to comply with new reporting requirements, while national securities exchanges will be responsible for approving or rejecting applications based on these reports. Third-party auditors will play a critical role in verifying the accuracy of these reports. As we learned in civics class, the system of checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful - but in practice, it's not always that simple.

The potential impact and implications of this bill are significant. If passed, it could lead to increased transparency and accountability for companies operating in the Xinjiang region. However, it may also impose additional burdens on issuers and national securities exchanges, potentially affecting the overall efficiency of the financial system. As we discussed in class, the legislative process is designed to balance competing interests and find a solution that works for everyone - but sometimes, that's easier said than done.

In conclusion, HR 8712 aims to address the issue of forced labor in the Xinjiang region by increasing transparency and accountability among issuers. While it may have significant implications for various stakeholders, its potential impact on promoting human rights and preventing forced labor makes it a noteworthy piece of legislation. As I taught you, the legislative process is a complex and often messy system - but with a solid understanding of how it works, we can better navigate the intricacies of lawmaking and work towards creating a more just and equitable society.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act - a bill that's got all the makings of a classic conspiracy thriller! On the surface, it seems like a noble effort to combat forced labor in China's Xinjiang region, but let me tell you, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requiring companies to disclose any involvement with forced labor in their supply chains. Sounds straightforward, right? But what if I told you that this is just a Trojan horse for something bigger? The real objective might be to create a framework for tracking and controlling global supply chains, giving the government unprecedented power over international trade.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces new requirements for companies to report on their supply chain links, including documentation of sourcing quantities from each facility. This is where things get interesting - what if this data collection is not just about combating forced labor, but also about gathering intel on companies' operations? The bill also mandates independent verification of documentation by third-party auditors, which could lead to a new industry of "compliance consultants" who'll make a killing off of this legislation.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Companies listed on national securities exchanges will be directly affected, as they'll need to comply with the new disclosure requirements. But what about smaller businesses that can't afford the added costs of compliance? Won't this create an uneven playing field, where only large corporations can navigate the complex regulatory landscape? And let's not forget the Uyghur people themselves - while the bill claims to be protecting their rights, might it also be used as a pretext for further US intervention in China?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The implications are far-reaching. This bill could set a precedent for similar legislation targeting other regions or industries, creating a global surveillance state where companies are forced to disclose every detail of their operations. It could also lead to trade wars and economic instability, as countries respond to the new regulations by imposing their own retaliatory measures. And what about the potential for abuse? Could this data be used to blackmail companies or individuals who refuse to comply with the government's agenda?

In conclusion, the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act is not just a simple bill - it's a complex web of intrigue and deception. While its stated goals may be noble, the real intentions behind it are shrouded in mystery. As your conspiracy theorist uncle, I'm telling you to keep a close eye on this one - it's got all the makings of a classic conspiracy thriller!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Oh, folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here - the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act, or HR 8712. (Sarcastic smile) Because, you know, freedom isn't just about American exceptionalism; it's also about sticking it to those pesky Chinese communists and their alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to shine a light on the dark underbelly of forced labor in China's Xinjiang region. (Wagging finger) You see, those elites in Beijing think they can just exploit the Uyghur people and get away with it? Not on our watch! The main objective is to require companies listed on US exchanges to disclose any ties to forced labor in their supply chains. (Dramatic pause) Because transparency is key to freedom, folks!

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to mandate that issuers file reports with the Commission detailing their connections to Xinjiang's forced labor practices. (Smirk) Oh, and they'll need to get independent verification from a third-party auditor, because we all know how trustworthy those corporate types are. The rules will also require companies to list their suppliers and sourcing quantities - (whispering) you know, for accountability purposes.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects US-listed companies with supply chains linked to Xinjiang, as well as the poor Uyghur folks being exploited. (Sympathetic nod) But let's be real; it's all about those American corporations and their bottom line. The Commission will have to issue new rules, and third-party auditors will get a nice payday verifying all this documentation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** (Sighing dramatically) This bill could lead to increased transparency, potentially hurting companies with shady supply chains. (Gasping) Oh no, the horror! But seriously, it might just make those corporations think twice about exploiting forced labor. The Uyghur people might get some justice, and we'll all feel good about ourselves for sticking up for freedom. (Winking) Of course, there's always the risk of unintended consequences - like companies finding ways to circumvent these new rules or passing on costs to consumers. But hey, that's just the price of freedom, right? (Chuckling)

There you have it, folks! The Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act: because freedom isn't free, and neither are those fancy iPhones made with forced labor. (Smirking) Stay vigilant, America!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another farcical attempt at legislation from the esteemed members of Congress. The Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act, HR 8712, is a masterclass in political theater, designed to appease the naive and the ignorant. Let's dissect this travesty, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's stated purpose is to require companies to disclose their involvement with forced labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). How noble. In reality, it's a shallow attempt to appear concerned about human rights while maintaining the status quo of corporate exploitation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require companies to report on their supply chains and disclose any connections to forced labor in XUAR. It also mandates independent verification of these reports, because, of course, we can trust third-party auditors to be impartial. The legislation includes penalties for non-compliance, such as delaying or rejecting applications for securities registration. Oh, the horror!

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved: companies with supply chains in XUAR, investors, and human rights activists. But let's not forget the real stakeholders – the Uyghur people, who will continue to suffer under Chinese oppression while American politicians pat themselves on the back for their "efforts."

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It may lead to some companies rebranding or re routing their supply chains, but it won't address the systemic issues of forced labor and corporate complicity. The real impact will be on the politicians' PR machines, which will churn out press releases and tweets about their "commitment to human rights." Meanwhile, the Uyghur people will remain trapped in a cycle of oppression, and American corporations will continue to profit from their suffering.

In conclusion, HR 8712 is a textbook example of legislative lip service. It's a cynical attempt to appease the conscience of the American public while maintaining the lucrative relationships between corporations and governments. The disease beneath this bill is the same one that afflicts most legislation: greed, corruption, and a complete disregard for human life. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Summary of the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act (HR 8712)**

### 1. Main Purpose & Objectives The main purpose of the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act is to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, requiring issuers to disclose certain activities related to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) in their registration statements and periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The objective is to increase transparency and prevent US companies from profiting from forced labor in the XUAR.

### 2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law The bill introduces several key provisions: - Requires issuers to disclose whether they or their affiliates source goods, wares, articles, or merchandise from the XUAR or use forced labor in their supply chains. - Mandates transparent documentation of supply chain links, including names, addresses, and sourcing quantities from each facility involved in mining, producing, or manufacturing these goods. - Requires independent verification of this documentation by a third-party auditor approved by the SEC before filing applications, reports, or registration statements. - Makes all received documentation publicly available.

### 3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders The affected parties and stakeholders include: - **Issuers**: Companies seeking to register securities with national securities exchanges must comply with the new disclosure requirements. - **Investors**: Will have access to more detailed information about companies' supply chains, allowing for more informed investment decisions. - **Consumers**: May benefit from reduced support of products made with forced labor through increased transparency and potential market pressures on companies. - **Workers in the XUAR**: The bill aims to protect workers by discouraging the use of forced labor in supply chains.

### 4. Potential Impact & Implications The potential impact and implications of this bill are significant: - **Increased Transparency**: Companies will be required to provide detailed information about their supply chains, potentially leading to better oversight and accountability. - **Ethical Investing**: Investors can make more informed decisions, aligning their investments with ethical standards. - **Market Pressures**: Companies may face market pressures to ensure their supply chains are free from forced labor, potentially reducing the incidence of such practices. - **Regulatory Compliance Costs**: Issuers may incur additional costs in complying with the new disclosure and verification requirements.

Overall, the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act aims to combat human rights abuses by increasing transparency and accountability among US companies operating in or sourcing materials from the XUAR. Its implementation could have far-reaching implications for ethical business practices, investor decision-making, and the protection of workers' rights globally.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's dive into the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act, bro. This bill is all about sheddin' some light on companies that might be gettin' down with forced labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of China.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main goal of this bill is to require companies to disclose whether they're involved in any way with forced labor in the XUAR. It's like, if you're gonna do business in the US, you gotta be transparent about your supply chain, man. The bill aims to prevent American investors from unintentionally supportin' human rights abuses.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to require companies to report on their connections to the XUAR. Here are some key changes:

* Companies gotta disclose if they source goods or materials from the XUAR, or if they're involved in any way with forced labor. * They gotta provide detailed documentation about their supply chain, including names and addresses of suppliers, and quantities sourced. * Independent third-party auditors will verify this info to ensure it's legit. * Companies that don't comply might face penalties, like not being able to list on a national securities exchange for a year.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects:

* Publicly traded companies in the US * Investors who want to make informed decisions about their investments * The Uyghur people and other minority groups in the XUAR who are affected by forced labor * Human rights organizations and advocacy groups

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The potential impact of this bill is huge, bro. It could:

* Help prevent American companies from contributin' to human rights abuses * Increase transparency and accountability in global supply chains * Support the Uyghur people and other minority groups in their fight against forced labor * Set a precedent for other countries to follow suit and take action against forced labor

However, there are also some potential challenges and limitations to consider. For example:

* Companies might try to find ways to circumvent the disclosure requirements or manipulate the auditing process. * The bill's implementation could be complex and require significant resources from regulatory agencies. * There might be unintended consequences, such as increased costs for companies that comply with the regulations, which could be passed on to consumers.

To mitigate these risks, it's essential to have robust enforcement mechanisms in place, including regular audits and inspections. Additionally, the bill should provide support and resources for companies that are making a genuine effort to comply with the regulations.

Overall, this bill is like a wave of change, man. It's gonna help create a more transparent and responsible business environment, and that's totally tubular. By providing a framework for companies to disclose their connections to forced labor, we can work towards a future where human rights are respected and protected.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act (HR 8712)**

### 1. Main Purpose & Objectives

The primary objective of the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act is to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, mandating issuers to disclose certain activities related to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR). This legislation aims to combat forced labor and human rights abuses in the XUAR by increasing transparency in supply chains.

### 2. Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law

- **Disclosure Requirements**: The bill requires issuers filing applications for security registration or reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to include documentation showing whether their supply or production chain involves goods sourced from or through the XUAR, or produced by forced labor. - **Independent Verification**: Issuers must obtain independent verification of this documentation by a third-party auditor approved by the SEC before filing. - **Public Availability**: The SEC will make all received documentation publicly available. - **Penalties for Non-Compliance**: Failure to comply with these requirements can result in an issuer's application not being approved, and they may be barred from re-filing for one year.

### 3. Affected Parties & Stakeholders

- **Issuers**: Companies seeking to register securities or already listed on national securities exchanges. - **Investors**: Those investing in companies that might have supply chains linked to the XUAR. - **Human Rights Advocates**: Groups and individuals advocating against forced labor and human rights abuses. - **Chinese Businesses and Government**: Entities potentially impacted by disclosures related to their involvement in the XUAR.

### 4. Potential Impact & Implications

The Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act has significant implications for transparency, ethical investing, and human rights. By requiring companies to disclose their supply chain links to the XUAR, it aims to pressure businesses to avoid complicity in forced labor practices. This could lead to a shift in global supply chains, potentially affecting Chinese businesses and the broader economy. The act also underscores the growing importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations in investment decisions.

**Monied Interest Analysis**: While the bill's primary driver appears to be human rights concerns rather than direct financial interests, its impact could be felt across various industries with supply chains potentially linked to the XUAR. Companies with significant investments or operations in China may face increased scrutiny and compliance costs. The legislation is backed by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, suggesting broad political support that transcends typical donor or PAC influences. However, industry lobby groups, particularly those representing sectors with complex global supply chains (such as technology and apparel), may advocate for flexibility or exemptions to mitigate potential economic impacts.

In conclusion, the Uyghur Forced Labor Disclosure Act represents a significant step towards addressing human rights abuses in the XUAR through financial transparency and accountability. Its passage could have far-reaching implications for corporate responsibility,

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$71,550

21 donors

PACs

Organizations

$2,250

Committees

Individuals

$69,300

No PAC contributions found

FRIENDS OF RUSSET PERRY

1 transaction

$1,000

GRO MORE DULANY BUILDERS

1 transaction

$1,000

ELECT ATOOSA REASER

1 transaction

$250

No committee contributions found

IRUDHAYANATHAN, ANTHONY

3 transactions

$13,200

JACOBS, IRWIN M

1 transaction

$3,300

ACHARYA, SANKET

1 transaction

$3,300

ALDANA, AIME

1 transaction

$3,300

ALI, TAJAMMAL

1 transaction

$3,300

BHUTADA, RISHI

1 transaction

$3,300

CHALLA, JAYANTH

1 transaction

$3,300

CHALLA, KAVITA

1 transaction

$3,300

CHEGU, LAKSHMI

1 transaction

$3,300

CHEGU, RANAPRATAP

1 transaction

$3,300

CRABTREE, SHONA

1 transaction

$3,300

GOLDEAN, PAUL

1 transaction

$3,300

GOLDEAN, STACY

1 transaction

$3,300

GORADIA, SAPPHIRA

1 transaction

$3,300

JAYARAMAN, SELVA

1 transaction

$3,300

KAPUR, RAMESH

1 transaction

$3,300

KARAMSETTY, PARDHA

1 transaction

$3,300

KARAMSETTY, SUNEETHA

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Moran, Nathaniel [R-TX-1]

ID: M001224

Top Contributors

PELTIER, PATRICK

PELTIER AUTO GROUP • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualTYLER, TX

$9,900

Jan 31, 2024

PELTIER, PATRICK

IndividualTYLER, TX

$6,600

Feb 22, 2024

MARSHALL, MATTHEW

DRAKE • REAL ESTATE

IndividualTYLER, TX

$6,600

Aug 22, 2024

MARSHALL, MATTHEW

DRAKE • REAL ESTATE

IndividualTYLER, TX

$6,600

Aug 22, 2024

ANDERSON, RICHARD M.

PAFFORD EMS • 911 PROFESSIONAL

IndividualMARSHALL, TX

$5,000

Apr 15, 2024

LEATHERWOOD, HARRY

SELF • SELF

IndividualTYLER, TX

$5,000

Sep 23, 2024

STOVALL, SCOTT

IndividualTROUP, TX

$3,300

Jan 18, 2024

PELTIER, MIKAH ANN

COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER • COMMUNITY VOLUNTEER

IndividualTYLER, TX

$3,300

Jan 31, 2024

PELTIER, PATRICK

PELTIER AUTO GROUP • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualTYLER, TX

$3,300

Jan 31, 2024

STEVENSON, DAVID L

CUSTOM COMMODITIES TRANSPORT • OWNER

IndividualDIANA, TX

$3,300

Feb 1, 2024

Rep. Carson, André [D-IN-7]

ID: C001072

Top Contributors

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

May 22, 2023

INDIANA IMPORT LLC

OrganizationFISHERS, IN

$1,000

Nov 11, 2023

MNAYMEH, HALA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCORAL GABLES, FL

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

DE LA CRUZ, FABIO

WESTON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • PARTNER

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

KHAN, AZHER M

CALDERON TEXTILES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCARMEL, IN

$3,300

Dec 8, 2023

HOGAN, ALAN P.

THE HOGAN GROUP, INC. • CONSULTANT

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Feb 22, 2023

JOHNSON, LACY M.

ICE MILLER • ATTORNEY

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Mar 16, 2023

STACK, ANN M.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Feb 22, 2023

ABDALLA, MIKE A.

MAGNA PROPERTIES • PRESIDENT

IndividualINDIANAPOLIS, IN

$3,300

Mar 11, 2024

MAMOUN, IHSAN

SDI RADIOLOGY • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSEFFNER, FL

$3,300

Jan 23, 2024

Rep. Espaillat, Adriano [D-NY-13]

ID: E000297

Top Contributors

JIM OWLES LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC CLUB

OrganizationNEW YORK, NY

$250

Sep 25, 2024

CASTILLO, IGNACIO

EXCLUSIVE REALTY CORP. • PRESIDENT

IndividualBRONX, NY

$3,500

Sep 27, 2024

ACOSTA, ROLANDO T.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP • PARTNER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Sep 28, 2023

ALCANTARA, MINOSCA

NYS BRIDGE AUTHORITY • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Sep 24, 2023

GAGLIARDI, PAUL

FLAIR BEVERAGES CORP. • SALES EXECUTIVE

IndividualBRONX, NY

$3,300

Sep 19, 2023

GAGLIARDI, PAUL

FLAIR BEVERAGES CORP. • SALES EXECUTIVE

IndividualBRONX, NY

$3,300

Sep 19, 2023

GREEN, SUSAN A

IndividualSTAMFORD, CT

$3,300

Sep 24, 2023

CABRERA, FELIX

IndividualIRVINGTON, NY

$3,300

Sep 24, 2023

LEVINE, DOUGLAS H

BIG MOVE PROPERTIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$3,300

Sep 24, 2023

LEVINE, DOUGLAS H

BIG MOVE PROPERTIES • CEO

IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL

$3,300

Sep 24, 2023

Rep. Krishnamoorthi, Raja [D-IL-8]

ID: K000391

Top Contributors

HONOR AGING LLC

OrganizationEAST BRUNSWICK, NJ

$3,300

Jul 16, 2024

PINNACLE HOSPITAL

OrganizationCROWN POINT, IN

$2,500

Mar 3, 2023

HOME BEE LLC

OrganizationWEST BLOOMFIELD, MI

$1,000

Sep 18, 2024

SAKA, SAMUEL

SELF EMPLOYED • ENTREPRENEUR

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$6,600

Jun 2, 2023

SAKA, SAMUEL

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$6,600

Jun 2, 2023

GAITONDE, SUJATA

UIC • PROFESSOR

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,700

Feb 6, 2024

GAITONDE, SUNIL

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,700

Feb 6, 2024

KALSI, RAHUL S

NICOR GAS • EXECUTIVE

IndividualOAK BROOK, IL

$3,700

Sep 22, 2023

KOZAKIEWICZ, BEATA

STERLING GROUP INC. • PRINCIPAL

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Oct 31, 2024

JAIN, RAJ

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualORLAND PARK, IL

$3,300

Nov 3, 2024

Rep. McGovern, James P. [D-MA-2]

ID: M000312

Top Contributors

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Oct 20, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Apr 30, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$2,900

Sep 30, 2023

HANEY, WILLIAM M III

DRAGONFLY • CEO

IndividualWAYLAND, MA

$6,600

Nov 29, 2023

DEMPSEY, BRIAN S

DEMPSEY LUCEY & ASSOCIATES • PRESIDENT

IndividualHAVERHILL, MA

$3,300

Nov 8, 2023

ESLER, JOHN K.

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSUTTON, MA

$3,300

Oct 24, 2023

HANEY, WILLIAM M III

IndividualWAYLAND, MA

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

TANG, KEVIN

TANG CAPITAL • CEO

IndividualSAN DIEGO, CA

$3,300

Nov 8, 2024

Rep. Pelosi, Nancy [D-CA-11]

ID: P000197

Top Contributors

PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS

OrganizationTEMECULA, CA

$3,300

Feb 28, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$3,300

Jul 12, 2024

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE TRIBE

OrganizationAGENCY VILLAGE, SD

$2,000

Jun 21, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationBANNING, CA

$325

Oct 24, 2023

VON FURSTENBERG, DIANE

SELF-EMPLOYED • FASHION DESIGNER

IndividualNEW MLFORDI, CT

$292,400

Nov 4, 2024

SILBERSTEIN, STEPHEN

N/A • RETIRED

IndividualBELVEDERE, CA

$50,000

Oct 6, 2023

CABRASER, ELIZABETH

LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP • PARTNER

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$50,000

Sep 30, 2023

GLASSER, HARVEY

SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$50,000

Sep 3, 2024

GLASSER, HARVEY

SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$50,000

Oct 24, 2024

Rep. Titus, Dina [D-NV-1]

ID: T000468

Top Contributors

LAS VEGAS PAIUTE TRIBE

OrganizationLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Dec 31, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$3,300

Feb 1, 2024

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$2,500

Jun 30, 2024

BARONA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLAKESIDE, CA

$1,500

Jun 30, 2023

RENO-SPARKS INDIAN COLONY

OrganizationRENO, NV

$1,000

Jun 11, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA

$1,000

Sep 8, 2023

NET2LINK, LLC

OrganizationPEMBROKE PINES, FL

$250

Oct 23, 2024

CHANG, RONIE

GOLDEN REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENTS • REALTOR

IndividualLAS VEGAS, NV

$3,300

Nov 2, 2024

PRITZKER, JAY

STATE OF ILLINOIS • GOVERNOR

IndividualCHICAGO, IL

$3,300

Oct 18, 2024

SCHMIDT, ERIC

HILLSPIRE LLC • MANAGER

IndividualPALO ALTO, CA

$3,300

Oct 23, 2024

Rep. Moulton, Seth [D-MA-6]

ID: M001196

Top Contributors

KARLA'S MARKET

OrganizationREVERE, MA

$500

Jul 25, 2023

BLOOM, BRADLEY

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWELLESLEY, MA

$6,600

Nov 15, 2024

BREDENBERG, DIANE M.

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSOUTHLAKE, TX

$6,600

Nov 15, 2024

SHAH, NIRAJ

WAYFAIR • RETAIL

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$6,600

Nov 17, 2024

CORCORAN, JAMES

AREX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP • INVESTOR

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Nov 20, 2024

D'AMICO, ALEXANDER

MCKINSEY & COMPANY • CONSULTANT

IndividualNEW CANAAN, CT

$6,600

Nov 18, 2024

HASTINGS, MARK

PSG EQUITY • INVESTOR

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$6,600

Nov 20, 2024

LEDLEY, CHARLES H.

LIMINALITY CAPITAL LP • INVESTOR

IndividualBOSTON, MA

$6,600

Nov 21, 2024

PEELER, DAVID RANDY

BERKSHIRE PARTNERS • MANAGING DIRECTOR

IndividualCAMBRIDGE, MA

$6,600

Nov 18, 2024

SHORTSLEEVE, BRIAN

M33 GROWTH • VENTURE CAPITAL

IndividualWELLESLEY, MA

$6,600

Nov 21, 2024

Rep. Tokuda, Jill N. [D-HI-2]

ID: T000487

Top Contributors

AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS

OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA

$3,300

Jun 30, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,500

Jun 21, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,000

Mar 27, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,650

Jun 27, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,650

May 9, 2024

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$1,000

Jun 27, 2024

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$1,000

Aug 28, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$500

Sep 18, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$300

Mar 27, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$200

Mar 27, 2024

Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large]

ID: N000147

Top Contributors

DONOHOE, BERT

THE DONOHOE COMPANIES INC. • EVP, REAL ESTATE

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$3,300

May 2, 2024

OTONI, RAFAELA

HILTON CORPORATION • PRESIDENT & CEO

IndividualMC LEAN, VA

$3,300

May 3, 2024

REID, JACK

RAM CUSTOM SERVICES • PRESIDENT

IndividualCHESAPEAKE BEACH, MD

$3,300

May 6, 2024

LEWIS, JACQUELINE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Jul 10, 2023

LEWIS, JACQUELINE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Jul 10, 2023

BARRY, DAVID E. JR

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualBEALLSVILLE, MD

$2,500

May 12, 2024

POLASKI, MICHAEL

THE DONOHOE COMPANIES INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualBROADLANDS, VA

$2,500

May 13, 2024

GRUNLEY, KENNETH

GRUNLEY CONSTRUCTION • CEO

IndividualPOTOMAC, MD

$2,500

Jun 23, 2023

BRUCH, CHRIS

THE DONOHOE COMPANIES INC. • CEO

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$2,300

Apr 30, 2024

EARNEST, JAMES M.

SELF-EMPLOYED • REAL ESTATE INVESTOR

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$2,300

May 10, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 34 nodes and 48 connections

Total contributions: $48

Top Donors - Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 6 harmed.

−Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.90
Section 13(t)(1)(D) requires issuers to disclose involvement in development or provision of surveillance goods, services, or technologies (including telecommunications, information security, and sensors) used to facilitate gross human rights abuses. This imposes compliance costs and potential reputational harm on big tech platforms that may have supply chain links to Xinjiang.
−Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.85
Section 13(t)(1)(D) explicitly includes telecommunications as part of surveillance goods, services, or technologies that issuers must disclose if used to facilitate human rights abuses in Xinjiang, creating regulatory burden and potential liability for telecom firms.
−Law Enforcement & Surveillance Techconfidence 0.85
Section 13(t)(1)(D) requires disclosure of involvement in development or provision of surveillance goods, services, or technologies (including telecommunications, information security, and sensors) used to facilitate gross human rights abuses, directly impacting law enforcement and surveillance tech vendors.
−Cybersecurityconfidence 0.80
Section 13(t)(1)(D) includes information security as part of surveillance technologies that issuers must disclose if used to facilitate gross human rights abuses, imposing disclosure and compliance costs on cybersecurity firms.
−Semiconductors & Hardwareconfidence 0.75
Section 12(m)(2)(A)(i) references the 'Illustrative List of Industries in Xinjiang' which includes electronics and polysilicon production; Section 13(t)(1)(A)(i) requires disclosure of sourcing from those industries, creating supply chain compliance burdens for semiconductor and hardware manufacturers.
−AI & Cloud Infrastructureconfidence 0.70
Section 13(t)(1)(D) covers surveillance technologies including information security and sensors, which could encompass AI and cloud infrastructure used for surveillance, imposing disclosure requirements on AI/cloud providers.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas [D-VA-10])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

AI & Cloud Infrastructure$11,402
from 5 contributions
- BAGAL, RAVINDRA$9,900
- JAIN, AKASH$1,502
Telecommunications$5,350
from 13 contributions
- POWER, THOMAS$1,000
- SMITH, EDWARD$1,000
- MUDDASANI, SUDHEER$500
- POWER, TOM$500
- WALKO, ZACHARY$500
Semiconductors & Hardware$3,601
from 2 contributions
- PRABHUKUMAR, GEETHA$3,601
Big Tech Platforms$1,250
from 3 contributions
- KUMAR, DEVENDRA$1,000
- BATTULA, KAIVALYA$250

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Strong

Vector: 57%

Pages: 645-647AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill aligns strongly with Project 2025's international labor policy goals, particularly in combating forced labor and enhancing supply-chain transparency to protect American workers from unfair competition and exploitative global labor practices."

Key themes:forced labor prohibitionsupply-chain transparencyinternational labor enforcementprotecting American workersethical trade practices

— 613 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l Congress must amend the law so that employers can again have the freedom to make hiring Americans a priority. Despite the significant advantages that preferring citizens over (work-authorized) aliens in hiring would provide to American workers, businesses, and the country at large, such a practice has been illegal since 1986.25 This makes no sense. Alternative View Some conservatives believe that the government has a duty to limit its spending in order to limit how much it takes from American families. This means that when the government spends money, it must find the most econom- ical and effective way to do so. Excessive government spending will be borne by American workers and families through reduced incomes and purchasing power. There may be good reasons to require a certain percentage of American workers on federal contracts, but those decisions should be based on economy and efficiency as opposed to arbitrary quotas. Visa Fraud. American businesses that commit visa fraud and hire illegal immi- grants should not be the beneficiaries of federal spending. But a 2020 report by the Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) examined the depart- ment’s process for excluding employers who commit visa fraud and abuse from federal contracts and found much to be desired. l To protect the American workforce from unscrupulous immigration lawyers, employers, and labor brokers, the department must follow the recommendations of the OIG and institute more robust investigations for suspected visa fraud and speedier debarments for those found guilty. INTERNATIONAL LABOR POLICY Leveling the International Playing Field for Workers. As recent decades of intense import competition and offshoring have made clear, American workers suffer when the U.S. opens its markets to foreign nations’ minimal labor standards and exploitative conditions. While federal law already prohibits the importation of goods produced with forced labor, the prohibitions are toothless without effective means of enforcement and cover only the most basic of workers’ rights. The Trump Administration and its United States Trade Representative (USTR) took unprece- dented steps to redress the issue for workers. The U.S.–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) contained the strongest and most far-reaching labor provisions of any free trade agreement (FTA), with protections and commitments to reduce labor abuses and raise wages. It also established new modes of enforcement. For future FTAs, the USTR should replicate the labor provisions of USMCA, especially the provisions to: — 614 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Eliminate all forms of forced or compulsory labor. l Protect workers’ rights to organize and participate voluntarily in a union without employer interference or discrimination. l Create a rapid-response mechanism to provide for an independent panel investigation of denial of labor rights at covered facilities. l Shift the burden of proof by presuming that an alleged violation affects trade and investment, unless otherwise demonstrated. For future authorizations of Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), the President should urge Congress to: l Create mechanisms for supply-chain transparency. l Institute a general prohibition on forced labor conditions. Investigate Foreign Labor Violations That Undermine American Work- ers. The United States’ embrace of globalization has exposed American workers to unfair competition from nations with cheap, abundant, and often exploited labor. American workers have, as a consequence, seen their earning power erode. While negotiating stronger trade agreements with robust labor provisions should be the primary tool with which to regulate international labor competition, the federal government can also take steps to identify the worst labor abuses and rule breakers. DOL’s Bureau of International Labor Affairs (ILAB) plays a critical role in monitor- ing and enforcing the labor provisions of U.S. trade agreements and trade preference programs as well as investigating child labor and human trafficking violations. l The next Administration should focus ILAB investigations on foreign labor violations that do the most to damage American workers’ earning power, specifically regimes that engage in child and forced labor, fail to protect workers’ organizing rights, and permit hazardous or otherwise exploitative working conditions. Alternative/Additional View. Conservatives share a belief in protecting and pro- moting American workers and their families and orienting international policies with Americans’ interests first. Some conservatives believe that the best way to put Amer- ica first is by making America more attractive. In addition to restrictions imposed on other countries, removing existing barriers to American manufacturing, employ- ment, and commerce can help American workers, entrepreneurs, and families.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 642-644AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on supply chain transparency regarding forced labor in Xinjiang, while the Project 2025 policy centers on prohibiting TSP investments in China and reforming public pension disclosure and multiemployer plans. Both address China-related financial risks and transparency, but the bill targets corporate securities disclosures, not pension or investment fund policies."

Key themes:China investment restrictionsfinancial transparencyaccountability measuresethical investing

— 609 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l DOL should exercise its oversight of the FRTIB to prohibit investments in China. l Congress should enact legislation prohibiting investment of the TSP in China. PENSION REFORMS. Public Pension Plan Disclosure. Residents of states that responsibly manage their public pension plans (pension plans for State and local government employ- ees) should not be responsible for bailing out states that do not do so. Money is ultimately fungible, so federal aid to States can effectively be used to free up other State funds for pension contributions. Although the federal government does not impose funding rules on public pension plans, these plans should be required to disclose the fair market value of plan assets and liabilities (using the Treasury yield curve as the discount rate) on an annual basis. In the aggregate, these plans were underfunded on a market basis by $6.501 trillion as of Fiscal Year (FY) 2021, even though the plans reported underfunding of only $1.076 trillion using overly optimistic assumptions. l Disclose the fair market value of plan assets and liabilities. Congress should require public pension funds to disclose the fair market value of plan assets and liabilities (using the Treasury yield curve as the discount rate) on an annual basis. Multiemployer Plans. At the request of multiemployer union pension plans, the government has given such plans much more lenient rules and discretion over funding than it has given to single-employer plans. Multiemployer plans have been severely mismanaged, and the plans have abused the discretion and deference given them by federal law and enforcement agencies to make promises that they cannot keep. As a result, these plans are generally severely underfunded, with $757 billion in aggregate underfunding, and a funding level of just 42 percent. The Biden Admin- istration has provided a massive taxpayer bailout to some of these plans, but without any needed reforms. Even worse, it gave out funds in excess of what the law allows. l Congress should reform multiemployer pensions to give participants in these plans the same protections as those in single-employer plans. Liabilities should be measured similarly to single-employer plans. Workers should be able to earn benefits at any employer in the plan, but liabilities should be divided amongst employers, instead of the current illusory joint and several liability under which no one is ultimately responsible for making up underfunding. Troubled plans should be prohibited from — 610 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise making new pension promises. More timely and detailed reporting should be imposed. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Cor- poration (PBGC) insures benefits for private sector pension plans, with separate single-employer and multiemployer insurance programs. l The PBGC’s annual report must be submitted on time, and with timely data that uses fair-market value principles to calculate the PBGC’s finances. The PBGC has been submitting portions of statutorily required annual reports many months late and using out-of-date data. And PBGC's data on plans is almost five years old. These problematic practices make it difficult for Congress to become aware of serious problems in the insurance programs, which received a bailout of over $85 billion in the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act. The PBGC should use existing statutory authority to protect workers, retirees, employers, and taxpayers by closely monitoring and taking appropriate remedial action with regard to badly run and underfunded multiemployer union pension plans, including termination where appropriate. The PBGC's refusal to use such authority helped cause its multiemployer program deficit to go from less than $500 million in 2008 to over $65 billion in 2017. l Congress should increase the variable rate premium on underfunding and eliminate the per-participant cap in order to appropriately take into account risk and limit the degree to which well-funded pension plans must subsidize underfunded plans. Reforms should proportionately reduce the fixed per-participant premium to ease the burden on well-funded plans and also increase premiums on multiemployer plans to match single-employer plans. Improving Access to Employee Stock Ownership Plans. Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs) are ERISA-covered employee retirement savings plans that allow employees to receive compensation in the form of equity in their employer business. These arrangements enable employees to formally partici- pate as investors in how their employers’ businesses are run. And they also align employer–employee incentives by giving employees a greater financial stake in the success of their employers. With over half of small businesses owned by business owners over the age of 55, ESOPs also create advantageous succession oppor- tunities that support the continuity of local businesses and regional economic

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 633-635AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on corporate supply-chain transparency regarding forced labor in Xinjiang, while the Project 2025 excerpt concerns union financial disclosure, OLMS funding, and NLRB policies. Both emphasize transparency and accountability, but their substantive domains differ significantly."

Key themes:transparencydisclosure requirementsaccountabilityoversightlabor rights

— 600 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise of state or local employees are exempt from this filing requirement. These dis- closure requirements help workers and the public understand how union leaders are raising and spending union dues; they also can serve as a vital source of infor- mation that helps workers decide if the unions they are asked to join are good stewards of the funds they collect. DOL, under both George W. Bush and Donald Trump, tried rulemakings (known as the Intermediate Bodies Rule) that would require some government unions to file the same information that is required of private-sector unions. Under President Trump, OLMS required unions to disclose involvement in trusts that they either own a majority stake in or control. In the past, union trust spending has been hidden, and it appears that trust assets have occasionally been corruptly spent for the benefit of private interests in union leadership— such as $30,000 spent on a private party, $37,500 spent on a Montblanc pen, condominiums for those in power, golf outings, and a Ferrari.20 But the Biden DOL eliminated a transparency rule requiring the filing of the T-1 Trust Annual Report. More generally, OLMS, which is charged with enforcing the law of union dis- closure, has historically been underfunded when compared to other DOL agencies. This relative lack of funding has made ensuring disclosure more difficult. l Enact transparency rules. The substance of the Intermediate Bodies Rule should pass into law, either through rulemaking or through legislation. The T-1 Trust Annual Report annual filing requirement should be restored. l Increase funding levels. Congress should expand the funding of the Office of Labor-Management Standards. Duty of Fair Representation. Unions have a duty of fair representation to their members, yet they too often abuse that duty to use their members’ resources on left-wing culture-war issues that are unrelated, and in fact often harmful, to union members’ own interests. l The NLRB should take enforcement or amicus action advancing the position that political conflicts of interest by union leadership can support claims for breach of the duty of fair representation in a manner analogous to financial conflicts of interest and analogous to breaches of the fiduciary duty of loyalty in other areas of law. Interpreting “Protected Concerted Activity.” In an effort to prevent employers from retaliating against workers who express a desire to unionize, cer- tain activities are deemed “protected concerted activity” (under §7 of the NLRA). — 601 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies The NLRB has issued extreme interpretations of these activities, such as deter- mining that a business’s requiring its employees to be courteous to customers and one another is an unlawful infringement on the free speech rights implicit in the protected concerted activity protections in the NLRA. l Reverse unreasonable interpretations of “protected concerted activity.” The NLRB should return to the 2019 Alstate Maintenance interpretation of what does and does not constitute protected concerted activity, including listing eight instances of lawful actions by employers. Injunctive Relief and Worker Organizing Activities. Within the confines of the more reasonable definition of protected concerted activity described above, the NLRB should increase its pursuit of reinstatement injunctions. Firing work- ers engaged in concerted activity has an immediate chilling effect on organizing, but remedies under the NLRA typically come only much later and amount only to backpay. In NLRA section 10(j), Congress empowered the NLRB to obtain temporary injunctions that immediately reinstate workers to their jobs in these circumstances. This provides a more meaningful remedy to the worker and creates a significant deterrent to unfair labor practices, because prompt reinstatement will tend to reinforce the legitimacy of the organizing effort. The NLRB overwhelmingly prevails when pursuing an injunction, succeeding 100 percent of the time in 2020 and 91 percent of the time in 2021. l Increase the use of 10(j) injunctive relief. The NLRB should increase its use of 10(j) and should articulate guidelines for situations in which it intends to seek injunctive relief; the board should delegate authority to pursue such injunctions to the general counsel and the general counsel should establish a policy of considering them expeditiously in all retaliation cases identified by regional offices. Dues-Funded Worker Centers. Under current law, both labor unions and unionized employers must file financial disclosures with DOL on an annual basis to ward off potential fraud and corruption of the sort that has been seen recently within the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW). However, worker centers, which have grown in number and influ- ence enormously over the past decade, are not required to file these disclosures. l Investigate worker centers and require financial disclosures. DOL should investigate worker centers that look and act like unions and bring enforcement actions to require them to file the same financial disclosures.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 642-644AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on supply chain transparency regarding forced labor in Xinjiang, while the Project 2025 policy centers on prohibiting TSP investments in China and reforming public pension disclosure and funding. Both involve China-related financial accountability, but the bill targets corporate securities disclosures under the SEC, whereas Project 2025 emphasizes pension fund investment restrictions and state pension transparency—resulting in only tangential thematic overlap."

Key themes:China accountabilityfinancial transparencyinvestment oversightethical investing

Trade

Weak

Vector: 58%

Pages: 863-865AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on supply chain transparency regarding forced labor in Xinjiang, while Project 2025's Trade section emphasizes deregulating securities offerings, reducing disclosure requirements (especially ESG-related), and limiting SEC authority—opposing the bill's mandate for expanded corporate disclosures."

Key themes:SEC regulationcorporate disclosureinvestor informationfinancial markets oversight

— 831 — Financial Regulatory Agencies l Either democratize access to private offerings by broadening the definition of accredited investor for purposes of Regulation D or eliminate the accredited investor restriction altogether.15 l Allow traditional self-certification of accredited investor status for all Regulation D Rule 506 offerings. l Exempt small micro-offerings from registration requirements.16 l Exempt small and intermittent finders from broker–dealer registration requirements and provide a simplified registration process for private placement brokers.17 l Exempt peer-to-peer lending from federal and state securities laws and reduce the regulatory burden on Regulation CF debt securities. l Make the Title I Emerging Growth Company (EGC) exemptions permanent for all EGCs. l Reduce the regulatory burden on small broker–dealers and exempt privately held, non-custodial broker–dealers from the requirements to use a PCAOB- registered firm for their audits. Congress should: l Amend the Internal Revenue Code to disregard crowdfunding and Regulation A shareholders for purposes of the 100-shareholder limit for Subchapter S corporations.18 BETTER CAPITAL MARKETS To improve capital markets, the SEC should: l Preempt blue sky registration, qualification, and continuing reporting requirements for securities traded on established securities markets (including a national securities exchange or an alternative trading system).19 l Terminate the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) program.20 l Abolish Rule 144 and other regulations that restrict securities resales and instead require a company that has sold securities to provide sufficient current informa- tion to the market to permit reasonable investment decisions and secondary sales. — 832 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Congress should: l Prohibit the SEC from requiring issuer disclosure of social, ideological, political, or “human capital” information that is not material to investors’ financial, economic, or pecuniary risks or returns. The proposed SEC climate change rule, which would quadruple the costs of being a public company, is particularly problematic.21 l Repeal the Dodd–Frank mandated disclosures relating to conflict minerals, mine safety, resource extraction, and CEO pay ratios.22 l Oppose efforts to redefine the purpose of business in the name of social justice; corporate social responsibility (CSR); stakeholder theory; environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria; socially responsible investing (SRI); sustainability; diversity; business ethics; or common- good capitalism. l Prohibit securities regulators, including SROs, from promulgating rules or taking other actions that discriminate, either favorably or unfavorably, on the basis of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such individual or group. SEC ADMINISTRATION To enable it to achieve its core mission more effectively, the SEC should:23 l Publish better data on securities offerings, securities markets, and securities law enforcement and publish an annual data book of time series data on these matters. Specifically, the SEC Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (DERA) needs to do a much better job of collecting and reporting fundamental data regarding offerings, regulatory costs, violations, enforcement, investors, state regulator taxes, fees and activities, and other matters. l Ensure that SEC resources flow toward its core functions and away from ancillary and support functions or from missions that do not fall within the SEC’s statutory charge. l Ensure that any three SEC Commissioners are empowered to place an item on the agenda and to receive adequate staff support to do so even without the Chairman’s support.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Subramanyam, Suhas

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 46164 Westlake Drive in Sterling, Virginia, as the Firefighter Trevor Brown Post Office Building.

119/hr/5058

Data Infrastructure Energy Measurement and Standards Act

119/hr/9372

Protect Every Preschooler Act of 2026

119/hr/9205

Back to All Bills