Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/8845
Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5]

ID: R000395

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 567.

May 14, 2026

Introduced

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

πŸ›οΈ

Committee Review

πŸ—³οΈ

Floor Action

βœ…

Passed House

πŸ›οΈ

Senate Review

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity, shall we?

The Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027, is a $440 million behemoth that's supposed to fund various departments and agencies. But don't be fooled – it's just a vehicle for pork-barrel spending and bureaucratic self-preservation.

Total funding amounts are a joke. The International Trade Administration gets $440 million, with $102 million remaining available until 2028. Because, you know, they need two years to figure out how to waste that money. The Bureau of Industry and Security receives $450 million, with $180 million available until expended. I'm sure it'll take them a while to exhaust those funds on "export administration field activities" and "official representation expenses abroad."

Key programs and agencies receiving funds include the Economic Development Administration ($256.5 million), Minority Business Development Agency (funding not specified, because who needs transparency?), and various science-related initiatives. Because, you know, science is important – unless it's related to climate change or actual progress.

Notable increases or decreases? Ha! The only notable thing is how they've managed to obfuscate the numbers. It's like trying to find a needle in a haystack, except the needle is a coherent budget allocation and the haystack is a mountain of bureaucratic doublespeak.

Riders and policy provisions attached to funding? Oh boy, where do I even start? There are provisions for "China antidumping and countervailing duty enforcement and compliance activities" ($16.4 million), because we need to protect our precious trade interests. And let's not forget the $20 million derived from fees to be retained and used by the International Trade Administration – because who needs congressional oversight when you can just self-fund your own bureaucratic empire?

Fiscal impact and deficit implications? *laughs* Don't make me laugh. This bill is a drop in the ocean of our national debt, but it's still a symptom of a larger disease: the inability of our government to prioritize actual governance over partisan posturing and special interest pandering.

In conclusion, this appropriations bill is a masterclass in legislative obfuscation, a testament to the boundless creativity of bureaucrats and politicians in finding new ways to waste taxpayer money. It's a diseased behemoth, riddled with corruption, incompetence, and a healthy dose of contempt for the American people. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do – like watching paint dry.

Related Topics

Foreign Aid & Diplomacy Federal Budget & Appropriations Defense Spending & Procurement
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$72,800
21 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$5,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$67,800

No PAC contributions found

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
2
THE GORMAN COMPANY
1 transaction
$1,200
3
DOUBLE R FARMS
1 transaction
$500

No committee contributions found

1
ROBINSON, TIM
2 transactions
$8,400
2
FAISON, JAY W
2 transactions
$6,600
3
MCCARTHY, JOHN
1 transaction
$3,300
4
HAMILTON, ERICA
1 transaction
$3,300
5
BAIRD, CHARLES J.
1 transaction
$3,300
6
BAIRD, RACHEL
1 transaction
$3,300
7
LUCKEY, PALMER
1 transaction
$3,300
8
ROBINSON, MICHAEL C.
1 transaction
$3,300
9
BOOTH, JAMES
1 transaction
$3,300
10
BOOTH, LINDA
1 transaction
$3,300
11
HAMILTON, J.D.
1 transaction
$3,300
12
MATHENY, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
13
MATTHEWS, CHARLES
1 transaction
$3,300
14
MATTHEWS, INA
1 transaction
$3,300
15
SCHENA, ROBERT
1 transaction
$3,300
16
DOTSON, TERRY L.
1 transaction
$3,300
17
EGNEW, JAMES C.
1 transaction
$3,300
18
HUTCHISON, BOB
1 transaction
$3,300

Donor Network - Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 22 nodes and 23 connections

Total contributions: $72,800

Top Donors - Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5]

Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount

3 Orgs18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 19 helped,6 harmed.

  • βˆ’Tobacco confidence 0.95

    Title V, Sec. 509: Explicitly prohibits use of funds to promote the sale or export of tobacco or tobacco products, or to seek reduction/removal of foreign marketing restrictions on tobacco, directly harming the tobacco industry.

  • +Telecommunications confidence 0.90

    Title I, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) salaries and expenses: $46,000,000 appropriated, with authority to retain and use offsetting collections from federal agencies for spectrum management and telecommunications research, providing direct funding and revenue retention benefits to the telecommunications industry.

  • Title V, multiple sections restrict firearms industry: Sec. 558 prohibits gun buyback/relinquishment programs; Sec. 559 prohibits red flag/extreme risk protection order laws; Sec. 560 prohibits federal firearms registry; Sec. 561 restricts ATF Demand 2 program; Sec. 562 prohibits classifying firearms with stabilizing braces as rifles/shotguns; Sec. 575 prohibits implementing interim final rule on firearms license requirements; Sec. 576 prohibits ATF's 'Definition of Engaged in the Business' rule

  • Title V, Sec. 530: Prohibits use of funds by DOJ or DEA in contravention of Section 7606 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (Legitimacy of Industrial Hemp Research), which protects hemp/CBD research; Sec. 591 prohibits rescheduling or removing marijuana from CSA schedules; Sec. 531 prohibits DOJ funds from preventing states from implementing medical marijuana laws.

  • +Health Insurance confidence 0.90

    Section 204 of Title II requires the Director of the Bureau of Prisons to provide escort services for female inmates to receive medical services outside federal facilities, which implies healthcare services utilization, benefiting health insurance providers through increased claims and reimbursements for medical care.

  • Title V, Sec. 541: Director of NSF must allocate CHIPS Act funds for workforce and education, and Sec. 542 requires continued application of negotiated indirect cost rates for DOC, NASA, and NSF, supporting semiconductor industry workforce development and research infrastructure.

+ 19 more industries not shown.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Rogers, Harold [R-KY-5]) received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β€” they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HELPS

Related Bills