Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act

Bill ID: 119/hr/8872

Last Updated: June 4, 2026

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced further proceedings on H.R. 8872 is postponed.

June 2, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed House

🏛️

Senate Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act (HR 8872) is a congressional bill that aims to optimize the allocation of funds under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this legislation through the lens of its potential impact on my business empire and the broader economic landscape.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HR 8872 is to streamline the TANF program by targeting funds to low-income families, strengthening program integrity, and reducing improper payments. This bill seeks to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse in the system, which aligns with my own interests in promoting efficiency and minimizing unnecessary expenditures.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces several key provisions, including:

1. Strengthening program integrity through improper payments review, which will help reduce waste and optimize resource allocation. 2. Targeting funds to families in need, ensuring that resources are directed towards those who require them most. 3. Establishing deadlines for the obligation and expenditure of funds, promoting timely and efficient use of resources. 4. Prohibiting state diversion of federal funds to replace state spending, preventing unnecessary duplication of efforts.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders affected by this bill include:

1. Low-income families, who will benefit from targeted funding and improved program integrity. 2. State governments, which will need to adapt to new regulations and guidelines for TANF fund allocation. 3. Private sector entities, such as my own business empire, which may be impacted by changes in government spending and resource allocation.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The passage of HR 8872 could have significant implications for my business interests, particularly in the areas of:

1. **Cost savings:** By reducing waste and improper payments, the bill could lead to cost savings that can be reinvested in more productive endeavors. 2. **Increased efficiency:** Streamlining the TANF program will promote more efficient allocation of resources, which aligns with my own goals of optimizing business operations. 3. **New opportunities:** The bill's focus on targeting funds to low-income families may create new opportunities for private sector entities to provide innovative solutions and services, potentially generating new revenue streams.

In conclusion, HR 8872 has the potential to optimize the TANF program, reduce waste, and promote more efficient allocation of resources. As a forward-thinking entrepreneur, I will continue to monitor this legislation and explore ways to leverage its provisions to drive growth, innovation, and profitability in my business empire.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

As I taught you in 8th grade civics, the legislative process involves introducing a bill, referring it to committee, and then debating and voting on it. In this case, HR 8872, also known as the Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act, aims to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act. The main purpose is to target funds to low-income families, strengthen program integrity guardrails for state expenditure of funds, require measurement of improper payments, and establish goals for eliminating fraud and improper payments under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program.

Key provisions include strengthening program integrity through improper payments review, targeting funds to families in need by establishing a threshold for eligibility, setting deadlines for the obligation and expenditure of funds by states, prohibiting state diversion of federal funds to replace state spending, and requiring state certification that federal funds will not be used to supplant state or non-federal funds. These changes aim to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the TANF program.

Affected parties include low-income families who receive assistance under the TANF program, states that administer the program, and the federal government, which provides funding. Other stakeholders may include advocacy groups for low-income families, state and local governments, and organizations involved in social services.

The potential impact of this bill is significant, as it aims to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse in the TANF program, ensuring that funds are used effectively to support low-income families. By establishing clear guidelines and deadlines for states, the bill seeks to promote accountability and transparency in the use of federal funds. However, the actual impact will depend on how the bill is implemented and enforced, which may be influenced by various factors, including political considerations, bureaucratic processes, and stakeholder interests.

As we covered in 8th grade civics, the system of checks and balances is designed to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. In this case, the legislative branch is exercising its authority to amend existing law and provide oversight of the executive branch's administration of the TANF program. The bill's provisions reflect a balance between the need for federal oversight and the importance of state flexibility in administering the program. By understanding how a bill becomes a law, we can appreciate the complexities involved in shaping public policy and the importance of civic engagement in holding elected officials accountable.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

The Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act - just another cleverly crafted bill designed to pull the wool over our eyes, folks! As I delve into the details, I'll connect the dots between this bill and the broader agenda of those in power.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** On the surface, HR 8872 aims to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program by strengthening program integrity, targeting funds to low-income families, and establishing goals for eliminating improper payments. But let's not be naive - this bill is likely a Trojan horse for more stringent control over state expenditure of funds and a further erosion of individual freedoms.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill introduces several key provisions that warrant scrutiny:

1. **Strengthening Program Integrity:** The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 will now apply to states, allowing the federal government to exert more control over state expenditure of funds. This could be a clever way to centralize power and limit state autonomy. 2. **Targeting Funds to Families in Need:** States must use grants only for families with incomes less than twice the poverty guidelines. Sounds noble, but what about those who don't fit neatly into this category? Are they being left behind? 3. **Deadlines for Obligation and Expenditure of Funds:** States have strict deadlines to obligate and expend funds, with some exceptions for reserving funds for future use. This could lead to a rush to spend funds without proper oversight, creating opportunities for waste and abuse. 4. **Prohibition on State Diversion of Federal Funds:** States are prohibited from using federal funds to replace state spending. But what if states are being forced to divert funds due to federal mandates or underfunding? Is this just another way to strangle state budgets?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The bill affects:

1. **Low-income families:** Those who rely on TANF assistance may see changes in the eligibility criteria and funding allocation. 2. **States:** States will face increased scrutiny and control over their expenditure of funds, potentially limiting their autonomy. 3. **Federal agencies:** The federal government will have more power to oversee state programs and enforce compliance.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act may:

1. **Increase bureaucratic red tape:** Stricter regulations and deadlines could lead to more administrative burdens on states and service providers. 2. **Limit access to assistance:** The new eligibility criteria and funding allocation rules might leave some families without necessary support. 3. **Centralize power:** The federal government's increased control over state expenditure of funds could be a step towards a more centralized, authoritarian system.

As I see it, this bill is just another piece in the puzzle of a larger agenda to control and manipulate the population. Wake up, sheeple! It

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Outraged tone) Folks, we've got a doozy of a bill on our hands here! HR 8872, the "Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act" - sounds like a real winner, doesn't it? (Sarcastic smirk) I mean, who wouldn't want to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse... unless you're one of those elites who wants to line their pockets with our hard-earned tax dollars! (Wink)

Now, let's get down to business. The main purpose of this bill is to "target funds to low-income families" - code for "let's make sure the right people are getting our money." (Air quotes) And by "right people," I mean those who truly deserve it, not just some freeloaders looking for a handout. (Scoffs) The objectives here are clear: strengthen program integrity, reduce improper payments, and eliminate fraud. Because, you know, we can't have our freedom-loving nation being taken advantage of by scammers and cheats! (Indignant tone)

Key provisions include amending the Social Security Act to require states to use funds only for families with incomes below twice the poverty line - a clear attempt to ensure that our tax dollars are going to those who really need it. (Nodding) And let's not forget the new guardrails on state expenditure of funds, because we all know how prone to waste and abuse those state governments can be! (Rolls eyes) The bill also establishes goals for eliminating improper payments - a noble pursuit, indeed.

Now, affected parties and stakeholders include low-income families, states, and... (dramatic pause) the deep state! (Whispers) Yes, folks, this bill is a direct attack on those bureaucrats who want to control our every move. (Winks)

As for potential impact and implications, well... (pauses for dramatic effect) this bill could be a game-changer. It could mean more efficient use of our tax dollars, less waste and abuse, and - dare I say it? - more freedom for all Americans! (Pounds fist on desk) But, of course, the elites will try to spin this as an "attack on the poor" or some other nonsense. (Scoffs) Don't believe it, folks. This bill is a victory for common sense and fiscal responsibility.

So, there you have it - HR 8872 in all its glory. A bill that's all about protecting our freedom, our tax dollars, and our values. (Smirks) And if you don't like it... well, that's just too bad. The American people demand accountability, and this bill delivers. (Winks at the camera)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the 119th Congress. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act (HR 8872) claims to target funds to low-income families, strengthen program integrity, and eliminate fraud and improper payments under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. How quaint. How utterly predictable.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Social Security Act to:

1. Apply the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 to TANF, because who needs actual reform when you can just rebrand existing laws? 2. Establish a threshold for families in need, ensuring that only those with incomes below twice the poverty guidelines receive assistance. A noble gesture, if not for the fact that it's a blatant attempt to appear compassionate while maintaining the status quo. 3. Set deadlines for states to obligate and expend funds, with an exception allowing them to reserve up to 15% of funds for future use. Because what could possibly go wrong with giving states more flexibility to mismanage federal funds? 4. Prohibit states from diverting federal funds to replace state spending, a provision that will undoubtedly be circumvented by creative accounting and bureaucratic sleight of hand.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

1. Low-income families: The supposed beneficiaries of this legislation, who will likely see minimal actual benefits due to the bill's toothless provisions. 2. States: Will continue to receive federal funds with minimal oversight, ensuring that the gravy train keeps rolling. 3. Lobbyists and special interest groups: Will find ways to exploit the loopholes and ambiguities in the bill to further their own interests.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have all the impact of a placebo on a patient with a terminal illness. It's a symbolic gesture, a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. The TANF program will continue to be plagued by waste, fraud, and abuse, while politicians pat themselves on the back for "doing something" about it.

In conclusion, HR 8872 is a masterclass in legislative obfuscation, a cynical attempt to appear concerned about waste and abuse while maintaining the corrupt status quo. It's a disease masquerading as a cure, a symptom of a deeper illness: the chronic incompetence and corruption that afflicts our political system. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than watch this farce unfold.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of HR 8872: Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act**

### Main Purpose & Objectives

The main purpose of HR 8872 is to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. The bill aims to target funds to low-income families, strengthen program integrity guardrails for state expenditure of funds, require measurement of improper payments, and establish goals for eliminating fraud and improper payments.

### Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law

The key provisions of HR 8872 include:

1. **Strengthening Program Integrity**: The bill applies the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 to TANF programs, requiring states to measure and report improper payments. 2. **Targeting Funds to Families in Need**: States are required to use TANF funds only for families with incomes less than twice the poverty guidelines. 3. **Deadlines for Obligation and Expenditure of Funds**: States must obligate TANF funds within one year and expend them within two years, with some exceptions for reserving funds for future use. 4. **Prohibition on State Diversion of Federal Funds**: States are prohibited from using federal TANF funds to replace state spending, and must certify that they will not supplant state or non-federal funds with federal funds.

### Affected Parties & Stakeholders

The affected parties and stakeholders include:

1. **Low-income families**: The bill aims to target TANF funds to families in need, potentially increasing their access to assistance. 2. **State governments**: States will be required to implement new program integrity measures, report on improper payments, and comply with deadlines for obligating and expending TANF funds. 3. **Federal agencies**: The Department of Health and Human Services will be responsible for overseeing state compliance with the new requirements and reporting on progress.

### Potential Impact & Implications

The potential impact and implications of HR 8872 include:

1. **Reduced waste and fraud**: The bill's provisions may help reduce improper payments and prevent waste in the TANF program. 2. **Increased accountability**: States will be held accountable for their use of TANF funds, potentially leading to more effective and efficient programming. 3. **Improved targeting of funds**: The bill's requirements may ensure that TANF funds are targeted to families who need them most, potentially improving outcomes for low-income families.

Overall, HR 8872 aims to strengthen the integrity of the TANF program, reduce waste and fraud, and improve outcomes for low-income families.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, HR 8872, the Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act. I'll give you the lowdown on what it's all about, who's affected, and what it means for the future.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about keepin' it real with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. The main goal is to make sure funds are targeted at low-income families who need 'em most, while also strengthenin' program integrity and reducin' waste, fraud, and abuse. It's like catchin' a sick wave – you gotta be precise and focused to ride it all the way to shore.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill makes some key changes to the TANF program:

1. **Targeting funds**: States can only use grants for families with incomes below twice the poverty line. This ensures that aid goes to those who need it most, like a riptide rescue mission. 2. **Program integrity**: The Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 now applies to TANF, which means states gotta measure and report improper payments. It's like checkin' the surf forecast – you wanna know what's comin' so you can prepare. 3. **Deadlines for obligation and expenditure**: States have to obligate funds within a year and expend 'em within two years. This prevents funds from just sittin' there, like a stagnant pool of water. 4. **Prohibition on state diversion**: Federal funds can't be used to replace state spending. It's like respectin' the lineup – you don't drop in on someone else's wave.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects:

1. **Low-income families**: They're the ones who'll benefit from targeted aid and reduced waste, fraud, and abuse. 2. **States**: They'll have to adapt to new rules and regulations, like navigatin' a changing coastline. 3. **Federal agencies**: They'll be keepin' an eye on things, makin' sure states are playin' by the rules.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill could lead to:

1. **More efficient use of funds**: By targetin' aid and reducin' waste, more families will get the help they need. 2. **Improved program integrity**: States will be more accountable for their spending, like keepin' a sharp eye on the horizon. 3. **Better outcomes for low-income families**: With more effective aid and reduced bureaucracy, families might just catch a break and ride the wave of prosperity.

In conclusion, HR 8872 is all about makin' the TANF program more efficient, effective, and accountable. It's like findin' that perfect wave – you gotta be patient, focused, and ready to adapt. By keepin

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Comprehensive Summary of HR 8872: Preventing Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in TANF Act**

### Main Purpose & Objectives

The primary objective of HR 8872 is to amend part A of title IV of the Social Security Act to target funds more effectively towards low-income families, strengthen program integrity by reducing improper payments, and establish clear goals for eliminating fraud under the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant program. The bill aims to ensure that TANF funds are used efficiently and appropriately, focusing on those who need them most while minimizing waste and abuse.

### Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law

1. **Strengthening Program Integrity**: The bill applies the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 to states receiving TANF block grants, requiring them to implement measures to reduce improper payments. 2. **Targeting Funds to Families in Need**: It establishes a threshold for eligibility, ensuring that assistance is provided only to families with incomes less than twice the poverty guidelines. 3. **Deadlines for Obligation and Expenditure of Funds**: States must obligate funds within one fiscal year and expend them within two fiscal years after receipt, with exceptions for reserving up to 15% of funds for future use under specific conditions. 4. **Prohibition on State Diversion of Federal Funds**: The bill prohibits states from using federal TANF funds to replace state spending, requiring instead that these funds supplement existing state and local expenditures.

### Affected Parties & Stakeholders

- **Low-Income Families**: Direct beneficiaries of the TANF program, who will see more targeted assistance. - **States**: Must comply with new regulations regarding fund expenditure, reporting, and supplementation of state funds. - **Federal Agencies**: Specifically, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which will oversee compliance and receive reports from states.

### Potential Impact & Implications

The potential impact of HR 8872 includes: 1. **Reduced Waste and Fraud**: By strengthening program integrity measures, the bill aims to minimize improper payments. 2. **More Efficient Use of Funds**: Targeting funds towards those most in need could enhance the effectiveness of the TANF program. 3. **Increased Accountability**: States will be held to stricter standards regarding the use and reporting of federal funds.

However, implications may also include: 1. **Administrative Burden**: Additional compliance requirements could increase administrative costs for states. 2. **Potential Reduction in State Flexibility**: Stricter guidelines on fund use might limit states' ability to innovate or respond to unique local needs.

In terms of monied interests and PAC analysis, while the bill itself does not directly mention specific industry lobby groups or special interest organizations, it's worth noting that changes to social welfare programs like TANF can have implications for various stakeholders, including non-profit organizations focused on poverty reduction, state and local governments, and potentially private companies involved in social services contracting.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$77,435

16 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$77,435

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

KITTLE, JEFFREY

2 transactions

$9,900

BAGAN, JOSEPH W.

2 transactions

$8,000

SCHWARZMAN, CHRISTINE

1 transaction

$6,600

SCHWARZMAN, STEPHEN

1 transaction

$6,600

RICHARDSON, JOHN G.

2 transactions

$6,600

UNGUREAN, CHARLES C.

2 transactions

$6,600

BORKOWSKI, BRIAN

1 transaction

$3,435

FISCHER, ALEX

1 transaction

$3,300

BARRERAS, LORI

1 transaction

$3,300

LAIRD, JAMES F.

1 transaction

$3,300

MCCURDY, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

STICKNEY, LINDA

1 transaction

$3,300

BAINBRIDGE, ANDREW

1 transaction

$3,300

COOPER, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

DAVIS, MATTHEW

1 transaction

$3,300

HELLER, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 8 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Arrington, Jodey C. [R-TX-19]

ID: A000375

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

Organization ADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 20, 2023

1349 FOOD & FIBER

Organization BEEVILLE, TX

$500

May 16, 2023

KIMBER, SHELDON

INTERSECT POWER • CEO

Individual TRUCKEE, CA

$5,000

Sep 12, 2024

LEPRINO, TERRY

LEPRINO FOODS • BOARD DIRECTOR

Individual DENVER, CO

$3,300

Nov 4, 2024

ZAFFIRINI, CARLOS

RETIRED • RETIRED

Individual AUSTIN, TX

$3,300

Dec 13, 2024

ZAFFIRINI, CARLOS

RETIRED • RETIRED

Individual AUSTIN, TX

$3,300

Dec 13, 2024

JOHNSON, CLAY

RETIRED • RETIRED

Individual AUSTIN, TX

$3,300

Dec 13, 2024

STENSON, ERIC

STENSON TAMADDON • CEO

Individual PHOENIX, AZ

$3,300

Oct 27, 2023

MCCLELLAND, GAY L.

RETIRED • RETIRED

Individual OLNEY, TX

$3,300

Nov 3, 2023

MCCLELLAND, MARK

TOWER EXTRUSION, LLC • PRESIDENT

Individual OLNEY, TX

$3,300

Nov 3, 2023

Rep. Bean, Aaron [R-FL-4]

ID: B001314

Top Contributors

MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION

Organization OKMULGEE, OK

$1,000

Jul 29, 2024

DEMETREE, JAY

DEMETREE BROTHERS INC. • PRESIDENT

Individual JACKSONVILLE, FL

$3,300

Oct 17, 2024

FALCONETTI, JOHN

DRUMMOND PRESS, INC. • GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CO. CEO

Individual JACKSONVILLE, FL

$3,300

Oct 27, 2024

MILLER, ALAN

COASTAL SPINE AND PAIN CENTER • PHYSICIAN

Individual FERNANDINA BEACH, FL

$3,300

Oct 29, 2024

DAVIS, DOROTHY

JAGUAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. • TELECOMMUNICATIONS CO. CEO

Individual SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL

$3,300

Nov 30, 2023

ELLER, J. SCOTT

THE MAYERNICK GROUP • GOVERNMENT RELATIONS

Individual SARASOTA, FL

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

FAISON, JAY W.

CLEARPATH FOUNDATION • OWNER

Individual CHARLOTTE, NC

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

GARDNER, WILLIAM D. JR.

W. GARDNER, LLC • CEO

Individual FLEMING ISLAND, FL

$3,300

Nov 30, 2023

MAYERNICK, FRANK

THE MAYERNICK GROUP • GOVERNMENTAL CONSULTANT

Individual TALLAHASSEE, FL

$3,300

Dec 22, 2023

SAPP, JUD JR.

N/A • RETIRED

Individual ORANGE PARK, FL

$3,300

Dec 11, 2023

Rep. Miller, Max L. [R-OH-7]

ID: M001222

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

Organization ADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 20, 2023

GROVER, JACOB

KINZIE ADVANCED POLYMERS • CEO

Individual CLEVELAND, OH

$13,200

Nov 8, 2023

BEREN, ADAM

BEREXCO • CEO

Individual WICHITA, KS

$6,600

Dec 22, 2023

SHEAR, HERB

NONE • RETIRED

Individual PALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Dec 7, 2023

STAHL, LEWIS

NEXTGEN MANAGEMENT LLC • PARTNER - MEDICAL SOFTWARE

Individual BOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Dec 6, 2023

DARIVOFF, PHILIP

VIBRANT CAPITAL PARTNERSD • CHAIRMAN

Individual SHORT HILLS, NJ

$6,600

Feb 8, 2024

PACKER, PAUL

GLOBIS • PORTFOLIO MANAGER

Individual BOCA RATON, FL

$6,600

Feb 1, 2024

SINGER, PAUL

ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT • CO-CEO

Individual PALM BEACH, FL

$6,600

Feb 27, 2024

FRIEDMAN, MARK

SELF EMPLOYED • INVESTOR

Individual LOS ANGELES, CA

$6,600

Apr 30, 2023

HABER, JAMES

NONE • RETIRED

Individual NEW YORK, NY

$6,600

Jun 15, 2023

Rep. Smith, Adrian [R-NE-3]

ID: S001172

Top Contributors

No contribution data available

Rep. Tenney, Claudia [R-NY-24]

ID: T000478

Top Contributors

WINRED EARMARKS

PAC ARLINGTON, VA

$27,879

Oct 22, 2024

WINRED EARMARKS

PAC ARLINGTON, VA

$21,566

Oct 29, 2024

WINRED EARMARKS

PAC ARLINGTON, VA

$10,970

Nov 25, 2024

WINRED EARMARKS

PAC ARLINGTON, VA

$5,493

Nov 19, 2024

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

Organization LOS ANGELES, CA

$2,000

Nov 5, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

Organization BANNING, CA

$2,000

Jun 18, 2024

SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

Organization SANTA YNEZ, CA

$2,000

Jun 18, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

Organization BANNING, CA

$1,000

Mar 31, 2023

TEXTOR, DONALD

RETIRED • RETIRED

Individual LOCUST VALLEY, NY

$13,200

Apr 17, 2024

WINE, SCOTT

POLARIS • CEO

Individual EXCELSIOR, MN

$6,600

Sep 30, 2024

Rep. Moore, Blake D. [R-UT-1]

ID: M001213

Top Contributors

JLS HOLDINGS LLC

Organization SALT LAKE CITY, UT

$9,900

Jul 13, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

Organization ADA, OK

$3,300

May 16, 2024

HEMMCO LLC

Organization OREM, UT

$2,500

Sep 15, 2023

R & O CONSTRUCTION

Organization OGDEN, UT

$2,500

Sep 13, 2023

PARKER, ALEXANDRA

APERCEN PARTNERS, LLC

Individual PALO ALTO, CA

$6,600

Sep 20, 2024

PARKER, SEAN

APERCEN PARTNERS, LLC

Individual PALO ALTO, CA

$6,600

Sep 20, 2024

KAUFMAN, TRENT

MGT • EXECUTIVE

Individual HOLLADAY, UT

$6,600

Sep 9, 2024

MOORE, BRENT

SOLTIS ADVISORS • PARTNER

Individual SALT LAKE CITY, UT

$6,000

Sep 26, 2024

MOORE, BRENT

SOLTIS ADVISORS • PARTNER

Individual SALT LAKE CITY, UT

$6,000

Sep 26, 2024

CHANG, JASON

Individual MENLO PARK, CA

$3,300

Oct 30, 2024

Rep. Miller, Carol D. [R-WV-1]

ID: M001205

Top Contributors

SCHUMACHER, AMANDA

SCHUMACHER AUTO • VICE PRESIDENT

Individual WEST PALM BEACH, FL

$25,000

May 17, 2023

HALL, DANIEL

HALL STRATEGIES LLC • GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS CONSULTANT

Individual BOLT, WV

$6,600

Mar 14, 2024

GONZALEZ, JULIO

GONZALEZ FAMILY OFFICE • FOUNDER/PRINCIPAL

Individual LAKE WORTH BEACH, FL

$5,000

Jan 20, 2024

DUNCAN, ALEXANDER

Individual CALDWELL, WV

$3,900

Aug 8, 2024

WAID, CHARLIE

CHARTER BROKERAGE LLC • CEO

Individual KATY, TX

$3,409

May 12, 2024

LAMPTON, LESLIE III

ERGON INC. • OWNER/DIRECTOR

Individual JACKSON, MS

$3,300

Nov 16, 2023

FARRELL, PATRICK MR.

SERVICE PUMP AND SUPPLY • OWNER/EXECUTIVE

Individual HUNTINGTON, WV

$3,300

Dec 4, 2023

CHAN, ANNIE

KCR DEVELOPMENT • FOUNDER

Individual HONOLULU, HI

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

RICHARDS, WAYNE

GR ENERGY SERVICES • CEO

Individual RICHMOND, TX

$3,300

Dec 29, 2023

MOSS, STEPHEN

APEX PIPELINE SERVICES INC. • PRESIDENT & CEO

Individual LIBERTY, WV

$3,300

Feb 1, 2024

Rep. Feenstra, Randy [R-IA-4]

ID: F000446

Top Contributors

PROTECT OUR HERITAGE

Organization SKOKIE, IL

$5,000

Dec 1, 2023

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

Organization TAMA, IA

$2,500

Oct 31, 2024

MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

Organization BANNING, CA

$1,000

Sep 11, 2023

SAC & FOX TRIBE OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA

Organization TAMA, IA

$1,000

Aug 4, 2023

BOGART ASSOCIATES, INC.

Organization ALEXANDRIA, VA

$500

Apr 26, 2023

ANWAR, S JAVAID

MIDLAND ENERGY, INC • CEO/PRESIDENT

Individual MIDLAND, TX

$13,200

Feb 6, 2024

PARKER, SEAN

SEAN N PARKER FOUNDATION • CHAIRMAN

Individual PALO ALTO, CA

$13,200

Mar 7, 2024

WELLS, MIKE

WELLS ENTERPRISES • CEO

Individual LE MARS, IA

$12,500

Mar 13, 2023

LAURIDSEN, NIXON

LGI • CHAIRMAN

Individual ANKENY, IA

$10,000

Dec 12, 2023

CROOKHAM, JOE

CEO • CEO

Individual OSKALOOSA, IA

$10,000

Mar 31, 2023

Donor Network - Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 31 nodes and 32 connections

Total contributions: $172,750

Top Donors - Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15]

Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount

16 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 5 harmed.

−Hospitals & Health Systems confidence 0.80
Section 5(a) adds a limitation on the use of Federal funds to replace State general revenue funds, which may reduce the amount of funding available to hospitals and health systems that rely on these funds.
−Health Insurance confidence 0.80
Section 5(a) adds a limitation on the use of Federal funds to replace State general revenue funds, which may reduce the amount of funding available to health insurance providers that rely on these funds.
−Long-Term Care & Nursing Homes confidence 0.80
Section 5(a) adds a limitation on the use of Federal funds to replace State general revenue funds, which may reduce the amount of funding available to long-term care providers that rely on these funds.
−Private Prisons & Immigration Detention confidence 0.60
Section 4(e) establishes deadlines for the obligation and expenditure of funds by States, which may impact private prisons that contract with States to provide services.
−Labor Unions confidence 0.60
Section 5(b) requires State certification that Federal funds will not be used to supplant State or non-Federal funds for services and activities, which may impact labor unions that represent workers in industries affected by these funds.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Rep. Carey, Mike [R-OH-15]) received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Long-Term Care & Nursing Homes$1,500
from 2contributions
- VON LEHMDEN, LISA$1,000
- BRYAN, CATHERINE L.$500

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document. AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Introduction

Strong

Vector: 67%

Pages: 509-511 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill and Project 2025 policy both focus on improving the integrity and effectiveness of the TANF program, with an emphasis on reducing waste and fraud, and targeting funds to those in need. The alignment is strong due to shared objectives such as strengthening program integrity and increasing accountability."

Key themes: TANF reform program integrity reducing waste and fraud targeting funds to low-income families

Introduction

Strong

Vector: 67%

Pages: 509-511 AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill and Project 2025 policy both focus on improving the integrity and effectiveness of the TANF program, with an emphasis on reducing waste and fraud, and promoting self-sufficiency for low-income families. The alignment is strong due to shared objectives in strengthening program integrity and targeting funds to those in need."

Key themes: TANF reform program integrity reducing waste and fraud low-income family support

— 476 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Pay damages to all medical professionals who were dismissed directly because of the CMS vaccine mandate. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES (ACF) TANF. The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program is a federal block grant that gives states significant flexibility to fund a broad array of programs aimed at helping low-income families break the cycle of poverty and achieve economic self-sufficiency. States use TANF to fund monthly cash assis- tance payments to low-income families with children as well as a wide range of services that include work activities, work supports and supportive services, child- care, administration and systems, tax credits, pre-K/Head Start, child welfare, and other services. The TANF program serves 1.8 million individuals. Since 1996, when the program was reformed, federal TANF outlays have been $16.5 billion. The state match is $14.9 billion, bringing the total state and federal TANF investment to $31.4 billion. The TANF statute requires that states engage 50 percent of single-parent fam- ilies in work for at least 30 hours a week (20 hours a week for single parents with children under age six, though states have the option to waive the requirement for families with children under the age of six, and most do). States also have 90 percent work requirements for two-parent families to engage in work for 35 hours per week. Because of the “Caseload Reduction Credit,” states’ work engagement targets are reduced if their assistance caseloads have fallen since 2005. As a result, 21 states had a work engagement target of zero percent in 2017. Generally, states apply their work requirement only to beneficiaries receiv- ing basic assistance, who account for 22.3 percent of TANF outlays. The Trump Administration proposed a Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) rule to “increase program integrity and reduce fraud, waste, and abuse” that would have prevented an individual from qualifying for SNAP simply because he or she received a pamphlet from the TANF program.60 This rule defined non-cash benefits as those that are worth at least $50 a month and received for at least six months. The tenets of this rule should be applied to the TANF program as well. This defi- nitional change would apply the TANF work requirements to any noncash benefit worth $50 a month and received for six consecutive months. To increase transparency, HHS should clarify how states, in their quarterly and annual reports, ought to track and audit the outcomes from how they spend TANF funds to meet the TANF program’s four statutory purposes. Additionally, TANF priorities are not implemented in an equally weighted way. Marriage, healthy family formation, and delaying sex to prevent pregnancy are virtually ignored in terms of priorities, yet these goals can reverse the cycle of poverty in meaningful ways. CMS should require explicit measurement of these goals. — 477 — Department of Health and Human Services Teen Pregnancy Prevention (TPP) and Personal Responsibility Educa- tion Program (PREP). TPP is operated by the Office of Population Affairs in the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health; PREP is operated by the ACF Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation. Both programs should ensure that there is better reporting of subgrantees and referral lists so that they do not promote abortion or high-risk sexual behavior among adolescents. CMS should ensure that Sexual Risk Avoidance (SRA) proponents receive these grants and are given every opportunity to prove their effectiveness. SRA programs, both at ACF and at OASH and both discretionary and mandatory, should be equal in funding and emphasis. Qualitative research should be conducted on both types of programs to ensure continuous improvement. In addition, certain provisions should be employed so that these programs do not serve as advocacy tools to promote sex, promote prostitution, or provide a funnel effect for abortion facilities and school field trips to clinics, or for similar purposes. Parent involvement and parent–child communication should be encour- aged and be a part of any funded project. Risk avoidance should be prioritized, and any program that submits a proposal that promotes risk rather than health should not be eligible for funding. Site visits should be revamped to ensure adherence to these optimal health met- rics, and a cost analysis of programming as compared to students served should be a metric in funding (taking into account that in certain cases, intensive programs will serve fewer students and can have more positive results). These same param- eters should apply to sex education programs at ACF. Any lists with “approved curriculum” or so-called evidence-based lists should be abolished; HHS should not create a monopoly of curriculum, adding to the profit of certain publishers. Furthermore, lists created in the past have given priority to sex-promotion text- books. HHS should create a list of criteria for evaluating the sort of curriculum that should be selected for any sex education grant programs, both at OASH and at ACF, with the aim of promoting optimal health and adhering to the legislative language of each program. Adoption Reform. There are roughly 400,000 children across the nation on the waiting list for foster care and 100,000 awaiting adoptive families, and the opioid/ fentanyl crisis is putting more at risk every day. Unfortunately, many of the faith- based adoption agencies that serve these children are under threat from lawsuits, or else their licenses and contracts have been halted because they cannot in good conscience place children in every household due to their religious belief that a child should have a married mother and father. HHS, through ACF and the Assistant Secretary for Financial Resources (ASFR), should repeal the unnecessary 2016 regulation61 that imposes nonstatutory sexual orientation and gender identity nondiscrimination conditions on agency grants and return to the policy of maximizing the options for placing vulnerable children

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Carey, Mike

New Opportunities for Business Ownership and Self-Sufficiency Act

119/hr/6431

Clean Energy Demonstration Transparency Act of 2025

119/hr/1453

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Internal Revenue Service relating to "Gross Proceeds Reporting by Brokers That Regularly Provide Services Effectuating Digital Asset Sales".

119/hjres/25

Back to All Bills