Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/hr/993
Last Updated: July 18, 2026

Sponsored by

Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]

ID: C001110

Follow the money

The bill

Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act

HR. 993, 119th Congress β€” read as touching Cybersecurity.

The sponsor

Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$90,300 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

March 10, 2025

Introduced

Committee Review

Floor Action

Passed House

Senate Review

πŸ“ Current Status

Next: Both chambers must agree on the same version of the bill.

πŸŽ‰

Passed Congress

πŸ–ŠοΈ

Presidential Action

βš–οΈ

Became Law

πŸ“š How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the same geniuses who thought a border wall was a good idea. Let's dissect this trainwreck.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Emerging Innovative Border Technologies Act (HR 993) claims to enhance border security operations by identifying and deploying new, innovative technologies. Yeah, because that's exactly what we need – more gadgets and gizmos to distract us from the real issues. The bill's primary objective is to create a plan for the Secretary of Homeland Security to develop and implement these emerging technologies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit a plan within 180 days, which includes:

* Identifying new technologies (because we haven't thrown enough money at this problem already) * Integrating and deploying said technologies * Assessing their effectiveness ( Spoiler alert: it'll be a glowing report, no matter how poorly they perform) * Coordinating with the private sector, small businesses, and other stakeholders to leverage emerging tech

Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory "CBP Innovation Team Authority" section, which authorizes the Commissioner of CBP to maintain one or more teams to research and adapt commercial technologies. Because what could possibly go wrong with giving a government agency carte blanche to play with new toys?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:

* U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) * Department of Homeland Security * Private sector companies looking to cash in on the border security gravy train * Small businesses and disadvantaged entities who'll be "encouraged" to participate (read: forced to compete for scraps) * University centers of excellence and Federal laboratories, because why not?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic case of treating symptoms rather than the disease. It's a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. The real issues – corruption, inefficiency, and a fundamentally flawed approach to border security – remain unaddressed.

The potential impact? More waste, more bureaucracy, and more opportunities for crony capitalism. The bill will likely lead to:

* A surge in government contracts for "innovative" technologies that may or may not work * Increased surveillance and data collection on border communities (because who needs privacy, anyway?) * Further militarization of the border, because what's a few more drones and sensors among friends?

In conclusion, HR 993 is a textbook example of legislative malpractice. It's a feel-good bill that accomplishes nothing meaningful while perpetuating the same failed policies that got us here in the first place. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to create another masterpiece of bureaucratic nonsense.

Related Topics

Immigration & Border SecurityNational Security & Intelligence
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

πŸ’° Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]

Congress 119 β€’ 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$90,300
24 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$33,700
Committees
$0
Individuals
$56,100

No PAC contributions found

1
SANTA YENEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
3 transactions
$7,700
2
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
2 transactions
$6,600
3
SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND MIWOK INDIANS
2 transactions
$4,000
4
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
2 transactions
$4,000
5
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
6
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
1 transaction
$3,300
7
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE
1 transaction
$3,300
8
SYCUAN BAND OF KUMEYAAY NATION
1 transaction
$1,500

No committee contributions found

1
RANCHERIA, SANTA ROSA
1 transaction
$6,600
2
PEREZ, FRANK
2 transactions
$6,600
3
FISHER, ROBERT J
1 transaction
$3,300
4
FISHER, WILLIAM S
1 transaction
$3,300
5
CORDERO, ALFONSO
1 transaction
$3,300
6
HARRINGTON, CHRIS
1 transaction
$3,300
7
CORDERO, MERCY
1 transaction
$3,300
8
CHALAN, MIKE
1 transaction
$3,300
9
VALE, SAM
1 transaction
$3,300
10
ADAMS, GEORGE
1 transaction
$3,300
11
SHAH, MANAHAR
1 transaction
$3,300
12
CARRILLO, FRANK
1 transaction
$3,300
13
SAMIELI, HENRY
1 transaction
$3,300
14
SAMUELI, SUSAN
1 transaction
$3,300
15
STAVROS, PETE
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 2 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Rep. Luttrell, Morgan [R-TX-8]

ID: L000603

Top Contributors

10

1
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE
OrganizationWOODVILLE, TX
$3,300
Dec 21, 2023
2
TIGUA INDIAN RES.-YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO
OrganizationEL PASO, TX
$3,300
Jun 20, 2023
3
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE
OrganizationWOODVILLE, TX
$3,300
Sep 27, 2024
4
TIGUA INDIAN RES.-YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO
OrganizationEL PASO, TX
$2,500
Sep 20, 2024
5
GRIFFIN, KENNETH
CITADEL LLC β€’ FOUNDER CEO
IndividualMIAMI BEACH, FL
$6,600
Apr 10, 2023
6
SINGER, PAUL
ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT β€’ CO-CEO CO-CIO PRESIDENT
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$6,600
Apr 10, 2023
7
STEDMAN, STUART
STEDMAN WEST INTERESTS INC. β€’ INVESTOR/PRESIDENT
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$6,600
Jun 22, 2023
8
FISHER, KENNETH
FISHER INVESTMENTS β€’ EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN
IndividualPLANO, TX
$6,600
May 23, 2024
9
FISHER, SHERRILYN
PLANO 6500 LLC β€’ MEMBER
IndividualPLANO, TX
$6,600
May 23, 2024
10
ERICKSON, MARILYN
RETIRED β€’ RETIRED
IndividualPOWELL, TN
$6,600
Jul 6, 2024

Rep. Gillen, Laura [D-NY-4]

ID: G000602

Top Contributors

10

1
RALLYE MOTORS
OrganizationROSLYN, NY
$6,000
Jul 18, 2023
2
RALLYE MOTORS
OrganizationROSLYN, NY
$6,000
Jun 5, 2023
3
FEDERATED INDIANS OF GRATON RANCHERIA
OrganizationROHNERT PARK, CA
$1,000
Aug 1, 2024
4
STONE, JAMES M
PLYMOUTH ROCK COMPANY, INC. β€’ EXECUTIVE
IndividualBOSTON, MA
$5,000
Oct 16, 2024
5
FAIVUS, HARRY E
SELF-EMPLOYED β€’ OPHTHALMOLOGIST
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$5,000
Nov 1, 2024
6
STONE, JAMES M
PLYMOUTH ROCK COMPANY, INC. β€’ EXECUTIVE
IndividualBOSTON, MA
$5,000
Oct 16, 2024
7
HELFER, RICKI
N/A β€’ NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$4,000
Sep 10, 2024
8
ANDEER, KYLE
APPLE INC β€’ ATTORNEY
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Mar 27, 2024
9
BINDER, CHARLES
SELF-EMPLOYED β€’ ATTORNEY
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Mar 21, 2024
10
BURNSTEIN, CLIFFORD
Q PRIME β€’ MANAGER
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Mar 28, 2024

Donor Network - Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 64 nodes and 36 connections (63 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $113,200

Top Donors - Rep. Correa, J. Luis [D-CA-46]

Showing top 24 donors by contribution amount

8 Orgs1 Committee15 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 5 helped.

  • +Cybersecurityconfidence 0.90

    Section 2(a) requires a plan to deploy emerging technologies including artificial intelligence, machine learning, automation, and other advanced technologies to enhance border security operations, which would benefit cybersecurity firms providing such technologies.

  • Section 2(a) explicitly mentions artificial intelligence and machine learning as technologies to be identified, integrated, and deployed for border security, directly benefiting AI and cloud infrastructure providers.

  • +Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.85

    Section 2(a)(12)(F) includes assessment of communications equipment such as radios, long-term evolution broadband, and miniature satellites, indicating potential procurement that would benefit telecommunications companies.

  • Section 2(a)(12)(C) includes mobile surveillance vehicles, tower-based surveillance, and advanced unattended sensors, which align with law enforcement and surveillance technology vendors such as Axon and Palantir.

  • +Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.80

    Section 2(a)(12) covers manned aircraft sensors, unmanned aerial systems, surveillance technology, and tunnel detectionβ€”areas where defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, and Northrop Grumman are active suppliers.

Related Bills