Censuring Representative Cory Mills.

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/hres/889

Last Updated: November 19, 2025

Censuring Representative Cory Mills.

HRES. 889, 119th Congress — read as touching Defense Contractors.

The sponsor

Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$65,099 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

40% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Health and Human Services" section, p. 515-517 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The petty squabbles of the legislative branch. How quaint.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** HRES 889 is a resolution censuring Representative Cory Mills for his alleged misconduct, including physical assault and misrepresentation of his military service. The bill's primary objective is to publicly condemn Mills' behavior and potentially pave the way for further disciplinary action.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution outlines various instances of Mills' alleged wrongdoing, including a domestic violence incident and discrepancies in his financial disclosure statements. It does not propose any changes to existing law but rather serves as a formal rebuke of Mills' actions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary affected party is Representative Cory Mills himself, whose reputation and potential future in politics may be impacted by this censure. Other stakeholders include the House of Representatives, which may face scrutiny for its handling of the situation, and the constituents who elected Mills to office.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a purely pragmatic perspective, this resolution is little more than a symbolic gesture. It will not result in any tangible consequences for Representative Mills or the House of Representatives as a whole. However, it may serve as a minor speed bump for Mills' future ambitions and potentially embolden his opponents.

As someone who has built their fortune on disrupting traditional power structures and exploiting inefficiencies, I must say that this resolution is a perfect example of the legislative branch's ineffectiveness. A true leader would not waste time on such petty squabbles but instead focus on dismantling the regulatory barriers that stifle innovation and progress.

In conclusion, HRES 889 is a non-event from a strategic perspective. It will not impact my business interests or influence the trajectory of our great nation. The real action lies in shaping policy to favor entrepreneurship and free markets – areas where I have invested heavily through my think tanks and lobbying efforts.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a resolution is a type of legislative proposal that expresses the opinion or sentiment of one chamber of Congress. In this case, HRES 889 is a censure resolution aimed at Representative Cory Mills.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this resolution is to formally condemn Representative Cory Mills for his alleged misconduct, including physical assault and domestic violence, as well as potential misrepresentations on his financial disclosure statements and questionable claims about his military service. The resolution seeks to hold Representative Mills accountable for his actions and restore the integrity of the House of Representatives.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This resolution does not propose any changes to existing law but rather serves as a formal rebuke of Representative Mills' behavior. It outlines various incidents and allegations against him, including the alleged assault on February 19, 2025, and his potential misrepresentations regarding his military service.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary affected party is, of course, Representative Cory Mills himself. However, this resolution also impacts the House of Representatives as a whole, as it seeks to maintain the institution's integrity and uphold its standards of conduct. Additionally, the public may be affected by the outcome of this resolution, as it could influence their perception of Congress and its ability to hold its members accountable.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, this resolution would serve as a formal censure of Representative Mills, which could damage his reputation and potentially impact his future in politics. It may also lead to further investigations or disciplinary actions against him. On a broader level, the passage of this resolution could reinforce the importance of accountability within Congress and demonstrate the institution's commitment to upholding its standards of conduct.

Now, I hope that was clear. As we covered in 8th grade civics class, a censure resolution is not the same as an impeachment or expulsion, but rather a formal expression of disapproval. It's essential to understand these distinctions, especially when it comes to holding elected officials accountable for their actions.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, we've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. HRES 889, censuring Representative Cory Mills. Now, I know what you're thinking - "What's the big deal? Just another swamp creature in Washington getting his feathers ruffled." But no, this one's different. This is about accountability, folks. (wink)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to censure Representative Cory Mills for his alleged misconduct, including a domestic violence incident and potential financial disclosure issues. The Democrats are trying to paint him as some kind of villain, but we all know the real motive here - to silence a conservative voice in Congress.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill outlines several instances of Representative Mills' alleged wrongdoing, including the domestic violence incident, which was thoroughly investigated by the Metropolitan Police Department. (Sarcastic tone) Oh, and let's not forget about those "fresh bruises" on the alleged victim's arm - I'm sure that had nothing to do with anything else. The bill also mentions potential financial disclosure issues and questions surrounding his Bronze Star award.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, Representative Mills is the obvious target here, but this bill also affects all of us who value freedom and due process. (Smirk) I mean, think about it - if they can go after Cory Mills like this, what's to stop them from coming for you or me next? The elites in Washington are just trying to consolidate their power and silence any opposition.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If this bill passes, it could set a precedent for future censures and potentially even impeachments. (Dramatic music plays) Can you imagine the chilling effect on free speech and dissenting voices in Congress? It's a slippery slope, folks. We need to stand up against these power-hungry elites and defend our freedom to speak truth to power.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But what about the allegations?" (Wink) Let me tell you, those are just that - allegations. And even if they were true, which I highly doubt, don't we all deserve a fair trial by our peers? This bill is nothing but a kangaroo court, folks.

So, there you have it - HRES 889 in all its glory. A bill designed to silence conservatives and consolidate power in the hands of the elites. We can't let that happen, America. (Patriotic music plays)

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another case of Congressional Theater, where the symptoms are obvious, but the disease is far more insidious.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill, HRES 889, is a masterclass in deflection and misdirection. The main purpose is to censure Representative Cory Mills for his alleged misconduct, including domestic violence, financial impropriety, and fabricating his military record. But let's not be naive – this is just a smokescreen to distract from the real issue: the systemic rot that allows individuals like Mills to thrive in politics.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill is a laundry list of Mills' alleged transgressions, carefully crafted to create a narrative of wrongdoing. But what's missing is any meaningful action or consequence. This is just a symbolic gesture, a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. No changes to existing law are proposed; it's all just a show.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include Mills himself (who will likely suffer no real consequences), his victims (who may finally get some semblance of justice), and the American public (who will be treated to another spectacle of Congressional grandstanding). The stakeholders? Oh, they're the ones who really matter: the politicians, lobbyists, and special interest groups who will use this bill as a prop to further their own agendas.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill will have zero impact on the underlying disease that plagues our politics. It's just another example of "see no evil, hear no evil" – pretend to take action while doing nothing meaningful. The implications are clear: business as usual in Washington, where accountability is a myth and politicians are above the law.

Diagnosis? This bill is suffering from a severe case of **Potemkin Village Syndrome**: all show, no substance. It's a carefully constructed facade designed to conceal the rot within. Treatment? None needed; just more of the same old politics as usual.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**HRES 889: Censuring Representative Cory Mills**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of HRES 889 is to censure Representative Cory Mills for his alleged misconduct, including an incident of domestic violence and potential misrepresentations in his financial disclosure statements. The resolution aims to hold Representative Mills accountable for his actions and to express the House's disapproval of his behavior.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution does not propose any changes to existing law but rather serves as a formal rebuke of Representative Mills' conduct. It outlines several instances of alleged misconduct, including:

* An incident of domestic violence on February 19, 2025, where Representative Mills allegedly assaulted a 27-year-old woman * Potential misrepresentations in his financial disclosure statements * Allegations of threatening to release intimate images and videos of a former romantic partner * Disputes over the veracity of his account of events that led to his receipt of a Bronze Star award

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* Representative Cory Mills, who is the subject of the censure resolution * The House of Representatives, which is taking action to hold Representative Mills accountable for his conduct * The constituents of Representative Mills' district, who may be impacted by their representative's behavior * Women and survivors of domestic violence, who may be affected by the allegations against Representative Mills

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, HRES 889 would:

* Express the House's formal disapproval of Representative Mills' conduct * Potentially damage Representative Mills' reputation and credibility * Set a precedent for holding members of Congress accountable for their personal conduct * Highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability in government

Overall, HRES 889 serves as a formal rebuke of Representative Mills' alleged misconduct and aims to hold him accountable for his actions.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this gnarly bill, HRES 889.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This resolution is all about censuring Representative Cory Mills for some pretty heavy stuff. The main objective is to formally condemn his behavior and call him out for allegedly assaulting a woman, threatening another former partner with revenge porn, and possibly lying about his military service. It's like, the House of Representatives is saying, "Dude, your actions are not cool."

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The resolution doesn't actually change any existing laws, but it does lay out a bunch of reasons why Representative Mills should be censured. It's like a big list of all the ways he allegedly messed up. The key provisions include:

* Allegations of physical assault against a 27-year-old woman * Threats to release nude images and intimate videos of another former partner * Possible misrepresentation of his military service, including a disputed Bronze Star award

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The main affected party is Representative Cory Mills himself. If this resolution passes, it'll be a major blow to his reputation and could potentially lead to further consequences. Other stakeholders include:

* The woman who allegedly was assaulted by Representative Mills * His former romantic partners who claim he threatened them with revenge porn * The House of Representatives as a whole, since this censure would reflect poorly on the institution

**Potential Impact & Implications** If this resolution passes, it'll be a big deal. Censure is like a formal slap on the wrist, but it can still have serious consequences for Representative Mills' career and reputation. It could also set a precedent for how the House of Representatives handles allegations of misconduct against its members.

On the other hand, if the resolution doesn't pass, it might send a message that this kind of behavior is tolerated or swept under the rug. Either way, it's gonna be a wild ride.

Anyway, dude, that's HRES 889 in a nutshell. It's like, a big deal about some serious allegations against Representative Cory Mills. Stay chill, but stay informed, bro!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**HRES 889: Censuring Representative Cory Mills**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of HRES 889 is to censure Representative Cory Mills for his alleged misconduct, including a physical assault on a romantic partner and potential misrepresentations in his financial disclosure statements. The resolution aims to hold Representative Mills accountable for his actions and restore the integrity of the House of Representatives.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The resolution outlines several instances of alleged misconduct by Representative Mills, including:

1. Physical assault on a romantic partner 2. Potential misrepresentations in financial disclosure statements 3. Alleged threats against former partners 4. Disputes over the legitimacy of his Bronze Star award

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

1. Representative Cory Mills, who faces censure for his alleged misconduct 2. The House of Representatives, whose integrity is at stake due to Representative Mills' actions 3. The public, who have a right to know about the conduct of their elected officials

**Potential Impact & Implications:** If passed, HRES 889 would:

1. Censure Representative Cory Mills, potentially damaging his reputation and credibility 2. Set a precedent for holding members of Congress accountable for misconduct 3. Highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability in government

However, it is essential to note that this resolution may also be motivated by partisan politics or personal agendas. The Democratic sponsor, Ms. Clarke of New York, may have received donations from groups or individuals opposed to Representative Mills' policies or actions.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there are no direct financial interests apparent in this resolution, it is possible that some groups or individuals may be backing the censure effort due to their opposition to Representative Mills' views on specific issues. For example:

* The National Organization for Women (NOW) may support the censure due to Representative Mills' alleged history of domestic violence. * The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) may also back the resolution as part of a broader strategy to target vulnerable Republican incumbents.

However, without further information on the sponsor's donors or the involvement of specific interest groups, it is challenging to provide a more detailed analysis.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$65,099

19 donors

PACs

Organizations

$2,900

Committees

Individuals

$62,199

No PAC contributions found

US MARSHALS SERVICE

1 transaction

$2,900

No committee contributions found

LAVINE, JONATHAN

2 transactions

$6,600

BURDEN, CARTER

2 transactions

$6,600

ELLIS, GAREY V

1 transaction

$3,300

GIFFORD, BILLY

1 transaction

$3,300

STEWART, JENNIFER M

1 transaction

$3,300

ANSTED, JEFFREY

1 transaction

$3,300

CHAIT, ERIC

1 transaction

$3,300

GREENFIELD, ELIZABETH

1 transaction

$3,300

MAX, ISRAEL

1 transaction

$3,300

LAVINE, JEANNIE

1 transaction

$3,300

GOTTESMAN, SALLY

1 transaction

$3,300

MANCUSO, SALVATORE

1 transaction

$3,300

CAMPBELL, CHUCK

1 transaction

$2,833

HILZENDAGER, JD

1 transaction

$2,833

PERRY, DANIELLE

1 transaction

$2,833

HAMILTON-GONZALES, SYLVETA

1 transaction

$2,500

DORWART, DAVID

1 transaction

$2,500

MANSHOORY, DAVID

1 transaction

$2,500

Donor Network - Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 41 nodes and 21 connections (52 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $65,099

Top Donors - Rep. Clarke, Yvette D. [D-NY-9]

Showing top 19 donors by contribution amount

1 Org18 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 harmed.

−Defense Contractorsconfidence 0.80
The bill censures Representative Cory Mills and removes him from the Committee on Armed Services, which may reflect negatively on the defense industry due to the representative's past claims of military heroism being disputed (Whereas individuals who served with Representative Cory Mills have called into question the veracity of the account of events which formed the basis of a recommendation that Representative Cory Mills receive an award of a Bronze Star).

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 60%

Pages: 515-517AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns censuring a member of Congress for alleged personal misconduct, whereas the Project 2025 HHS section addresses caregiver strategy, telehealth licensing, contraceptive mandate rules, and related health policy; there is no substantive thematic or policy overlap."

— 483 — Department of Health and Human Services l Readdress the National Strategy to Support Family Caregivers. While in theory the strategy aims to support family members with duties to care for older family members, the plan is overly focused on racial and “LGBTQ+ equity.” The strategy should be examined to establish an efficient plan to support caregivers and their families. There should also be a review of its COVID-19 policies. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (HRSA) l Congress should allow CMS to use the 340B data that HRSA collects rather than having CMS conduct its own survey, especially in view of the U.S. Supreme Court’s American Hospital Association v. Becerra decision.69 The legislation should also create penalties for those who do not respond to HRSA’s data collection. l Legally define the locus of service as where the provider is located during the telehealth visit rather than where the patient is. With such a definition, states could continue to reserve their powers to establish the standards for licensure and scope of practice. The providers could ensure continuity and consistency of care no matter where their patients might move while maintaining the licenses that make the most sense for them. Americans are far more mobile and technologically advanced today than they were when most health care laws were written. Telehealth has become increasingly important, particularly during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. It also has great potential in rural and other areas where there are shortages of health care providers. HRSA’s Office for the Advancement of Telehealth includes a program known as the Licensure Portability Grant Program, which bolsters state efforts to reform licensing laws to maximize telehealth flexibility. HRSA does not have the authority through this office to dictate licensure laws; that power has typically been reserved to the states. However, telehealth across state lines, when permitted, is interstate commerce, which can be regulated by the federal government according to the Constitution. l Restore Trump religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate (also a CMS rule). HHS should rescind, if finalized, the regulation titled “Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” proposed jointly by HHS, Treasury, and Labor.70 This rule proposes to amend Trump-era final rules regarding religious and moral exemptions and accommodations for coverage of certain preventive services under the ACA. Preventive services include contraception, and — 484 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise it appears the proposed rule would change the existing regulations for religious and moral exemptions to the ACA’s contraception mandate. There is no need for further rulemaking that curtails existing exemptions and accommodations. l Require HRSA to use rulemaking to update the women’s preventive services mandate. The contraceptive mandate issued under Obamacare has been the source of years of egregious attacks on many Americans’ religious and moral beliefs. The mandate was issued as part of the women’s preventive services guidelines, which were issued without any rulemaking that involved public notice and an opportunity to comment. Instead, HRSA issued and changed the mandate by simply posting changes to its website. HRSA also started off not requiring coverage of fertility awareness–based methods of family planning, then requiring them, and then removing the requirement without notifying the public. A federal judge recently ruled that this failure to undergo notice and comment in issuing the mandate is unlawful. HRSA should be required to repromulgate any women’s preventive services mandates through the notice and comment process that is compliant with the Administrative Procedures Act. Moreover, since the Obama Administration HRSA entered into long- term contracts with the pro-abortion American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and related entities to serve as an exclusive adviser with respect to the content of this mandate, HRSA has used this arrangement to ignore comments that members of the public were sometimes able to submit in the process, and ACOG has abused its position to attack HHS’s allowance of religious and moral exemptions to the contraceptive mandate. HHS should rescind these contracts and establish an advisory committee that is compliant with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and has members that are committed to women’s preventive services and are not pro-abortion ideologues. l Expand inclusion of fertility awareness–based methods and supplies to family planning in the women’s preventive services mandate. The ACA requires coverage of and prevents insurance plans from imposing any cost-sharing requirements on women who obtain preventive care and screenings as defined by HRSA. In 2016, HHS included “instruction in fertility awareness-based methods” as part of this requirement. However, in December 2021, HHS removed that language from its list without using the notice-and-comment process or giving any rationale, both of which are mandated by the Administrative Procedures Act. In August

Department of Health and Human Services

Minimal

Vector: 59%

Pages: 506-508AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 889 concerns censuring a House member for alleged personal misconduct, while the Project 2025 HHS section addresses abortion policy, transgender coverage, EMTALA enforcement, and related health regulations; there is no substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:government oversightethical conduct

— 474 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise no abortions, preempts no pro-life state laws, and explicitly requires stabilization of the unborn child. HHS should rescind the guidance and end CMS and state agency investigations into cases of alleged refusals to perform abortions. DOJ should agree to eliminate existing injunctions against pro-life states, withdraw its enforcement lawsuits, and in lawsuits against CMS on the guidance agree to injunctions against CMS and withdraw appeals of injunctions. l Reissue a stronger transgender national coverage determination. CMS should repromulgate its 2016 decision that CMS could not issue a National Coverage Determination (NCD) regarding “gender reassignment surgery” for Medicare beneficiaries. In doing so, CMS should acknowledge the growing body of evidence that such interventions are dangerous and acknowledge that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support such coverage in state plans. l Enforce EMTALA. The undeniable reality of abortion is that it does do not always result in a dead baby, and these born-alive babies are left to die. HHS should use EMTALA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act,53 which prohibits disability discrimination, to investigate instances of infants born alive and left untreated in covered hospitals. CMS, OCR, and OIG should be required to follow through on these investigations with specific enforcement actions. HHS should revive a Trump Administration proposed regulation, “Special Responsibilities of Medicare Hospitals in Emergency Cases and Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in Critical Health and Human Service Programs or Activities,”54 to achieve this end. In addition, Congress should pass the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act55 to require that proper medical care be given to infants who survive an abortion and to establish criminal consequences for practitioners who fail to provide such care. l Permanently codify both the Hyde family of amendments and the protections provided by the Weldon Amendment. Congress can accomplish this through legislation such as the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act56 (Hyde) and the Conscience Protection Act57 (Weldon). — 475 — Department of Health and Human Services Radical Redefinition of Sex. On August 4, 2022, HHS published a proposed rule entitled “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities.”58 This rule addresses nondiscrimination provisions of the Affordable Care Act, known as Section 1557, which is enforced by the Office for Civil Rights and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Section 1557 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and sex in covered health programs or activities. Under the proposed rule, sex is redefined: “Discrimination on the basis of sex includes, but is not limited to, discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes; sex characteristics, including intersex traits; pregnancy or related conditions; sexual orientation; and gender identity.”59 In other words, the department proposes to interpret Section 1557 as if it created special privileges for new classes of people, defined in ways that are highly ideological and unscientific. The redefinition of sex to cover gender identity and sexual orientation and pregnancy to cover abortion should be reversed in all HHS and CMS programs as was done under the Trump Administration. This includes the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Low-income families who rely on CHIP should not be coerced, pressured, or otherwise encouraged to embrace this ideologically moti- vated sexualization of their children. However, while the Biden Administration’s Section 1557 regulation should be altered and corrected, the lactation room requirements added in the regulation should either be consistently included in any upcoming Section 1557 rulemaking or be proposed in a new individual rule. COVID-19 Vaccination and Mask Requirements. Health care workers were praised for their self-sacrifice in caring for sick patients at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, but then they were fired if they objected to receiving COVID- 19 vaccines with or without complying with onerous masking requirements and regardless of whether they already had the virus and had gained natural immunity. With the disease being endemic and constantly mutating, vaccines and univer- sal masking in health care facilities do not have appreciable benefits in reducing COVID-19 transmission throughout the community. Moreover, more recent COVID strains pose fewer health risks than the earlier strains, and the pandemic has been declared to be at an end. CMS should: l Announce nonenforcement of the Biden Administration’s COVID-19 vaccination mandate on Medicaid and Medicare hospitals. l Revoke corresponding guidance and regulations. l Refrain from imposing general COVID-19 mask mandates on health care facilities or personnel.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 59%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 889 focuses on censuring a member of Congress for personal misconduct, while the Project 2025 DHS section outlines homeland security priorities such as immigration enforcement and agency reform; there is no substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:accountabilitytransparency

— 168 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, § 101(b)(1), https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ296/PLAW-107publ296.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 2. See, for example, “Elon Musk Slams CISA Censorship Network as ‘Propaganda Platform,’” Kanekoa News, December 28, 2022, https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/elon-musk-slams-cisa-censorship-network (accessed March 14, 2023). 3. H.R. 2680, An Act to Amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for Other Purposes, Public Law No. 89-236, 89th Congress, October 3, 1965, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79- Pg911.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 4. Added to the Immigration and Nationality Act by the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. See H.R. 3610, Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997, Public Law No. 104-208, 104th Congress, September 30, 1996, Division C, https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ208/ PLAW-104publ208.pdf (accessed March 14, 2023). 5. 8 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8 (accessed March 14, 2023). 6. 18 U.S. Code, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18 (accessed March 14, 2023). 7. 5 U.S. Code §§ 551–559, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/part-I/chapter-5/subchapter-II (accessed March 14, 2023). 8. Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Budget Comparison and Adjustments Appropriation and PPA Summary,” in U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. CIS-4, https://www.uscis.gov/ sites/default/files/document/reports/U.S._Citizenship_and_Immigration_Services%E2%80%99_Budget_ Overview_Document_for%20Fiscal_Year_2023.pdf#:~:text=The%20FY%202023%20Budget%20includes%20 %24913.6M%2C%204%2C001%20positions%3B,of%20%24444.1M%20above%20the%20FY%202022%20 President%E2%80%99s%20Budget (accessed March 14, 2023), and Table, “United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Comparison of Budget Authority and Request,” in ibid., p. CIS-5. 9. H.R. 7311, William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, Public Law No. 110-457, 110th Congress, December 23, 2008, § 235, https://www.congress.gov/110/plaws/publ457/PLAW- 110publ457.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 10. Matter of A-B-, Respondent, 27 I&N Dec. 316 (A.G. 2018), https://www.justice.gov/eoir/page/file/1070866/ download (accessed January 18, 2023). 11. Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. 387 (2012), https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/387/ (accessed January 18, 2023). 12. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act [Public Law 93–288; Approved May 22, 1974] [As Amended Through P.L. 117–328, Enacted December 29, 2022], https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ COMPS-2977/pdf/COMPS-2977.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 13. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Budget Overview, Fiscal Year 2023 Congressional Justification, p. FEMA-24, https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Federal%20Emergency%20 Management%20Agency_Remediated.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 14. Report, United States Secret Service: An Agency in Crisis, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives, 114th Congress, December 9, 2015, https://republicans-oversight.house.gov/ wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Oversight-USSS-Report.pdf (accessed January 18, 2023). 15. 5 U.S. Code § 7103, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7103 (accessed March 15, 2023). 16. S. 3418, Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law No. 93-579, 93rd Congress, December 31, 1974, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-88/pdf/STATUTE-88-Pg1896.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 17. H.R. 1428, Judicial Redress Act of 2015, Public Law No. 114-126, 114th Congress, February 24, 2016, https://www. congress.gov/114/plaws/publ126/PLAW-114publ126.pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 18. H.R. 1158, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, Public Law No. 116-93, 116th Congress, December 20, 2019, https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1158 (accessed January 18, 2023). — 169 — Department of Homeland Security 19. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspector General, Management Directive No. 0810.1, June 10, 2004, https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/foia/mgmt_directive_0810_1_the_office_of_inspector_general. pdf (accessed March 15, 2023). 20. H.R. 5005, Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law No. 107-296, 107th Congress, November 25, 2002, https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/house-bill/5005 (accessed January 18, 2023).

Department of Education

Minimal

Vector: 59%

Pages: 365-367AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 889 focuses on censuring a member of Congress for alleged personal misconduct, while the Project 2025 policy addresses Title IX regulations, sex-based data collection, and student loan policies in the Department of Education. There is no substantive thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 332 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise to create and collect data on a new “nonbinary” sex category (in addition to the current “male” or “female” sex categories) and to retire data collection that indi- cates the number of (1) high school–level interscholastic athletics sports in which only male and female students participate, (2) high school–level athletics teams in which only male or female students participate, and (3) participants on high school–level interscholastic athletics sports teams in which only male or only female students participate. These poorly conceived changes are contrary to law, fail to take account of student privacy interests and statutory protections favoring parental rights under the Protection of Pupils Rights Amendment, and jettison longstanding data collections that assist in the enforcement of Title IX. l The new Administration must quickly move to rescind these changes, which add a new “nonbinary” sex category to OCR’S data collection and issue a new CRDC that will collect data directly relevant to OCR’s statutory enforcement authority. Student Assistance General Provisions, Federal Perkins Loan Program, and William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program Final Regulations Effective July 1, 2023, the department promulgated final regulations addressing loan forgiveness under the HEA’s provisions for borrower defense to repayment (“BDR”), closed school loan discharge (“CSLD”), and public service loan forgive- ness (“PSLF”). The regulations also included prohibitions against pre-dispute arbitration agreements and class action waivers for students enrolling in institu- tions participating in Title IV student loan programs. Acting outside of statutory authority, the current Administration has drastically expanded BDR, CSLD, and PSLF loan forgiveness without clear congressional authorization at a tremendous cost to the taxpayers, with estimates ranging from $85.1 to $120 billion. l The new Administration must quickly commence negotiated rulemaking and propose that the department rescind these regulations. l The next Administration should also rescind Dear Colleague Letter (DCL) GEN 22-11 and DCL GEN 22-10 and its letters to accreditation agencies dated July 19, 2022, which are attempts to undercut Florida’s SB 7044, providing universities more flexibility on accreditation. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance (Title IX) With its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published on July 12, 2022, the Biden Education Department seeks to gut the hard-earned rights of women with its changes to the department’s regulations implementing Title IX, which prohibits — 333 — Department of Education discrimination on the basis of sex in educational programs and activities. Instead, the Biden Administration has sought to trample women’s and girls’ athletic oppor- tunities and due process on campus, threaten free speech and religious liberty, and erode parental rights in elementary and secondary education regarding sensitive issues of sex. The new Administration should take the following steps: l Work with Congress to use the earliest available legislative vehicle to prohibit the department from using any appropriations or from otherwise enforcing any final regulations under Title IX promulgated by the department during the prior Administration. l Commence a new agency rulemaking process to rescind the current Administration’s Title IX regulations; restore the Title IX regulations promulgated by then-Secretary Betsy DeVos on May 19, 2020; and define “sex” under Title IX to mean only biological sex recognized at birth. l Work with Congress to amend Title IX to include due process requirements; define “sex” under Title IX to mean only biological sex recognized at birth; and strengthen protections for faith-based educational institutions, programs, and activities. The Trump Administration’s 2020 Title IX regulation protected the founda- tional right to due process for those who are accused of sexual misconduct. The Biden Administration’s proposed change to the interpretation of Title IX disposes of these rights. l The next Administration should move quickly to restore the rights of women and girls and restore due process protections for accused individuals. At the same time, there is no scientific or legal basis for redefining “sex” to “sexual orientation and gender identity” in Title IX. Such a change misrepresents the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Bostock, threatens the American system of federalism, removes important due process protections for students in higher education, and puts girls and women in danger of physical harm. Facilitating social gender transition without parental consent increases the likelihood that children will seek hormone treatments, such as puberty blockers, which are experimental medical interventions. Research has not demonstrated positive effects and long- term outcomes of these treatments, and the unintended side effects are still not fully understood.

Department of Homeland Security

Minimal

Vector: 59%

Pages: 201-204AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"HRES 889 is a resolution to censure a member of Congress for personal misconduct, while the Project 2025 DHS policy focuses on immigration enforcement, border security, and agency restructuring. There is no substantive policy or thematic connection between the two."

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Rep. Clarke, Yvette D.

Magnus White and Safe Streets for Everyone Act of 2026

119/hr/7353

Back to All Bills