District of Columbia Local Funds Act, 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/1077
Last Updated: October 8, 2025

Sponsored by

Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

ID: C001035

Follow the money

The bill

District of Columbia Local Funds Act, 2025

S. 1077, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$73,600 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

61% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 40-42 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

March 17, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another thrilling episode of "Congressional Kabuki Theater"! Let's dissect this appropriations bill, shall we?

**Diagnosis:** Chronic Obfuscation Syndrome (COS) with symptoms of Budgetary Bloat and Egregious Lack of Transparency.

The District of Columbia Local Funds Act, 2025, is a masterclass in legislative doublespeak. This bill is less about funding the nation's capital and more about perpetuating the status quo of bureaucratic inefficiency and fiscal irresponsibility.

**Total Funding Amounts:** A whopping $13.8 billion (yes, billion) is allocated for the District of Columbia's local funds. Because who needs accountability when you can just throw money at a problem?

**Key Programs and Agencies:** The bill allocates funds to various agencies, including the Department of Human Services ($1.4 billion), the Department of Transportation ($434 million), and the Metropolitan Police Department ($533 million). I'm sure these agencies will use their newfound riches wisely... said no one ever.

**Notable Increases or Decreases:** Compared to previous years, this bill shows a 3% increase in overall funding. Because inflation is just an excuse to spend more money on pet projects and bureaucratic overhead.

**Riders and Policy Provisions:** Ah, the fun part! This bill includes riders that restrict the use of funds for certain purposes, such as:

* Prohibiting the use of funds for abortion services (because who needs reproductive rights?) * Restricting the District's ability to implement its own marijuana laws (because federal overreach is always a good idea) * Mandating the creation of a "District of Columbia Local Budget Act" (because more bureaucracy is always better)

**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications:** This bill will, of course, contribute to our nation's ever-growing deficit. But who cares about fiscal responsibility when you can just kick the can down the road?

In conclusion, this appropriations bill is a textbook example of Congressional incompetence. It's a Frankenstein's monster of bureaucratic waste, special interest pandering, and fiscal recklessness. I'm sure the good people of Washington D.C. will be thrilled to know their tax dollars are being used to perpetuate this farce.

**Prescription:** A healthy dose of transparency, accountability, and fiscal responsibility. But let's be real, that's just a pipe dream in our current system.

Related Topics

Federal Budget & AppropriationsState & Local Government AffairsCriminal Justice & Law Enforcement
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$73,600
15 donors
PACs
$1,000
Organizations
$0
Committees
$0
Individuals
$72,600
1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$1,000

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

1
SILBEY, ALEXANDER
1 transaction
$6,600
2
ARNOLD, LAURA
1 transaction
$6,600
3
READ, KURT
2 transactions
$6,600
4
COATES, CHRIS
2 transactions
$6,600
5
CROTTY, THOMAS
2 transactions
$6,600
6
YOUNGMAN, ANDREW
2 transactions
$6,600
7
BUFFALOE, STEPHANIE
2 transactions
$6,600
8
EGGE, LESLIE
2 transactions
$6,600
9
CASSITY, BRENDON
1 transaction
$3,300
10
TURKISH, JASON
1 transaction
$3,300
11
GIORDANO JR, THOMAS J
1 transaction
$3,300
12
BEST, THILO
1 transaction
$3,300
13
ARNOLD, JOHN
1 transaction
$3,300
14
CHISHOLM, ROBERT
1 transaction
$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Van Hollen, Chris [D-MD]

ID: V000128

Top Contributors

10

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jun 3, 2023
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Apr 25, 2024
3
BROE, PATRICK
FOUNDERBROE GROUP
IndividualDENVER, CO
$5,000
Sep 17, 2024
4
BROE, PAULA
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualDENVER, CO
$5,000
Sep 17, 2024
5
FUSTOK, OMAR
SELF EMPLOYEDHEALTHCARE
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Dec 6, 2024
6
HUSAIN, NOMAAN K.
HUSAIN LAWATTORNEY
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Dec 5, 2024
7
HUSAIN, NOMAAN K.
HUSAIN LAWATTORNEY
IndividualHOUSTON, TX
$3,300
Dec 5, 2024
8
JAVED, MOHAMMAD SHAHID
TRUE INSURANCE SOLUTIONSREAL ESTATE
IndividualBEAUMONT, TX
$3,300
Dec 4, 2024
9
JAVED, MOHAMMAD SHAHID
TRUE INSURANCE SOLUTIONSREAL ESTATE
IndividualBEAUMONT, TX
$3,300
Dec 4, 2024
10
JAVED, MUHAMMAD TAHIR
RICELAND HEALTHCARECEO
IndividualBEAUMONT, TX
$3,300
Dec 4, 2024

Sen. Alsobrooks, Angela D. [D-MD]

ID: A000382

Top Contributors

10

1
FRIENDS OF JHEANELLE WILKINS
COMSILVER SPRING, MD
$500
Sep 30, 2023
2
FRIENDS OF DIANA FENNELL
COMBRENTWOOD, MD
$250
Sep 21, 2023
3
FRIENDS OF MAHASIN AMIN
COMFORT WASHINGTON, MD
$110
Aug 22, 2023
4
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$3,300
Dec 13, 2023
5
LAKEWOOD HEALTHCARE ASSOC LLC
OrganizationWOODBINE, MD
$3,300
Sep 7, 2023
6
TYSON PROJECT MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$2,500
Jun 25, 2023
7
MASTER PRODUCTIONS, LLC.
OrganizationBOWIE, MD
$250
Sep 14, 2023
8
ADOLPH, GWENDOLYN
NOT EMPLOYEDNOT EMPLOYED
IndividualNEW ROCHELLE, NY
$6,600
Oct 23, 2023
9
THOMAS, TORI
IndividualMCLEAN, VA
$5,800
Aug 2, 2024
10
JAMAR, STEVEN
IndividualCOLUMBIA, MD
$3,700
Oct 23, 2024

Sen. Murray, Patty [D-WA]

ID: M001111

Top Contributors

10

1
SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE
OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA
$3,300
Oct 26, 2023
2
SAN PABLO LYTTON TRIBE
OrganizationSAN PABLO, CA
$3,300
Oct 26, 2023
3
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE
OrganizationPORT ANGELES, WA
$3,300
Mar 30, 2023
4
LOWER ELWHA KLALLAM TRIBE
OrganizationPORT ANGELES, WA
$3,300
Mar 30, 2023
5
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$3,300
Sep 22, 2023
6
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
OrganizationMARICOPA, AZ
$2,500
Nov 13, 2024
7
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
OrganizationTACOMA, WA
$2,500
Feb 22, 2024
8
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
OrganizationTACOMA, WA
$2,500
Sep 30, 2024
9
YAKAMA NATION
OrganizationSEATTLE, WA
$2,000
Oct 11, 2024
10
SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE
OrganizationSISSETON, SD
$2,000
Jun 30, 2024

Sen. Warner, Mark R. [D-VA]

ID: W000805

Top Contributors

10

1
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE, LLC
OrganizationROANOKE, VA
$5,300
Sep 25, 2024
2
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationDURANT, OK
$600
Sep 28, 2023
3
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationDURANT, OK
$400
Sep 28, 2023
4
DEKKER, DAVID T.
PILLSBURYVICE CHAIR
IndividualBETHESDA, MD
$9,900
Dec 31, 2024
5
TULL, THOMAS
TULCOCEO
IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA
$6,000
Nov 21, 2024
6
SWARTZ, SUSAN
SELF EMPLOYEDARTIST
IndividualPARK CITY, UT
$3,300
Jul 31, 2023
7
MATNEY, JOHN
RAPOCA ENERGY COMPANYPARTNER
IndividualBRISTOL, VA
$3,300
Aug 29, 2023
8
MILLONES, PETER
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC.ATTORNEY
IndividualDARIEN, CT
$3,300
Sep 29, 2023
9
MATNEY, JUSTIN K
SELF EMPLOYEDBUSINESS OWNER
IndividualBRISTOL, VA
$3,300
Aug 29, 2023
10
MATNEY, JOHN
RAPOCA ENERGY COMPANYPARTNER
IndividualBRISTOL, VA
$3,300
Aug 29, 2023

Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

ID: K000384

Top Contributors

10

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$2,300
Jun 18, 2024
2
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$1,000
Jun 26, 2023
3
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA
$1,000
Jun 18, 2024
4
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jun 25, 2024
5
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$1,000
Jun 18, 2024
6
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
OrganizationDURANT, OK
$1,000
Oct 15, 2024
7
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$1,000
Dec 29, 2023
8
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$600
Oct 25, 2023
9
STONEHALL FARM
OrganizationTHE PLAINS, VA
$500
Jun 30, 2024
10
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$400
Oct 25, 2023

Sen. Kim, Andy [D-NJ]

ID: K000394

Top Contributors

10

1
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$6,600
Sep 11, 2024
2
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$3,300
Sep 30, 2024
3
JSTREETPAC
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Feb 15, 2024
4
JSTREETPAC
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$1,000
Feb 15, 2024
5
JSTREETPAC
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Jan 11, 2024
6
COUNCIL FOR A LIVABLE WORLD
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$500
Oct 11, 2023
7
GIVE CHANCES
OrganizationNORTHVALE, NJ
$300
Jul 10, 2023
8
GIVE CHANCES
OrganizationNORTHVALE, NJ
$300
Apr 26, 2023
9
JSTREETPAC
CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD
OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC
$250
Feb 15, 2024
10
KIM, ANTHONY
CENTERVIEW PARTNERSFINANCE
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$6,600
Sep 30, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 52 nodes and 36 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $101,960

Top Donors - Sen. Collins, Susan M. [R-ME]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC14 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.

Introduction

Moderate60.6%
Pages: 40-42

— 7 — Foreword Instead, party leaders negotiate one multitrillion-dollar spending bill—several thousand pages long—and then vote on it before anyone, literally, has had a chance to read it. Debate time is restricted. Amendments are prohibited. And all of this is backed up against a midnight deadline when the previous “omnibus” spending bill will run out and the federal government “shuts down.” This process is not designed to empower 330 million American citizens and their elected representatives, but rather to empower the party elites secretly nego- tiating without any public scrutiny or oversight. In the end, congressional leaders’ behavior and incentives here are no differ- ent from those of global elites insulating policy decisions—over the climate, trade, public health, you name it—from the sovereignty of national electorates. Public scrutiny and democratic accountability make life harder for policymakers—so they skirt it. It’s not dysfunction; it’s corruption. And despite its gaudy price tag, the federal budget is not even close to the worst example of this corruption. That distinction belongs to the “Administrative State,” the dismantling of which must a top priority for the next conservative President. The term Administrative State refers to the policymaking work done by the bureaucracies of all the federal government’s departments, agencies, and millions of employees. Under Article I of the Constitution, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” That is, federal law is enacted only by elected legislators in both houses of Congress. This exclusive authority was part of the Framers’ doctrine of “separated powers.” They not only split the federal government’s legislative, executive, and judicial powers into different branches. They also gave each branch checks over the others. Under our Constitution, the legislative branch—Congress—is far and away the most powerful and, correspondingly, the most accountable to the people. In recent decades, members of the House and Senate discovered that if they give away that power to the Article II branch of government, they can also deny responsi- bility for its actions. So today in Washington, most policy is no longer set by Congress at all, but by the Administrative State. Given the choice between being powerful but vulnerable or irrelevant but famous, most Members of Congress have chosen the latter. Congress passes intentionally vague laws that delegate decision-making over a given issue to a federal agency. That agency’s bureaucrats—not just unelected but seemingly un-fireable—then leap at the chance to fill the vacuum created by Congress’s preening cowardice. The federal government is growing larger and less constitutionally accountable—even to the President—every year. l A combination of elected and unelected bureaucrats at the Environmental Protection Agency quietly strangles domestic energy production through difficult-to-understand rulemaking processes;

Introduction

Moderate60.6%
Pages: 40-42

— 7 — Foreword Instead, party leaders negotiate one multitrillion-dollar spending bill—several thousand pages long—and then vote on it before anyone, literally, has had a chance to read it. Debate time is restricted. Amendments are prohibited. And all of this is backed up against a midnight deadline when the previous “omnibus” spending bill will run out and the federal government “shuts down.” This process is not designed to empower 330 million American citizens and their elected representatives, but rather to empower the party elites secretly nego- tiating without any public scrutiny or oversight. In the end, congressional leaders’ behavior and incentives here are no differ- ent from those of global elites insulating policy decisions—over the climate, trade, public health, you name it—from the sovereignty of national electorates. Public scrutiny and democratic accountability make life harder for policymakers—so they skirt it. It’s not dysfunction; it’s corruption. And despite its gaudy price tag, the federal budget is not even close to the worst example of this corruption. That distinction belongs to the “Administrative State,” the dismantling of which must a top priority for the next conservative President. The term Administrative State refers to the policymaking work done by the bureaucracies of all the federal government’s departments, agencies, and millions of employees. Under Article I of the Constitution, “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.” That is, federal law is enacted only by elected legislators in both houses of Congress. This exclusive authority was part of the Framers’ doctrine of “separated powers.” They not only split the federal government’s legislative, executive, and judicial powers into different branches. They also gave each branch checks over the others. Under our Constitution, the legislative branch—Congress—is far and away the most powerful and, correspondingly, the most accountable to the people. In recent decades, members of the House and Senate discovered that if they give away that power to the Article II branch of government, they can also deny responsi- bility for its actions. So today in Washington, most policy is no longer set by Congress at all, but by the Administrative State. Given the choice between being powerful but vulnerable or irrelevant but famous, most Members of Congress have chosen the latter. Congress passes intentionally vague laws that delegate decision-making over a given issue to a federal agency. That agency’s bureaucrats—not just unelected but seemingly un-fireable—then leap at the chance to fill the vacuum created by Congress’s preening cowardice. The federal government is growing larger and less constitutionally accountable—even to the President—every year. l A combination of elected and unelected bureaucrats at the Environmental Protection Agency quietly strangles domestic energy production through difficult-to-understand rulemaking processes; — 8 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l Bureaucrats at the Department of Homeland Security, following the lead of a feckless Administration, order border and immigration enforcement agencies to help migrants criminally enter our country with impunity; l Bureaucrats at the Department of Education inject racist, anti-American, ahistorical propaganda into America’s classrooms; l Bureaucrats at the Department of Justice force school districts to undermine girls’ sports and parents’ rights to satisfy transgender extremists; l Woke bureaucrats at the Pentagon force troops to attend “training” seminars about “white privilege”; and l Bureaucrats at the State Department infuse U.S. foreign aid programs with woke extremism about “intersectionality” and abortion.3 Unaccountable federal spending is the secret lifeblood of the Great Awokening. Nearly every power center held by the Left is funded or supported, one way or another, through the bureaucracy by Congress. Colleges and school districts are funded by tax dollars. The Administrative State holds 100 percent of its power at the sufferance of Congress, and its insulation from presidential discipline is an unconstitutional fairy tale spun by the Washington Establishment to protect its turf. Members of Congress shield themselves from constitutional accountability often when the White House allows them to get away with it. Cultural institutions like public libraries and public health agencies are only as “independent” from public accountability as elected officials and voters permit. Let’s be clear: The most egregious regulations promulgated by the current Administration come from one place: the Oval Office. The President cannot hide behind the agencies; as his many executive orders make clear, his is the respon- sibility for the regulations that threaten American communities, schools, and families. A conservative President must move swiftly to do away with these vast abuses of presidential power and remove the career and political bureaucrats who fuel it. Properly considered, restoring fiscal limits and constitutional accountability to the federal government is a continuation of restoring national sovereignty to the American people. In foreign affairs, global strategy, federal budgeting and pol- icymaking, the same pattern emerges again and again. Ruling elites slash and tear at restrictions and accountability placed on them. They centralize power up and away from the American people: to supra-national treaties and organizations, to left-wing “experts,” to sight-unseen all-or-nothing legislating, to the unelected career bureaucrats of the Administrative State.

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills