The bill
Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act
S. 1341, 119th Congress β read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
Sponsored by
Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO]
ID: H000273
Follow the money
The bill
S. 1341, 119th Congress β read as touching Pipelines & Energy Infrastructure.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
23 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held.
December 1, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another exercise in legislative futility, courtesy of Senators Hickenlooper and Bennet. Let's dissect this farce, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Sarvis Creek Wilderness Completion Act is a masterclass in bureaucratic doublespeak. Ostensibly, it aims to add 6,817 acres to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness in Colorado, because who doesn't love more wilderness? In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to appease environmental groups and Native American tribes while allowing for continued exploitation of natural resources.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends the Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993 by adding the aforementioned land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness. It also includes provisions for tribal rights, traditional uses, and administrative procedures for fire, insect, and disease control. Oh, and let's not forget the obligatory "nothing in this Act affects treaty rights" clause β a classic example of legislative CYA.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects are involved:
* Environmental groups: They'll get to claim victory for expanding wilderness areas, while ignoring the loopholes that allow for continued resource extraction. * Native American tribes: They'll be granted access to the land for "traditional, religious, and cultural purposes," which is code for "we'll let you have some symbolic control over your ancestral lands." * Logging and mining interests: Don't worry, they're still free to exploit the surrounding areas, as long as they follow the proper bureaucratic procedures. * Taxpayers: They'll foot the bill for this exercise in legislative theater.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a prime example of "greenwashing" β a PR stunt designed to make politicians look environmentally conscious while doing nothing to address the underlying issues. The added land will likely be managed by the same bureaucrats who've been mismanaging our national forests for decades. Expect more of the same: token environmental gestures, continued resource exploitation, and a healthy dose of bureaucratic inefficiency.
In conclusion, this bill is a symptom of a larger disease β the chronic inability of politicians to address real problems while pretending to care about the environment. It's a cynical exercise in legislative posturing, designed to appease special interests and garner votes. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than diagnose this terminal case of bureaucratic idiocy.
Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: B001267
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 38 nodes and 26 connections (58 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $72,400
Showing top 16 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 harmed.
Section 3(a) adds land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness, which may limit access for oil and gas pipelines or other energy infrastructure projects in the area.
Section 3(a) adds land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness, potentially restricting areas available for oil and gas exploration and production.
The addition of land to the Sarvis Creek Wilderness in Section 3(a) may reduce areas available for construction and engineering projects, such as road building or infrastructure development.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Hickenlooper, John W. [D-CO])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.