The bill
Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026
S. 2257, 119th Congress β read as touching Telecommunications.
Sponsored by
Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]
ID: M001190
Follow the money
The bill
S. 2257, 119th Congress β read as touching Telecommunications.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 113.
July 9, 2025
π Current Status
Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
The Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026 - a bill that's about as exciting as a root canal without anesthesia. Let's get down to business and dissect this mess.
**Total Funding Amounts and Budget Allocations**
The total funding for the Legislative Branch comes out to be around $5.3 billion. Because, of course, our esteemed lawmakers need more money to "serve" us. The largest chunk goes to the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper ($130 million), followed by the Senate's Salaries, Officers, and Employees ($314 million). I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that these are the people responsible for "securing" the Senate.
**Key Programs and Agencies Receiving Funds**
The usual suspects get their fair share of taxpayer dollars: the Vice President's office ($3.2 million), the President Pro Tempore's office ($904,000), and the Majority and Minority Leaders' offices (a combined $6.7 million). The Committee on Appropriations gets a whopping $22.7 million, because who doesn't love a good committee? And let's not forget the Office of the Chaplain, which receives a paltry $699,000 to "spiritually guide" our lawmakers.
**Notable Increases or Decreases from Previous Years**
Compared to last year's budget, this bill increases funding for the Senate's Salaries, Officers, and Employees by 3.5% ($10 million). I'm sure it has nothing to do with inflation or the fact that they need more money to "keep up appearances." The Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper also gets a 2.5% increase ($3.2 million), because security is always a top priority... unless you're talking about securing our borders.
**Riders or Policy Provisions Attached to Funding**
The bill includes a lovely provision that requires any unexpended balances in Senators' official personnel and office expense accounts to be returned to the Treasury for deficit reduction. How noble of them! Too bad it's just a drop in the bucket compared to the overall budget. It's like trying to put out a forest fire with a squirt gun.
**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications**
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this bill will increase the federal deficit by $2.5 billion over the next five years. But hey, who's counting? It's not like we're already drowning in debt or anything. The real kicker is that this bill doesn't even address the underlying issues of waste and inefficiency within the Legislative Branch. It's just more of the same old, same old - throwing money at problems instead of actually solving them.
In conclusion, this appropriations bill is a perfect example of the disease that plagues our government: a complete lack of accountability, transparency, and fiscal responsibility. It's a never-ending cycle of waste, corruption, and self-serving interests. But hey, what do I know? I
Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]
Congress 119 β’ 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 73 nodes and 30 connections (86 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $78,800
Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 harmed.
Section 208 prohibits using funds to acquire telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation, imposing a restriction on procurement that harms these companies and the broader telecommunications industry reliant on such equipment.
Section 210 requires agencies to coordinate with food service providers to eliminate or reduce plastic waste, including plastic straws, and explore biodegradable items, which imposes regulatory costs on plastics manufacturers and reduces demand for single-use plastics.
Section 209(a) prohibits using funds to maintain or establish a computer network unless it blocks viewing, downloading, and exchanging of pornography, which could increase compliance costs for media companies that operate networks or platforms hosting such content.
For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022βpresent cycles. Donations are not proof of intent β they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.
A resolution to constitute the majority party's membership on certain committees for the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress, or until their successors are chosen.
Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to ''Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications''; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
Taxpayer Funds Oversight and Accountability Act