Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/2257
Last Updated: July 11, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]

ID: M001190

Follow the money

The bill

Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026

S. 2257, 119th Congress — read as touching Telecommunications.

The sponsor

Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$78,800 raised

30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Executive Office of the President of the United States" section, p. 96-98 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 113.

July 9, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

The Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026 - a bill that's about as exciting as a root canal without anesthesia. Let's get down to business and dissect this mess.

**Total Funding Amounts and Budget Allocations**

The total funding for the Legislative Branch comes out to be around $5.3 billion. Because, of course, our esteemed lawmakers need more money to "serve" us. The largest chunk goes to the Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper ($130 million), followed by the Senate's Salaries, Officers, and Employees ($314 million). I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that these are the people responsible for "securing" the Senate.

**Key Programs and Agencies Receiving Funds**

The usual suspects get their fair share of taxpayer dollars: the Vice President's office ($3.2 million), the President Pro Tempore's office ($904,000), and the Majority and Minority Leaders' offices (a combined $6.7 million). The Committee on Appropriations gets a whopping $22.7 million, because who doesn't love a good committee? And let's not forget the Office of the Chaplain, which receives a paltry $699,000 to "spiritually guide" our lawmakers.

**Notable Increases or Decreases from Previous Years**

Compared to last year's budget, this bill increases funding for the Senate's Salaries, Officers, and Employees by 3.5% ($10 million). I'm sure it has nothing to do with inflation or the fact that they need more money to "keep up appearances." The Office of the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper also gets a 2.5% increase ($3.2 million), because security is always a top priority... unless you're talking about securing our borders.

**Riders or Policy Provisions Attached to Funding**

The bill includes a lovely provision that requires any unexpended balances in Senators' official personnel and office expense accounts to be returned to the Treasury for deficit reduction. How noble of them! Too bad it's just a drop in the bucket compared to the overall budget. It's like trying to put out a forest fire with a squirt gun.

**Fiscal Impact and Deficit Implications**

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this bill will increase the federal deficit by $2.5 billion over the next five years. But hey, who's counting? It's not like we're already drowning in debt or anything. The real kicker is that this bill doesn't even address the underlying issues of waste and inefficiency within the Legislative Branch. It's just more of the same old, same old - throwing money at problems instead of actually solving them.

In conclusion, this appropriations bill is a perfect example of the disease that plagues our government: a complete lack of accountability, transparency, and fiscal responsibility. It's a never-ending cycle of waste, corruption, and self-serving interests. But hey, what do I know? I

Related Topics

Federal Budget & AppropriationsCongressional Rules & ProceduresExecutive Branch Oversight
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$432,800
204 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$66,900
Committees
$0
Individuals
$365,900

No PAC contributions found

1
HABEMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE INDIAN TRIBE
2 transactions
$6,600
2
MIAMI TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
2 transactions
$6,600
3
SNOQUALMIE TRIBE
2 transactions
$6,600
4
POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS
2 transactions
$6,000
5
MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS
2 transactions
$5,000
6
MUSCOGEE CREEK NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
7
THE CHICKASAW NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
8
OTOE MISSOURIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$3,000
9
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$3,000
10
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,900
11
AK-CHIN INDIAN COMMUNITY
1 transaction
$2,900
12
PALA BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,900
13
THE UTE INDIAN TRIBE
1 transaction
$2,800
14
SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$2,500
15
SYCUAN BAND OF THE KUMEYAAY NATION
1 transaction
$2,500
16
ONEIDA NATION
1 transaction
$2,000
17
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS
2 transactions
$2,000
18
MORONGO BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,500
19
SENECA NATION OF INDIANS
1 transaction
$1,000
20
CHOCTAW NATION
1 transaction
$500

No committee contributions found

1
KIMBER, SHELDON
4 transactions
$12,000
2
GARVER, C M
3 transactions
$10,300
3
NAGEL, RICK R. MR.
2 transactions
$8,300
4
GAYLOR, JOHN R.
2 transactions
$7,100
5
MILLER, JEFFREY
2 transactions
$7,100
6
BUERGER, ALAN
2 transactions
$6,600
7
CROTTY, THOMAS
2 transactions
$6,600
8
EVANS, ROGER
2 transactions
$6,600
9
MCCALL, CHARLES
2 transactions
$6,600
10
MCCALL, CHARLES A.
2 transactions
$6,600
11
MCCALL, CLAY
2 transactions
$6,600
12
MCDAVID, CARLY
2 transactions
$6,600
13
MCKNIGHT, DREW
2 transactions
$6,600
14
PEMBERTON, LEWIS PECK
2 transactions
$6,600
15
STONE, SHELDON
2 transactions
$6,600
16
WALTON, S. ROBSON
2 transactions
$6,600
17
WEBB, DAN
2 transactions
$6,600
18
WEINER, KANE
2 transactions
$6,600
19
GRAY, C. BOYDEN
2 transactions
$5,000
20
MARTIN, JOHN
2 transactions
$5,000
21
MACKINNON, JEFFREY M MR.
3 transactions
$3,500
22
BURRAGE, STEVE MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
23
BURRAGE, STEVEN MARK
1 transaction
$3,300
24
FIELDS, JACK
1 transaction
$3,300
25
HOLLAND, LUCAS
1 transaction
$3,300
26
LANCE, BILL G. MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
27
MAYER, TONY
1 transaction
$3,300
28
MCCALL, CARSON HAYS
1 transaction
$3,300
29
MCCALL, CHARLES IV
1 transaction
$3,300
30
MCKEE, JACK MR.
1 transaction
$3,300
31
NIXON, DENNIS
1 transaction
$3,300
32
NORMAN, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
33
OSTER, ROBERT
1 transaction
$3,300
34
LAZARSKI, ANTHONY J. MR.
2 transactions
$3,000
35
BODE, JOHN MR.
1 transaction
$2,900
36
CAI, PING
1 transaction
$2,900
37
DU, ZHENG
1 transaction
$2,900
38
FLATT, RAYMOND
1 transaction
$2,900
39
FLINN, ELDON MR.
1 transaction
$2,900
40
FLOWERS, CHRIS MR.
1 transaction
$2,900
41
GUO, MEIRONG
1 transaction
$2,900
42
HATTON, DAVID DWAYNE MR.
1 transaction
$2,900
43
LEVINSON, LEE I. MR.
1 transaction
$2,900
44
LIU, HUIYING
1 transaction
$2,900
45
NI, YUN FENG
1 transaction
$2,900
46
TAYLOR, BRUCE
1 transaction
$2,900
47
WILEY, LAWRENCE
1 transaction
$2,900
48
ZHOU, YUAN
1 transaction
$2,900
49
BUERGE, ROBIN
1 transaction
$2,500
50
CURTIS, CHANDA
1 transaction
$2,500
51
DERDERIAN, JAMES MR.
1 transaction
$2,500
52
GEDULDIG, SAM MR.
1 transaction
$2,500
53
HAUCK, MEGAN
1 transaction
$2,500
54
JOHNSON, H. FISK
1 transaction
$2,500
55
RICHARDS, JIM
1 transaction
$2,500
56
RITTER, RYAN MR.
1 transaction
$2,500
57
SMITH, LARRY
1 transaction
$2,500
58
STERNFELS, ROBERT
1 transaction
$2,500
59
STIPICEVIC, JOHN
1 transaction
$2,500
60
FIELD, MARSHALL
1 transaction
$2,000
61
FORBES, ANDREW
1 transaction
$2,000
62
GUIDA, ALFONSO MR. JR.
2 transactions
$2,000
63
JOYCE, SEAN
2 transactions
$2,000
64
LINK, TUCKER
1 transaction
$2,000
65
MARSHALL, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$2,000
66
POPP, MONICA
2 transactions
$2,000
67
SHUMWAY, CHAD
1 transaction
$2,000
68
ARNDT, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$1,500
69
BARKER, GUY
1 transaction
$1,500
70
BOLIN, BILL
1 transaction
$1,500
71
BRAVO, MATTHEW
1 transaction
$1,500
72
GAILEY, MARK M. MR.
1 transaction
$1,500
73
HILER, JONATHAN
2 transactions
$1,500
74
HIRSHEY, KEN
1 transaction
$1,500
75
JACKSON, RYAN
1 transaction
$1,500
76
MAGALLANES, NICOLAS
1 transaction
$1,500
77
PAC, SNC
1 transaction
$1,500
78
WHITE, JOEL MR.
1 transaction
$1,500
79
WOLF, JOSEPH
1 transaction
$1,500
80
WRIGHT, ALLEN
1 transaction
$1,500
81
BARBER, SHONNA
2 transactions
$1,000
82
BARBY, ALLEN
1 transaction
$1,000
83
BEALL, DONALD R.
1 transaction
$1,000
84
BUCKALEW, ADAM L
1 transaction
$1,000
85
CALLAHAN, KENNETH III
1 transaction
$1,000
86
CANTRELL, MIKE
1 transaction
$1,000
87
CARON, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$1,000
88
COOPER, JILL
1 transaction
$1,000
89
COPELAND, GERRET VANSWERINGEN JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
90
COX, ROBERT MR. AND MR
1 transaction
$1,000
91
DOWNS, RAISSA
1 transaction
$1,000
92
FOWLER, KATHY
1 transaction
$1,000
93
GUNN, ASHLEY
1 transaction
$1,000
94
HARROZ, JOE
1 transaction
$1,000
95
HATZIS, LUKE
1 transaction
$1,000
96
HENKE, FRAZIER
1 transaction
$1,000
97
HODGSON, CHRIS
1 transaction
$1,000
98
KING, ANDREW
1 transaction
$1,000
99
LAMB, MONICA
1 transaction
$1,000
100
LASS, CON
1 transaction
$1,000
101
LOPER, GINGER
2 transactions
$1,000
102
LUCAS, JANE
1 transaction
$1,000
103
MCDONALD, MIKE
1 transaction
$1,000
104
MCDOUGALL, CHAD T. MR.
1 transaction
$1,000
105
MILLER, BRIAN
1 transaction
$1,000
106
NIELSEN, MIKE
2 transactions
$1,000
107
OSBORN, WILLIAM MR. AND MR
1 transaction
$1,000
108
PATAKI, TIM
1 transaction
$1,000
109
PAUP, SPIVEY
1 transaction
$1,000
110
PEARSON, DUANNE
1 transaction
$1,000
111
POLAK, ERIN
1 transaction
$1,000
112
POTEET, PAUL
1 transaction
$1,000
113
RADY, PAUL
1 transaction
$1,000
114
REID, RANDI
2 transactions
$1,000
115
RIPLINGER, SCOTT
1 transaction
$1,000
116
SCOFIELD, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
117
SHAW, RHOD
1 transaction
$1,000
118
STEIN, MARTIN
1 transaction
$1,000
119
STRUNK, JEFFREY
1 transaction
$1,000
120
SZAFRANSKI, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
121
THROCKMORTON, CHRIS
1 transaction
$1,000
122
TRYSLA, TIM
1 transaction
$1,000
123
WILLCOX, DARREN
1 transaction
$1,000
124
WITCHEY, DEBBIE
1 transaction
$1,000
125
ALSPACH, ROBERT
1 transaction
$500
126
BAKER, GEORGE D MR.
1 transaction
$500
127
BARTLETT, DOYLE
1 transaction
$500
128
BILL, TERESA
1 transaction
$500
129
BRAATEN, TYLER
1 transaction
$500
130
BRANDT, KIMBERLY
1 transaction
$500
131
BUCKALEW, ADAM L.
1 transaction
$500
132
CARAM, GEORGE
1 transaction
$500
133
CARD, BRAD
1 transaction
$500
134
CATANZARO, MIKE
1 transaction
$500
135
CHOE, YONG
1 transaction
$500
136
COLE, KELLY
1 transaction
$500
137
DELGADO, MARTIN
1 transaction
$500
138
DEMERITT, DARYN
1 transaction
$500
139
DIAZ DE LA RUBIO, TOMAS
1 transaction
$500
140
DILLINGHAM, DON
1 transaction
$500
141
DOBIAS, MATTHEW
1 transaction
$500
142
EDATTEL, PAUL
1 transaction
$500
143
FINCH, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
144
HALITI, BESNIK
1 transaction
$500
145
HALL, HUNTER
1 transaction
$500
146
HAMBY, JAMES
1 transaction
$500
147
HAWKS, T.A.
1 transaction
$500
148
HEAFITZ, JONATHAN
1 transaction
$500
149
HENRY, VALERIE
1 transaction
$500
150
HUNT, HOLLYE
1 transaction
$500
151
IRIZARRY, STEVEN
1 transaction
$500
152
KEATING, FRANK
1 transaction
$500
153
KEISER, ANDREW
1 transaction
$500
154
LAMP, DAVE
1 transaction
$500
155
LANAGAN, LINDSAY
1 transaction
$500
156
LEPORE, JOHN
1 transaction
$500
157
LONG, CHARLES
1 transaction
$500
158
LOUGHRAN, TIM
1 transaction
$500
159
LUKAWSKI, JENNIFER MS.
1 transaction
$500
160
MANDEL, JESSICA
1 transaction
$500
161
MARSHALL, HAZEN
1 transaction
$500
162
MAY, ELIZABETH
1 transaction
$500
163
MCELROY, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
164
MERCER, K. ELAINE
1 transaction
$500
165
MOOREHEAD, PAUL MR.
1 transaction
$500
166
MURRAY, JOSEPH
1 transaction
$500
167
NELSON, TYLER MR.
1 transaction
$500
168
PAYNE, WILLIAM II
1 transaction
$500
169
POWELL, ROBERT
1 transaction
$500
170
ROSS, THOMAS
1 transaction
$500
171
SANDGREN, MATT
1 transaction
$500
172
SCHWARTZ, DOUG
1 transaction
$500
173
SMERUD, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500
174
SMITH, WILL
1 transaction
$500
175
SPERLING, ANDREW
1 transaction
$500
176
SPIVEY, LAWRENCE
1 transaction
$500
177
THORNHILL, BARRETT
1 transaction
$500
178
TRYON, WARREN
1 transaction
$500
179
TYLER, TONY J.
1 transaction
$500
180
WARNER, FREDERIC C MR. JR
1 transaction
$500
181
WELLS, BRYAN
1 transaction
$500
182
WILLIAMS, DENNIS
1 transaction
$500

Donor Network - Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 72 nodes and 86 connections

Total contributions: $86

Top Donors - Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK]

Showing top 22 donors by contribution amount

20 Orgs2 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 3 harmed.

  • −Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.90

    Section 208 prohibits using funds to acquire telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation, imposing a restriction on procurement that harms these companies and the broader telecommunications industry reliant on such equipment.

  • Section 210 requires agencies to coordinate with food service providers to eliminate or reduce plastic waste, including plastic straws, and explore biodegradable items, which imposes regulatory costs on plastics manufacturers and reduces demand for single-use plastics.

  • Section 209(a) prohibits using funds to maintain or establish a computer network unless it blocks viewing, downloading, and exchanging of pornography, which could increase compliance costs for media companies that operate networks or platforms hosting such content.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Mullin, Markwayne [R-OK])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Executive Office of the President of the United States

Weak
Vector: 64%
Pages: 96-98AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill provides funding for the Office of the Vice President but does not contain provisions that enhance the VP's role as a presidential emissary to the Senate or strengthen interagency policy coordination as outlined in Project 2025. The alignment is therefore only tangential, relating to general VP office support rather than the specific policy objectives."

Key themes:Vice President Office fundingLegislative-executive liaisonAppropriations for executive functions

— 64 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise Senate, often serves as a presidential emissary to the Senate and thus can be espe- cially helpful in securing passage of the President’s legislative agenda. To the extent that he or she desires, a Vice President can have a direct role in shaping Administration policy. A Vice President who regularly attends meetings and disperses staff across the interagency and policy councils is a Vice President whose voice will be heard. AUTHOR’S NOTE: Special thanks to those who contributed to this chapter: Stephen Billy, Scott Pace, Casey Mulligan, Edie Heipel, Mike Duffey, Vance Ginn, Iain Murray, Laura Cunliffe, Mario Loyola, Anthony Campau, Paige Agostin, Molly Sikes, Paul Ray, Kenneth A. Klukowski, Michael Anton, Robert Greenway, Valerie Huber, James Rockas, Paul Winfree, Aaron Hedlund, Brian McCormack, David Legates, Art Kleinschmidt, Paul Larkin, Kayla Tonnessen, Jeffrey B. Clark, Jonathan Wolfson, and Bob Burkett. — 65 — Executive Office of the President of the United States ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articleii#section1 (accessed January 30, 2023). 2. James Madison, The Federalist Papers No. 47, January 30, 1788, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/ Madison/01-10-02-0266 (accessed January 30, 2023). 3. 31 U.S.C. §§ 1341(a)(1)(A) and 1341(a)(1)(B), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/1341 (accessed January 30, 2023); § 1342, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/1342 (accessed January 30, 2023); and § 1517(a), https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/1517(a) (accessed January 30, 2023). 4. President William J. Clinton, Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” September 30, 1993, in Federal Register, Vol. 58, No. 190 (October 4, 1993), pp. 51735–51744, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ FR-1993-10-04/pdf/FR-1993-10-04.pdf (accessed March 9, 2023). 5. Brent J. McIntosh, General Counsel, Department of the Treasury, and Neomi Rao, Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Memorandum of Agreement, “The Department of the Treasury and the Office of Management and Budget Review of Tax Regulations Under Executive Order 12866,” April 11, 2018, https://home.treasury.gov/sites/default/files/2018-04/04-11%20Signed%20Treasury%20OIRA%20MOA.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 6. See Steven A. Engel, Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, “Extending Regulatory Review Under Executive Order 12866 to Independent Regulatory Agencies,” 43 Op. O.L.C. __ (Oct. 8, 2019), https:// www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opinions/attachments/2020/12/30/2019-10-08-extend-reg-review.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 7. Office of Management and Budget, Circular A-4, “Regulatory Analysis,” September 17, 2003, https:// www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/legacy_drupal_files/omb/circulars/A4/a-4.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 8. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13891, “Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents,” October 9, 2019, in Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 199 (October 15, 2019), pp. 55235– 55238, https://home.treasury.gov/sites/default/files/2018-04/04-11%20Signed%20Treasury%20OIRA%20MOA. pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 9. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” January 30, 2017, in Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 22 (February 3, 20170, pp. 9339–9341, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2017-02-03/pdf/2017-02451.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 10. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13777, “Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,” February 24, 2017, in Federal Register, Vol. 82, No. 39 (March 1, 2017), pp. 12285–12287, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/FR-2017-03-01/pdf/2017-04107.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 11. See note 8, supra. 12. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13892, “Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication,” in Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 199 (October 15, 2019), pp. 55239–55243, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-10-15/pdf/2019-22624.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 13. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13893, “Increasing Government Accountability for Administrative Actions by Reinvigorating Administrative PAYGO,” October 10, 2019, in Federal Register, Vol. 84, No. 200 (October 16, 2019), pp. 55487–55488, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-10-16/pdf/2019-22749. pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 14. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13924, “Regulatory Relief to Support Economic Recovery,” May 19, 2020, in Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 100 (May 22, 2020), pp. 31353–31356, esp. 31355, https://www.govinfo. gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-05-22/pdf/2020-11301.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 15. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13979, “Ensuring Democratic Accountability in Agency Rulemaking,” January 18, 2021, in Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 13 (January 22, 2021), pp. 6813–6815, https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-22/pdf/2021-01644.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023). 16. President Donald J. Trump, Executive Order 13980, “Protecting Americans from Overcriminalization Through Regulatory Reform,” January 18, 2021, in Federal Register, Vol. 86, No. 13 (January 22, 2021), pp. 6817–6820, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2021-01-22/pdf/2021-01645.pdf (accessed January 31, 2023).

Small Business Administration

Minimal
Vector: 64%
Pages: 780-782AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026 focuses solely on funding for the legislative branch and contains no provisions related to the Small Business Administration, small business lending, or any of the policy objectives outlined in the Project 2025 SBA section."

Key themes:no overlapunrelated

— 748 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise loan credit subsidy costs, and miscellaneous program “enhancements” to support small businesses through economic challenges or circumstances. As noted by the Congressional Research Service: Overall, the SBA’s appropriations have ranged from a high of over $761.9 billion in FY2020 to a low of $571.8 million in FY2007. Much of this volatility is due to significant variation in supplemental appropriations for disaster assistance to address economic damages caused by major hurricanes and for SBA lending program enhancements to help small businesses access capital during and immediately following recessions. For example, in FY2020, the SBA received over $760.9 billion in supplemental appropriations to assist small businesses adversely affected by the novel coronavirus (COVID- 19) pandemic.18 The CRS further notes that “[o]verall, since FY2000, appropriations for SBA’s other programs, excluding supplemental appropriations, have increased at a pace that exceeds inflation.”19 In terms of current loan volume, the SBA “reached nearly $43 billion in fund- ing to small businesses, providing more than 62,000 traditional loans through its 7(a), 504, and Microloan lending partners and over 1,200 investments through SBA licensed Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022.”20 The agency’s total budgetary resources for FY 2022 amount to $44.25 billion, which represents 0.4 percent of the FY 2022 U.S. federal budget.21 HISTORY OF MISMANAGEMENT Throughout its history, various SBA programs and practices have generated negative news headlines and scathing Government Accountability Office (GAO) and Inspector General (IG) reports that have centered on mismanagement, lack of competent personnel and/or systems, and waste, fraud and abuse.22 From the 8a program23 to Hurricane Katrina24 to the more current COVID-19 (EIDL) program and PPP lending program,25 the SBA has managed to maintain its lending role even when repeated system failures have affected its distribution of funds. Congress has been somewhat responsive, pressuring the SBA to clean up fraud-related matters within its COVID-19 lending and grant programs.26 Repub- licans in the U.S. House of Representatives have gone farther, specifying that the SBA needs to improve transparency and accountability and deal with mission creep, the expansion of unauthorized programs, and structural and reporting deficiencies that have allowed mismanagement and fraud to reoccur, largely through massive supplemental appropriations.27 The SBA is led by an Administrator (currently a member of the President’s Cabinet) and a Deputy Administrator. Senate-confirmed appointees include — 749 — Small Business Administration the Administrator, Deputy Administrator, Chief Counsel for Advocacy, and Inspector General. Entrepreneurs and small businesses require limited-government policies that do not impede their risk-taking and growth. A future Administration can leverage and strengthen core SBA functions that have been fairly effective at reining in and calling attention to costly regulations and policies that are harmful to small businesses. This core advocacy function is aided both by statutory authority and by a network of small-business organizations and allies that support limited-gov- ernment policies.28 Moreover, an effective SBA Administrator and leadership team can work and advocate across the federal government to ensure that extreme regulatory poli- cies—or anticompetitive rules and actions that may favor big businesses over small businesses or international competitors over American small businesses—are dismantled or do not progress when proposed. MISSION CREEP AND ENLARGEMENT As noted, Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives have evidenced con- cern about SBA mission creep and the need to make a sprawling, unaccountable agency more focused and operationally sound. Moreover, there is unease that the agency has moved from being open to any eligible small business searching for sup- port to being hyperfocused on “disproportionately impacted,” politically favored, or geographically situated small businesses and entrepreneurs. Today, initiatives aimed at “inclusivity” are in fact creating exclusivity and stringent selectivity in deciding what types of small businesses and entities can use SBA programs. For example, even though the SBA under President Donald Trump proposed a rule to remove all of the unconstitutional religious exclusions from its regulations29 to conform with Supreme Court decisions that have made their unconstitutionality clear, the SBA has not acted on the proposed rule and still uses religious exclusions in determining eligibility for business loans. Several other specific concerns include but are not limited to: l The SBA’s request to become a “designated voter agency” in response to President Biden’s executive order on “Promoting Access to Voting.”30 l The creation of duplicative channels and “pilot programs” for the delivery of business training rather than working through existing counseling partners. The programs are largely duplicative of private, state and local government, and educational system offerings.31 l A push to expand direct government lending.32

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Minimal
Vector: 61%
Pages: 648-650AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2026 focuses on funding for congressional operations and includes provisions related to intern compensation and deficit reduction, which are unrelated to the Department of Labor's budget reductions, personnel policies, or compliance initiatives outlined in Project 2025."

— 615 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies ORGANIZATIONAL AGENDA Budget l Reduce the agencies’ budgets to the low end of the historical average. The Trump Administration’s FY 2020 request, $10.9 billion, would provide a workable target for spending reductions for DOL, for example. l Spending reductions should occur primarily in the Employment and Training Administration (ETA). l Focus health and safety inspections on egregious offenders, as other inspections are often abused and usurp state and local government prerogatives. Personnel l Maximize hiring of political appointees. At its best, the Trump Administration Department of Labor worked with up to 150 political appointees. That is still a tiny percentage of the department. The number of political appointees should be maximized in order to improve the political accountability of the department. l Appoint new EEOC and NLRB general counsels on Day One. The Biden Administration broke significant precedent by firing the EEOC and NLRB general counsels despite their term appointments. The next Administration should do the same and expand on the Biden Administration’s new precedent by refusing to acknowledge terms in other offices, where applicable, and installing acting or full new officers immediately. l Implement a hiring freeze for career officials. A hiring freeze imposes financial discipline on agencies’ personnel costs and reduces agency bloat. Office of Compliance Initiatives l DOL should fully staff the Office of Compliance Initiatives (OCI), which was reopened by the Trump Administration after the Obama Administration closed its predecessor down. OCI educates employers and workers on their rights, responsibilities, and available recourse under the many statutes, rules, and regulations administered by DOL. Most businesses want to follow the law and OCI exists to make knowing the rules easier, which leads to increased compliance.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills

Similar Topics