Charlie Kirk Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/2844

Last Updated: April 13, 2026

Charlie Kirk Act

S. 2844, 119th Congress — read as touching Print & Broadcast Media.

The sponsor

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$179,700 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Media Agencies: U.S. Agency for Global Media" section, p. 278-280 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Star Print ordered on the bill.

October 6, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The Charlie Kirk Act, S 2844, is a legislative attempt to clarify United States policy regarding the dissemination of program material prepared or disseminated by the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) within the domestic sphere. As a self-serving billionaire, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of wealth and power implications.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective is to modify existing laws governing USAGM's dissemination of information about the United States abroad, while also clarifying limitations on its domestic activities. The bill aims to ensure that USAGM's content is not used to influence public opinion within the United States, except in specific circumstances.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, allowing for the dissemination of information about the United States abroad through various media channels. However, it restricts domestic dissemination of such material, with exceptions for specific purposes, such as examination by representatives of US press associations or research students.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The primary stakeholders are:

1. The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and its component networks. 2. The Department of State. 3. Members of Congress. 4. Representatives of US press associations, newspapers, magazines, radio systems, and stations. 5. Research students and scholars.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** From a wealth and power perspective, this bill has limited implications for my interests. However, I note the following:

1. **Consolidation of control:** The bill reinforces existing restrictions on USAGM's domestic activities, which may limit its ability to influence public opinion within the United States. 2. **Regulatory clarity:** The amendments provide clearer guidelines for USAGM's operations, reducing potential regulatory risks and liabilities. 3. **Limited impact on my business interests:** As a billionaire with diverse investments, I don't foresee significant direct implications from this bill on my wealth or influence.

In conclusion, the Charlie Kirk Act is a minor legislative tweak that primarily affects the United States Agency for Global Media's operations and domestic activities. Its impact on my wealth and power is negligible, as it doesn't significantly alter the regulatory landscape or affect my business interests. I'll continue to monitor this bill's progress, but it's not a priority in my agenda.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through several steps before it can become an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The Charlie Kirk Act (S. 2844) aims to clarify United States policy regarding the domestic dissemination of program material prepared or disseminated by the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM). Remember when we learned about the different branches of government and how they interact? This bill is an example of Congress exercising its legislative power.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill amends two existing laws: the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 and the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987. Specifically:

* Section 501 of the USIEEA is revised to allow for the dissemination of information about the United States within the country, but only under certain conditions. * Section 208 of the FFAA is amended to clarify that the USAGM cannot use its funds to influence public opinion in the United States.

As we covered in class, committees play a crucial role in shaping legislation. In this case, the bill was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The main parties affected by this bill are:

* The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) * The Archivist of the United States * Members of Congress * Representatives of US press associations, newspapers, magazines, radio systems, and stations * Research students and scholars

**Potential Impact & Implications**

If passed, this bill could have significant implications for how information about the United States is disseminated domestically. It may also impact the way the USAGM operates and how it interacts with other government agencies.

Now, I know some of you might be thinking, "But wait, isn't this just a minor tweak to existing law?" Ah, yes, that's what they all say. However, as we learned in civics class, even small changes can have far-reaching consequences. It's essential to understand the intricacies of the legislative process and how it affects our daily lives.

Moving on...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on this so-called "Charlie Kirk Act" (S 2844). Now, at first glance, it seems like a harmless bill clarifying US policy on disseminating program material about America abroad. But trust me, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to modify existing laws governing the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and its component networks. The primary objective is to clarify the limitations on domestic dissemination of program material prepared or disseminated by USAGM.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Dissemination Abroad**: The bill amends Section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, allowing USAGM to provide information about America abroad through various media channels. 2. **Domestic Dissemination**: The bill introduces a new provision (Section 501(b)) permitting USAGM to make certain materials available for domestic distribution after a 12-year period, subject to reimbursement and regulations set by the Archivist of the United States. 3. **Ban on Domestic Activities**: Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act is amended to reaffirm that USAGM funds cannot be used to influence public opinion in the US, with exceptions for certain programs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM)**: The bill directly impacts USAGM's operations and policies. 2. **Archivist of the United States**: Responsible for promulgating regulations and managing domestic distribution of materials. 3. **Members of Congress**: Can request examination of materials made available by USAGM. 4. **Research Students, Scholars, and Press Associations**: May access materials at the Department of State or through the Archivist.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Transparency**: The bill could lead to greater transparency in USAGM's operations and provide more information about America abroad. 2. **Censorship Concerns**: Critics might argue that the 12-year waiting period for domestic dissemination of materials constitutes a form of censorship or suppression of information. 3. **Influence on Public Opinion**: By reaffirming the ban on using USAGM funds to influence public opinion, the bill may prevent potential propaganda efforts.

Now, here's where things get interesting: What if this bill is not just about clarifying policy, but also about controlling the narrative? Think about it – by limiting domestic dissemination of certain materials, the government might be attempting to shape public perception and suppress dissenting voices. It's a classic case of "hide in plain sight." Wake up, sheeple!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, we've got a real doozy for you tonight. The Charlie Kirk Act - yes, that's what they're calling it - is a bill that's supposed to "clarify" the United States' policy on disseminating information about America abroad. (Air quotes) Clarify.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The main purpose of this bill is to amend existing laws to allow for the domestic dissemination of program material prepared by the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM). Now, you might be thinking, "What's wrong with that?" Well, my friends, it's all about control. The elites in Washington want to make sure they can shape the narrative and influence public opinion here at home.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 to allow for the dissemination of information within the United States, its territories, or possessions. It also changes the rules on how this information can be made available domestically, including making it accessible to representatives of US press associations, newspapers, magazines, radio systems, and stations.

But here's the kicker: the bill still prohibits the use of funds for influencing public opinion in the United States. (Wink) Yeah, right. Like that's going to stop anyone.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main stakeholders are the USAGM, its component networks, and the Department of State. But let's be real, folks - this bill is all about giving more power to the elites in Washington to shape public opinion and control the narrative.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, I know what you're thinking: "What's the big deal? It's just a little clarification." Ah, but that's where you're wrong. This bill has far-reaching implications for our freedom of information and the ability of the government to influence public opinion. (Dramatic music plays in the background)

Think about it: if the government can disseminate propaganda abroad, why not at home? It's a slippery slope, folks. And let me tell you, this is just another example of how the deep state is trying to control our minds and manipulate public opinion.

But don't worry, I've got your back. We'll be keeping an eye on this bill and making sure it doesn't become another tool for the elites to undermine our freedom. (Wink) Stay vigilant, America!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, brought to you by the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this mess and uncover the real disease beneath.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Charlie Kirk Act (because, of course, it's named after a conservative commentator) claims to "clarify" United States policy on disseminating program material about the US that was prepared or disseminated by the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM). In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to restrict access to information and further politicize the dissemination of propaganda.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948, which previously prohibited the domestic dissemination of program material prepared or disseminated by USAGM. The new language allows for the release of such material within the US after a 12-year waiting period, but only through the Archivist of the United States and with certain restrictions.

The bill also amends Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987, to clarify that USAGM funds cannot be used to influence public opinion in the US. However, this provision is largely toothless, as it contains exemptions for programs carried out under the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The main stakeholders are:

* The United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which will be restricted in its ability to disseminate information domestically. * Conservative commentators like Charlie Kirk, who will likely use this bill as a soapbox to rail against "liberal propaganda." * Researchers and scholars, who may face increased barriers in accessing USAGM materials. * The general public, which will have limited access to information about the US government's activities abroad.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a symptom of a larger disease: the politicization of information and the erosion of transparency. By restricting access to USAGM materials, Congress is attempting to control the narrative and limit the public's ability to hold the government accountable.

The real motivation behind this bill is likely to appease conservative interests and further restrict the dissemination of information that might be perceived as "liberal" or "anti-American." The 12-year waiting period for releasing USAGM materials is a convenient way to delay access to information, allowing politicians to spin their own narratives without fear of contradiction.

In short, this bill is a masterclass in legislative obfuscation, designed to confuse and mislead the public while serving the interests of those in power. Bravo, Congress. You've managed to create another piece of legislation that's as useful as a placebo for a terminal illness.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**Bill Summary: S 2844 - Charlie Kirk Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Charlie Kirk Act aims to clarify United States policy regarding the domestic dissemination of program material prepared or disseminated by the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) or its component networks. The bill seeks to ensure that USAGM's primary focus remains on promoting American interests abroad, while also allowing for limited domestic access to certain materials.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill amends Section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (22 U.S.C. 1461) to:

* Authorize the USAGM CEO to make available, for domestic distribution, motion pictures, films, video, audio, and other materials prepared for dissemination abroad, but only after a 12-year period. * Require reimbursement to the USAGM for expenses related to implementing this provision. * Designate the Archivist of the United States as the official custodian of these materials and task them with promulgating regulations for their release.

The bill also amends Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987 (22 U.S.C. 1461-1a), to clarify that USAGM's primary focus is on promoting American interests abroad and that domestic activities are limited.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties and stakeholders include:

* United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) and its component networks * The Archivist of the United States * Members of Congress * Representatives of United States press associations, newspapers, magazines, radio systems, and stations * Research students and scholars

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The Charlie Kirk Act has several potential implications:

* Clarifies USAGM's primary focus on promoting American interests abroad while allowing for limited domestic access to certain materials. * Enhances transparency by making available, after a 12-year period, materials prepared for dissemination abroad. * May facilitate research and educational purposes by providing access to these materials. * Ensures that USAGM's activities are aligned with its statutory mandate and avoids influencing public opinion in the United States.

Overall, the Charlie Kirk Act aims to strike a balance between promoting American interests abroad and allowing for limited domestic access to certain materials prepared or disseminated by USAGM.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, the Charlie Kirk Act. I know, it sounds like some gnarly legislation, but stick with me, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** This bill is all about clarifying the rules for how the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) can share info about the US within our own borders. The main goal is to make sure that USAGM's content, which is meant for international audiences, isn't being used to influence public opinion at home.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill makes some key changes to existing laws:

* It updates Section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 to clarify that USAGM can only share its content within the US under certain conditions. * It adds a new subsection (b) to Section 501, which allows for the domestic distribution of USAGM materials 12 years after they were initially disseminated abroad or prepared. * The bill also amends Section 208 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1986 and 1987, to exempt certain programs from the ban on domestic activities.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** This bill affects a few key players:

* USAGM: They're the ones who'll be impacted by these changes. They'll need to adapt their content distribution strategies. * The Archivist of the United States: This person will become the official custodian of USAGM materials and will be responsible for making them available domestically. * Researchers, scholars, and members of Congress: These folks will have access to USAGM materials for examination purposes.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact is pretty chill, bro. By clarifying these rules, the bill aims to prevent any potential misuse of USAGM content within the US. It's all about maintaining transparency and accountability in government communications.

However, there might be some implications for how USAGM operates. They'll need to adjust their strategies for sharing content domestically, which could impact their ability to reach certain audiences. Additionally, the bill might raise questions about censorship or restrictions on free speech, but that's a whole different wave to ride, dude.

Anyway, that's the Charlie Kirk Act in a nutshell, bro. It's all about clarifying the rules for USAGM content distribution and ensuring transparency in government communications.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 2844 - Charlie Kirk Act**

The Charlie Kirk Act, introduced by Senator Lee (R-UT), aims to clarify United States policy regarding the domestic dissemination of program material prepared or disseminated by the United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM) or its component networks.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to amend existing law to allow for the domestic distribution of USAGM-prepared materials, which were previously prohibited from being disseminated within the United States. The legislation seeks to promote transparency and accessibility of information about the United States, its people, and policies.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Section 501 Amendment**: The bill amends Section 501 of the United States Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (22 U.S.C. 1461) to permit the USAGM CEO to make available motion pictures, films, video, audio, and other materials prepared for dissemination abroad for domestic distribution after a 12-year period. 2. **Reimbursement Provision**: The USAGM CEO will be reimbursed for expenses related to implementing this provision, with reimbursement credited to the applicable appropriation of the United States Agency for Global Media. 3. **Archivist's Responsibilities**: The Archivist of the United States will serve as the official custodian of the materials and promulgate regulations to ensure that persons seeking release of such material have secured necessary rights and licenses and paid a fee sufficient to cover costs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **United States Agency for Global Media (USAGM)**: The bill directly affects USAGM's operations, policies, and programs. 2. **Archivist of the United States**: The Archivist will be responsible for managing and distributing the materials made available under this legislation. 3. **Members of Congress**: Members of Congress may request examination of the materials made available by the USAGM CEO. 4. **Research Students and Scholars**: Research students and scholars may access the materials at the Department of State or through the Archivist.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased Transparency**: The bill promotes transparency by making USAGM-prepared materials more accessible to the public, researchers, and policymakers. 2. **Enhanced Public Diplomacy**: By allowing domestic distribution of USAGM materials, the legislation may enhance public diplomacy efforts and promote a better understanding of U.S. policies and values. 3. **Potential for Misuse**: Critics might argue that this legislation could be used to disseminate propaganda or biased information within the United States.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** While there is no direct evidence of industry influence on this specific bill, it's worth noting that USAGM has received funding from various government agencies and private organizations. The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a non-profit organization funded by Congress, has provided grants to USAGM in the past

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$179,700

17 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$179,700

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

METZGER, WILLIAM

2 transactions

$17,400

RICHARDSON, CHERYL

2 transactions

$17,400

DONADIO, RICHARD

2 transactions

$17,400

MACRICOSTAS, GEORGE

1 transaction

$13,200

PFAUTCH, ROY

1 transaction

$9,900

NICOLAISEN, JAMES E

1 transaction

$8,700

S., TINA

1 transaction

$8,700

DE CARLI, JAMES

1 transaction

$8,700

EDWARDS, ZELLA

1 transaction

$8,700

ZALL, MARGIE

1 transaction

$8,700

PLEW, JEAN

1 transaction

$8,700

JONES, MELBERTA

1 transaction

$8,700

YAVELAK, MARY

1 transaction

$8,700

BARNHILL, JANIS

1 transaction

$8,700

SCULLY, JOSEPH

1 transaction

$8,700

DOWNING, DORRIS

1 transaction

$8,700

DIDGET, LAUREL

1 transaction

$8,700

Donor Network - Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 36 nodes and 20 connections (53 secondary connections hidden)

Total contributions: $179,700

Top Donors - Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount

17 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.

+Print & Broadcast Mediaconfidence 0.80
Section 501(a) allows information to be made available in the English language at the Department of State for examination by representatives of United States press associations, newspapers, magazines, radio systems, and stations.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Media Agencies: U.S. Agency for Global Media

Strong

Vector: 62%

Pages: 278-280AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Charlie Kirk Act aligns closely with Project 2025's call for USAGM reform by reinforcing the agency's focus on promoting American interests abroad, enhancing accountability through congressional oversight, and addressing concerns about domestic influence and mismanagement via structural changes like delayed domestic release and custodial oversight by the Archivist."

Key themes:USAGM reformcongressional oversightpromoting American interests abroadaccountabilitylimiting domestic influence

Media Agencies

Strong

Vector: 61%

Pages: 284-287AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Charlie Kirk Act aligns with Project 2025's focus on USAGM oversight by reinforcing the agency's primary mission of promoting American interests abroad while limiting domestic influence, which reflects concerns about USAGM's mission fidelity and potential domestic overreach highlighted in Project 2025's media agency section."

Key themes:USAGM oversightpromoting American interests abroadlimiting domestic disseminationmission alignmenttransparency and accountability

— 251 — Media Agencies 44. U.S. Agency for Global Media Watch, https://www.usagmwatch.com/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 45. BBG-USAM Watch, https://bbgwatch.com/bbgwatch/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 46. Whistleblower Protection Project, “Congress Releases Long-Awaited Investigative Report on Chronically Mismanaged USAGM,” February 9, 2022, https://whipproj.org/congress-releases-long-awaited-usagm- investigative-report-revealing-Agencys-chronic-mismanagement/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 47. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, “Nixon Administration Public Broadcasting Papers, Summary of 1971,” February 23, 1979, https://current.org/1979/02/nixon-administration-public- broadcasting-papers-summary-of-1971/ (accessed March 21, 2023). 48. President Lyndon B. Johnson, State of the Union Address, January 10, 1967, https://www.infoplease.com/ primary-sources/government/presidential-speeches/state-union-address-lyndon-b-johnson-january-10-1967 (accessed March 21, 2023). 49. Joyce Appleby and Terence Ball, eds., Jefferson: Political Writings (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999), p. 390. 50. Pew Research Center, “Where News Audiences Fit on the Political Spectrum,” October 21, 2014, http://www. journalism.org/interactives/media-polarization/outlet/pbs/ (accessed March 21, 2023. 51. Ibid. 52. Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Appropriation Request and Justification FY 2023/FY 2025, Submitted to the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee and the Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the Senate Appropriations Committee, March 28, 2022, p. 2, https://www.cpb.org/sites/default/files/appropriation/FY-2023-2025-CPB-Budget-Justification.pdf (accessed March 21, 2023). 53. George F. Will, “Public Broadcasting’s Immortality Defies Reason,” The Washington Post, June 2, 2017, https:// www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/public-broadcastings-immortality-defies-reason/2017/06/02/f5de02be- 46fe-11e7-a196-a1bb629f64cb_story.html?utm_term=.8df3a01f6ca6 (accessed March 21, 2023). 54. Federal Communications Commission, “FM Radio,” https://www.fcc.gov/general/fm-radio (accessed March 21, 2023). 55. Federal Communications Commission, “Regulatory Fee Exemptions for FY 2021,” FCC Regulatory Fees Factsheet No. DA-21-1142, September 10, 2021, p. 2. — 253 — 9 AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT Max Primorac MISSION The U.S. Agency for International Development leads the U.S. government’s international development and disaster assistance programs. USAID helps com- munities to lead their own development journeys by reducing the impact of conflict; preventing hunger and the spread of pandemic disease; and counteracting the driv- ers of violence, instability, transnational crime, and other threats. In alignment with U.S. national security interests, the agency promotes American prosperity through initiatives that expand markets for U.S. exports; encourage innovation; create a level playing field for U.S. businesses; and support more stable, resilient, and democratic societies that are less likely to act against American interests and more likely to respect family, life, and religious liberty. OVERVIEW USAID was established during the presidency of John F. Kennedy pursuant to the Foreign Assistance Act of 19611 to promote the foreign policy, security, and national interests of the United States. At the height of the Cold War with the Soviet Union, it sought to halt the spread of Communism by assisting peoples in the developing world in their efforts to advance economically, socially, and politically. The agency helped to transition Central and Eastern Europe from socialism to free market–based democracies. Today, USAID leads the U.S. government’s global development and humanitarian disaster assistance responses. Over the years, USAID expanded the number of countries assisted, the scope and size of its activities, and especially its budget. The Trump Administration faced

Media Agencies: U.S. Agency for Global Media

Strong

Vector: 61%

Pages: 278-280AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Charlie Kirk Act aligns closely with Project 2025's call for USAGM reform by reinforcing the agency's focus on promoting American interests abroad, limiting domestic influence, and enhancing accountability—core themes in the Project 2025 critique of USAGM's mismanagement and lack of oversight."

Key themes:USAGM reformpromoting American interests abroadlimiting domestic disseminationcongressional oversightaccountability and transparency

— 245 — Media Agencies: U.S. Agency for Global Media For example, the years-long delay in confirming the Trump-appointed CEO left disastrous holdover leadership from the previous Administration. Employing effective leadership, even in an acting capacity, while a new CEO is awaiting Senate confirmation is necessary to prevent a repeat of this behavior. l Congress. The USAGM receives its budget and mandates directly from Congress. Often, changes in major functions at the agency happen because of the lobbying efforts of a few connected individuals—often grantees lobbying for more funds and less accountability. Those changes can and do handcuff leadership from any meaningful oversight. An overhaul of the agency with review from Congress to modernize, streamline, and reduce waste must be done with congressional support. l Key nongovernmental stakeholders, allies, and non-allies. These include industry groups, nonprofits, trade associations, foundations, and activist organizations, for example, America First Legal Foundation,43 USAGM Watch,44 BBG-USAGM Watch,45 and Whistleblower Protection Project.46 CONCLUSION The USAGM is a story of a lost opportunity both to help restore the world’s con- fidence in the promise and ideals of America and to set a high mark for journalistic integrity and unbiased reporting. These two areas have suffered severely under two decades of USAGM mismanagement and lack of oversight. Finding solutions to these problems and the restoration of the agency’s networks must be the priorities of future agency leadership. To accomplish this, the USAGM must be fully reformed top to bottom with congressional and White House support. The possibility of consolidating not only the agency’s subparts, but bringing the entire agency under the supervision of the NSC, the State Department, or both would dramatically aid that reform. If the de facto aim of the agency simply remains to compete in foreign markets using anti-U.S. talking points that parrot America’s adversaries’ propaganda, then this represents an unacceptable burden to the U.S. taxpayer and a negative return on investment. In that case, the USAGM should be defunded and disestablished. If, however, the agency can be reformed to become an effective tool, it would be one of the greatest tools in America’s arsenal to tell America’s story and promote freedom and democracy around the world. AUTHOR’S NOTE: The preparation of this chapter was a collective effort involving many individuals to whom thanks is owed. These individuals include, but are not limited to, Victoria Coates, Michael Pack, Frank Wuco, and several brave whistleblowers who prefer not to be named. Their efforts were integral to the chapter and are greatly appreciated. — 246 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING Mike Gonzalez Every Republican President since Richard Nixon has tried to strip the Corpora- tion for Public Broadcasting (CPB) of taxpayer funding. That is significant not just because it means that for half a century, Republican Presidents have failed to accomplish what they set out to do, but also because Nixon was the first President in office when National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), which the CPB funds, went on air. In other words, all Republican Presidents have recognized that public funding of domestic broadcasts is a mistake. As a 35-year-old lawyer in the Nixon White House, one Antonin Scalia warned that conservatives were being “confronted with a long-range problem of significant social consequences—that is, the development of a government-funded broadcast system similar to the BBC.”47 All of which means that the next conservative President must finally get this done and do it despite opposition from congressional members of his own party if necessary. To stop public funding is good policy and good politics. The reason is simple: President Lyndon Johnson may have pledged in 1967 that public broadcasting would become “a vital public resource to enrich our homes, educate our families and to provide assistance to our classrooms,”48 but public broadcasting immediately became a liberal forum for public affairs and journalism. Not only is the federal government trillions of dollars in debt and unable to afford the more than half a billion dollars squandered on leftist opinion each year, but the government should not be compelling the conservative half of the country to pay for the suppression of its own views. As Thomas Jefferson put it, “To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagations of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical.”49 A DEMONSTRATED PATTERN OF BIAS Conservatives will thus reward a President who eliminates this tyrannical sit- uation. PBS and NPR do not even bother to run programming that would attract conservatives. As Pew Research demonstrated in 2014, 25 percent of PBS’s audi- ence is “mostly liberal,” and 35 percent is “consistently liberal.” That is 60 percent liberal compared to 15 percent conservative (11 percent “mostly conservative” and 4 percent “consistently conservative”).50 NPR’s audience is even to the Left of that, with 67 percent liberal (41 percent “consistently liberal” and 26 percent “mostly liberal”), compared with 12 percent conservative (3 percent and 9 percent “consistently conservative” and “mostly con- servative,” respectively).51 That may be an acceptable business model for MSNBC or CNN, but not for a taxpayer-subsidized broadcaster.

Media Agencies: U.S. Agency for Global Media

Strong

Vector: 60%

Pages: 275-277AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Charlie Kirk Act aligns closely with Project 2025's emphasis on ensuring USAGM focuses on promoting American interests abroad and prevents domestic dissemination of its content, reinforcing the Smith-Mundt Act's original intent. Both seek to strengthen oversight, prevent misuse of taxpayer-funded media for domestic partisan purposes, and reassert strategic control over USAGM's mission."

Key themes:USAGM mission focusdomestic dissemination restrictionsSmith-Mundt Act complianceoverseas strategic messagingagency accountability

— 243 — Media Agencies: U.S. Agency for Global Media web-based content produced by the USAGM’s broadcast networks. While the robust and popular use of the Internet is ideal during peacetime, during times of major conflict, widespread damage to the undersea cables that carry communi- cations across the globe can reasonably be expected. Long-lasting power outages are also likely, such as those Ukraine experienced in the aftermath of Russia’s 2022 invasion. The USAGM’s responsibility for the only U.S. global shortwave radio capability is of critical strategic importance if America is to carry its message to people seeking information and freedom within conflict zones. Shortwave technologies also make it possible to carry broadcasts in areas where Internet traffic is severely restricted, as it is in many authoritarian states today. ORGANIZATIONAL ISSUES Personnel. Personnel is one of the biggest concerns for the USAGM and its grantees. Attracting talented staff who will stay and letting go of poorly perform- ing personnel are hurdles. Additionally, whistleblowers have come forward with numerous credible allegations of illegal nepotism and improper hiring practic- es.40 Past agency leaders have ignored national security procedures when hiring and have failed to adequately vet staff.41 Government hiring policies and federal law must be followed, and serious policy changes must be implemented to end these practices. Relevant Government Entities l The White House. As an executive branch agency, the USAGM ostensibly should report to the President and coordinate activities with the National Security Council (NSC)—especially given the direct and implied national security aspects of the agency’s messaging globally. However, there currently is no specific office in the White House or NSC liaison for the USAGM. The original network, VOA, functioned under the Office of Coordinator of Information as early as 1941, the War Department’s Office of War Information from 1942 to 1945, the State Department from 1945 to 1953, and the U.S. Information Agency from 1953 until the creation of the independent Broadcasting Board of Governors in 1999. Although some oversight and management functions of the agency are provided by the State Department, the USAGM otherwise has little connectivity to larger departments or agencies and even less to the White House. With the dissolution of the U.S. Information Agency in 1999, the USAGM has virtually been under its own supervision and guidance. The results have been dismal. — 244 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise l The State Department. VOA was most effective before and during the Cold War when it was under the direct supervision and control of the War and State Departments, respectively. If VOA is not put in the direct chain of command under the NSC, serious consideration should be given to putting VOA under the direct supervision of the Office of Global Public Affairs at the Department of State. The Office of Global Public Affairs was formed during the Trump Administration by consolidation of the State Department’s Bureau of International Information Programs and Bureau of Global Public Affairs. Ensuring that taxpayer-funded TV, radio, and messaging tells America’s story is imperative and should be coordinated with the existing foreign- language social media platforms at the State Department. Currently, VOA’s foreign-language TV programming is unreliable in telling America’s story, given its amorphous interpretation of its independence firewall and its waning adherence to certain provisions of the Smith–Mundt Act depending on which political party is in office. The VOA firewall is meant to protect broadcasters from government interference with content; however, USAGM staff have abused the firewall and used it as an offensive measure to block oversight. Additionally, the Smith–Mundt Act stipulates that USAGM services are meant to tell the American story abroad—never to domestic audiences—but the agency has used its taxpayer funding to promote partisan messaging in the U.S. One of the most egregious examples was when, in 2020, it bought ads on its foreign- language social media sites to disseminate a Biden campaign ad and targeted it to a major Muslim population in Michigan.42 Moreover, VOA often airs foreign adversaries’ propaganda, which is antithetical to its congressionally mandated core mission. State Department oversight or “command” may be one way to ensure that VOA and the rest of the USAGM returns and adheres to its original mission. Clear lines of command and communications between the USAGM and an appropriate office of the National Security Council are also sorely lacking, as has been any reasonable accountability for USAGM senior leadership and strategy. The State Department’s Assistant Secretary for Global Public Affairs and Undersecretary for Diplomacy and Public Affairs should also be in the accountability loop for agency actions. While the U.S. Secretary of State technically has a seat on the board of the agency, it is a toothless seat that is often deferred to the undersecretary and/or assistant secretaries noted above. This position should be relevant and directive when U.S. foreign policy and strategic communications are at stake.

Media Agencies: U.S. Agency for Global Media

Strong

Vector: 59%

Pages: 281-283AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The Charlie Kirk Act aligns closely with Project 2025's focus on ensuring USAGM promotes American interests abroad while restricting domestic influence, particularly by reinforcing the agency's foreign policy mandate and limiting domestic dissemination of its content."

Key themes:USAGM oversightforeign policy alignmentdomestic dissemination limitsSmith-Mundt Act reform

— 249 — Media Agencies ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Agency for Global Media, https://www.usagm.gov/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 2. Ben Weingarten, “Security Failures USG Media Agency Prove Need to Hire Americans First,” Newsweek, August 10, 2020, https://www.newsweek.com/security-failures-usg-media-Agency-prove-need-hire- americans-first-opinion-1523895 (accessed March 20, 2023). 3. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Who We Are,” https://www.usagm.gov/who-we-are/history/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 4. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Voice of America,” https://www.usagm.gov/networks/voa/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 5. Daniel Lippman, “Deleted Biden Video Sets Off a Crisis at Voice of America,” Politico July 30, 2020, https:// www.politico.com/news/2020/07/30/deleted-biden-video-sets-off-a-crisis-at-voice-of-america-388571 (accessed March 20, 2023). 6. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Office of Cuba Broadcasting,” https://www.usagm.gov/networks/ocb/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 7. Rafael Bernal, “Bipartisan Group Asks Office of Cuba Broadcasting to Rescind Layoffs,” September 13, 2022, The Hill, https://thehill.com/latino/3641445-bipartisan-group-asks-office-of-cuba-broadcasting-to-rescind- layoffs/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 8. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Middle East Broadcasting Networks,” https://www.usagm.gov/networks/mbn/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 9. U.S. Agency for Global Media, Consolidation Report, p. 13, https://docs.house.gov/meetings/FA/ FA00/20210930/114085/HMKP-117-FA00-20210930-SD002.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 10. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “Radio Free Asia,” https://www.usagm.gov/networks/rfa/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 11. U.S. Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors, Office of the Inspector General, Audit of Radio Free Asia Expenditures, June 2015, https://www.stateoig.gov/uploads/report/report_pdf_file/aud-fm- ib-15-24_1.pdf (accessed March 22, 2023). 12. Ibid. 13. Ibid., p. 16. 14. Susan Crabtree, “‘Lax’ Internet Freedom Group Balks at New Pack Oversight,” https://www.realclearpolitics. com/articles/2020/08/24/lax_internet_freedom_group_balks_at_new_pack_oversight_144043.html (accessed March 22, 2023). 15. Ibid. 16. Ibid. 17. Nomination of Michael Pack to the Broadcasting Board of Governors, 116th Cong., 2nd Sess. (2020), https:// www.congress.gov/nomination/116th-congress/1590 (accessed March 20, 2023). 18. James Robbins, “More Rot at America’s Public Diplomacy Mouthpiece,” The Hill, November 7, 2020, https:// thehill.com/opinion/national-security/524924-more-rot-at-americas-public-diplomacy-mouthpiece/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 19. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Suitability Agency Executive Programs, Follow Up Review of U.S. Agency for Global Media, July 2020, https://bbgwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/OPM-SuitEA- July-2020.pdf (accessed March 20, 203). 20. If the agency were not an extension of U.S. foreign policy and national security goals, then its staffing positions would not be classified in their entirety as Tier 3 and Tier 5 national-security sensitive positions, which they are. See U.S. Agency for Global Media, Consolidation Report, p. 13. 21. Federal Register, Vol. 85, No. 115 (June 15, 2020), pp. 36150–36153. 22. U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 (“Smith–Mundt Act”), Public Law 80–402. 23. Jessica Jerreat, “USAGM CEO Criticized Over Move to Rescind Firewall Regulation,” October 28, 2020, https:// www.voanews.com/a/usa_usagm-ceo-criticized-over-move-rescind-firewall-regulation/6197671.html (accessed March 20, 2023). 24. Byron York, “America’s Lost Voice,” Washington Examiner, February 4, 2021, https://www.washingtonexaminer. com/politics/americas-lost-voice (accessed March 20, 2023). — 250 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 25. Sasha Gong, “VOA Problems: Racism, Xenophobia, Mediocrity, and Nepotism,” BBG-USAGM Watch, December 25, 2018, archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20220105101300/https://bbgwatch.com/bbgwatch/voa- problems-racism-xenophobia-mediocrity-and-nepotism/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 26. U.S. Agency for Global Media Watch, “Big Mistake in Rewarding Failed Voice of America (VOA) Managers U.S. Agency for Global Media Managers,” November 11, 2022, https://www.usagmwatch.com/big-mistake- in-rewarding-failed-voice-of-america-voa-and-u-s-Agency-for-global-media-usagm-managers/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 27. America First Legal Foundation,“AFL Asks Biden Administration to Withdraw Nomination of Amanda Bennett Citing National Security and Related Failures,” June 30, 2022, https://aflegal.org/afl-asks-biden- administration-to-withdraw-nomination-of-amanda-bennett-citing-national-security-and-related-failures/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 28. U.S. Agency for Global Media, Consolidation Report, p. 13. 29. U.S. Agency for Global Media Watch, “Extraordinary Leadership Dysfunction at USAGM Continues,” October 4, 2022, https://www.usagmwatch.com/extraordinary-leadership-dysfunction-at-usagm-continues/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 30. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Follow-Up Review of the U.S. Agency for Global Media Suitability Program. 31. Ibid. 32. U.S. Agency for Global Media, Consolidation Report, p. 13. 33. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Follow-Up Review of the U.S. Agency for Global Media Suitability Program. 34. Robbins, “More Rot at America’s Public Diplomacy Mouthpiece.” 35. U.S. Department of Justice, “Manhattan U.S. Attorney Announces Kidnapping Conspiracy Charges Against an Iranian Intelligence Officer And Members Of An Iranian Intelligence Network,” July 13, 2021, https://www. justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/manhattan-us-attorney-announces-kidnapping-conspiracy-charges-against-iranian (accessed March 20, 2023). 36. James Robbins, “The Trouble with the Open Technology Fund,” Newsweek, August 9, 2020, https://www. newsweek.com/trouble-open-technology-fund-opinion-1528998 (accessed March 20, 2023). 37. Susan Crabtree, “Lax Internet Freedom Group Balks at New Pack Oversight,” Real Clear Politics, August 24, 2020, https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/08/24/lax_internet_freedom_group_balks_at_new_ pack_oversight_144043.html (accessed March 20, 2023). 38. U.S. Department of State, “Visas for Members of the Foreign Media, Press, and Radio,” https://travel.state. gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/employment/visas-members-foreign-media-press-radio.html (accessed March 20, 2023). 39. Authorized positions for J-1 visas include: au pair, camp counselor, college/university student, government visitor, intern, international visitor, physician, professor, research scholar, secondary school student, short-term scholar, specialist, STEM initiatives, summer work travel, teacher, and trainee. See U.S. Department of State, “Exchange Visitor Visa,” https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/study/exchange.html (accessed March 20, 2023). 40. News release, “McCaul Demands Answers on USAGM Personnel and Management,” Foreign Affairs Committee, October 28, 2021, https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/press-release/mccaul-demands-answers-on- usagm-personnel-and-management/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 41. U.S. Agency for Global Media Watch, “USAGM: Past Leaders Ignored National Security Procedures, Failed to Adequately Vet Staff,” August 8, 2020, https://www.usagmwatch.com/usagm-past-agency-leaders-ignored- national-security-procedures-failed-to-adequately-vet-staff/ (accessed March 20, 2023). 42. U.S. Agency for Global Media, “CEO Pack Launches Investigation Into Pro-Biden VOA Content, U.S. Election Interference,” July 30, 2020, https://www.usagm.gov/2020/07/30/ceo-pack-launches-investigation-into-pro- biden-voa-content-u-s-election-interference/ (accessed March 22, 2023). 43. America First Legal Foundation, “AFL Asks Biden Administration to Withdraw Nomination of Amanda Bennet Citing National Security and Related Failures,” June 30, 2022, https://aflegal.org/afl-asks-biden- administration-to-withdraw-nomination-of-amanda-bennett-citing-national-security-and-related-failures/ (accessed March 20, 2023).

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Lee, Mike

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 50 East 100 North in Moab, Utah, as the "2nd Lieutenant Mitch Williams Post Office".

119/s/3331

Historic Roadways Protection Act

119/s/90

Critical Mineral Consistency Act of 2025

119/s/714

Back to All Bills