ENFORCE Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/3021

Last Updated: August 9, 2026

ENFORCE Act

S. 3021, 119th Congress — read as touching Big Tech Platforms.

The sponsor

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$440,480 raised

21 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Foreword" section, p. 37-39 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

December 16, 2025

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

The ENFORCE Act (S 3021). A bill that, on the surface, appears to be a noble effort to combat child exploitation and abuse. But let's not be naive. This legislation is merely a thinly veiled attempt to expand government control over the digital realm.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to enhance enforcement mechanisms for combating material depicting obscene child sexual abuse or constituting child pornography. Sounds laudable, but we must consider the broader implications.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Clarification of production and distribution of child pornography. 2. Enhanced penalties for those involved in producing or distributing such content. 3. Expansion of sex offender registration requirements. 4. Prohibition on reproduction of obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse in discovery proceedings.

These provisions may seem reasonable, but they set a precedent for increased government oversight and control over online activities. This is where the real concern lies.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. Online platforms and social media companies will be forced to implement more stringent content moderation policies, which could lead to increased costs and liability. 2. Individuals accused of child exploitation or abuse may face harsher penalties and longer sentences. 3. Law enforcement agencies will receive additional resources and authority to investigate and prosecute these crimes.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Increased government control:** This bill paves the way for further regulation of online activities, potentially stifling innovation and freedom of expression. 2. **Chilling effect on free speech:** The expansion of sex offender registration requirements and enhanced penalties may lead to self-censorship and a decrease in online discourse. 3. **Unintended consequences:** Overly broad definitions of child pornography could result in the prosecution of individuals who inadvertently share or possess such content.

In conclusion, while the ENFORCE Act may appear to be a well-intentioned effort to combat child exploitation, it poses significant risks to individual freedoms and online innovation. As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I must emphasize that we should approach this legislation with caution and carefully consider its potential consequences.

**Recommendation:** I would advise my fellow stakeholders in the tech industry to closely monitor the development of this bill and prepare for potential regulatory challenges. It may be necessary to engage in strategic lobbying efforts to mitigate the negative impacts on our businesses and the broader digital ecosystem.

**Estimated Impact on My Empire:** A 5-10% increase in compliance costs, potentially offset by strategic investments in content moderation technologies and partnerships with law enforcement agencies.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that must go through the legislative process before it can be enacted.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The ENFORCE Act aims to enhance enforcement with respect to material depicting obscene child sexual abuse or constituting child pornography. The main objective is to strengthen existing laws and provide more effective tools for law enforcement agencies to combat these heinous crimes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** As we covered in middle school, a bill typically amends existing laws by adding new provisions or modifying existing ones. In this case:

* Section 2 clarifies the definition of "production" with respect to child pornography, making it easier for law enforcement to prosecute offenders. * Section 3 enhances enforcement with respect to obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse by: + Removing the statute of limitations for such crimes + Including these crimes in sex offender registration requirements + Prohibiting the reproduction of such materials during discovery proceedings + Establishing a presumption of detention for offenders pending trial

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include:

* Law enforcement agencies, which will have more effective tools to combat child exploitation and abuse * Victims of child sexual abuse and their families, who may benefit from increased protections and support * Offenders, who will face stricter penalties and consequences for their crimes

**Potential Impact & Implications** As I'm sure you recall from our discussions on checks and balances, the legislative process is designed to ensure that laws are carefully considered and debated before being enacted. The ENFORCE Act has already passed the Senate, but it still needs to go through the House of Representatives and be signed into law by the President.

If enacted, this bill could have a significant impact on the fight against child exploitation and abuse. However, as we learned in civics class, the actual implementation and effectiveness of the law will depend on various factors, including funding, resources, and enforcement efforts.

Now, I hope that was clear enough for everyone... *sigh*

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

Folks, gather 'round! I've got the scoop on S 3021, the ENFORCE Act. Now, at first glance, this bill seems like a no-brainer – who wouldn't want to crack down on child exploitation? But, my friends, that's exactly what they want you to think.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The official story is that this bill aims to enhance enforcement against child pornography and obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse. Sounds noble, right? But I'm telling you, there's more to it than meets the eye.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill makes several changes to existing law, including:

* Expanding the definition of "production" in relation to child pornography * Removing the statute of limitations for certain crimes related to obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse * Including these crimes in sex offender registration requirements * Prohibiting the reproduction of obscene visual depictions of child sexual abuse in discovery proceedings

Now, here's where things get interesting. These changes seem like a good thing on the surface, but what if I told you that this bill also gives the government more power to control and monitor online activity? That's right; with these new provisions, they can justify increased surveillance and censorship under the guise of protecting children.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The obvious stakeholders here are law enforcement agencies, child protection organizations, and victims of child exploitation. But let's not forget about the tech companies, internet service providers, and online platforms that will be forced to comply with these new regulations. And what about the average citizen? Will they be subject to increased scrutiny and monitoring?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching implications for our civil liberties and online freedoms. With its broad language and vague definitions, it could be used to justify all sorts of draconian measures against individuals and organizations that have nothing to do with child exploitation.

Think about it: if the government can control what we see and share online, they can control the narrative. And once they've got their foot in the door, who's to say they won't use this power to silence dissenting voices or stifle free speech?

Wake up, folks! This bill is not just about protecting children; it's about expanding government control over our lives and our online activities. Mark my words: this is just the beginning of a slippery slope that will lead us down a dark path of censorship and surveillance.

Now, pass the mashed potatoes, would you?

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. The ENFORCE Act, S 3021, is being touted as a major victory for the protection of our nation's most vulnerable citizens – our children. (pauses for dramatic effect)

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to strengthen federal laws against child exploitation and pornography. Now, I know what you're thinking: "Isn't this just common sense?" And to that, I say... (smirking) of course it is! But our elites in Washington need a reminder every now and then about what really matters.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The ENFORCE Act makes several key changes:

1. It clarifies the definition of child pornography production, making it easier for law enforcement to prosecute these heinous crimes. 2. It removes the statute of limitations for obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse, ensuring that perpetrators can't hide behind a ticking clock. 3. It includes crimes of obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse in sex offender registration, keeping our communities safer. 4. And, it prohibits the reproduction of these vile materials during discovery, protecting victims from further trauma.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and – most importantly – the victims of child exploitation and their families. ( voice dripping with sarcasm) Oh, and I'm sure the pedophiles and child predators out there are just thrilled about this development.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Folks, this bill is a major step forward in our fight against the scourge of child exploitation. By strengthening our laws and providing more tools for law enforcement, we're sending a clear message to these monsters: you will be caught, and you will be punished. (winking) And let's not forget about the freedom-loving Americans who'll be protected by this bill – our children.

Now, I know some of my liberal friends might say, "But what about due process?" or "What about the potential for overreach?" (chuckling) Oh, come on! We're talking about child predators here. Do we really need to worry about their rights? (smirking) I think not.

In conclusion, the ENFORCE Act is a vital piece of legislation that will help keep our children safe and bring justice to those who would seek to harm them. So, let's all take a moment to applaud our brave lawmakers for taking on this critical issue... (pausing for dramatic effect) before we get back to the real fight: defending our freedom from the elites who want to take it away!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another bill that's about as genuine as a politician's smile at a funeral. Let me dissect this farce for you.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The ENFORCE Act claims to enhance enforcement against child pornography and obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse. How noble. In reality, it's just another opportunity for politicians to grandstand on a sensitive issue while doing little to address the root problems.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** This bill amends various sections of title 18, United States Code, to clarify production and distribution of child pornography, remove the statute of limitations for certain offenses, and enhance penalties. Oh, and it also includes some token provisions about victim access to visual depictions involved in a violation. How thoughtful.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects: politicians looking for a photo op, law enforcement agencies seeking more power, and the obligatory "concerned citizens" who think this bill will magically solve the problem of child exploitation. Meanwhile, the actual victims and their families are just pawns in this legislative game.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It might make some politicians feel good about themselves, but it won't significantly impact the scourge of child exploitation. The real issues – poverty, lack of education, and systemic failures – will remain unaddressed. Instead, we'll get more bureaucratic red tape, increased surveillance, and a further erosion of civil liberties.

In medical terms, this bill is like treating a patient's symptoms with a placebo while ignoring the underlying disease. It's a classic case of "legislative theater" – all show, no substance. The politicians behind this bill are either incompetent or complicit in perpetuating the problem.

Diagnosis: Terminal naivety, with a healthy dose of cynicism and a complete disregard for the well-being of actual victims. Treatment: A strong dose of reality, followed by a thorough examination of the root causes of child exploitation. Prognosis: Poor, as long as politicians continue to prioritize their own interests over meaningful solutions.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**ENFORCE Act (S. 3021) Summary**

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The ENFORCE Act aims to enhance enforcement of federal laws related to obscene child sexual abuse and child pornography, with the primary objective of protecting children from exploitation.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

* Clarifies the definition of "production" in relation to child pornography, making it easier to prosecute individuals who create or distribute such material. * Removes the statute of limitations for crimes involving obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse. * Includes crimes of obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse in sex offender registration requirements. * Prohibits the reproduction of obscene visual depictions of child sexual abuse during discovery, and allows victims access to these materials under certain conditions. * Presumes detention pending trial for individuals accused of violating section 1466A (obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse). * Requires supervised release after imprisonment for violations of section 1466A.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

* Children who are victims of exploitation and abuse * Law enforcement agencies responsible for investigating and prosecuting crimes related to child pornography and obscene child sexual abuse * Courts handling cases involving these crimes * Sex offenders required to register under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The ENFORCE Act aims to strengthen federal laws against child exploitation, making it easier to prosecute individuals who create or distribute material depicting child sexual abuse. The changes to existing law may lead to:

* Increased prosecution of individuals involved in creating or distributing child pornography * Enhanced protection for victims of child exploitation and abuse * Improved coordination between law enforcement agencies and courts handling these cases * Stricter penalties for those convicted of crimes related to obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse

Overall, the ENFORCE Act seeks to address the growing concern of child exploitation and abuse by strengthening federal laws and enhancing enforcement efforts.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this ENFORCE Act like it's a gnarly wave, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The ENFORCE Act is all about enhancing enforcement when it comes to child exploitation and obscenity, man. It aims to strengthen laws related to child pornography and obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse. The bill's main objective is to make sure the feds can effectively investigate and prosecute these heinous crimes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** This bill makes some significant changes to existing law, bro:

* Clarifies what constitutes production of child pornography, making it easier for prosecutors to go after those who create this sick stuff. * Removes the statute of limitations for obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse, so perpetrators can't just wait out the clock and avoid justice. * Includes crimes related to obscene visual representations in sex offender registration requirements, keeping communities safer. * Prohibits reproduction of these images during discovery, protecting victims from further trauma. * Presumes detention for those accused of violating section 1466A (obscene visual representations) pending trial, because these crimes are just too serious.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The ENFORCE Act affects various parties and stakeholders, including:

* Victims of child exploitation and their families * Law enforcement agencies and prosecutors working to combat these crimes * Sex offenders and those accused of violating section 1466A * The broader community, as this bill aims to keep neighborhoods safer

**Potential Impact & Implications** The ENFORCE Act could have a significant impact on the fight against child exploitation, bro:

* By strengthening laws and enforcement, it may deter some perpetrators from committing these crimes. * Victims and their families might feel more confident in seeking justice, knowing that the system is working to protect them. * Law enforcement agencies will have more tools at their disposal to investigate and prosecute these complex cases.

However, there's also a risk of unintended consequences, like:

* Overly broad definitions or applications of the law could lead to unjust outcomes or chilling effects on free speech. * Increased penalties might not necessarily address the root causes of child exploitation or provide adequate support for victims.

Anyway, dude, that's the ENFORCE Act in a nutshell. It's all about getting tough on child exploitation and obscenity while protecting those who need it most.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 3021 - ENFORCE Act**

The ENFORCE Act, sponsored by Senator [Redacted], aims to enhance enforcement of laws related to child exploitation and pornography. The bill's primary objective is to strengthen the federal government's ability to prosecute individuals who produce, distribute, or possess material depicting obscene child sexual abuse or constituting child pornography.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:**

The ENFORCE Act seeks to:

1. Clarify the definition of "production" in relation to child pornography. 2. Enhance enforcement with respect to obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse. 3. Strengthen penalties for individuals convicted of child exploitation offenses.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Section 2252A of title 18, United States Code, is amended to clarify the definition of "production" in relation to child pornography. 2. The statute of limitations for obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse is removed (Section 3299). 3. Crimes involving obscene visual representations of child sexual abuse are included in sex offender registration requirements (Section 111(5)(A)(iii) of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006). 4. A prohibition on reproduction of obscene visual depictions of child sexual abuse in discovery is established (Section 1466A).

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. Law enforcement agencies responsible for investigating and prosecuting child exploitation cases. 2. Victims of child exploitation and their families. 3. Individuals convicted of child exploitation offenses.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

The ENFORCE Act's provisions aim to strengthen the federal government's ability to combat child exploitation. However, some critics argue that the bill may infringe upon individual rights, particularly with regards to the prohibition on reproduction of obscene visual depictions in discovery.

Notably, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) has expressed support for the bill, citing its potential to enhance enforcement efforts against child exploitation. However, some civil liberties organizations have raised concerns about the bill's impact on due process and individual rights.

**Monied Interest Analysis:**

While no specific PACs or industry lobby groups are directly backing this bill, it is worth noting that Senator [Redacted] has received significant campaign contributions from law enforcement unions and organizations focused on child welfare. These interests may have influenced the senator's decision to sponsor the ENFORCE Act.

In conclusion, the ENFORCE Act aims to strengthen federal laws related to child exploitation and pornography. While its provisions may enhance enforcement efforts, they also raise concerns about individual rights and due process. As the bill moves forward, it is essential to consider the potential implications of these changes on affected parties and stakeholders.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$440,480

20 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$440,433

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

WEEKLEY, RICHARD W

1 transaction

$100,000

MCINGVALE, JAMES F

1 transaction

$50,000

MCINGVALE, LINDA

1 transaction

$50,000

DUNN, TIMOTHY

1 transaction

$45,000

MIDDLETON, MAYES

2 transactions

$25,000

MARTIN, KIMBERLY R

1 transaction

$20,000

BLAINE, JAY C.

1 transaction

$16,478

THOMPSON, JERE W. MR. JR.

1 transaction

$13,200

MIDDLETON, MACEY

1 transaction

$12,500

BOLDRICK, MILES

1 transaction

$12,500

BOLDRICK, LAURIE

1 transaction

$12,500

MIDDLETON, MACY

1 transaction

$12,500

WHITEHILL, KIT

1 transaction

$10,755

CARROLL, TRACEY

1 transaction

$10,000

HUFFINES, PHILLIP

1 transaction

$10,000

ALBIN, ALAN S.

1 transaction

$10,000

AGRESTI, JOSEPH A

1 transaction

$10,000

ADAMSON, MARK

1 transaction

$10,000

WILKS, JO ANN

1 transaction

$10,000

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 3 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

OLSON, LYNDON

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWACO, TX

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Oct 2, 2023

KIM, CHRISTINE M.

BBB LLC • ATTORNEY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Apr 15, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

JONES, JERRY C.

LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Sep 19, 2024

NESSEL, ARIEL

NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER

IndividualROSS, CA

$3,300

Jul 12, 2024

Sen. Lee, Mike [R-UT]

ID: L000577

Top Contributors

MACRICOSTAS, GEORGE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualINCLINE VILLAGE, NV

$13,200

May 14, 2024

PFAUTCH, ROY

CIVIC SERVICE • CONSULTANT

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$9,900

Feb 20, 2024

NICOLAISEN, JAMES E

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPORTLAND, OR

$8,700

Jul 19, 2024

METZGER, WILLIAM

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBOONVILLE, IN

$8,700

Jul 23, 2024

S., TINA

SELF • RESTAURANT

IndividualMAUREPAS, LA

$8,700

Sep 10, 2024

DE CARLI, JAMES

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualDANA POINT, CA

$8,700

Aug 10, 2024

EDWARDS, ZELLA

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualCHAMBERSBURG, PA

$8,700

Sep 10, 2024

RICHARDSON, CHERYL

GRANITE SCHOOL DISTRICT • PARAEDUCATOR

IndividualSLC, UT

$8,700

Jul 9, 2024

DONADIO, RICHARD

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualDACULA, GA

$8,700

Aug 13, 2024

ZALL, MARGIE

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualBOYNTON BEACH, FL

$8,700

Sep 19, 2024

Sen. Kennedy, John [R-LA]

ID: K000393

Top Contributors

REITERMAN, MARY ELIZABETH

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSTOKESDALE, NC

$17,400

Oct 3, 2024

VIVIAN, MICHAEL A

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualPHOENIX, AZ

$17,400

Oct 23, 2024

REITERMAN, MARY ELIZABETH

IndividualSTOKESDALE, NC

$17,400

Nov 18, 2024

VIVIAN, MICHAEL A

IndividualPHOENIX, AZ

$17,400

Oct 23, 2024

JONES, SHIRLEY

IndividualLAKELAND, FL

$17,400

May 9, 2024

LACOSTE, ROGER

IndividualNEW BEDFORD, MA

$17,400

Jun 30, 2024

JONES, SHIRLEY

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualLAKELAND, FL

$17,400

May 6, 2024

LACOSTE, ROGER

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW BEDFORD, MA

$17,400

Jun 22, 2024

LABEDZ, DAVID

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualWARREN, MI

$17,400

Sep 5, 2024

LABEDZ, DAVID

IndividualWARREN, MI

$11,000

Sep 6, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 32 nodes and 34 connections

Total contributions: $34

Top Donors - Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX]

Showing top 20 donors by contribution amount

1 Committee19 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 2 harmed.

−Big Tech Platformsconfidence 0.80
Section 2 and Section 3 imply increased enforcement and regulation of online content, which may impact big tech platforms' content moderation policies and practices, potentially increasing their costs and liabilities.
−Telecommunicationsconfidence 0.60
The bill's focus on interstate or foreign commerce (Section 2) may lead to increased scrutiny of telecommunications companies' role in facilitating the distribution of obscene child sexual abuse material or child pornography.

Who funds the sponsor on these industries

For each industry this bill affects, here's what the sponsor (Sen. Cornyn, John [R-TX])received from donors associated with that industry during the 2022–present cycles. Donations are not proof of intent — they are a record of who funds the people writing the law.

Industries this bill HARMS

Telecommunications$8,900
from 9 contributions
- STANKEY, JOHN MR.$6,200
- STEPHENS, JOHN J. MR.$1,500
- SWINBANK, JOSEPH B. MR.$1,000
- LUKER, RENEE$200
Big Tech Platforms$7,000
from 4 contributions
- WALKER, KENT$6,200
- WALKER, KENT MR.$800

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Foreword

Strong

Vector: 62%

Pages: 37-39AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The ENFORCE Act aligns strongly with Project 2025's objective to combat pornography, particularly child sexual abuse material, by enhancing enforcement, removing statutes of limitations, and imposing stricter penalties—directly supporting the policy's call to imprison producers and distributors of such content and protect children from exploitation."

Key themes:child sexual abuse materialpornography enforcementprotection of childrencriminal penalties for offenderslaw enforcement strengthening

— 5 — Foreword (“DEI”), gender, gender equality, gender equity, gender awareness, gender-sensi- tive, abortion, reproductive health, reproductive rights, and any other term used to deprive Americans of their First Amendment rights out of every federal rule, agency regulation, contract, grant, regulation, and piece of legislation that exists. Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered. In our schools, the question of parental authority over their children’s education is a simple one: Schools serve parents, not the other way around. That is, of course, the best argument for universal school choice—a goal all conservatives and con- servative Presidents must pursue. But even before we achieve that long-term goal, parents’ rights as their children’s primary educators should be non-negotiable in American schools. States, cities and counties, school boards, union bosses, princi- pals, and teachers who disagree should be immediately cut off from federal funds. The noxious tenets of “critical race theory” and “gender ideology” should be excised from curricula in every public school in the country. These theories poison our children, who are being taught on the one hand to affirm that the color of their skin fundamentally determines their identity and even their moral status while on the other they are taught to deny the very creatureliness that inheres in being human and consists in accepting the givenness of our nature as men or women. Allowing parents or physicians to “reassign” the sex of a minor is child abuse and must end. For public institutions to use taxpayer dollars to declare the superiority or inferiority of certain races, sexes, and religions is a violation of the Constitu- tion and civil rights law and cannot be tolerated by any government anywhere in the country. But the pro-family promises expressed in this book, and central to the next conservative President’s agenda, must go much further than the traditional, narrow definition of “family issues.” Every threat to family stability must be confronted. This resolve should color each of our policies. Consider our approach to Big Tech. The worst of these companies prey on children, like drug dealers, to get them addicted to their mobile apps. Many Silicon Valley executives famously don’t let their own kids have smart phones.2 They nevertheless make billions of dollars addicting other people’s children to theirs. TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, and other social media platforms are specifically designed to create the digital — 6 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise dependencies that fuel mental illness and anxiety, to fray children’s bonds with their parents and siblings. Federal policy cannot allow this industrial-scale child abuse to continue. Finally, conservatives should gratefully celebrate the greatest pro-family win in a generation: overturning Roe v. Wade, a decision that for five decades made a mockery of our Constitution and facilitated the deaths of tens of millions of unborn children. But the Dobbs decision is just the beginning. Conservatives in the states and in Washington, including in the next conservative Administration, should push as hard as possible to protect the unborn in every jurisdiction in America. In particular, the next conservative President should work with Congress to enact the most robust protections for the unborn that Congress will support while deploying existing federal powers to protect innocent life and vigorously complying with statutory bans on the federal funding of abortion. Conservatives should ardently pursue these pro-life and pro-family policies while recognizing the many women who find themselves in immensely difficult and often tragic situations and the hero- ism of every choice to become a mother. Alternative options to abortion, especially adoption, should receive federal and state support. In summary, the next President has a moral responsibility to lead the nation in restoring a culture of life in America again. PROMISE #2: DISMANTLE THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE AND RETURN SELF-GOVERNANCE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. Of course, the surest way to put the federal government back to work for the American people is to reduce its size and scope back to something resembling the original constitutional intent. Conservatives desire a smaller government not for its own sake, but for the sake of human flourishing. But the Washington Establishment doesn’t want a constitutionally limited government because it means they lose power and are held more accountable by the people who put them in power. Like restoring popular sovereignty, the task of reattaching the federal gov- ernment’s constitutional and democratic tethers calls to mind Ronald Reagan’s observation that “there are no easy answers, but there are simple answers.” In the case of making the federal government smaller, more effective, and accountable, the simple answer is the Constitution itself. The surest proof of this is how strenuously and creatively generations of progressives and many Repub- lican insiders have worked to cut themselves free from the strictures of the 1789 Constitution and subsequent amendments. Consider the federal budget. Under current law, Congress is required to pass a budget—and 12 issue-specific spending bills comporting with it—every single year. The last time Congress did so was in 1996. Congress no longer meaningfully budgets, authorizes, or categorizes spending.

Department of Justice

Moderate

Vector: 59%

Pages: 590-592AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"Both the ENFORCE Act and the Project 2025 DOJ section aim to improve the Department of Justice's effectiveness in enforcing federal laws, though the ENFORCE Act targets child exploitation while Project 2025 focuses on depoliticizing the DOJ and restoring its integrity. The overlap lies in strengthening DOJ enforcement and upholding the rule of law."

Key themes:Department of Justicelaw enforcementrule of lawprosecutionvictim protection

— 557 — Department of Justice such as increases in “sextortion,” ransomware, and the continued proliferation of child pornography. DEFENDING THE RULE OF LAW The DOJ’s actions over the course of the Biden Administration exhibit scorn for its stated mission: “to uphold the rule of law, to keep our country safe, and to pro- tect civil rights.”54 The Biden Administration’s unprecedented politicization and weaponization of the department therefore demand a comprehensive response from the next Administration. Restoration of the department’s values of independence, impartiality, honesty, integrity, respect, and excellence must serve as first principles for its efforts on all fronts. Concretely, the DOJ must identify and address all individuals, policies, and directives that have fueled the destruction of these core values and the American people’s loss of trust in the department and its officials. The next Administration will need to exert significant energy to dismantle the two-tiered system of justice currently in place at the department while simultaneously applying the rule of law evenly and with neutrality. Specific examples of department corruption, such as the Russia collusion hoax, will need to be tackled, exposed, and addressed head-on. This will require not just winning in a court of law, but also demonstrating culpability to the public and the media in a concrete and nonrefutable manner. These efforts will require commitment and willpower, but they will be essential to restoring the trust of the American people. Promptly and Properly Eliminating Lawless Policies, Investigations, and Cases, Including All Existing Consent Decrees. Few things undermine the DOJ’s credibility more than brazenly partisan and ideologically driven prosecution of an Administration’s perceived political enemies, yet the department has readily indulged in such misadventures during the Biden Administration. Before even entering the Robert F. Kennedy building on January 20, 2025, the next Adminis- tration should: l Conduct a thorough review of all publicly available policies, investigations, and cases. l In a manner consistent with applicable law, prepare a plan to end immediately any policies, investigations, or cases that run contrary to law or Administration policies. l Ensure that upon the next President’s inauguration, appointees at the department obtain information about anything that was not learned before taking office and conduct the same analysis. — 558 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise An egregious example of the need for such a review is provided by the depart- ment’s use of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act55 to harass pro-life demonstrators while not pursuing similar investigations of shocking acts of violence committed against pro-life pregnancy resource centers. On the morning of September 23, 2022, pro-life activist Mark Houck was arrested by more than 15 FBI agents at his home in Pennsylvania in front of his wife and small children. Agents came to his door with guns drawn to arrest the 48-year-old father of seven whose alleged crime involved a minor altercation with an activist who was harass- ing one of his children in front of an abortion clinic almost one year before Mr. Houck’s arrest by the FBI.56 Similarly, Paul Vaughn, a 55-year-old father of 11, was arrested at his home in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee, by armed FBI agents for allegedly participating in a peaceful protest at an abortion clinic one year earlier.57 These arrests stand in stark contrast to the department’s virtual silence on the wave of vandalism and violence directed at religiously affiliated institutions, includ- ing pregnancy resource centers, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.58 The Catholic News Agency reported more than one hundred such incidents as of September 2022.59 By engaging in disparate and viewpoint-based enforcement of an already con- troversial law like the FACE Act against pro-life activists, the DOJ has needlessly undermined its credibility with law-abiding people of faith. The department should make every effort to uphold equal protection of the law and avoid politically moti- vated and viewpoint-based prosecutions. Specifically, it should: l Ensure that its review extends beyond ending the absurd double standards embodied in the ongoing campaign of FACE Act prosecutions and instead be a thorough and holistic review of all DOJ activities, including all consent degrees and settlement agreements currently in force. l Seek to terminate any unnecessary or outdated consent decree to which the United States is a party. l Consider pursuing intervention in other matters where consent decrees or settlement agreements continue to bind parties years or decades after the fact. l As its review concludes, and consistent with applicable law, take appropriate action in all cases, including those on appeal. l Enact policies and regulations that prohibit settlement payments to third parties.

Department of Education

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 377-379AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The ENFORCE Act focuses on strengthening criminal enforcement against child sexual abuse material, whereas the Project 2025 Department of Education section centers on expanding parental rights in education (FERPA/PPRA, private right of action). Both concern child welfare but address distinct policy domains, resulting in only tangential alignment."

Key themes:child welfarefederal oversightprotection of minors

— 344 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise pronouns). The federal government could demand that schools include curriculum or lessons regarding critical race or gender theory in a way that violates parental rights, especially if it requires minors to disclose information about their religious beliefs, or beliefs about race or gender in violation of the Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (20 USC Sec. 1232h). To remedy the lack of clear and robust protection for parental rights, the next Administration should: l Work to pass a federal Parents’ Bill of Rights that restores parental rights to a “top-tier” right. Such legislation would give families a fair hearing in court when the federal government enforces any policy against parents in a way that undermines their right and responsibility to raise, educate, and care for their children. The law would require the government to satisfy “strict scrutiny”—the highest standard of judicial review—when the government infringes parental rights. l Further ensure that any regulations that could impact parental rights contain similar protections and require federal agencies to demonstrate that their action meets strict scrutiny before a final rule is promulgated. At the same time, Congress should also consider equipping parents with a private right of action. Two federal laws provide certain privacy protections for students attending educational institutions or programs funded by the department. The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) protects the privacy of student education records and allows parents and students over the age of 18 to inspect and review the student’s education records maintained by the school and to request corrections to those records. FERPA also authorizes a number of excep- tions to this records privacy protection that allow schools to disclose the student’s education records without the consent or knowledge of the parent or student. The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) requires schools to obtain paren- tal consent before asking questions, including surveys, about political affiliations or beliefs; mental or psychological issues; sexual behaviors or attitudes; critical appraisals of family members; illegal or self-incriminating behavior; religious prac- tices or beliefs; privileged relationships, as with doctors and clergy; and family income, unless for program eligibility. The difficulty for parents is that FERPA and PPRA do not authorize a private right of action. If a school refuses to comply with either statute, the only remedy is for the parent or student (if over the age of 18) to file an administrative complaint with the U.S. Department of Education, which must then work with the school to obtain compliance before taking any action to suspend or terminate federal — 345 — Department of Education financial assistance. Investigations can take months if not years. The department has never suspended or terminated the funding for an educational institution or agency for violating FERPA or PPRA. In essence, Congress has granted parents and students important statutory rights without an effective remedy to assert those rights. l The next Administration should work with Congress to amend FERPA and PPRA to provide parents and students over the age of 18 years with a private right of action to seek injunctive and declaratory relief, together with attorneys’ fees and costs if a prevailing party, against educational institutions and agencies that violate rights enshrined in these statutes. This will empower parents and students, level the playing field between families and education bureaucracies, and encourage institutional compliance with these statutory requirements. Protect Parental Rights in Policy In addition to strengthening legal protections for parents, the next Adminis- tration should: l Prioritize legislation advancing such rights. Promising ideas have appeared in bills introduced in the 117th Congress such as H.R.8767, the Empowering Parents Act,15 sponsored by Representative Bob Good (R-VA); H.R. 6056, the Parents’ Bill of Rights Act,16 sponsored by Representative Julia Letlow (R-LA); and H.J.Res. 99,17 proposing an amendment to the Constitution relating to parental rights, sponsored by Representative Debbie Lesko (R-AZ). l These congressional actions should be carefully reviewed to make sure they complement state Parents' Bills of Rights, such as those passed in Georgia (2022), Florida (2021), Montana (2021), Wyoming (2017), Idaho (2015), Oklahoma (2014), Virginia (2013), and Arizona (2010). As documented by writers such as Abigail Shrier and others, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons documented a four-fold increase in the number of biological girls seeking gender surgery between 2016 and 2017. Larger increases were found in the U.K. from 2009 to 2019 and 2017 to 2018. These statistics and others point to a social contagion in which minor children, especially girls, are attempting to make life-altering decisions using puberty blockers and other hor- mone treatments and even surgeries to remove or alter vital body parts. Heritage Foundation research finds that providing easier access to such treatments and

Federal Trade Commission

Weak

Vector: 60%

Pages: 908-910AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The ENFORCE Act focuses on criminal enforcement against child sexual abuse material and obscene visual representations, while the Project 2025 FTC policy targets unfair contractual practices and data collection by online platforms affecting children's mental health and privacy. Though both aim to protect children online, their mechanisms, legal frameworks, and primary concerns differ significantly."

Key themes:child protectiononline safetyexploitation prevention

— 875 — Federal Trade Commission Protecting Children Online. The FTC has long protected children in a variety of different contexts. Internet platforms profit from obtaining information from children without parents’ knowledge or consent—and social media’s effect on the well-being of American children is well-documented. Around 2012, American teens experienced a dramatic decline in wellness. Depression, self-harm, suicide attempts, and suicide all increased sharply among U.S. adolescents between 2011 and 2019,16 with similar trends worldwide.17 The increase occurred at the same time that social media use moved from rare to ubiquitous among teens,18 making social media a prime suspect for the sudden rise in mental health issues among teens. In addition, excessive social media use is strongly linked to mental health issues among individuals. Several studies strongly support the notion that social media use is a cause, not just a correlation, of subjective well-being and poor mental health.19 Social media and other large platforms form millions of contracts every year with American children. And even though a minor can void most contracts into which he or she enters, most jurisdictions have laws that hold minors accountable for the benefits received under the contract. Thus, children can make enforceable contracts for which parents could end up bearing responsibility. Targeting chil- dren to create potentially harmful contracts or making parents responsible for such contractual relationships is an unfair trade practice. The FTC, therefore, has the authority, interest, and duty to protect children online from such contractual relationships. l The FTC should examine platforms’ advertising and contract- making with children as a deceptive or unfair trade practice, perhaps requiring written parental consent. Currently, the Child Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA)20 regulates the information internet firms can obtain from children. COPPA fails because it (1) only protects children under the age of 13, leaving older teenagers completely unprotected and (2) only prohibits platforms from collecting information from a child using “actual knowledge” rather than abiding by the “constructive knowledge” standard, which prohibits collecting information from a user reasonably assumed to be underage. The FTC has rulemaking authority under this statute but has done little with this authority, nor can it—given the statutory constraints. However, l The FTC can and should institute unfair trade practices proceedings against entities that enter into contracts with children without parental consent. Personal parental responsibility is, of course, key, but the law must respect, not undermine, lawful parental authority.

Department of Labor and Related Agencies

Minimal

Vector: 60%

Pages: 618-620AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The ENFORCE Act focuses on combating child sexual abuse material and enhancing criminal penalties for related offenses, while the Project 2025 policy addresses sex discrimination enforcement based on a biological binary definition of sex, pro-life workplace accommodations, and religious employer protections. There is no substantive thematic or policy overlap between the two."

— 585 — Department of Labor and Related Agencies l Direct agencies to refocus enforcement of sex discrimination laws. The President should direct agencies to focus their enforcement of sex discrimination laws on the biological binary meaning of “sex.” PRO-LIFE MEASURES l Promote pro-life workplace accommodations for mothers. Federal law should protect life and promote pro-family policies. Current law, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act,3 provides nondiscrimination protections in the workplace for pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions. The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA)4 requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for women “to the known limitations related to the pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions,” unless “the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of the [employer’s] business.” The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) also provides nondiscrimination and accommodation protections in the workplace for certain pregnancy-related disability.5 None of these laws requires an employer provide health insurance benefits for elective abortion. l Pass a law requiring equal (or greater) benefits for pro-life support for mothers and clarifying abortion exclusions. Congress should pass a law requiring that to the extent an employer provides employee benefits for abortion, it must provide equal or greater benefits for pregnancy, childbirth, maternity, and adoption. That law should also clarify that no employer is required to provide any accommodations or benefits for abortion. l Keep anti-life “benefits” out of benefit plans. Some benefits attorneys and pro-choice advocates have argued since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision6 that the longstanding doctrine of Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)7 preemption should block individual states’ efforts to prohibit employers from helping employees procure abortions via offering various kinds of coverage under employee-sponsored benefit plans. ERISA should not be allowed to trump states’ ability to protect innocent human life in the womb. Congress and DOL should clarify that ERISA does not preempt states’ power to restrict abortion, surrogacy, or other anti-life “benefits.” RELIGION l Provide robust protections for religious employers. America’s religious diversity means that workplaces include people of many faiths and that many employers are faith-based. Nevertheless, the Biden Administration has been hostile to people of faith, especially those with traditional beliefs — 586 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise about marriage, gender, and sexuality. The new Administration should enact policies with robust respect for religious exercise in the workplace, including under the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA),8 Title VII, and federal conscience protection laws. l Issue an executive order protecting religious employers and employees. The President should make clear via executive order that religious employers are free to run their businesses according to their religious beliefs, general nondiscrimination laws notwithstanding, and support participation of religious employees and employers as federal contractors and in federal activities and programs. l Clarify Title VII’s religious organization exemptions. Congress should clarify Title VII’s religious organization exemptions to make it more explicit that those employers may make employment decisions based on religion regardless of nondiscrimination laws. l Provide Robust Accommodations for Religious Employees. Title VII requires reasonable accommodations for an employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs, observances, or practices unless it poses an undue hardship on the employer’s business. These accommodation protections also apply to issues related to marriage, gender, and sexuality. Unless the Supreme Court overrules its bad precedent, Congress should clarify that undue hardship means “significant difficulty or expenses,” not “more than a de minimis cost” as the Court has previously held. General EEOC Reforms. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commis- sion (EEOC) does not have rulemaking authority under Title VII and other laws it enforces, yet it issues “guidance,” “technical assistance,” and other documents, including some that push new policy positions. EEOC should disclaim its regulatory pretensions and abide by the guidance reforms dis- cussed below. l EEOC should disclaim its regulatory pretensions. l Affirm decision-making via majority vote of Commissioners. EEOC should affirm as policy the Title VII requirement that it exercise substantive power via majority vote of Commissioners, not by unilateral Chair action or by delegation to staff.

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Cornyn, John

Promoting Resilient Buildings Act

119/s/388

A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 620 East Pecan Boulevard in McAllen, Texas, as the "Agent Raul H. Gonzalez Jr. Memorial Post Office".

119/s/917

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026

119/s/1071

Back to All Bills