Ensuring Predictable and Reliable Water Deliveries Act of 2025

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/3120
Last Updated: November 11, 2025

Sponsored by

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

ID: C001098

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Invalid Date

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another brilliant example of congressional incompetence. Let's dissect this trainwreck, shall we?

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The Ensuring Predictable and Reliable Water Deliveries Act of 2025 is a laughable attempt to strong-arm Mexico into providing water to the United States under the Treaty relating to the Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande. The bill's sponsors, Cruz and Cornyn, are trying to sound tough on Mexico while actually accomplishing nothing.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of State to submit a report every 180 days (because who needs actual diplomacy?) assessing Mexico's water deliveries under the treaty. If Mexico doesn't meet its obligations, the President can limit or terminate engagement with the Mexican government on non-treaty matters (except for counter-narcotics efforts, because priorities). The bill also defines "non-Treaty requests" and "appropriate committees of Congress," because who doesn't love a good game of bureaucratic jargon?

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Mexico, obviously. But let's be real, this bill is more about posturing for the American public than actual diplomacy. Other stakeholders include:

* Farmers and water districts in the southwestern United States who might benefit from predictable water deliveries (but probably won't). * Environmental groups who will inevitably sue over the lack of consideration for ecological impacts. * The Mexican government, which will likely respond with a mix of amusement and annoyance.

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a perfect example of "legislative theater." It's all about appearances, not actual results. Mexico might make some token gestures to appease the United States, but this bill won't change the fundamental dynamics of water management in the region.

In reality, this bill will:

* Strain US-Mexico relations without achieving any meaningful goals. * Provide a convenient excuse for politicians to grandstand on "toughness" while accomplishing nothing. * Waste taxpayer dollars on pointless bureaucratic exercises (those 180-day reports won't write themselves, after all).

Diagnosis: This bill is suffering from a severe case of "Congressional Incompetence Syndrome," characterized by symptoms such as:

* Grandstanding without substance * Lack of understanding of complex issues * Prioritizing appearances over actual results

Treatment: A healthy dose of skepticism and ridicule.

Related Topics

Civil Rights & Liberties State & Local Government Affairs Transportation & Infrastructure Small Business & Entrepreneurship Government Operations & Accountability National Security & Intelligence Criminal Justice & Law Enforcement Federal Budget & Appropriations Congressional Rules & Procedures
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$1,532,371
26 donors
PACs
$1,497,892
Organizations
$34,479
Committees
$0
Individuals
$0
1
WINRED
2 transactions
$1,497,892
1
FASKEN MANAGEMENT
1 transaction
$10,000
2
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF HARRISON COUNTY
1 transaction
$4,000
3
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
1 transaction
$3,300
4
THE CHICKASAW NATION
1 transaction
$3,300
5
FOLAD ENTERPRISES LLC
1 transaction
$2,000
6
JOHNSEY
4 transactions
$1,604
7
ALABAMA- COUSHATTA TRIBE
1 transaction
$1,000
8
BALCH & BINGHAM LLP
1 transaction
$1,000
9
PARTNERS HOTEL GROUP LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
10
KHAT INVESTMENS LLC
1 transaction
$1,000
11
PJB INVESTMENT ADVISORS LLC
1 transaction
$800
12
GRANT MORELAND LP LLC
1 transaction
$750
13
BL PARTNERS GROUP LLC
1 transaction
$750
14
MILLE'S LLC
1 transaction
$500
15
HARRY M BETTIS JR LLC
1 transaction
$500
16
ROBDON L.P.
1 transaction
$500
17
JAMES E. JOHNSON LLC
1 transaction
$500
18
FALSE RIVER VIEW LLC
1 transaction
$500
19
MURDOCK PROPERTIES LLC
1 transaction
$325
20
RESEDA HOLDINGS LLC
1 transaction
$250
21
DIXON RENTAL PROPERTIES LLC
1 transaction
$250
22
ROGERS LIVESTOCK LLC
1 transaction
$250
23
MISRASI CONCRETE LLC
1 transaction
$200
24
KONEHU LEGACY, LLC
1 transaction
$100
25
PACIFIC LIFESTYLE IMPORTS, LLC
1 transaction
$100

No committee contributions found

No individual contributions found

Donor Network - Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 27 nodes and 30 connections

Total contributions: $1,532,371

Top Donors - Sen. Cruz, Ted [R-TX]

Showing top 25 donors by contribution amount

1 PAC25 Orgs