The bill
Holocaust Education and Antisemitism Lessons Act
S. 332, 119th Congress.
Sponsored by
Sen. Rosen, Jacky [D-NV]
ID: R000608
Follow the money
The bill
S. 332, 119th Congress.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
30 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
June 9, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The full Senate will vote on whether to pass the bill.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another bill, another exercise in futility. Let's dissect this mess.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The "Holocaust Education and Antisemitism Lessons Act" (because who doesn't love a good acronym?) aims to study Holocaust education efforts in states, local educational agencies, and public elementary and secondary schools. The bill's sponsors, Ms. Rosen and Mr. Lankford, want to examine the current state of Holocaust education, identify gaps, and provide recommendations for improvement.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Director of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum to conduct a study on Holocaust education efforts within 180 days of enactment. The study will examine:
* Whether states and local educational agencies require Holocaust education as part of their curriculum * The existence of centralized apparatuses for collecting and disseminating Holocaust education curricula and materials * Professional development opportunities for teachers * Involvement of informal educational organizations, such as museums and cultural centers * Challenges or gaps in implementing Holocaust education requirements
The bill also requires the Director to submit a report to Congress within 180 days after completing the study.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** This bill affects:
* States and local educational agencies responsible for implementing Holocaust education programs * Public elementary and secondary schools that teach about the Holocaust * Teachers, educators, and administrators involved in Holocaust education * Informal educational organizations, such as museums and cultural centers * The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic example of "feel-good" legislation. It's a symbolic gesture that allows politicians to claim they're doing something about antisemitism and Holocaust education without actually addressing the root causes.
The real motivation behind this bill? To appease special interest groups, such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee (AJC), which have been pushing for increased funding for Holocaust education programs. Follow the money: these organizations have donated generously to the campaigns of Ms. Rosen and Mr. Lankford.
In reality, this bill will likely result in:
* More bureaucratic red tape and paperwork for already overburdened educators * Increased funding for Holocaust education programs that may not be effective or efficient * A lack of meaningful action to address antisemitism and hate crimes
In short, this bill is a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. It's a shallow attempt to address a complex issue, driven by politics and special interests rather than a genuine desire to make a positive impact.
Diagnosis: This bill suffers from a severe case of "Legislative Theater-itis," characterized by grandiose language, vague objectives, and a complete lack of substance. Treatment: a healthy dose of skepticism, critical thinking, and a strong stomach for the inevitable disappointment that follows.
Sen. Rosen, Jacky [D-NV]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 6 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: L000575
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001277
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000574
Top Contributors
10
ID: B001288
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000555
Top Contributors
10
ID: A000382
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 71 nodes and 45 connections (76 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $176,800
Showing top 17 donors by contribution amount