EFFECTIVE Food Procurement Act

Download PDF
Bill ID: 119/s/3471
Last Updated: September 7, 2026

Sponsored by

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

ID: M000133

Follow the money

The bill

EFFECTIVE Food Procurement Act

S. 3471, 119th Congress — read as touching Crop Producers.

The sponsor

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$72,200 raised

22 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

85% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Agriculture" section, p. 344-346 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held.

January 13, 2026

Introduced

Committee Review

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed members of Congress. Let's dissect this monstrosity and uncover the real disease beneath the surface.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

The EFFECTIVE Food Procurement Act (because who doesn't love a good acronym?) claims to improve purchasing practices by the Department of Agriculture, promoting a more just, healthy, and sustainable food system. How quaint. In reality, this bill is a Trojan horse for special interest groups, masquerading as a champion of social justice and environmental sustainability.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill introduces a plethora of new definitions, certifications, and programs, all designed to create a Byzantine bureaucracy that will inevitably benefit the well-connected and well-funded. Key provisions include:

* The creation of a certification program for "covered producers" (beginning farmers, veterans, socially disadvantaged farmers, etc.), which will undoubtedly become a cash cow for consultants and auditors. * The expansion of purchasing authorities to include various sections of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act, because who doesn't love a good game of legislative shell-shuffling? * The introduction of a "policy to limit deforestation," which sounds noble but is likely a thinly veiled attempt to enrich certain stakeholders in the forestry industry.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The usual suspects will benefit from this bill:

* Large agricultural corporations, who will exploit the new certification programs and purchasing authorities to further consolidate their market share. * Special interest groups, such as environmental organizations and social justice advocates, who will use this bill as a Trojan horse to advance their agendas. * Lobbyists and consultants, who will feast on the complexity and bureaucratic red tape created by this legislation.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

This bill will have several predictable consequences:

* Increased costs for taxpayers, as the Department of Agriculture will need to hire more bureaucrats to administer these new programs. * Further consolidation of the agricultural industry, as smaller farmers and producers are squeezed out by the complexity and expense of compliance. * A surge in "greenwashing" and "social justice-washing," as companies exploit the bill's provisions to burnish their public images without actually changing their practices.

In conclusion, this bill is a classic case of legislative myopia, where politicians prioritize short-term gains for special interest groups over long-term consequences for the general public. It's a disease that will only spread if left unchecked.

Related Topics

Water & Air Quality Regulations
Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions
$599,464
297 donors
PACs
$0
Organizations
$2,000
Committees
$0
Individuals
$597,464

No PAC contributions found

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
2 transactions
$2,000

No committee contributions found

1
DONOHUE, JOHN
2 transactions
$9,900
2
HARRIS, WILLIAM SR.
3 transactions
$9,500
3
SWIG, MARY
3 transactions
$7,600
4
MARCHAND, PAUL
3 transactions
$7,500
5
ABRAMS, JEFFREY J.
2 transactions
$6,600
6
BRADLEY, DAVID
2 transactions
$6,600
7
BRADLEY, KATHERINE BRITTAIN
2 transactions
$6,600
8
BUTLER, ANDREW
2 transactions
$6,600
9
CARDWELL, NEAL
2 transactions
$6,600
10
CONWAY, RONALD C.
2 transactions
$6,600
11
DOUGLAS, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$6,600
12
GOLDBERG, BENNETT H.
2 transactions
$6,600
13
GOLDBERG, CAROL B.
2 transactions
$6,600
14
GOLDBERG, HENRY H.
2 transactions
$6,600
15
GUTTMAN KLEIN, DANIELLE
2 transactions
$6,600
16
KLEIN III, ROB
2 transactions
$6,600
17
KLEIN, ROBERT N. II
2 transactions
$6,600
18
LANDRY, BARRIE
2 transactions
$6,600
19
MANOCHERIAN, JED
2 transactions
$6,600
20
MCGRATH, KATHLEEN
2 transactions
$6,600
21
MERRIGAN, JOHN A.
2 transactions
$6,600
22
MUNGER, PHILIP R.
2 transactions
$6,600
23
RESNICK, LYNDA RAE
2 transactions
$6,600
24
RESNICK, STEWART A.
2 transactions
$6,600
25
ROBINSON, FRANCES
2 transactions
$6,600
26
RUBIN, MILES
2 transactions
$6,600
27
RUBIN, NANCY
2 transactions
$6,600
28
SAKELLARIS, GEORGE P.
2 transactions
$6,600
29
TOCCO, JESSICA BEESON
2 transactions
$6,600
30
WEISSMAN, ANN
2 transactions
$6,600
31
WEISSMAN, IRVING
2 transactions
$6,600
32
WESTLY, STEVEN
2 transactions
$6,500
33
ATKINS, CHET G.
2 transactions
$6,000
34
BRILLIANT, LARRY B
2 transactions
$6,000
35
ANDELSON, MICHELE
2 transactions
$5,000
36
JOHNSTON, PHILIP
2 transactions
$5,000
37
KARGMAN, WILLIAM M.
2 transactions
$5,000
38
ROSS, GARY
2 transactions
$5,000
39
SRIDHAR, KR
2 transactions
$5,000
40
ZEVNIK, PAUL A.
3 transactions
$4,300
41
WHITE, ROBERT F.
2 transactions
$4,200
42
MOUTOUDIS, EVANGELOS
2 transactions
$3,800
43
BOYLE, JAMES
4 transactions
$3,500
44
BAER, WILLIAM
1 transaction
$3,300
45
BENDER, GRACE
1 transaction
$3,300
46
BOGER, JOSHUA
1 transaction
$3,300
47
CROLL, DAVID D.
1 transaction
$3,300
48
CROWLEY, MATTHEW
1 transaction
$3,300
49
HUNDT, REED
1 transaction
$3,300
50
JONES, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
51
LUDWIG, EUGENE A.
1 transaction
$3,300
52
MAKIHARA, JUN
1 transaction
$3,300
53
MOUTOUDIS, ELEFTHERIA
1 transaction
$3,300
54
PIERCE, DAVID
1 transaction
$3,300
55
RIVERA GAMARRA, LILIANA
1 transaction
$3,300
56
SANT, ROGER W.
1 transaction
$3,300
57
SCHMIDT, WENDY
1 transaction
$3,300
58
SWIG, STEVEN
2 transactions
$3,300
59
UNGER, KATHLEEN
1 transaction
$3,300
60
UNGER, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$3,300
61
WEISS, DANIEL
1 transaction
$3,300
62
EMMET, HENRY
4 transactions
$3,250
63
NIEMCZEWSKI, CHRIS
1 transaction
$3,231
64
TEPPER, YANIV
1 transaction
$3,200
65
CAFRITZ, JANE
1 transaction
$3,000
66
GUERNSEY, SHERWOOD
2 transactions
$3,000
67
TANZI, RUDOLPH
1 transaction
$3,000
68
BROWNELL, ANNE
5 transactions
$3,000
69
HOQUE, MAKSUDUL
1 transaction
$2,900
70
KLEIN, ISRAEL
1 transaction
$2,900
71
NESSEL, ARIEL
1 transaction
$2,900
72
BAUER, PETER
2 transactions
$2,800
73
MORNINGSTAR, RICHARD
1 transaction
$2,800
74
SYED, BADRA
1 transaction
$2,700
75
BROSNAN, KEELY
1 transaction
$2,500
76
DERDERIAN, JAMES
2 transactions
$2,500
77
PRIOR, MICHAEL T.
1 transaction
$2,500
78
RESOR, GRIFF
5 transactions
$2,500
79
SOBRATO, JOHN M
1 transaction
$2,500
80
SILVERSTEIN, PATRICIA
1 transaction
$2,400
81
SILVERSTEIN, ROGER
1 transaction
$2,400
82
BAYLISS, KIM KOONTZ
1 transaction
$2,300
83
NORTON, CHARLES F. JR.
2 transactions
$2,300
84
VALLEE, JAMES
1 transaction
$2,263
85
MORRIS, SARA
3 transactions
$2,200
86
BERKOWITZ, ROGER F.
1 transaction
$2,000
87
BUSH, ANTOINETTE
2 transactions
$2,000
88
CLARK, BRIAN M
1 transaction
$2,000
89
DOHERTY, REGINA QUINLAN
1 transaction
$2,000
90
GLYNN, THOMAS P. III
1 transaction
$2,000
91
GOLD, PAULA
3 transactions
$2,000
92
HALSTROM, FREDERIC
1 transaction
$2,000
93
HARRINGTON, MICHAEL J.
2 transactions
$2,000
94
LAW, DONALD
2 transactions
$2,000
95
LEVIN, BLAIR
1 transaction
$2,000
96
MACDONALD, ALEX
3 transactions
$2,000
97
MANNING, MARY JO
4 transactions
$2,000
98
MOELLER, JANE
1 transaction
$2,000
99
MURPHY, JOHN
2 transactions
$2,000
100
SEGEL, ARTHUR I.
1 transaction
$2,000
101
SHAH, ANIKET
1 transaction
$2,000
102
WILKINS, JON S. JR.
1 transaction
$2,000
103
RAMER, BRUCE
1 transaction
$1,720
104
VRADENBURG, GEORGE III
2 transactions
$1,600
105
BELL, DAWN
1 transaction
$1,500
106
BENCHLEY, WENDY
2 transactions
$1,500
107
BURBANK, STEPHEN
3 transactions
$1,500
108
D'ALESSANDRO, DAVID
1 transaction
$1,500
109
GOODFRIEND, DAVID
2 transactions
$1,500
110
LASALA, BARRY
1 transaction
$1,500
111
RAPPAPORT, SUSAN
3 transactions
$1,500
112
TAVLARIDES, MARK
2 transactions
$1,500
113
SELLIKEN, JOSEPH
2 transactions
$1,300
114
PAPOULIAS-SAKELLARIS, CATHERINE
1 transaction
$1,200
115
ALCALDE, HECTOR
1 transaction
$1,000
116
ATHY, ANDREW JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
117
BALIAN, RITA
2 transactions
$1,000
118
BARTLETT, JACOB
1 transaction
$1,000
119
BARTLETT, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
120
BENINCASA, JUSTIN D.
1 transaction
$1,000
121
BOYLE, LEO V.
1 transaction
$1,000
122
BRENNAN, JACK
1 transaction
$1,000
123
CARR, RYAN
1 transaction
$1,000
124
CARROLL, JOHN J. JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
125
CHOWDHURY, NUSRAT J
1 transaction
$1,000
126
COOK WILTON, KATHY JO
1 transaction
$1,000
127
DELEON, RUDY
1 transaction
$1,000
128
DEYST, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
129
DORE, LAWRENCE H JR
1 transaction
$1,000
130
FARRAH, LOUIS J II
1 transaction
$1,000
131
FEINGOLD, ELLEN
2 transactions
$1,000
132
FIELDS, JACK M. JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
133
FINEBERG, HARVEY
1 transaction
$1,000
134
FLAHERTY, SEAN
1 transaction
$1,000
135
FLORESCU, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
136
GOLDBERG, FRED
1 transaction
$1,000
137
GOLDBERG, WENDY
1 transaction
$1,000
138
GOO, MICHAEL
2 transactions
$1,000
139
GORE, MARY T
1 transaction
$1,000
140
HADLEY, CHRISTOPHER
1 transaction
$1,000
141
HAND, LLOYD
1 transaction
$1,000
142
HARE, BRENDAN
1 transaction
$1,000
143
HARRINGTON, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$1,000
144
HENNESSEY, JOHN W
2 transactions
$1,000
145
HIGGINS, ROBERT F.
1 transaction
$1,000
146
HORMEL, RAMPA
1 transaction
$1,000
147
HOSSAIN, AKMAL MD
1 transaction
$1,000
148
HULL, MEGAN
1 transaction
$1,000
149
IANNELLA, CHRISTOPHER JR.
1 transaction
$1,000
150
JACOBS, PATRICIA
1 transaction
$1,000
151
JEPPSON, JOHN
1 transaction
$1,000
152
JOHNSON, DOUGLAS
1 transaction
$1,000
153
JONES, PATRICK
1 transaction
$1,000
154
KAUFFMAN, RICHARD
1 transaction
$1,000
155
KAZI, MUAZZAM
1 transaction
$1,000
156
KELLEHER, TIMOTHY C. III
1 transaction
$1,000
157
KOUNTOUPES, LISA M.
1 transaction
$1,000
158
LACAMERA, PAUL
2 transactions
$1,000
159
LEBLANC, MARIANNE
1 transaction
$1,000
160
LEITER, DAVID
1 transaction
$1,000
161
LENEHAN, PAMELA
1 transaction
$1,000
162
LEON, JUSTIN
1 transaction
$1,000
163
LOYLESS, BETSY
1 transaction
$1,000
164
MABEY, MARY
1 transaction
$1,000
165
MAHONEY, SHELAGH E
1 transaction
$1,000
166
MARTIN, BRAD
1 transaction
$1,000
167
MATTHEWS, KATHLEEN C.
1 transaction
$1,000
168
MCCARRON, ROBERT J.
1 transaction
$1,000
169
MEEHAN, MARTIN T.
1 transaction
$1,000
170
MINAHAN, ALFRED A.
2 transactions
$1,000
171
MINAHAN, JOANNE & AL
1 transaction
$1,000
172
MONSUR, MOHAMMED A.
1 transaction
$1,000
173
MURPHY, LYNDA
1 transaction
$1,000
174
NURUZZAMAN, QUAZI M.
1 transaction
$1,000
175
O'CONNELL, DANIEL
1 transaction
$1,000
176
O'CONNELL, MARILYN LYNG
1 transaction
$1,000
177
ORTNER, CHARLES
1 transaction
$1,000
178
OTTAWAY, ALEXANDRA
2 transactions
$1,000
179
PENDERGAST, EDWARD
1 transaction
$1,000
180
PERGAMENT, RUSSEL
1 transaction
$1,000
181
POMERANCE, RAFE
1 transaction
$1,000
182
RAHMAN, ASHIKUR
1 transaction
$1,000
183
RAISER, MARY M.
1 transaction
$1,000
184
RODOPHELE, ROBERT P.
1 transaction
$1,000
185
ROOSEVELT JR., JAMES
2 transactions
$1,000
186
RUSSO, JANE L
1 transaction
$1,000
187
SANFILIPPO, ANGELA
1 transaction
$1,000
188
SCHNED, HARRY
1 transaction
$1,000
189
SEYMOUR, JANE
1 transaction
$1,000
190
SHAW, RHOD M.
1 transaction
$1,000
191
SHEFF, DOUGLAS K.
1 transaction
$1,000
192
SIMON, NEAL S.
1 transaction
$1,000
193
SLAIMAN, GARY D.
1 transaction
$1,000
194
SMITH, JAMES E.
1 transaction
$1,000
195
SOLOMONT, ALAN
1 transaction
$1,000
196
STOTTLEMYER, JUSTIN
1 transaction
$1,000
197
STREISAND, BARBARA
1 transaction
$1,000
198
TARRICONE, ANTHONY
1 transaction
$1,000
199
TRAVAGLINI, ROBERT E.
1 transaction
$1,000
200
VERMA, VISHAL
1 transaction
$1,000
201
WHITE, ROBERT M.
1 transaction
$1,000
202
ZIEGLER, BART
1 transaction
$1,000
203
BOYLE, JIM
2 transactions
$1,000
204
KEARNEY, BERNADETTE
1 transaction
$800
205
NAGLE, ROBERT
1 transaction
$800
206
BOYLE, ANNE C.
1 transaction
$700
207
DYM, BARRY
1 transaction
$600
208
PEABODY, GEORGE
1 transaction
$600
209
WALDRON, GERARD
1 transaction
$600
210
AFREEN, AL BELI
1 transaction
$500
211
AINSWORTH, PETER
1 transaction
$500
212
ALI, REZA
1 transaction
$500
213
ANDELSON, AMY
1 transaction
$500
214
AYOUB, PAUL JOSEPH
1 transaction
$500
215
BACHMAN, KATHARINE E.
1 transaction
$500
216
BALBONI, PHILIP
1 transaction
$500
217
BERMAN, ROGER L.
1 transaction
$500
218
BLAIS, CRAIG L.
1 transaction
$500
219
BRAMANTE, SALVATORE
1 transaction
$500
220
BRESKIN, JULIE
1 transaction
$500
221
BROWN, ANN
1 transaction
$500
222
CETRULO, LAWRENCE
1 transaction
$500
223
COSTELLO, MICHAEL C.
1 transaction
$500
224
COWELL, STEPHEN
1 transaction
$500
225
CUNNINGHAM, BOBBY
1 transaction
$500
226
DELELLO, ROBERT A.
1 transaction
$500
227
GLICKMAN, JONATHAN B.
1 transaction
$500
228
HALPERT, STUART
1 transaction
$500
229
HAMMERLE, TERESE
1 transaction
$500
230
HARTNETT, PAUL J. JR.
1 transaction
$500
231
HECK, BOBBIE
1 transaction
$500
232
HENN, JOHN
1 transaction
$500
233
HILLIS, JANETTE
1 transaction
$500
234
IADAROLA, ELIZABETH
1 transaction
$500
235
JAMES, CLAUDIA
1 transaction
$500
236
JOYCE, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
237
KAHN, THOMAS
1 transaction
$500
238
KATEB, BABAK
1 transaction
$500
239
KENEALY, EDMUND
1 transaction
$500
240
KOEHLER, MIKE
1 transaction
$500
241
KORNBLUH, KAREN
1 transaction
$500
242
KORNGOLD, ADAM
1 transaction
$500
243
KWAN, SHU MAY
1 transaction
$500
244
LEAKE, ALEXANDRA
1 transaction
$500
245
LEAL, MARIAN SUSAN
1 transaction
$500
246
LIGUORI, RAFFAELE R
1 transaction
$500
247
LIPSON, FRAN
1 transaction
$500
248
LONERGAN, PAUL A.
1 transaction
$500
249
LORSCH, PATRICIA M.
1 transaction
$500
250
LOW, STEPHANIE
1 transaction
$500
251
LUTZ, FRED T
1 transaction
$500
252
MAGUIRE MEEHAN, JENNIFER
1 transaction
$500
253
MAHONEY, MARY R.
1 transaction
$500
254
MARCUS, JESSICA
1 transaction
$500
255
MCCARTHY, JOHN
1 transaction
$500
256
MCGLYNN JR., JOHN J.
1 transaction
$500
257
MEANS, ROSEANNA
1 transaction
$500
258
MITROPOULOS, NICHOLAS T.
1 transaction
$500
259
MONE, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
260
MOSHE, YARIV
1 transaction
$500
261
MOULTON, DAVID
1 transaction
$500
262
NOURI, KEYVAN
1 transaction
$500
263
O'NEILL, BRIAN T.
1 transaction
$500
264
OBRIEN, ANDREW
1 transaction
$500
265
OLEARY, JAMES
1 transaction
$500
266
PAONE, MARTIN
1 transaction
$500
267
PARKER, GLENN
1 transaction
$500
268
PATERNITI, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500
269
PERETZ, ANNE
1 transaction
$500
270
RAFSHOON, EDEN
1 transaction
$500
271
REGUNBERG, MICHAL
1 transaction
$500
272
REICHMAN, JUDITH
1 transaction
$500
273
RICCA, JOSEPH A
1 transaction
$500
274
RIZZOLO, CAROL
1 transaction
$500
275
ROTENBERG, MICHAEL
1 transaction
$500
276
ROYCE, JACQUELINE
1 transaction
$500
277
RUGEL, AMY
1 transaction
$500
278
SABAGH, DENYSE
1 transaction
$500
279
SARKISIAN, ELLEN
1 transaction
$500
280
SEGARS, CHARLES
1 transaction
$500
281
SMITH, ABBE Y.
1 transaction
$500
282
SOISSON, AMY M.
1 transaction
$500
283
SOLOMON, KENNETH
1 transaction
$500
284
STEFANINI, JOHN AUGUSTO
1 transaction
$500
285
SUTTON, BARBARA
1 transaction
$500
286
SYKES, BRIAN F
1 transaction
$500
287
THOMPSON, KENNETH
1 transaction
$500
288
WALKER, KEVIN
1 transaction
$500
289
WOLFE, STEVEN
1 transaction
$500
290
WOLLACK, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500
291
WORLEY, RICHARD
1 transaction
$500

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 4 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

20

1
OLSON, LYNDON
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualWACO, TX
$3,300
Dec 20, 2024
2
ALIX, JAY
ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$3,300
Oct 2, 2023
3
KIM, CHRISTINE M.
BBB LLC • ATTORNEY
IndividualNEW YORK, NY
$3,300
Oct 31, 2023
4
ALIX, JAY
ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER
IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI
$3,300
Apr 15, 2024
5
ROURE, RITA
PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Apr 10, 2024
6
ROURE, RITA
PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN
IndividualGREENWICH, CT
$3,300
Apr 10, 2024
7
CHAVEZ, TOM
KRUX INC. • CEO
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Jul 13, 2024
8
CHAVEZ, TOM
KRUX INC. • CEO
IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA
$3,300
Jul 13, 2024
9
JONES, JERRY C.
LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE
IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR
$3,300
Sep 19, 2024
10
NESSEL, ARIEL
NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER
IndividualROSS, CA
$3,300
Jul 12, 2024

Sen. Schiff, Adam B. [D-CA]

ID: S001150

Top Contributors

64

1
KOI NATION OF NORTHERN CA
OrganizationSANTA ROSA, CA
$3,300
Feb 29, 2024
2
PECHANGA BAND OF INDIANS
OrganizationTEMECULA, CA
$3,300
Feb 26, 2024
3
KOI NATION OF NORTHERN CA
OrganizationSANTA ROSA, CA
$3,300
Feb 29, 2024
4
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$3,300
Mar 1, 2024
5
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$3,300
Mar 1, 2024
6
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Sep 6, 2023
7
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS GENERAL FUND
OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Aug 9, 2023
8
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$3,300
Sep 27, 2023
9
AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS GENERAL FUND
OrganizationPALM SPRINGS, CA
$3,300
Aug 9, 2023
10
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
OrganizationSANTA YNEZ, CA
$3,300
Jul 21, 2023

Sen. Welch, Peter [D-VT]

ID: W000800

Top Contributors

22

1
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jun 8, 2023
2
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
May 3, 2024
3
FIELD, MARSHALL
THE OLD MOUNTAIN COMPANY, INC. • EXECUTIVE
IndividualCHICAGO, IL
$3,300
May 18, 2023
4
RECHNITZ, JOAN
IndividualRED BANK, NJ
$3,300
Apr 22, 2024
5
RECHNITZ, JOAN
IndividualRED BANK, NJ
$3,300
Apr 22, 2024
6
GORDON, PATRICIA
SELF • MD
IndividualLOS ANGELES, CA
$3,300
May 22, 2024
7
STILLER, ROBERT
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Sep 22, 2024
8
STILLER, ROBERT
NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED
IndividualPALM BEACH, FL
$3,300
Sep 22, 2024
9
KALKUT, CRAIG
WEST FRONT STRATEGIES • GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
IndividualWASHINGTON, DC
$2,500
May 3, 2023
10
SCHWARTZ, MARTIN
MINILEC SERVICE • CONSUMER ELECTRONICS
IndividualCARMEL, CA
$2,000
May 18, 2023

Sen. Padilla, Alex [D-CA]

ID: P000145

Top Contributors

29

1
CHEROKEE NATION
OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK
$5,000
Dec 24, 2024
2
MOORETOWN RANCHERIA
OrganizationOROVILLE, CA
$3,300
Oct 7, 2024
3
TOLOWA DEE-NI' NATION
OrganizationSMITH RIVER, CA
$3,300
May 7, 2024
4
TULE RIVER TRIBAL COUNCIL
OrganizationPORTERVILLE, CA
$3,300
Aug 12, 2024
5
THE CHICKASAW NATION
OrganizationADA, OK
$2,500
Nov 22, 2023
6
ONEIDA NATION
OrganizationONEIDA, WI
$1,000
Oct 3, 2023
7
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
Jun 5, 2023
8
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION
OrganizationONEIDA, WI
$1,000
Jun 21, 2024
9
SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY
OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN
$1,000
May 16, 2024
10
KIMBER, SHELDON
INTERSECT POWER • CEO
IndividualTRUCKEE, CA
$5,000
Apr 27, 2023

Donor Network - Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

PACs
Organizations
Individuals
Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Loading...

Showing 35 nodes and 59 connections

Total contributions: $59

Top Donors - Sen. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA]

Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount

1 Org14 Individuals

Industry Impact

Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 4 helped.

  • +Crop Producersconfidence 0.85

    Section 4(b)(1)(A) and (2)(A) prioritize foods from covered producers, which includes small/medium-sized farms and socially disadvantaged farmers, directly benefiting crop producers who meet these criteria.

  • +Agribusinessconfidence 0.80

    Section 4(b)(1)(A) and (2)(A) require purchasing foods produced by covered producers or sourced from covered entities, which includes small/medium-sized farms and socially disadvantaged farmers, benefiting agribusiness suppliers that work with such producers.

  • +Labor Unionsconfidence 0.80

    Section 4(b)(3)(A)-(C) require sourcing from vendors with collective bargaining agreements, worker justice certification, or labor peace agreements, directly benefiting labor unions through expanded unionized food supply chains.

  • Section 4(b)(2)(D) includes foods from farms participating in independent animal welfare certification programs, which could benefit meat and dairy processors that adopt such certifications to supply USDA.

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Agriculture

Strong
Vector: 70%
Pages: 344-346AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The EFFECTIVE Food Procurement Act aligns closely with Project 2025's Department of Agriculture section by promoting a transformed, fairer, more competitive, and resilient food system through sustainable procurement, support for disadvantaged farmers, and environmental safeguards—echoing USDA's own stated goals in transforming the food system."

Key themes:food system transformationsupport for disadvantaged farmersenvironmental sustainabilityresilient food economiesequity and inclusion

— 311 — Department of Agriculture ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p.1, https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/ files/documents/2023-usda-budget-summary.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 2. See, for example, U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Transforming the U.S. Food System,” https://www.usda. gov/fst (accessed December 14, 2022). 3. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p.1. 4. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “USDA Celebrates 150 Years,” https://www.usda.gov/our-agency/about-usda/ history (accessed December 16, 2022). 5. The law stated, “[T]here is hereby established at the seat of government of the United States a Department of Agriculture, the general designs and duties of which shall be to acquire and to diffuse among the people of the United States useful information on subjects connected with agriculture in the most general and comprehensive sense of that word, and to procure, propagate, and distribute among the people new and valuable seeds and plants.” Gladys L. Baker et al., Century of Service: The First 100 Years of the United States Department of Agriculture, (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1963) p. 13, https://babel. hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4254098&view=1up&seq=33 (accessed December 16, 2022). 6. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Summary, p. 2. 7. Ibid., p. 2. 8. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2022–2026, p. 3, https://www.usda.gov/sites/ default/files/documents/usda-fy-2022-2026-strategic-plan.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 9. News release, “USDA Announces Framework for Shoring Up the Food Supply Chain and Transforming the Food System to Be Fairer, More Competitive, More Resilient,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, June 1, 2022, https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2022/06/01/usda-announces-framework-shoring-food-supply- chain-and-transforming (accessed December 14, 2022). 10. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Transforming the U.S. Food System.” 11. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Strategic Plan: Fiscal Years 2022–2026, pp. 1–2. 12. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Background on the U.S. Approach to the 2021 UN Food Systems Summit,” August 4, 2021, https://www.usda.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Background-on-US-approach-2021-UN- Food-Systems-Summit.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 13. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “UN Food Systems Summit,” https://www.usda.gov/oce/sustainability/un- summit (accessed December 14, 2022). 14. Mark Bittman et al., “How a National Food Policy Could Save Millions of American Lives,” The Washington Post, November 7, 2014, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-a-national-food-policy-could- save-millions-of-american-lives/2014/11/07/89c55e16-637f-11e4-836c-83bc4f26eb67_story.html (accessed December 14, 2022); Daren Bakst and Gabriella Beaumont-Smith, “No, We Don’t Need to Transform the American Food System,” The Daily Signal, February 26, 2021, https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/02/26/ no-we-dont-need-to-transform-the-american-food-system/ (accessed December 14, 2022); and Daren Bakst, “Biden’s Food Conference Should Put People First, Not Environmental Extremism,” The Daily Signal, September 22, 2022, https://www.dailysignal.com/2022/09/22/bidens-food-conference-should-put-people- first-not-environmental-extremism/ (accessed December 14, 2022). 15. News release, “USDA to Invest Up to $300 Million in New Organic Transition Initiative,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, August 22, 2022, https://www.usda.gov/media/press-releases/2022/08/22/usda-invest-300- million-new-organic-transition-initiative (accessed December 14, 2022). 16. Gary Baise, “Sri Lanka’s Green New Deal Was a Disaster,” Farm Futures, November 14, 2022, https://www. farmprogress.com/commentary/sri-lankas-green-new-deal-was-disaster (accessed December 16, 2022). 17. See, for example, Catherine Greene et al., “Growing Organic Demand Provides High-Value Opportunities for Many Types of Producers,” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, February 6, 2017, https://www. ers.usda.gov/amber-waves/2017/januaryfebruary/growing-organic-demand-provides-high-value-opportunities- for-many-types-of-producers/#:~:text=ERS%20research%20shows%20that%20many,flavor%20desired%20 by%20the%20consumer (accessed December 14, 2022), and Andrea Carlson, “Investigating Retail Price Premiums for Organic Foods,” Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, May 24, 2016, https://www.ers. usda.gov/amber-waves/2016/may/investigating-retail-price-premiums-for-organic-foods/ (accessed December 16, 2022). Further, there are many myths, such as those regarding the alleged health benefit of organic food. One — 312 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise meta study found that “[t]he published literature lacks strong evidence that organic foods are significantly more nutritious than conventional foods.” Crystal Smith-Spangler et al., “Are Organic Foods Safer or Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives,” Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 157, No. 5 (September 4, 2012), pp. 348–366, https:// www.acpjournals.org/doi/epdf/10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00007 (accessed December 16, 2022). 18. Steve Savage, “USDA Data Confirm Organic Yields Significantly Lower Than With Conventional Farming,” Genetic Literacy Project, February 16, 2018, https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2018/02/16/usda-data-confirm- organic-yields-dramatically-lower-conventional-farming/ (accessed December 16, 2022). 19. See, for example, U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Notice: Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry Partnership Program, Request for Comments,” USDA–2021–0010, October 21, 2021, https://www.regulations. gov/document/USDA-2021-0010-0001 (accessed December 16, 2022). 20. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Public Law 117–169. 21. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, “Productivity Growth in U.S. Agriculture (1948–2019),” https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/agricultural-productivity-in-the-u-s/productivity- growth-in-u-s-agriculture-1948-2019/ (accessed December 14, 2022). 22. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, “Total Food Budget Share Increased from 9.4 Percent of Disposable Income to 10.3 Percent in 2021,” July 15, 2022, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ chart-gallery/gallery/chart-detail/?chartId=76967 (accessed December 14, 2022). 23. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Quintiles of Income Before Taxes: Annual Expenditure Means, Shares, and Standard Errors, and Coefficients of Variation, Consumer Expenditure Surveys,” 2021, Table 1101, https://www.bls.gov/cex/tables/calendar-year/mean-item-share-average-standard-error/cu- income-quintiles-before-taxes-2021.pdf (accessed December 16, 2022), and Daren Bakst and Patrick Tyrrell, “Big Government Policies That Hurt the Poor and How to Address Them,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No.176, April 5, 2017, p. 7, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/files/2017-04/SR176.pdf. 24. Daren Bakst and Joshua Sewell, “Congress Should Stop Abrogating Its Spending Power and Rein in the USDA Slush Fund,” Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 6052, February 19, 2021, p. 2, https://www.heritage.org/ budget-and-spending/report/congress-should-stop-abrogating-its-spending-power-and-rein-the-usda. 25. Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act of 1948, Public Law 80–806. 26. Bakst and Sewall, “Congress Should Stop Abrogating Its Spending Power.” 27. Ibid., p. 3. 28. Daren Bakst, “Comment from Bakst, Darren” on “Notice: Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry Partnership Program, Request for Comments,” USDA–2021–0010, October 21, 2021,” November 1, 2021, https://www. regulations.gov/document/USDA-2021-0010-0001/comment?filter=bakst (accessed December 16, 2022). 29. U.S. Department of Agriculture, “Notice: Climate-Smart Agriculture and Forestry Partnership Program.” 30. Megan Stubbs, “The Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC),” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, updated January 14, 2021, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R44606 (accessed December 16, 2022). 31. “Overall, 34 percent of all farms reported receiving some type of Government payment in 2021,” and “[o]verall, 14 percent of U.S. farms participated in Federal crop insurance programs.” Christine Whitt, Noah Miller, and Ryan Olver, “America’s Farms and Ranches at a Glance: 2022 Edition,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, pp. 24 and 26, https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/105388/eib-247. pdf?v=527.4 (accessed March 18, 2023). This data, which apparently does not cover crop insurance, included payments beyond just commodity payments, such as conservation payments. 32. Randy Schnepf, “Farm Safety-Net Payments Under the 2014 Farm Bill: Comparison by Program Crop,” Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, August 11, 2017, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44914.pdf (accessed December 14, 2022). 33. Although livestock and specialty crop producers do receive some subsidies, former American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman captured the subsidy issue well. He “dismisse[d] outright the claim that farmers couldn’t survive without subsidy money. ‘Why does the livestock industry survive without subsidies?’ he ask[ed]. ‘Why does the specialty crop [fruit and vegetable] industry survive?’” Tamar Haspel, “Why Do Taxpayers Subsidize Rich Farmers?” The Washington Post, March 15, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost. com/lifestyle/food/why-do-taxpayers-subsidize-rich-farmers/2018/03/15/50e89906-27b6-11e8-b79d- f3d931db7f68_story.html (accessed March 18, 2023).

Department of Agriculture

Weak
Vector: 69%
Pages: 338-340AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill promotes sustainable, equitable, and transparent food procurement practices, while Project 2025 seeks to reduce USDA market interventions, eliminate checkoff programs, oppose export promotion subsidies, and advance agricultural biotechnology—objectives that are largely misaligned or contradictory to the bill’s approach."

Key themes:USDA reformagricultural policymarket influencefarmer supporttransparency

— 306 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise programs,104 and they focus on research and promotion of commodities such as beef and eggs. Marketing orders cover research and promotion, but also cover issues such as quality regulations and volume controls. The latter issue, volume controls, is a means to restrict supply, which drives up prices for consumers. Fortunately, there are few active volume controls.105 Marketing orders and checkoff programs are some of the most egregious pro- grams run by the USDA. They are, in effect, a tax—a means to compel speech—and government-blessed cartels. Instead of getting private cooperation, they are tools for industry actors to work with government to force cooperation. The next Administration should: l Reduce the number and scope of marketing orders and checkoff programs. The USDA should reject any new requests for marketing orders and checkoff programs to the extent authorized by law and eliminate existing programs when possible. While the programs work differently, there are often petition processes and other ways that make it difficult for affected parties to get rid of the marketing orders and checkoff programs,106 and the USDA itself may not even be required to honor requests to terminate a program.107 The USDA should make the process easier. Further, the USDA should reject any effort to bring back volume controls to limit supplies of commodities. l Work with Congress to eliminate marketing orders and checkoff programs. These programs should be eliminated, and if industry actors want to collaborate, they should do so through private means, not using the government to compel cooperation. l Promote legislation that would require regular votes. There should be regular voting for parties subject to checkoff programs and marketing orders. For example, the voting should occur at least every five years, to determine whether a marketing order or checkoff program should continue. The USDA should be required to honor the results of such a vote. Through regular voting, parties can demonstrate their support for a marketing order or checkoff program and ensure that those administering them will be held accountable. Focus on Trade Policy, Not Trade Promotion. The USDA’s Foreign Agri- cultural Service (FAS) covers numerous issues, including “trade policy,” which is a reference to removing trade barriers, among other things, to ensure an envi- ronment conducive to trade.108 It also covers trade promotion.109 This includes programs like the Market Access Program110 that subsidizes trade associations, — 307 — Department of Agriculture businesses, and other private entities to market and promote their products overseas. FAS should play a proactive and leading role to help open upmarkets for American farmers and ranchers. There are numerous barriers, such as sani- tary and phytosanitary measures, blocking American agricultural products from gaining access to foreign markets.111 However, FAS should not help businesses and industries promote their exports, something these businesses and industries can and should do on their own. The next Administration should: l Push legislation to repeal export promotion programs. The USDA should work with Congress to repeal market development programs like the Market Access Program and similar programs. Remove Obstacles for Agricultural Biotechnology. Innovation is critical to agricultural production and the ability to meet future food needs. The next Admin- istration should embrace innovation and technology, not hinder its use—especially because of scare tactics that ignore sound science. One of the key innovations in agriculture is genetic engineering. According to the USDA, “[C]urrently, over 90 percent of U.S. corn, upland cotton, and soybeans are produced using GE [genet- ically engineered] varieties.”112 Despite the importance of agricultural biotechnology, in 2016, Congress passed a federal mandate to label genetically engineered food.113 This legislation was argu- ably just a means to try to provide a negative connotation to GE food. There are other challenges as well for agricultural biotechnology. For example, Mexico plans to ban the importation of U.S. genetically modified yellow corn.114 The next Administration should: l Counter scare tactics and remove obstacles. The USDA should strongly counter scare tactics regarding agricultural biotechnology and adopt policies to remove unnecessary barriers to approvals and the adoption of biotechnology. l Repeal the federal labeling mandate. The USDA should work with Congress to repeal the federal labeling law, while maintaining federal preemption, and stress that voluntary labeling is allowed. l Use all tools available to remove improper trade barriers against agricultural biotechnology. The USDA should work closely with the Office of the United States Trade Representative to remove improper barriers imposed by other countries to block U.S. agricultural goods.

Section Three

Weak
Vector: 68%
Pages: 323-325AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill advances equity, climate‑smart, and sustainable food procurement, which directly contradicts the Project 2025 view that USDA should avoid shaping the economy and prioritize production over equity and environmental goals. While both address USDA and agriculture, their objectives are opposed."

Key themes:USDAagriculturefood procurementrural development

— 290 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise protection and management, rural development, and related issues with a commitment to delivering equitable and climate smart opportunities that inspire and help America thrive.1 The first part of the mission statement regarding the issues covered is not new to the Biden Administration; it reflects the overly broad nature of the USDA’s work. However, the language bringing in equity and climate change is new to the Biden Administration and part of the USDA’s express effort to transform agricultural production.2 The USDA’s new vision statement illuminates the focus of this effort: An equitable and climate smart food and agriculture economy that protects and improves the health, nutrition and quality of life of all Americans, yields healthy land, forests and clean water, helps rural America thrive, and feeds the world.3 This effort is one of a federal central plan to put climate change and envi- ronmental issues ahead of the most important requirements of agriculture—to efficiently produce safe food. The USDA would apparently use its power to change the very nature of the food and agriculture economy into one that is “equitable and climate smart.” As an initial matter, the USDA should not try to control and shape the economy, but should instead remove obstacles that hinder food production. Further, it should not place ancillary issues, such as environmental issues, ahead of agricultural production itself. A Proper Mission Statement. Even before the Biden Administration’s rad- ical effort to reshape the USDA’s work, the USDA’s mission was and is too broad, including serving as a major welfare agency through implementation of programs such as food stamps. This far-reaching mission is not the fault of the USDA, but of Congress, which has given the department its extensive power. Congress must limit the USDA’s role. A proper mission would clarify that the department’s primary focus is on agriculture and that the USDA serves all Amer- icans. The USDA’s “client” is the American people in general, not a subset of interests, such as farmers, meatpackers, environmental groups, etc. Within this agricultural focus, the USDA should develop and disseminate information and research (the historical role of the USDA); identify and address concrete threats to public health and safety arising directly from food and agri- culture; remove unjustified foreign trade barriers blocking market access for American agricultural goods; and generally remove government barriers that undermine access to safe and affordable food across the food supply chain. Core principles should be included within any mission statement, including a recognition that farmers, and the food system in general, should be free from unnecessary government intervention. Further, there should be clear statements

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Full Policy Text

Related Bills