FLOWS Act
Download PDFSponsored by
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
ID: M001153
Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.
March 17, 2026
Introduced
Committee Review
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
Floor Action
Passed Senate
House Review
Passed Congress
Presidential Action
Became Law
📚 How does a bill become a law?
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Bill Summary
Another masterpiece of legislative theater, courtesy of the esteemed Senator Murkowski and her trusty sidekick, Mr. King. Let's dissect this monstrosity, shall we?
**Main Purpose & Objectives**
The FLOWS Act (Fair Licensing for Operations of Water Structures Act) claims to address certain alterations in, and the maintenance and repair of, project works related to hydropower projects. It also aims to provide a licensing framework for micro hydrokinetic energy projects. How noble.
In reality, this bill is a thinly veiled attempt to grease the wheels for big energy companies to operate with minimal regulatory oversight. The "fair" in FLOWS Act is a joke – it's more like the "Fast-Track Licensing for Operations of Water Structures Act."
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**
The bill amends the Federal Power Act to:
1. Exempt non-substantial alterations and additions to project works from Commission approval. 2. Allow routine maintenance, repair, or replacement of project works without prior approval. 3. Create an expedited licensing process for micro hydrokinetic energy projects with a capacity of 5 megawatts or less.
These changes are designed to reduce regulatory hurdles and costs for energy companies, making it easier for them to operate and expand their hydropower projects. The "savings clause" in Section 2(c) is a token gesture to appease environmental groups, but it's essentially toothless.
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**
The usual suspects:
1. Energy companies: They'll love the reduced regulatory burden and faster licensing process. 2. Environmental groups: They might grumble about the lack of oversight, but they'll likely be placated by the token concessions in the bill. 3. Local communities: They might get some lip service about "safety" and "environmental concerns," but ultimately, their interests will take a backseat to those of big energy.
**Potential Impact & Implications**
This bill is a classic case of regulatory capture. By reducing oversight and streamlining the licensing process, it will:
1. Increase the risk of environmental disasters and safety hazards. 2. Give energy companies more freedom to operate with impunity. 3. Further entrench the dominance of big energy in the market.
The micro hydrokinetic energy project provisions are a red herring – they're just a way to make the bill seem more palatable to environmental groups. In reality, these projects will likely be small potatoes compared to the massive hydropower projects that will benefit from this legislation.
In conclusion, the FLOWS Act is a masterclass in legislative sleight of hand. It's a gift to big energy companies, wrapped in a veneer of "fairness" and "expedited licensing." Don't be fooled – this bill is a recipe for disaster, and it will only serve to further entrench the interests of those who already hold too much power.
Related Topics
💰 Campaign Finance Network
Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No committee contributions found
Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance
This bill has 1 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]
ID: K000383
Top Contributors
10
Donor Network - Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 25 nodes and 32 connections
Total contributions: $85,700
Top Donors - Sen. Murkowski, Lisa [R-AK]
Showing top 21 donors by contribution amount