The bill
Lewis & Clark Regional Water System Expansion Feasibility Study Act
S. 3725, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.
Sponsored by
Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
ID: T000250
Follow the money
The bill
S. 3725, 119th Congress — read as touching Construction & Engineering.
The sponsor
Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.
The money
20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.
The alignment
This bill's text tracks the "Introduction" section, p. 569-571 of the Mandate for Leadership.
Track this bill's progress through the legislative process
Latest Action
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held.
March 16, 2026
📍 Current Status
Next: The bill moves to the floor for full chamber debate and voting.
1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.
2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.
3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.
4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.
5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.
6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.
7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!
Another masterpiece of congressional incompetence, masquerading as a "feasibility study" for the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System Expansion. How quaint.
**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to conduct a feasibility study (read: pork barrel project) to determine whether expanding the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota is a good idea. Spoiler alert: it's not about the water; it's about the money.
**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill requires the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study (because we clearly need more studies) and develop a feasibility report that will inevitably recommend authorizing construction, despite the project's dubious merits. The non-federal project entity (i.e., the Lewis and Clark Rural Water System, Inc.) gets to participate in this farce, ensuring their interests are well-represented.
The bill also establishes a cost-sharing agreement for feasibility study costs, because why should taxpayers foot the entire bill? Oh wait, they will. The federal share of costs is capped at 50%, but don't worry, that's just a minor detail; we'll find ways to exceed it. And, of course, there's an authorization of appropriations for $10 million, because what's a little more debt among friends?
**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The usual suspects:
* The Lewis and Clark Rural Water System, Inc., which will benefit from the expansion (and likely has already lined up contractors and suppliers). * Local governments in Iowa, Minnesota, and South Dakota, who'll get to "consult" on the project (i.e., rubber-stamp it). * Federal agencies, which will pretend to care about environmental impact assessments. * Taxpayers, who'll foot the bill for this boondoggle.
**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill is a classic example of legislative theater. The study will likely conclude that expansion is necessary (because who needs actual evidence?), and construction will commence, fueled by pork barrel politics and crony capitalism. Expect:
* Wasteful spending on unnecessary infrastructure. * Increased water rates for local residents. * Environmental degradation from the project's impact. * More opportunities for corruption and kickbacks.
In short, this bill is a symptom of a deeper disease: the insatiable appetite for government largesse and the willingness to sacrifice common sense at the altar of special interests. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have better things to do than analyze the latest Congressional abomination.
Sen. Thune, John [R-SD]
Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle
No PAC contributions found
No organization contributions found
No committee contributions found
This bill has 5 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.
ID: R000605
Top Contributors
10
ID: K000367
Top Contributors
10
ID: G000386
Top Contributors
10
ID: E000295
Top Contributors
10
ID: S001203
Top Contributors
10
Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.
Showing 42 nodes and 35 connections (36 secondary connections hidden)
Total contributions: $133,825
Showing top 15 donors by contribution amount
Which industries are materially affected by specific provisions in this bill. 1 helped.
Section 3(a)(1) requires a feasibility study for constructing a project to supply municipal, rural, and industrial water to expand the Lewis & Clark Regional Water System, which would involve construction and engineering work if authorized.
This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.
— 536 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 2. Engaging in real-time monitoring of operations. l Reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies by consolidating federal water working groups. l Implement actions identified in the Federal Action Plan for Improving Fore- casts of Water Availability,93 especially by adopting improvements related to: 1. Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations; and 2. Arial Snow Observation Systems. l Clarify the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act94 to ensure consistent application with other federal infrastructure loan programs under the Federal Credit Reform Act. This should be done to foster opportunities for locally led investment in water infrastructure. l Reinstate Presidential Memorandum on Promoting the Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West.95 AMERICAN INDIANS AND U.S. TRUST RESPONSIBILITY The Biden Administration has breached its federal trust responsibilities to American Indians. This is unconscionable. Specifically, the Biden Administra- tion’s war on domestically available fossil fuels and mineral sources has been devastating. To wit: l The ability of American Indians and tribal governments to develop their abundant oil and gas resources has been severely hampered, depriving them of the revenue and profits to which they are entitled during a time of increasing worldwide energy prices, forcing American Indians—who are among the poorest Americans—to choose between food and fuel. l Indian nations with significant coal resources have some of the highest quality and cleanest-burning coal in the world, but the Biden Administration has sought to destroy the market for their coal by eliminating coal-fired electricity in the country and to prevent the transport of their coal for sale internationally. Meanwhile, the Biden Administration, at great public expense, artificially boosted the demand for electric vehicles, which, because of their remote locations, the absence of increased electricity demands for charging electric vehicles nearby, and the distances to be traveled, are not a choice for Indian communities. — 537 — Department of the Interior l A significant percentage of critical minerals needed by the United States is on Indian lands, but the Biden Administration has actively discouraged development of critical mineral mining projects on Indian lands rather than assisting in their advancement. l Despite Indian nations having primary responsibility for their lands and environment and responsibility for the safety of their communities, the Biden Administration is reversing efforts to put Indian nations in charge of environmental regulation on their own lands. Moreover, Biden Administration policies, including those of the DOI, have dis- proportionately impacted American Indians and Indian nations. l By its failure to secure the border, the Biden Administration has robbed Indian nations on or near the Mexican border of safe and secure communities while permitting them to be swamped by a tide of illegal drugs, particularly fentanyl. l When ending COVID protocols at Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) schools, Biden’s DOI failed to ensure an accurate accounting of students returning from school shutdowns, which presents a significant danger to the families that trust their children to that federal agency. l The BIE is not reporting student academic assessment data to ensure parents and the larger tribal communities know their children are learning and are receiving a quality education. The new Administration must take the following actions to fulfill the nation’s trust responsibilities to American Indians and Indian nations: l End the war on fossil fuels and domestically available minerals and facilitate their development on lands owned by Indians and Indian nations. l End federal mandates and subsidies of electric vehicles. l Restore the right of tribal governments to enforce environmental regulation on their lands. l Secure the nation’s border to protect the sovereignty and safety of tribal lands.
— 536 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 2. Engaging in real-time monitoring of operations. l Reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies by consolidating federal water working groups. l Implement actions identified in the Federal Action Plan for Improving Fore- casts of Water Availability,93 especially by adopting improvements related to: 1. Forecast Informed Reservoir Operations; and 2. Arial Snow Observation Systems. l Clarify the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act94 to ensure consistent application with other federal infrastructure loan programs under the Federal Credit Reform Act. This should be done to foster opportunities for locally led investment in water infrastructure. l Reinstate Presidential Memorandum on Promoting the Reliable Supply and Delivery of Water in the West.95 AMERICAN INDIANS AND U.S. TRUST RESPONSIBILITY The Biden Administration has breached its federal trust responsibilities to American Indians. This is unconscionable. Specifically, the Biden Administra- tion’s war on domestically available fossil fuels and mineral sources has been devastating. To wit: l The ability of American Indians and tribal governments to develop their abundant oil and gas resources has been severely hampered, depriving them of the revenue and profits to which they are entitled during a time of increasing worldwide energy prices, forcing American Indians—who are among the poorest Americans—to choose between food and fuel. l Indian nations with significant coal resources have some of the highest quality and cleanest-burning coal in the world, but the Biden Administration has sought to destroy the market for their coal by eliminating coal-fired electricity in the country and to prevent the transport of their coal for sale internationally. Meanwhile, the Biden Administration, at great public expense, artificially boosted the demand for electric vehicles, which, because of their remote locations, the absence of increased electricity demands for charging electric vehicles nearby, and the distances to be traveled, are not a choice for Indian communities.
Policy matches are calculated using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text. A score of 60% or higher indicates meaningful thematic overlap. This does not imply direct causation or intent, but highlights areas where legislation aligns with Project 2025 policy objectives.
Tradeable Energy Performance Standards Act
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of Energy relating to "Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Walk-In Coolers and Walk-In Freezers".
CORE Act of 2025