First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act

Download PDF

Bill ID: 119/s/567

Last Updated: July 17, 2026

First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act

S. 567, 119th Congress.

The sponsor

Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Every bill has someone who introduced it. That name is where the paper trail starts.

The money

$73,160 raised

20 itemised contributions to this sponsor, pulled from FEC filings.

The alignment

55% match to Project 2025

This bill's text tracks the "Department of Defense" section, p. 134-136 of the Mandate for Leadership.

Bill's Journey to Becoming a Law

Track this bill's progress through the legislative process

Latest Action

Held at the desk.

June 14, 2026

Introduced

📍 Current Status

Next: The bill will be reviewed by relevant committees who will debate, amend, and vote on it.

🏛️

Committee Review

🗳️

Floor Action

✅

Passed Senate

🏛️

House Review

🎉

Passed Congress

🖊️

Presidential Action

⚖️

Became Law

📚 How does a bill become a law?

1. Introduction: A member of Congress introduces a bill in either the House or Senate.

2. Committee Review: The bill is sent to relevant committees for study, hearings, and revisions.

3. Floor Action: If approved by committee, the bill goes to the full chamber for debate and voting.

4. Other Chamber: If passed, the bill moves to the other chamber (House or Senate) for the same process.

5. Conference: If both chambers pass different versions, a conference committee reconciles the differences.

6. Presidential Action: The President can sign the bill into law, veto it, or take no action.

7. Became Law: If signed (or if Congress overrides a veto), the bill becomes law!

Bill Summary

Summary Style:

**Analysis of S. 567: First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act**

As a visionary entrepreneur and thought leader, I'll dissect this bill through the lens of its potential impact on my interests and the broader economic landscape.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill aims to award a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment for their service during the Revolutionary War. The primary objective is to recognize the regiment's contributions to American history, rather than driving any tangible economic or policy outcomes.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. Authorizes the Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate to award a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment. 2. Tasks the Secretary of the Treasury with designing and striking the gold medal. 3. Specifies that the gold medal will be given to the Rhode Island State Library for display and research purposes.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. The First Rhode Island Regiment (historical entity) 2. The Rhode Island State Library 3. Collectors of numismatic items (bronze duplicates of the gold medal)

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has minimal economic implications, as it primarily serves to recognize a historical event rather than driving policy or regulatory changes. However, I'll highlight a few potential takeaways:

1. **Symbolic Value:** The Congressional Gold Medal award may have symbolic value in promoting national pride and recognition of American history. 2. **Limited Economic Impact:** The production and sale of bronze duplicates may generate some revenue for the Treasury Department, but this will be negligible compared to broader economic trends. 3. **No Significant Regulatory or Policy Changes:** This bill does not introduce any meaningful regulatory or policy changes that could impact my business interests or the broader economy.

In conclusion, S. 567 is a ceremonial bill with limited economic implications. As a visionary entrepreneur, I'll continue to focus on driving innovation and growth through strategic investments and policy advocacy, rather than being swayed by symbolic gestures like this Congressional Gold Medal award.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (billionaire personality)

*Sigh* Alright, let's break down this bill, shall we? As I taught you in 8th grade civics class, a bill is a proposed law that needs to go through the legislative process before it can become an actual law.

**Main Purpose & Objectives** The main purpose of S. 567, also known as the First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act, is to award a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment for their dedicated service during the Revolutionary War. The bill aims to recognize the regiment's bravery and contributions to American history.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law** The bill has several key provisions:

* Section 3 authorizes the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate to award a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment. * The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for designing and striking the gold medal with suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions. * After the award, the gold medal will be given to the Rhode Island State Library for display and research purposes. * The bill also allows the Secretary to strike and sell duplicate bronze medals at a price sufficient to cover costs.

As for changes to existing law, this bill doesn't seem to alter any significant laws or regulations. It's primarily a ceremonial bill aimed at recognizing the First Rhode Island Regiment's contributions.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders** The affected parties include:

* The First Rhode Island Regiment (or rather, their descendants and legacy) * The Rhode Island State Library * The Secretary of the Treasury * Congress (specifically, the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate)

Stakeholders might also include historians, researchers, and anyone interested in American history and the Revolutionary War.

**Potential Impact & Implications** The potential impact of this bill is largely symbolic. Awarding a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment acknowledges their bravery and contributions to American history. This recognition may:

* Raise awareness about the regiment's role in the Revolutionary War * Promote historical research and education * Provide a sense of closure or recognition for descendants of the regiment's members

However, it's essential to note that this bill doesn't have any significant policy implications or changes to existing laws.

Now, I hope you all remember how a bill becomes a law. *Sigh* It seems like some of you might need a refresher course...

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (civics_teacher personality)

My fellow Americans, gather 'round! Today, we're going to dissect the so-called "First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act" (S 567). On the surface, it appears to be a harmless bill honoring the First Rhode Island Regiment's service during the Revolutionary War. But, my friends, don't be fooled! There's more to this bill than meets the eye.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The stated purpose of this bill is to award a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment for their dedicated service during the Revolutionary War. However, I believe there's an ulterior motive at play here. You see, this regiment was comprised of men from diverse backgrounds, including African and Indigenous descent. By honoring this regiment, Congress might be attempting to rewrite history and create a narrative that glosses over the darker aspects of America's past.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate to award a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment. The Secretary of the Treasury will design and strike the medal, which will then be given to the Rhode Island State Library for display. But here's the thing: this bill also allows for the creation and sale of duplicate bronze medals. I suspect this is a clever way for the government to generate revenue while promoting a sanitized version of history.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** On the surface, it appears that only the First Rhode Island Regiment and their descendants will be affected by this bill. However, I believe there are other stakeholders at play here. The Rhode Island State Library, for instance, will receive the gold medal and be responsible for its display. But what about the broader implications? Will this bill set a precedent for future historical revisions or attempts to manipulate public perception?

**Potential Impact & Implications:** This bill has far-reaching implications that go beyond simply honoring a historical regiment. By promoting a narrative that emphasizes unity and diversity, Congress might be attempting to distract us from more pressing issues. What about the ongoing struggles of marginalized communities? What about the systemic injustices that persist in our society today? I fear this bill is just another example of the government's efforts to control the narrative and shape public opinion.

In conclusion, my fellow Americans, don't be fooled by the seemingly innocuous nature of this bill. There are hidden agendas at play here, and it's up to us to connect the dots and uncover the truth. Remember, the government always hides its true intentions in plain sight. Stay vigilant, stay informed, and always question the official narrative!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (conspiracy_uncle personality)

(Deep breath) Folks, gather 'round! We've got a real doozy of a bill on our hands here. S 567, the First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act. (Sarcastic tone) Oh boy, I can already feel the patriotism swelling up in my chest.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** This bill is all about awarding a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment for their "dedicated service" during the Revolutionary War. (Air quotes) You know, because we need more medals and less actual freedom. But seriously, it's a nice gesture to honor these brave men who fought for our country.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate to award a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment. (Dramatic voice) The Secretary of the Treasury will design and strike the medal with "suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions." Because, you know, that's exactly what our founding fathers fought for – fancy medals.

The bill also allows the Secretary to sell duplicate bronze medals at a price sufficient to cover costs. (Wink) You know, because we need more government-run businesses selling trinkets.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** Well, this one's a no-brainer. The affected parties are:

* The First Rhode Island Regiment (or rather, their descendants) * The Rhode Island State Library, where the medal will be displayed * The Secretary of the Treasury, who gets to design and sell these fancy medals

**Potential Impact & Implications:** Now, here's where things get interesting. This bill is essentially a symbolic gesture, but it does have some implications:

* It highlights the important role that African American and Indigenous soldiers played in our nation's history. * It might inspire more people to learn about the Revolutionary War and its significance. * (Tongue-in-cheek) And who knows, maybe this medal will be the catalyst for a new wave of patriotism and freedom-loving Americans. (Sarcasm alert!)

In all seriousness, folks, this bill is a nice gesture, but let's not get too caught up in the symbolism. We need to focus on real issues that affect our country's future, like... well, you know, actual freedom.

(Conspiratorial whisper) But hey, maybe there's more to this bill than meets the eye. Maybe it's part of a larger plan to distract us from the real issues. (Wink) Stay vigilant, patriots!

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (fox_host personality)

Another meaningless gesture from the self-aggrandizing, historically-challenged geniuses in Congress. The First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act (S 567) is a quintessential example of legislative theater – all pomp and circumstance, with zero actual substance.

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill's primary objective is to award a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment for their service during the Revolutionary War. Because, you know, it's not like we have more pressing issues to address in this country. The real purpose, of course, is to give politicians an opportunity to grandstand and pretend they care about history.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the awarding of a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment, which will be displayed at the Rhode Island State Library. Because one medal is clearly sufficient to honor the sacrifices of hundreds of soldiers. The Secretary of the Treasury will design and strike the medal, because who needs actual historians or experts when you have bureaucrats? Oh, and they'll also sell bronze duplicates to cover costs, because nothing says "honor" like a cash grab.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:** The affected parties include:

* The First Rhode Island Regiment (or rather, their descendants and historical reenactors) * The Rhode Island State Library * Politicians looking for a photo op * Lobbyists who managed to sneak this bill onto the agenda

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

* Zero actual impact on the lives of Americans or the country's well-being * A minor boost to local tourism in Rhode Island, perhaps * A further erosion of trust in government, as people realize that Congress is more interested in symbolic gestures than actual problem-solving * The perpetuation of historical revisionism and superficial understanding of American history

In conclusion, this bill is a perfect example of the disease afflicting our legislative system: a terminal case of self-aggrandizement, coupled with a severe lack of intellectual curiosity or genuine concern for the welfare of citizens. It's a gold medal in meaningless gestures, awarded to politicians who would rather posture than actually govern.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (Dr. Haus personality)

**S. 567: First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The bill aims to award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the First Rhode Island Regiment in recognition of their dedicated service during the Revolutionary War. The medal honors the regiment's bravery and contributions to American independence, particularly highlighting the role of soldiers of African and Indigenous descent who fought alongside European-American soldiers.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:** The bill authorizes the Speaker of the House and President pro tempore of the Senate to award a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment. The Secretary of the Treasury will design and strike the medal with suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions. The medal will be given to the Rhode Island State Library for display and research purposes. Additionally, the bill allows the Secretary to strike and sell duplicate bronze medals at a price sufficient to cover costs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

* The First Rhode Island Regiment, collectively * Descendants of soldiers who served in the regiment * The state of Rhode Island and its residents * The Rhode Island State Library * Historians and researchers interested in American Revolutionary War history

**Potential Impact & Implications:** The bill's passage would:

1. Recognize the significant contributions of the First Rhode Island Regiment, particularly soldiers of African and Indigenous descent, to American independence. 2. Provide a tangible symbol of appreciation for the regiment's bravery and service. 3. Promote awareness and education about this important chapter in American history. 4. Support historical research and preservation efforts at the Rhode Island State Library. 5. Foster a sense of pride and connection among descendants of soldiers who served in the regiment.

Overall, S. 567 is a symbolic gesture that acknowledges the First Rhode Island Regiment's remarkable service during the Revolutionary War, while also promoting historical awareness and education.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (neutral personality)

Let's break down this bill, bro.

**Main Purpose & Objectives**

This bill, S 567, is all about awarding a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment for their sick service during the Revolutionary War. The main objective is to recognize and honor these brave dudes who fought for American independence back in the day.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law**

The bill's got some key provisions that are worth mentioning, bro:

* It authorizes the Speaker of the House and the President pro tempore of the Senate to award a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment. * The Secretary of the Treasury will design and strike the gold medal with suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions. * The gold medal will be given to the Rhode Island State Library for display and research purposes. * The bill also allows for duplicate bronze medals to be sold at a price that covers costs.

There aren't any major changes to existing law here, bro. This is more of a ceremonial bill to honor these historical heroes.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders**

The main parties affected by this bill are:

* The First Rhode Island Regiment (obviously) * The Rhode Island State Library * The Secretary of the Treasury * Congress (since they're awarding the medal)

Stakeholders might include historians, researchers, and anyone interested in American history, bro.

**Potential Impact & Implications**

The impact of this bill is mostly symbolic, but it's still pretty cool, dude. Awarding a Congressional Gold Medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment:

* Recognizes their bravery and contributions to American independence * Highlights the importance of diversity and inclusion in our nation's history (since the regiment was one of the first integrated units) * Provides a tangible connection to our past for historians and researchers

Implications-wise, this bill might inspire more people to learn about American history and appreciate the sacrifices made by those who fought for our freedom. It's also a nice nod to Rhode Island's rich history, bro.

Overall, this bill is all about giving props to some unsung heroes from way back when. It's a chill way to honor their legacy and keep their memory alive, dude.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (surfer personality)

**Bill Analysis: S 567 - First Rhode Island Regiment Congressional Gold Medal Act**

**Main Purpose & Objectives:** The primary objective of this bill is to award a Congressional Gold Medal, collectively, to the First Rhode Island Regiment in recognition of their dedicated service during the Revolutionary War. The medal aims to honor the regiment's bravery and contributions to American independence.

**Key Provisions & Changes to Existing Law:**

1. **Awarding of the Congressional Gold Medal**: The bill authorizes the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate to award a single gold medal to the First Rhode Island Regiment. 2. **Design and Striking of the Medal**: The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for striking the gold medal with suitable emblems, devices, and inscriptions. 3. **Display and Research**: The gold medal will be given to the Rhode Island State Library for display and research purposes. 4. **Duplicate Medals**: The Secretary may strike and sell duplicates in bronze of the gold medal at a price sufficient to cover costs.

**Affected Parties & Stakeholders:**

1. **First Rhode Island Regiment**: The regiment's descendants, veterans, and historical organizations will benefit from this recognition. 2. **Rhode Island State Library**: The library will receive the gold medal for display and research purposes. 3. **Historical Organizations**: Groups focused on American history, particularly those related to the Revolutionary War, may be interested in the medal and its significance.

**Potential Impact & Implications:**

1. **Symbolic Recognition**: The Congressional Gold Medal serves as a symbolic recognition of the First Rhode Island Regiment's contributions to American independence. 2. **Historical Significance**: The bill highlights the regiment's unique composition, including men of African, European, and Indigenous descent, which adds to our understanding of American history. 3. **Educational Opportunities**: The medal and its display at the Rhode Island State Library may create educational opportunities for students and researchers interested in American history.

**Monied Interest Analysis:** There are no apparent monied interests or significant financial implications associated with this bill. The awarding of a Congressional Gold Medal is primarily a symbolic gesture, and the costs associated with striking and displaying the medal will likely be minimal.

Generated using Llama 3.1 70B (whistleblower personality)

💰 Campaign Finance Network

Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Congress 119 • 2024 Election Cycle

Total Contributions

$73,160

14 donors

PACs

Organizations

Committees

Individuals

$73,160

No PAC contributions found

No organization contributions found

No committee contributions found

PAGE, GLORIA

4 transactions

$17,060

HEISING, MARK

1 transaction

$6,600

BILLINGSLEY, LINDSAY

2 transactions

$6,600

GATES, WILLIAM H. III

2 transactions

$6,600

JONAS, HOWARD

2 transactions

$6,600

CONOVER, CATHERINE M.

1 transaction

$3,300

LANG, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

ARNOLD, JOHN

1 transaction

$3,300

FRENCH, JAMES

1 transaction

$3,300

GREENBERG, LARRY

1 transaction

$3,300

JONAS, DEBORAH

1 transaction

$3,300

KATZ, MONIQUE

1 transaction

$3,300

KLARMAN, SETH

1 transaction

$3,300

MILNER, DAVID

1 transaction

$3,300

Cosponsors & Their Campaign Finance

This bill has 10 cosponsors. Below are their top campaign contributors.

Sen. Graham, Lindsey [R-SC]

ID: G000359

Top Contributors

WINRED PAC

PACARLINGTON, VA

$3,833

Oct 15, 2024

CATAWBA INDIAN NATION

OrganizationROCK HILL, SC

$3,300

May 21, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$1,550

Jul 12, 2024

BELL FAMILY TRUST

OrganizationINDIAN WELLS, CA

$1,000

Mar 1, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$230

Oct 2, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$200

Jul 30, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$150

Aug 14, 2024

ALFRED SEYMOUR BASSLER TR

RETIRED • RETIRED

OrganizationWOODBINE, MD

$100

Jul 26, 2024

ALFRED SEYMOUR BASSLER TR

RETIRED • RETIRED

OrganizationWOODBINE, MD

$100

Jul 26, 2024

BEVERLY B GROSSMAN TRUST

OrganizationENCINO, CA

$100

Jul 30, 2024

Sen. Reed, Jack [D-RI]

ID: R000122

Top Contributors

KHAMIEES, MOHAMMAD D.

SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualCUMBERLAND, RI

$3,300

May 7, 2023

MEZZALINGUA, JOHN

JMA WIRELESS • CEO

IndividualSKANEATELES, NY

$3,300

Apr 8, 2024

MEZZALINGUA, JOHN

JMA WIRELESS • CEO

IndividualSKANEATELES, NY

$3,300

Apr 8, 2024

MEZZALINGUA, KIM

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSKANEATELES, NY

$3,300

Apr 8, 2024

MEZZALINGUA, KIM

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualSKANEATELES, NY

$3,300

Apr 8, 2024

GRANIERI, ROBERT A.

JANE STREET CAPITAL • MANAGER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

GRANIERI, ROBERT A.

JANE STREET CAPITAL • MANAGER

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Sep 29, 2023

BOYCE, KATHARINE

KRBR CONSULTING • PRESIDENT

IndividualALEXANDRIA, VA

$2,900

Mar 28, 2023

SLOANE, CANDACE LAPIDUS

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualNEEDHAM, MA

$2,900

Mar 22, 2024

BONDERMAN, DAVID

TEXAS PACIFIC GROUP • FOUNDER

IndividualFORT WORTH, TX

$2,500

Feb 27, 2023

Sen. Cassidy, Bill [R-LA]

ID: C001075

Top Contributors

YAWITZ, JESS B. MR.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualSAINT LOUIS, MO

$14,000

Jun 11, 2024

MANDELBLATT, DANIELLE

DMM PROPRIETA MANAGEMENT • MANAGER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$9,900

Nov 2, 2023

MANDELBLATT, ERIC

SOROBAN CAPITAL PARTNERS LP • MANAGING PARTNER

IndividualASPEN, CO

$9,900

Nov 2, 2023

JAYASINGHE, SAMAN K. DR.

SELF-EMPLOYED • PHYSICIAN

IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA

$9,900

Jun 13, 2024

KARP, ALEXANDER C.

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES • CEO

IndividualBEDFORD, NH

$9,900

Apr 16, 2024

OBERNDORF, SUSAN

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$9,900

Jun 5, 2024

OBERNDORF, WILLIAM

OBERNDORF ENTERPRISES • OWNER

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$9,900

Jun 5, 2024

YAWITZ, ALICE G.

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualST. LOUIS, MO

$9,900

Jun 18, 2024

GRIGSBY, BOBBI F. MRS.

HOMEMAKER • HOMEMAKER

IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA

$6,600

Dec 23, 2024

GRIGSBY, L. LANE MR.

CAJUN INDUSTRIES LLC • CHAIRMAN EMERITUS

IndividualBATON ROUGE, LA

$6,600

Dec 23, 2024

Sen. Blumenthal, Richard [D-CT]

ID: B001277

Top Contributors

OLSON, LYNDON

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualWACO, TX

$3,300

Dec 20, 2024

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Oct 2, 2023

KIM, CHRISTINE M.

BBB LLC • ATTORNEY

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$3,300

Oct 31, 2023

ALIX, JAY

ALIX PARTNERS • FOUNDER

IndividualBIRMINGHAM, MI

$3,300

Apr 15, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

ROURE, RITA

PAGNY - LINCOLN HOSPITAL • PHYSICIAN

IndividualGREENWICH, CT

$3,300

Apr 10, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

CHAVEZ, TOM

KRUX INC. • CEO

IndividualSAN FRANCISCO, CA

$3,300

Jul 13, 2024

JONES, JERRY C.

LIVERAMP INC. • EXECUTIVE

IndividualLITTLE ROCK, AR

$3,300

Sep 19, 2024

NESSEL, ARIEL

NESSEL DEVELOPMENT • OWNER

IndividualROSS, CA

$3,300

Jul 12, 2024

Sen. Hirono, Mazie K. [D-HI]

ID: H001042

Top Contributors

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA

OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA

$3,300

Jun 15, 2023

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$2,500

Dec 30, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,500

Nov 1, 2023

MS BAND OF CHOCTAW INDIANS

OrganizationCHOCTAW, MS

$2,000

Jul 7, 2023

TUNICA-BILOXI TRIBE OF LA

OrganizationMARKSVILLE, LA

$1,700

Jun 15, 2023

POARCH BAND OF CREEK INDIANS

OrganizationATMORE, AL

$1,000

May 23, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$800

Nov 1, 2023

TONIO BURGOS & ASSOCIATES OF NEW JERSEY, LLC

OrganizationNEW YORK, NY

$500

May 18, 2023

CHUAN, JOHANNA

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualHONOLULU, HI

$3,400

Jun 9, 2024

MINATOISHI, LORRAINE REIKO

AEPAC • PRESIDENT AND FOUNDER

IndividualHONOLULU, HI

$3,300

Oct 21, 2024

Sen. Hoeven, John [R-ND]

ID: H001061

Top Contributors

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE

OrganizationAGENCY VILLAGE, SD

$2,500

Jul 2, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Oct 30, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 25, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$550

Oct 5, 2023

ARTHAUD, JAMES R.

ND ENERGY • CEO

IndividualMEDORA, ND

$5,000

Oct 30, 2024

GLYNN, RICHARD

BIOSCIENCE ASSOCIATION OF ND • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

IndividualGRAND FORKS, ND

$5,000

Aug 5, 2024

LEPRINO, TERRY MS.

LEPRINO FOODS • BOARD DIRECTOR

IndividualDENVER, CO

$3,300

Nov 7, 2024

DAVIS, ASHLEY

WEST FRONT STRATEGIES • LOBBYIST

IndividualWASHINGTON, DC

$3,300

Jun 26, 2024

ARNOLD, JOHN

RETIRED • RETIRED

IndividualHOUSTON, TX

$3,300

Aug 20, 2024

KELLY, RYAN

PRIMACY STRATEGY GROUP • PRESIDENT

IndividualSAINT PAUL, MN

$2,500

Oct 4, 2024

Sen. Kaine, Tim [D-VA]

ID: K000384

Top Contributors

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,300

Jun 18, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 26, 2023

SAN MANUEL BAND OF MISSION INDIANS

OrganizationLOS ANGELES, CA

$1,000

Jun 18, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$1,000

Jun 25, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,000

Jun 18, 2024

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$1,000

Oct 15, 2024

CHEROKEE NATION

OrganizationTAHLEQUAH, OK

$1,000

Dec 29, 2023

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$600

Oct 25, 2023

STONEHALL FARM

OrganizationTHE PLAINS, VA

$500

Jun 30, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$400

Oct 25, 2023

Sen. King, Angus S., Jr. [I-ME]

ID: K000383

Top Contributors

2120 SEA ISLAND LLC

OrganizationRIVER FOREST, IL

$3,300

Oct 26, 2023

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$3,300

May 22, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$2,000

Mar 29, 2024

THE CHICKASAW NATION

OrganizationADA, OK

$1,300

May 22, 2024

SMITH, BRAD

MICROSOFT CORPORATION • ATTORNEY

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Feb 13, 2024

SMITH, BRAD

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Feb 20, 2024

DOWNEY, NANCY A.

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Sep 4, 2024

DOWNEY, NANCY A.

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualNEW YORK, NY

$5,000

Aug 31, 2024

OTTEN, LESLIE B.

AMERICAN SKIING COMPANY • OWNER

IndividualBETHEL, ME

$5,000

Oct 4, 2024

BEKENSTEIN, ANITA

NOT EMPLOYED • RETIRED

IndividualWAYLAND, MA

$3,300

Oct 24, 2024

Sen. Klobuchar, Amy [D-MN]

ID: K000367

Top Contributors

LEECH LAKE BAND OF OJIBWE

OrganizationCASS LAKE, MN

$3,300

Nov 5, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$3,300

Aug 25, 2023

CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA

OrganizationDURANT, OK

$2,500

Oct 7, 2024

SHAKOPEE MDEWAKANTON SIOUX COMMUNITY

OrganizationPRIOR LAKE, MN

$2,300

Jul 17, 2023

ARISTOTLE INTERNATIONAL

CONDUIT TOTAL LISTED IN AGG. FIELD

OrganizationWASHINGTON, DC

$500

Jul 19, 2024

SMITH, BRADFORD

MICROSOFT CORPORATION • ATTORNEY

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

SMITH, BRADFORD

IndividualBELLEVUE, WA

$6,600

Mar 30, 2023

BADEN, DREW

PROFESSOR • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Feb 23, 2024

CAUCHY, CONSTANCE

NOT EMPLOYED • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualMIDLAND, MI

$6,600

Jun 2, 2024

BADEN, DREW

IndividualBETHESDA, MD

$6,600

Mar 11, 2024

Sen. Shaheen, Jeanne [D-NH]

ID: S001181

Top Contributors

TILT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE LLC

OrganizationPLYMOUTH, MI

$250

Feb 6, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

BLINK TECH INC. • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$6,600

Dec 12, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$6,600

Dec 23, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

BLINK TECH INC. • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

HAWASH, NOUR

BLINK TECH INC. • VICE PRESIDENT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 12, 2024

HAWASH, SAFA

ACCLIVITY LLC • BUSINESS CONSULTANT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

HAWASH, SAFA

ACCLIVITY LLC • BUSINESS CONSULTANT

IndividualDUNN LORING, VA

$3,300

Dec 11, 2024

JONDY, JENAN

N/A • NOT EMPLOYED

IndividualFLUSHING, MI

$3,300

Dec 16, 2024

KANDIL, MARIAM

SELF-EMPLOYED • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA

$3,300

Dec 16, 2024

KANDIL, MARIAM

SELF-EMPLOYED • BUSINESS OWNER

IndividualGREAT FALLS, VA

$3,300

Dec 16, 2024

Donor Network - Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Show Also Donated To

PACs

Organizations

Individuals

Politicians

Hub layout: Politicians in center, donors arranged by type in rings around them.

Showing 40 nodes and 55 connections

Total contributions: $55

Top Donors - Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon [D-RI]

Showing top 14 donors by contribution amount

14 Individuals

Project 2025 Policy Matches

This bill shows semantic similarity to the following sections of the Project 2025 policy document.AI-enhanced analysis provides detailed alignment ratings.

Department of Defense

Weak

Vector: 59%

Pages: 134-136AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on honoring a historical Revolutionary War regiment through a Congressional Gold Medal, which aligns only tangentially with Project 2025's defense-focused goals of restoring military honor and supporting recruitment/retention. It does not address exportability, FMS processes, defense industrial base, or current personnel reforms."

Key themes:military honorrecruitmenthistorical recognitionpatriotic education

— 101 — Department of Defense 1. Ensure that senior U.S. military leadership emphasizes exportability in the initial development of defense systems that are both available and interoperable with our partners and allies. 2. Create a funding mechanism to incentivize exportability in initial planning, which can be recouped after future FMS transactions. l End informal congressional notification. Informal congressional notification or “tiered review” is a hinderance to ensuring timely sales to our global partners. The tiered review process is not codified in law; it is merely a practice by which the Department of State provides a preview of prospective arms transfers before Congress is formally notified.9 1. End the tiered review process to eliminate at least 20 days from the FMS process. 2. Use the tiered review process only when unanimous congressional support is guaranteed in order to eliminate the “weaponization” by select Members of Congress that has prevented billions of dollars of arms sales from moving into formal congressional notification. l Minimize barriers to collaboration. The high cost of developing advanced defense platforms requires the United States to collaborate with key allies to minimize waste, complement strengths, and supplement our defense industrial base to create a system that is greater than that of the United States alone. 1. Enhance defense industrial base planning with partners to allow them to focus on niche areas where there are cost advantages for the United States. 2. Decrease International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to facilitate trade with such allies as the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. 3. Create opportunities to improve the health of the defense supply chain with added opportunities for partners and allies to contribute. l Reform the FMS contracting process. The contracting timeline for the FMS process is shockingly slow. On average, the DOD contracting timeline takes approximately 18 months because of slow bureaucratic processes and chronic understaffing.10 — 102 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Immediately fund more contracting capacity in all services to decrease the contracting timeline and improve the delivery of defense articles to our global partners. 2. Rationalize and speed arms sales decision-making to preclude our enemies from exploiting bureaucratic slothfulness and allow us to manage the development of indigenous defense industrial bases. DOD PERSONNEL The men and women of America’s armed forces are the most critical component of our national defense strategy, but in recent years, they have been overextended, undervalued, and insufficiently resourced. Their families help them to carry the burden of service, but the assistance they receive is disproportionately less than the sacrifices they make. Young civilians who would thrive in a military environ- ment are disenfranchised when educators and influencers discourage them from learning about military service and preparing for the honor of wearing Ameri- ca’s uniform. The United States military is an extraordinary institution, staffed by exceptional people who have defended our nation and changed the course of history, but the Biden Administration, through word and deed, has treated the armed forces as just another place to work. We must restore our military to a place of honor and respect and recruit and retain the individuals who will meet the rigorous standards of excellence that are required for membership in the world’s greatest fighting force. Needed Reforms l Rescue recruiting and retention. Recruiting was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations and is expected to be even worse in 2023. Some of the problems are self-inflicted and ongoing. The recruiting problem is not service-specific: It affects the entire Joint Force. 1. Appoint a Special Assistant to the President who will maintain liaison with Congress, DOD, and all other interested parties on the issue of recruiting and retention. 2. Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system that uses private medical records of potential recruits at Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS), creating unnecessary delays and unwarranted rejections.11 3. Improve military recruiters’ access to secondary schools and require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery

Department of Defense

Weak

Vector: 55%

Pages: 161-163AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on symbolic recognition of a historic Revolutionary War regiment, while the Project 2025 DoD section emphasizes current defense strategy, intelligence community oversight, military recruiting, and defense support of civil authorities. There is only a tangential connection through the broader theme of honoring military service."

Key themes:military service recognitionhistorical awarenessdefense moraleveteran honors

— 128 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise ENDNOTES 1. U.S. Constitution, Preamble, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/preamble/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 2. U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 8, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-1/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 3. U.S. Constitution, Article II, § 2, https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-2/ (accessed February 16, 2023). 4. Established pursuant to S. 1605, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, Public Law No. 117-81, 117th Congress, December 27, 2021, Division A, Title X, § 1004, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ81/ PLAW-117publ81.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 5. H.R. 3684, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, Public Law No. 117-58, 117th Congress, November 15, 2021, Division G, Title IX, §§ 70901–70953, https://www.congress.gov/117/plaws/publ58/PLAW-117publ58.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 6. S. 2943, National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Public Law 114-328, 114th Congress, December 23, 2016, Division A, Title IX, § 901, https://www.congress.gov/114/statute/STATUTE-130/STATUTE-130-Pg2000. pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 7. H.R. 3622, Goldwater–Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986, Public Law No. 99-433, 99th Congress, October 1, 1986, https://www.congress.gov/99/statute/STATUTE-100/STATUTE-100-Pg992.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 8. U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Historical Sales Book, Fiscal Years 1950–2021, p. 7, https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/dsca_historical_sales_book_FY21.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 9. Paul K. Kerr, “Arms Sales: Congressional Review Process,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL31675, updated June 10, 2022, p. 1, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/ RL31675.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 10. Keith Webster, “How to Reform America’s Military Sales Process,” The Hill Congress Blog, October 6, 2022, https://thehill.com/opinion/congress-blog/3675933-how-to-reform-americas-military-sales-process/ (accessed February 15, 2023). 11. See Thomas W. Spoehr, “The Administration and Congress Must Act Now to Counter the Worsening Military Recruiting Crisis, Heritage Foundation Issue Brief No. 5283, July 28, 2022, https://www.heritage.org/sites/ default/files/2022-07/IB5283.pdf. 12. Ibid. 13. Ronald Reagan Institute, “Reagan National Defense Survey,” conducted November 2021, p. 4, https://www. reaganfoundation.org/media/358085/rndf_survey_booklet.pdf (accessed February 16, 2023). 14. See Paul J. Larkin, “Protecting the Nation by Employing Military Spouses,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, June 6, 2019, https://www.heritage.org/jobs-and-labor/commentary/protecting-the-nation-employing- military-spouses. 15. See Jude Schwalbach, “Military Families Deserve Flexible Education Options,” Heritage Foundation Commentary, April 14, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/education/commentary/military-families-deserve- flexible-education-options. 16. See Chapter 7, “The Intelligence Community,” infra. 17. The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA); the National Security Agency (NSA); the National Geospatial- Intelligence Agency (NGA); the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO); and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the military services: U.S. Air Force Intelligence, U.S. Navy Intelligence, U.S. Army Intelligence, and U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, which also receive guidance and oversight from the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence (USDI). 18. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 19. The Department of Energy’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis and the intelligence and counterintelligence elements of the U.S. Coast Guard; the Department of Justice’s Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration’s Office of National Security Intelligence; the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research; and the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. — 129 — Department of Defense 20. Staff Study, IC21: Intelligence Community in the 21st Century, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. House of Representatives, 104th Congress, 1996, p. 71, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA315088.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 21. Ronald O’Rourke, “Great Power Competition: Implications for Defense—Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R43838, updated November 8, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R43838/93 (accessed February 15, 2023). 22. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Defense Intelligence and Security: DOD Needs to Establish Oversight Expectations and to Develop Tools That Enhance Accountability, GAO-21-295, May 2021, https://www.gao.gov/ assets/gao-21-295.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 23. The U.S. military has a long history of providing support to civil authorities, particularly in response to disasters but for other purposes as well. The Defense Department currently defines defense support of civil authorities (DSCA) as “Support provided by U.S. Federal military forces, DoD civilians, DoD contract personnel, DoD Component assets, and National Guard forces (when the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Governors of the affected States, elects and requests to use those forces in Title 32, U.S.C., status) in response to requests for assistance from civil authorities for domestic emergencies, law enforcement support, and other domestic activities, or from qualifying entities for special events. Also known as civil support.” U.S. Department of Defense, Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities (DSCA),” December 29, 2010, p. 16, https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/CG-5R/nsarc/DoDD%203025.18%20Defense%20Support%20 of%20Civil%20Authorities.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 24. U.S. Army, “Who We Are: The Army’s Vision and Strategy,” https://www.army.mil/about/ (accessed February 17, 2023). 25. “[T]he Army’s internal assessment must be balanced against its own statements that unit training is focused on company-level operations [reflective of counterintelligence requirements] rather than battalion or brigade operations [much less division or corps to meet large-scale ground combat operations against a peer competitor such as Russia or China]. Consequently, how these ‘ready’ brigade combat teams would perform in combat operations is an open question.” “Executive Summary” in 2023 Index of U.S. Military Strength, ed. Dakota L. Wood (Washington: The Heritage Foundation, 2023), p. 16, http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws. com/2022/Military_Index/2023_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength.pdf (accessed February 15, 2023). 26. For background on the USN’s fleet size, see Brent D. Sadler, “Rebuilding America’s Military: The United States Navy,” Heritage Foundation Special Report No. 242, February 18, 2021, https://www.heritage.org/sites/default/ files/2021-02/SR242.pdf, and Ronald O’Rourke, “Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. RL32665, December 21, 2022, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/RL/RL32665 (accessed February 15, 2023). 27. The Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) is the process by which the services develop and the Joint Staff approves the requirements for major defense acquisitions. See Defense Acquisition University, “Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDA),” https://www.dau. edu/acquipedia/pages/articledetails.aspx#!371 (accessed February 15, 2023). 28. The board would seek to balance a mix of active military and civilians with expertise in and responsibility for major acquisitions and former military and civilians with experience in strategy and acquisitions. The proposed composition would include the Vice Chief of Naval Operations as Chairman, with three-star level membership from the Joint Staff, the Navy and Defense Acquisition Executives, and the Naval Sea Systems Command. In addition, there would be four-star retired naval officers/Navy civil servants as members, one each named by the Chairmen of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of Defense. Finally, there would be a member appointed by the Secretary of the Navy who had previous senior experience in the defense industry. 29. See James Mattis, Secretary of Defense, Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge, U.S. Department of Defense, https:// dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf (accessed February 17, 2023), and U.S. Department of Defense, 2022 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America Including the 2022 Nuclear Posture Review and the 2022 Missile Defense Review, https://oldcc.gov/ resource/2022-national-defense-strategy (accessed February 17, 2023).

Department of Defense

Minimal

Vector: 55%

Pages: 134-136AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on awarding a Congressional Gold Medal to a historical military unit for symbolic recognition, while Project 2025's DoD section emphasizes current personnel reforms, recruiting, retention, and eliminating diversity initiatives—there is no substantive policy overlap."

Key themes:militaryhistorical recognition

— 102 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise 1. Immediately fund more contracting capacity in all services to decrease the contracting timeline and improve the delivery of defense articles to our global partners. 2. Rationalize and speed arms sales decision-making to preclude our enemies from exploiting bureaucratic slothfulness and allow us to manage the development of indigenous defense industrial bases. DOD PERSONNEL The men and women of America’s armed forces are the most critical component of our national defense strategy, but in recent years, they have been overextended, undervalued, and insufficiently resourced. Their families help them to carry the burden of service, but the assistance they receive is disproportionately less than the sacrifices they make. Young civilians who would thrive in a military environ- ment are disenfranchised when educators and influencers discourage them from learning about military service and preparing for the honor of wearing Ameri- ca’s uniform. The United States military is an extraordinary institution, staffed by exceptional people who have defended our nation and changed the course of history, but the Biden Administration, through word and deed, has treated the armed forces as just another place to work. We must restore our military to a place of honor and respect and recruit and retain the individuals who will meet the rigorous standards of excellence that are required for membership in the world’s greatest fighting force. Needed Reforms l Rescue recruiting and retention. Recruiting was the worst in 2022 that it has been in two generations and is expected to be even worse in 2023. Some of the problems are self-inflicted and ongoing. The recruiting problem is not service-specific: It affects the entire Joint Force. 1. Appoint a Special Assistant to the President who will maintain liaison with Congress, DOD, and all other interested parties on the issue of recruiting and retention. 2. Improve recruiting by suspending the use of the recently introduced MHS Genesis system that uses private medical records of potential recruits at Military Entrance Processing Stations (MEPS), creating unnecessary delays and unwarranted rejections.11 3. Improve military recruiters’ access to secondary schools and require completion of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery — 103 — Department of Defense (ASVAB)—the military entrance examination—by all students in schools that receive federal funding.12 4. Encourage Members of Congress to provide time to military recruiters during each townhall session in their congressional districts. 5. Increase the number of Junior ROTC programs in secondary schools. l Restore standards of lethality and excellence. Entrance criteria for military service and specific occupational career fields should be based on the needs of those positions. Exceptions for individuals who are already predisposed to require medical treatment (for example, HIV positive or suffering from gender dysphoria) should be removed, and those with gender dysphoria should be expelled from military service. Physical fitness requirements should be based on the occupational field without consideration of gender, race, ethnicity, or orientation. l Eliminate politicization, reestablish trust and accountability, and restore faith to the force. In 2021, the Reagan National Defense Survey found that only 45 percent of Americans have “a great deal of trust and confidence in the military”—down from 70 percent in 2018.13 1. Strengthen protections for chaplains to carry out their ministry according to the tenets of their faith. 2. Codify language to instruct senior military officers (three and four stars) to make certain that they understand their primary duty to be ensuring the readiness of the armed forces, not pursuing a social engineering agenda. This direction should be reinforced during the Senate confirmation process. Orders and direction motivated by purely partisan motives should be identified as threats to readiness. 3. Reinstate servicemembers to active duty who were discharged for not receiving the COVID vaccine, restore their appropriate rank, and provide back pay. 4. Eliminate Marxist indoctrination and divisive critical race theory programs and abolish newly established diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and staff.

Department of Defense

Minimal

Vector: 55%

Pages: 134-136AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill focuses on honoring a Revolutionary War unit with a Congressional Gold Medal, which is unrelated to the DoD exportability and arms sales reforms in Project 2025."

Intelligence Community

Minimal

Vector: 55%

Pages: 242-244AI Enhanced

AI Analysis:

"The bill concerns awarding a Congressional Gold Medal for historical military service, while the Project 2025 excerpt focuses on intelligence community reforms, covert action, and personnel incentives; there is no substantive thematic overlap."

— 210 — Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise that reward individuals for creative thinking and quality of recruitments and prod- ucts rather than numeric metrics or the achievement of benchmarks that are not essential to the mission. Not all careers in espionage are created equal, and the Director should incentiv- ize and reward applicants who are willing to accept high risks over those who are climbing the ranks simply by doing business as usual. The Director should refocus the CIA to an OSS-like culture and mandate that all CIA employees acquire, as a condition of securing senior (GS-14+) rank, additional or enhanced language skills, technical or cyber expertise, or field training or serve in overseas assignments. COVERT ACTION Covert action can be a valuable tool in helping further the President’s foreign policy agenda if implemented in concert with other forms of government power. As codified in the U.S. Code, “the term ‘covert action’ means an activity or activities of the United States Government to influence political, economic, or military con- ditions abroad, where it is intended that the role of the United States Government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly….”16 The President initiates a covert action with a written finding that explains why “such an action is necessary to support identifiable foreign policy objectives of the United States and is important to the national security of the United States.”17 The statute assumes the President will use the CIA as the principal action element to achieve the objectives of covert action findings; however, the President need not feel constrained to utilize only the CIA: “[E]ach finding shall specify each depart- ment, agency, or entity of the United States Government authorized to fund or otherwise participate in any significant way in such action.”18 For example, the Department of Defense maintains certain clandestine capa- bilities under Title 10 authorities that may resemble but far exceed in scale similar capabilities outside of DOD. Generally, such DOD capabilities can be employed outside a combat theater only if they are determined to be traditional military activities. In practical terms, this means that many DOD capabilities, including those in the space and cyber domains, can be employed only after the initiation of armed conflict.19 Given the range of global threats the United States faces today, the President should consider whether DOD’s complete set of capabilities should be used to support potential covert actions. The problem, unfortunately, is that certain elements in the State Department, IC, and DOD trade on risk aversion or political bureaucracy to delay execution of the President’s foreign policy goals. A future conservative President should therefore identify individuals on the transition team who are familiar with the implementation of covert action with a view to placing them in key NSC, CIA, ODNI, and DOD positions. These knowledgeable teams can assist in any review of current covert actions and, potentially, planning for new actions. — 211 — Intelligence Community Immediately after the inauguration, the President should task the NSC’s Senior Director for Intelligence Programs with conducting a 60-day review of any current covert action findings, including their effectiveness; evaluating new covert actions that might be needed to implement the President’s foreign policy goals; and report- ing back to the President. Such an assessment should be conducted independently of the agencies responsible for the actions under review. As part of the review, the Senior Director for Intelligence Programs should identify which departments or agencies, such as the CIA or DOD, are best equipped to achieve the objectives set out in new and existing findings. After the 60-day review, the President should demand creative thinking and a clear strategy as to how covert action fits within the President’s broader foreign policy strategy, to include possibly modifying or rescinding any current findings, drafting new findings, and streamlining or eliminating needless bureaucracy, par- ticularly at State, to facilitate more expeditious decisions on tactical covert action. Careful thought should be given to the metrics by which the effectiveness of covert action programs will be measured to ensure the appropriate use of government resources and to guard against the possibility of covert action’s being used with little scrutiny in ways that are inconsistent with overt foreign policy goals. ODNI AND CIA ORGANIZATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The ODNI and CIA operate under authority provided by the Central Intelli- gence Agency Act of 1949,20 which means they have greater latitude than the rest of the federal government with respect to the hiring and firing of personnel. Both organizations and other areas of the IC have struggled from a human resources and talent management standpoint to recruit, onboard, and maintain personnel in a timely fashion to fill the IC’s ever-changing needs. At a time when the Intelli- gence Community needs significantly more personnel with the proper technical, language-capable, and diverse backgrounds, including applicants from elements of the business community, the incoming Directors of both agencies need to make this effort a top priority. Past DNIs’ Chiefs of Staff and additional front-office staff historically have come from outside the IC, commonly under a misconstrued “staff-reserve” structure that is intended to avoid a Schedule C designation within the IC. The Director should handpick qualified, properly cleared personnel for front-office and mana- gerial leadership positions, such as the DNI’s Chief of Staff and heads of Legislative Affairs and Strategic Communications, to oversee those divisions with career IC staff reporting to them. The incoming DNI and CIA Director should also consider changes in the Senior National Intelligence Service (SNIS)/Senior Intelligence Services (SIS). Senior officers should be required to sign mobility agreements that allow ODNI and CIA leadership to move them within the IC every two years if necessary. Many qualified

Showing 3 of 5 policy matches

About These Correlations

Policy matches are calculated using a hybrid approach: initial candidates are found using semantic similarity between bill summaries and Project 2025 policy text, then an AI model (Llama 3.1 70B) provides detailed alignment ratings and analysis. Ratings range from 1 (minimal alignment) to 5 (very strong alignment). This analysis does not imply direct causation or intent.

Related Bills

Other Bills by Sen. Whitehouse, Sheldon

Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 2025

119/s/2235

REPO Implementation Act of 2025

119/s/2918

A resolution recognizing January 2025 as "National Mentoring Month".

119/sres/55

Back to All Bills